Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Biosynthesis, Structure, Function, and Antigenicity: Implications for the Design of Spike-Based Vaccine Immunogens

Liangwei Duan, Qianqian Zheng, Hongxia Zhang and 3 more

Frontiers in Immunology · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.576622

Abstract

The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), poses a grave threat to global public health and imposes a severe burden on the entire human society. Like other coronaviruses, the SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes spike (S) glycoproteins, which protrude from the surface of mature virions. The S glycoprotein plays essential roles in virus attachment, fusion and entry into the host cell. Surface location of the S glycoprotein renders it a direct target for host immune responses, making it the main target of neutralizing antibodies. In the light of its crucial roles in viral infection and adaptive immunity, the S protein is the focus of most vaccine strategies as well as therapeutic interventions. In this review, we highlight and describe the recent progress that has been made in the biosynthesis, structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein, aiming to provide valuable insights into the design and development of the S protein-based vaccines as well as therapeutics.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic represents an unprecedented public health, social and economic challenge. The etiological agent of COVID-19 is a new member of the Coronaviridae family that is closely related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and was recently referred to as SARS-CoV-2 by the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The virus has spread rapidly and sustainably around the global resulting in over twenty-one million cases and more than 750,000 deaths as of August 15, 2020.

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are enveloped positive-sense RNA viruses. Enveloped CoVs entering host cells and initiating infection is achieved through the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. Membrane fusion is mediated by the large type I transmembrane S glycoprotein on the viral envelope and the cognate receptor on the surface of host cells. The surface-exposed location of the S glycoprotein not only allows it to carry out membrane fusion but also renders it a direct target for host immune responses, making it the major target of neutralizing antibodies. Because of its central roles in viral infection and eliciting protective humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in hosts during infection, the S protein is the primary target for vaccine design as well as antiviral therapeutics.

Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the wealth of research related to the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein biosynthesis, structure, function, and antigenicity, aiming to provide useful insights into the design and development of the S protein-based vaccines as well as therapeutics to prevent or treat the ongoing global spread of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.

Synthesis, Processing and Trafficking of the SARS-CoV-2 S Glycoprotein

The SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein is synthesized as a 1273-amino acid polyprotein precursor on the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) ( Figure 1 ). The unprocessed precursor harbors an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) signal sequence located at the N terminus, which targets the S glycoprotein to the RER membrane and is removed by cellular signal peptidases in the lumen of the ER. A single stop-transfer, membrane-spanning sequence located at the C terminus of the S protein prevents it from being fully released into the lumen of the ER and subsequent secretion from the infected cell. Co-translationally, N-linked, high-mannose oligosaccharide side chains are added during synthesis. Shortly after synthesis, the S glycoprotein monomers trimerize, which might be thought to facilitate the transport from the ER to the Golgi complex. Once in the Golgi complex, most of the high-mannose oligosaccharide side chains are modified to more complex forms, and O-linked oligosaccharide side chains are also added.

In the trans-Golgi network, the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein is proteolytically cleaved by cellular furin or furin-like proteases at the S1/S2 cleavage site, comprising multiple arginine residues that are not found in the closely related SARS-CoV. Cleavage at the S1/S2 site yields a surface subunit S1, which attaches the virus to the host cell surface receptor, and a transmembrane subunit S2, which mediates the fusion of viral and host cell membranes. The S1 and S2 subunits remain associated through noncovalent interactions in a metastable prefusion state. Furin-like cleavage is essential for the S-protein mediated cell-cell fusion and viral infectivity, and is required for efficient SARS-CoV-2 infection of human lung cells and airway epithelial cells.

Following cleavage, an ER retrieval signal (ERRS) consisting of a conserved KxHxx motif located at the extreme C terminus ensures that the mature SARS-CoV-2 S protein accumulates near the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), where driven by interactions with another structural protein, the membrane (M) protein, the S protein participates in virus particle assembly and is incorporated into virus envelope ( Figure 1 ). Besides, a fraction of mature SARS-CoV-2 S proteins travel through the secretory pathway to the plasma membrane, where they can mediate fusion of infected with uninfected cells to form multinucleated giant cells (syncytia). This may allow direct spreading of the virus between cells and potentially alter the virulence of SARS-CoV-2.

Notably, a deletion of ~20 amino acid containing the ERRS from the cytoplasmic tail of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been shown to increase the infectivity of single-cycle vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-S pseudotypes and replication-competent recombinant VSVs bearing the S glycoprotein, which likely could be translated to single-cycle human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-S or other retrovirus-S pseudotypes straightforward. Presumably, this deletion may enhance the cell surface expression of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein, thereby facilitating the S protein incorporation into pseudovirions and replication-competent virions.

SARS-CoV-2 S Protein Structure and Function

As mentioned above, the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein plays pivotal roles in viral infection and pathogenesis. Mature S glycoprotein on the viral surface is a heavily glycosylated trimer, each protomer of which is composed of 1260 amino acids (residues 14-1273) ( Figure 2A ). The surface subunit S1 is composed of 672 amino acids (residues 14–685) and organized into four domains: an N-terminal domain (NTD), a C-terminal domain (CTD, also known as the receptor-binding domain, RBD), and two subdomains (SD1 and SD2) ( Figure 2A ). The transmembrane S2 subunit is composed of 588 amino acids (residues 686-1273) and contains an N-terminal hydrophobic fusion peptide (FP), two heptad repeats (HR1 and HR2), a transmembrane domain (TM), and a cytoplasmic tail (CT), arranged as FP-HR1-HR2-TM-CT ( Figure 2A ).

As a typical class I viral fusion protein, the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein shares common structural, topological and mechanistic features with other class I fusion proteins, including HIV envelope (Env) glycoprotein and influenza virus haemagglutinin (HA). Like other class I viral fusion proteins, the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein is also a conformational machine that mediates viral entry by rearranging from a metastable unliganded state, through a pre-hairpin intermediate state, to a stable postfusion state. Since the first genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 became publicly available, a number of structures have been determined for the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein trimer fragments in both the prefusion and postfusion states ( Figures 2B–D ).

The overall architecture of the prefusion SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain stabilized by two consecutive proline mutations in two conformations determined by single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a ~160 Å long trimer with a triangular cross-section, with the S1 subunit adopting a “V” shape contributing to the overall triangular appearance and the S2 subunit forming the stalk ( Figures 2B, C ). The structural difference between these two conformations only lies in the position of one of the three S1 RBDs ( Figures 2B, C ). When all three RBDs are in the “down” position, the resulting S ectodomain trimer assumes a closed conformation, in which the receptor-binding surface of the S1 RBD is buried at the interface between protomers and cannot be accessible by its receptor ( Figure 2B ). The S ectodomain trimer with one single RBD in the “up” position assumes a partially open conformation and represents the functional state, as the receptor-binding surface of the “up” RBD can be fully exposed ( Figure 2C ). The structural information provides a blueprint for structure-based design of vaccine immunogens and entry inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2.

In the closed SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain trimer, inter-protomer interactions occur through the S1 CTD packed against the other two S1 CTDs and one NTD from an adjacent protomer because of domain swapping and through S2, primarily between helical interactions formed by the upstream and central helices from each subunit around the trimer axis ( Figure 2B ). The S1 subunits rest above the S2 trimer, stabilizing the later in the prefusion conformation ( Figure 2B ). When the S ectodomain trimer adopts a partially open conformation, the RBD in the “up” position will abolish the contacts with the S2 subunit of an adjacent protomer, destabilizing the partially open conformation ( Figure 2C ). This will be beneficial to the dissociation of the S1 subunit and facilitate conformational rearrangements that the S2 trimer undergoes to mediate viral entry.

Prefusion structures of human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) and mouse hepatitis virus S protein ectodomains without two consecutive proline mutations reveal only fully closed conformation, similar to that observed for a full-length, wild-type prefusion form of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein. Notably, it is well established that trimeric prefusion HIV-1 Env primarily resides in a closed configuration that is conformationally masked to evade antibody-mediated neutralization and can spontaneously sample a transient, functional configuration. It can thus be speculated that native CoV S glycoproteins on mature and infectious virions share a similar conformational masking feature, concealing the receptor-binding surface (for those utilizing CTDs as RBDs) ( Figure 2C ), which is further discussed below.

Several lines of research have established that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is an entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Detailed interactions between the SARS-CoV-2 RBD and its receptor ACE have been revealed by several structures of ACE2 in complex with RBD. Structurally, RBD consists of two subdomains: a core and an external subdomain. An extended loop (residues 438-506), which lies on one edge of the core subdomain, presents a gently concave surface to cradle the N-terminal helix (α1) of ACE2. Analysis of the interface between the SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ACE2 reveals that a total of 17 residues in RBD are in contact with 20 amino acids in ACE2, forming a network of hydrophilic interactions that are suggested to predominate the virus-receptor engagement. Outside this extended loop, residue Lys417 located in helix α3 of the core subdomain, was shown to form ionic interactions with Asp30 of ACE2. As the extended loop contains almost all the amino acids of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD that contact ACE2, it is referred to as the receptor-binding motif (RBM).

It has been proposed that inhibiting the interaction between RBD and ACE2 might be useful in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recombinant soluble ACE2 and ACE2-Fc have been shown to have potential applications in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. As the interaction between the RBD and ACE2 is extensive, small molecules probably cannot be used as entry inhibitors to effectively block the virus entry by targeting the interaction interface. However, peptides would be able to engage most of the residues belonging to RBM. A pioneering study demonstrated that a 23-amino acid peptide (residues 21-43), derived from the N-terminal helix (α1) of ACE2, specifically associates with the SARS-CoV-2 RBD with low nanomolar affinity and disables receptor interactions, representing a promising strategy for preventing the virus from invading human cells. In another study, a 65-amino acid peptide (residues 19-83), derived from the N-terminal back-to-back helices (α1 and 2) and composed of most of the residues of ACE2 that mediate interactions with the S protein, shows a similar but probably more potent inhibitory effect.

The formation of a trimer-of-hairpins structure (also known as six-helix bundle) comprising HR1 and HR2 in the postfusion conformation is a unifying feature of class I viral fusion proteins. The crystal structure of a protein construct in which SARS-CoV-2 HR1 and HR2 were connected by a six-residue hydrophilic flexible linker was determined to be a canonical six-helix bundle structure with a rod-like shape ∼115 Å in length and ∼25 Å in diameter. Three HR1 helices form a parallel central coiled-coil with three HR2 helices packing in an oblique, antiparallel manner against deep hydrophobic grooves on the surface of the central coiled-coil. Notably, when a full-length S protein construct bearing the native furin-like cleavage site was transiently expressed by Expi293F cells, the purified S proteins contained the dissociated S2 trimer in the postfusion conformation. The cryo-EM structure of this trimeric postfusion S2 shows that the central helix (CH) extended regular helices from the central coiled-coil, oriented toward target cells ( Figure 2D ), which forms the longest central triple helical coiled-coil (~180Å) among all known class I transmembrane subunit structures.

The SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in the pre-hairpin intermediate state is very unstable and is just transiently present in vivo after triggering by ACE2 engagement, stymieing structural characterization of the S protein in this state. However, although this fusion-intermediate phase is very short, it is enough for inhibitory peptides to associate with the pre-hairpin intermediate and block the six-helix bundle formation. Furthermore, it has already been shown that the HR1 regions in various human CoVs are highly conserved, and therefore could serve as an attractive target for the design and development of potent and broad-spectrum inhibitors of pan-CoVs, including SARS-CoV-2. A highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor, EK1C4, has been reported to have good prophylactic and therapeutic potential against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Glycan Shield of the SARS-CoV-2 S Glycoprotein

As mentioned earlier, the SARS-CoV-2 S proteins are heavily decorated by heterogeneous N-linked glycans projecting from the S trimer surface. The SARS-CoV-2 S sequence encodes up to 22 N-linked glycan sequons per protomer, which likely plays an important role in protein folding and host immune evasion as a glycan shield. Of the 22 potential N-linked glycosylation sites on the S protein, 14 were identified to be predominantly occupied by processed, complex-type glycans. The remaining eight sites were found to be dominated by oligomannose-type glycans, which are divergent from those founded on host glycoproteins. Although glycosylation sites (N165, N234, N343) proximal to the receptor-binding sites on the SARS-CoV-2 S protein can be observed, ACE2 bound to the glycosylated and deglycosylated S ectodomains with nearly identical affinity (1.7 nM vs 1.5 nM) determined by a biolayer interferometry binding assay. This observation suggests that the high binding affinity between the SARS-CoV-2 S protein and ACE2 does not depend on the S protein glycosylation.

When the site-specific N-linked glycans are mapped onto the prefusion structure of the SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain, the resulting model exhibited substantially higher levels of glycan-free surface than that revealed by structures of fully glycosylated, trimeric HIV-1 Env ectodomains. This suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is covered by a less dense and less effective glycan shield compared to viral glycoproteins from HIV-1 and Lassa virus, which may be beneficial for the induction of humoral immunity and could be good news for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Notably, it has been shown that multiple major viral surface antigens have neutralizing epitopes that are partly or even exclusively composed of carbohydrate moieties, exemplified by the HIV-1 Env spike, which could be recognized by a large number of carbohydrate-binding antibodies, including 2G12, PG9, PG16, CH04, PGT121, PGT128, PGT135, and PGT145. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, more recently a potent neutralizing antibody against both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, S309, has been shown to recognize a highly conserved glycan-containing RBD epitope. These observations suggest that carbohydrate moieties could be immunogenic and highlight the need for immunogens to display the glycans important for the recognition of neutralizing antibodies; in support of this, specific N-linked glycans on Hemagglutinin has been shown to be essential for the elicitation of broadly neutralizing antibodies against Influenza. Accordingly, there has been mounting interest in exploring the potential of immunogenic glycan moieties as vaccine candidates against multiple viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

SARS-CoV-2 S Glycoprotein-Mediated Membrane Fusion

Membrane fusion and viral entry of SARS-CoV-2 is initiated by binding of RBD in the viral S glycoprotein transiently sampling the functional conformation to ACE2 on the surface of target cells ( Figure 1 ). After receptor engagement at the plasma membrane or ensuing virus endocytosis by the host cell, a second cleavage (S2′ cleavage site) is generated, which is mediated by a cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 or endosomal cysteine proteases cathepsins B and L ( Figure 1 ). Protease cleavage at S2′ site frees the fusion peptide from the new S2 N-terminal region, further destabilizes the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein and may initiate S2-mediated membrane fusion cascade. Following the second cleavage, the fusion peptide at the N terminus of the S2 trimer is inserted into the host membrane, forming the pre-hairpin intermediate state. Since the pre-hairpin intermediate state is extremely unstable, the S2 fusion protein is refolded quickly and irreversibly into the stable postfusion state. These large conformational rearrangements pull the viral and host cell membrane into close proximity, leading ultimately to the membrane fusion.

Insights Into the Design and Development of S Protein-Based Vaccines

Since SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the causative agent of COVID-19, and its first genome sequence was released immediately and freely by a Chinese research group, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates based on various vaccine platforms, such as inactivated or live attenuated vaccines, DNA and mRNA vaccines, viral vector-based vaccines, and recombinant protein-based vaccines, have been developed. Most of these vaccine strategies are based on the full-length S glycoprotein, the major viral surface antigen. When a vaccine strategy requires that the SARS-CoV-2 S protein be recombinantly expressed in the human body, the ERRS should be omitted to enhance the cell surface expression level of the resulting protein.

Theoretically, the native HIV-1 Env trimer present on the surface of intact virions is thought to be a most ideal immunogen, as most of the neutralizing antibodies thus far described could recognize and bind to the prefusion form of trimeric HIV-1 Env, although it is with great difficulty that such neutralizing antibodies against this glycan-covered, sequence-variable native form are induced. For SARS-CoV-2, different lines of research have shown that convalescent sera from SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 patients showed no or limited cross-neutralization activity against these two viruses by pseudotyped and authentic viral infection assays, despite significant cross-reactivity in binding to the S glycoproteins of both viruses. Similar results were also observed in infected or immunized animals. Together with the finding that although the SARS-CoV-2 S protein shares a high degree of amino acid sequence identity with that of SARS-CoV (~76% overall), the RBM is less conserved (~47% identity) than any other functional region or domain, it can thus been surmised that the RBM has the most immunodominant neutralizing epitope(s) of the whole S protein, capable of readily eliciting strong neutralizing antibody responses. However, the native trimeric SARS-CoV-2 S protein could conceal each of its immunodominant RBMs by adopting the closed conformation. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 evades immune surveillance also through conformational masking, which is well-documented for HIV-1; while at the same time, the S protein could transiently sample the functional state to engage ACE2, consistent with the notion that the fusion glycoprotein of highly pathogenic viruses have evolved to perform its functions while evading host neutralizing antibody responses.

Another concern for vaccine candidates based on the full-length S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 is raised by the observation that the S1 subunit could spontaneously dissociate from the S glycoprotein probably as a trimer that still assumes the RBD closed conformation, leaving only the postfusion S2 trimer. The resulting S1 and S2 subunits might expose immunodominant, nonneutralizing epitopes that are utilized by SARS-CoV-2 to serve as decoys to distract the host immune system, inducing a large proportion of ineffective antibody responses, as documented for HIV-1 and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

It should be noted that although vaccine candidates based on the full-length S protein of the closely related SARS-CoV could elicit neutralizing antibody responses against infection of SARS-CoV, they may also induce harmful immune responses, including liver damage of the vaccinated animals, infection of human immune cells by SARS-CoV, and antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV infection. Therefore, although the S proteins of both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are thought to be promising vaccine immunogens for generating protective immunity, optimizing antigen design is critical to ensure an optimal immune response through exposing more neutralizing epitopes and displaying fewer potentially weakly or non-neutralizing epitopes. Vaccines containing or expressing the full-length S protein or its soluble ectodomain form should thus be engineered to sample a RBD(s) “up” conformation while the rest is still kept in the prefusion state.

Apart from recombinant, soluble, stabilized ectodomains that are engineered to expose the immunodominant RBD by adapting the RBD(s) “up” conformation, RBD proteins of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have also been widely used as recombinant protein-based vaccines. The RBD of SARS-CoV is highly immunogenic and is targeted by most of the neutralizing monoclonal antibodies that have been characterized. Based on the observation that a 193-amino acid fragment (residues 318-510) was previously identified to be the minimal RBD region of SARS-CoV, a corresponding 194-amino acid fragment (residues 331-524) can be readily selected as the minimal RBD region of SARS-CoV-2 and has already been characterized. This minimal form of RBDs of both viruses could serve as a vaccine candidate.

However, a conserved cysteine residue is located immediately upstream of the minimal RBD fragments of both viruses and always forms a disulfide bond in nearly all published structures containing this residue; this is also the case for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and HCoV-HKU1, consistent with the observation that all RBDs of these viruses share a conserved structural core. The disulfide bond contributes to stabilization of the RBD structure and likely modulates the protein immunogenicity. This notion is consistent with the observation that mice immunized with a longer form of the SARS-CoV RBD (residues 318-536) produced a higher titer of neutralizing antibodies compared with mice immunized with the minimal RBD region (residues 318-510). Therefore, when each of the minimal RBD fragments of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is used as vaccine candidates, the critical cysteine residue should not be ignored and thus should be included.

Besides the RBD, which has been shown to a major target for human neutralizing antibody responses, the NTD was recently identified to be a new vulnerable site of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein for antibody neutralizing and therefore could also serve as a recombinant protein-based vaccine. As expected, NTD-specific neutralizing antibodies could target the S protein in both closed and open conformations. In addition, the apparent accessibility of the fusion peptide and HR1 region in published structures of the SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain trimer as well as their high sequence conservation among CoVs suggests that they would be good immunogen candidates for epitope-focused vaccine design aimed at raising broadly CoV neutralizing antibodies. The epitope-focused vaccine design has proven to be successful in generating neutralizing antibodies against RSV fusion glycoprotein. However, neutralizing antibodies targeted against these two regions still need to be isolated in infected individuals to support this notion.

Unlike wild-type full-length S protein of SARS-CoV-2, the above monomeric fragments do not induce any infection-enhancing antibodies or harmful immune or inflammatory responses, all of which could be potentially avoided through structure-based immunogen design to improve immunogenicity. However, wide-type full-length or soluble ectodomain form of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein could trigger stronger cellular immune responses, which have been demonstrated to play an important role in controlling diseases caused by CoVs, including SARS-CoV-2, and are probably also an important determinant of effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, when more than one RBD of the S protein trimer is engineered to be locked in the “up” conformation, the antigenicity and immunogenicity of the resulting RBDs would be significantly enhanced compared to monomeric RBD form. Moreover, improved protection is likely to be achieved when vaccinated with full-length or soluble ectodomain form of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein in that both forms can elicit neutralizing antibodies directed against non-RBD sites, as observed for MERS-CoV.

Genetic variation has been used by many viruses that have RNA genomes, including HIV and influenza, as a mechanism to avoid antibody-mediated immunity, and is partially responsible for the great difficulty in developing effective and durable vaccines against these viruses. As an RNA virus, however, SARS-CoV-2 has a very low mutation rate overall likely because CoVs have a genetic proofreading mechanism. All reported variations occurred in the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein have a prevalence of no more than 1%, with an exception of D614G, which has become the most prevalent genotype in the global COVID-19 pandemic. Fortunately, although the D614G mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein has been shown to enhance viral infectivity, until now there is no evidence that infection with SARS-CoV-2 carrying the G614 mutant will be associated with disease severity. Furthermore, assays using both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies generated from individuals naturally infected with D614- or G614-carrying viruses demonstrated that the D614G mutation retains or even increases viral susceptibility to neutralization. This suggests that the D614G mutant maintains or favors an open, functional conformational state.

Although at an extremely low frequency, natural variations, including L452R A475V, V483A, and F490L that render the S glycoprotein resistant to certain neutralizing antibodies targeting the RBD, emerged under no selection pressure exerted by approved vaccines or neutralizing antibodies or entry inhibitors. However, it has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 escape mutants could be easily selected and quickly amplified under the selection pressure of single antibody treatment. These observations suggest that a combination of at least two neutralizing antibodies that recognize and bind to distinct and non-overlapping epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein (e.g., RBD and NTD, as well as HR and glycan) is required to restrict the possible occurrence of viral escape mutants and potential subsequent loss of single antibody-mediated neutralization. When these observations are taken into consideration for vaccine design and development, an ideal SARS-CoV-2 immunogen should contain as many exposed neutralizing epitopes as possible, although the RBD also possesses extra epitope(s) besides the epitope in the RBM region.

Concluding Remarks and Prospects

SARS-CoV-2 is a highly contagious pathogen that continues to spread quickly around the globe, causing COVID-19 to be one of the worst pandemics in recorded history. A safe and efficacious vaccine represents one of the best ways to reduce or eliminate the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, no vaccines for any of the known human CoVs have been licensed, although several potential SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV vaccines have advanced into human clinical trials for years, suggesting the development of effective vaccines against human CoVs has always been challenging. However, it has been shown that both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 could readily induce neutralizing antibodies following natural infection or immunization. Moreover, a growing number of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein with high potency have been isolated from plenty of convalescent donors as well as humanized mice, some of which have been shown to afford protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in animal models. It thus seems that vaccine candidates designed to elicit such neutralizing antibodies are feasible. It is widely accepted that the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a most promising immunogen for producing protective immunity. However, it is likely that the S protein has evolved to perform its functions while evading host neutralizing antibody responses and thus should be engineered to ensure an optimal immune response. The immunogen design strategies described in this review based on the wealth of the SARS-CoV-2 S glycoprotein research related to its biosynthesis, structure, function, antigenicity as well as immunogenicity will likely contribute to the ultimate success of safe and efficacious vaccines against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

Our research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (Grant No.182300410327), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81871312 and 81701546), and by the 111 Project (No. D20036).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 152

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Dong E Du H Gardner L An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis (2020 ) 20:533–4.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1

  5. 5.

    Cui J Li F Shi ZL Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol (2019 ) 17:181–92.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9

  6. 6.

    Harrison SC Viral membrane fusion. Virology (2015 ) 479-480:498–507.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.043

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Tang T Bidon M Jaimes JA Whittaker GR Daniel S Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antiviral Res (2020 ) 178:104792.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104792

  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Walls AC Park YJ Tortorici MA Wall A McGuire AT Veesler D Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell (2020 ) 181:281–92.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058

  12. 12.

    Amanat F Krammer F SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: Status Report. Immunity (2020 ) 52:583–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.007

  13. 13.

    Liu Z Xiao X Wei X Li J Yang J Tan H Composition and divergence of coronavirus spike proteins and host ACE2 receptors predict potential intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol (2020 ) 92:595–601.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.25726

  14. 14.

    Breitling J Aebi M N-linked protein glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2013 ) 5:a013359.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a013359

  15. 15.

    Braakman I Hebert DN Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2013 ) 5:a013201.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a013201

  16. 16.

    Broer R Boson B Spaan W Cosset FL Corver J Important role for the transmembrane domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein during entry. J Virol (2006 ) 80:1302–10.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.80.3.1302-1310.2006

  17. 17.

    Chung CY Majewska NI Wang Q Paul JT Betenbaugh MJ SnapShot: N-Glycosylation Processing Pathways across Kingdoms. Cell (2017 ) 171:258– e1.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.014

  18. 18.

    Aebi M N-linked protein glycosylation in the ER. Biochim Biophys Acta (2013 ) 1833:2430–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.001

  19. 19.

    Helenius A Aebi M Intracellular functions of N-linked glycans. Science (2001 ) 291:2364–9.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.291.5512.2364

  20. 20.

    Schwarz F Aebi M Mechanisms and principles of N-linked protein glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol (2011 ) 21:576–82.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.005

  21. 21.

    Zhang X Wang Y Glycosylation Quality Control by the Golgi Structure. J Mol Biol (2016 ) 428:3183–93.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.030

  22. 22.

    Andersen KG Rambaut A Lipkin WI Holmes EC Garry RF The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med (2020 ) 26:450–2.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9

  23. 23.

    Joshi HJ Narimatsu Y Schjoldager KT Tytgat HLP Aebi M Clausen H SnapShot: O-Glycosylation Pathways across Kingdoms. Cell (2018 ) 172:632–e2.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.016

  24. 24.

    Hoffmann M Kleine-Weber H Pohlmann S A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol Cell (2020 ) 78:779–84 e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022

  25. 25.

    Coutard B Valle C de Lamballerie X Canard B Seidah NG Decroly E The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res (2020 ) 176:104742.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Lontok E Corse E Machamer CE Intracellular targeting signals contribute to localization of coronavirus spike proteins near the virus assembly site. J Virol (2004 ) 78:5913–22.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.78.11.5913-5922.2004

  28. 28.

    Stertz S Reichelt M Spiegel M Kuri T Martinez-Sobrido L Garcia-Sastre A The intracellular sites of early replication and budding of SARS-coronavirus. Virology (2007 ) 361:304–15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.027

  29. 29.

    McBride CE Li J Machamer CE The cytoplasmic tail of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains a novel endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal that binds COPI and promotes interaction with membrane protein. J Virol (2007 ) 81:2418–28.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02146-06

  30. 30.

    Ujike M Huang C Shirato K Makino S Taguchi F The contribution of the cytoplasmic retrieval signal of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus to intracellular accumulation of S proteins and incorporation of S protein into virus-like particles. J Gen Virol (2016 ) 97:1853–64.

    Not in our library10.1099/jgv.0.000494

  31. 31.

    Malik YA Properties of Coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2. Malays J Pathol (2020 ) 42:3–11.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Dieterle ME Haslwanter D Bortz III RH Wirchnianski AS Lasso G Vergnolle O A replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus for studies of SARS-CoV-2 spike-mediated cell entry and its inhibition. Cell Host Microbe (2020 ) 28:486–96.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.020

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Wrapp D Wang N Corbett KS Goldsmith JA Hsieh CL Abiona O Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science (2020 ) 367:1260–3.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb2507

  35. 35.

    Bosch BJ van der Zee R de Haan CA Rottier PJ The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol (2003 ) 77:8801–11.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.77.16.8801-8811.2003

  36. 36.

    Pancera M Zhou T Druz A Georgiev IS Soto C Gorman J Structure and immune recognition of trimeric pre-fusion HIV-1 Env. Nature (2014 ) 514:455–61.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13808

  37. 37.

    Kirchdoerfer RN Cottrell CA Wang N Pallesen J Yassine HM Turner HL Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature (2016 ) 531:118–21.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature17200

  38. 38.

    Rey FA Lok SM Common Features of Enveloped Viruses and Implications for Immunogen Design for Next-Generation Vaccines. Cell (2018 ) 172:1319–34.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.054

  39. 39.

    Harrison SC Viral membrane fusion. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2008 ) 15:690–8.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.1456

  40. 40.
  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    Walls AC Tortorici MA Bosch BJ Frenz B Rottier PJM DiMaio F Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature (2016 ) 531:114–7.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature16988

  43. 43.

    Kwong PD Doyle ML Casper DJ Cicala C Leavitt SA Majeed S HIV-1 evades antibody-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-binding sites. Nature (2002 ) 420:678–82.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01188

  44. 44.

    Lewis GK Finzi A DeVico AL Pazgier M Conformational Masking and Receptor-Dependent Unmasking of Highly Conserved Env Epitopes Recognized by Non-Neutralizing Antibodies That Mediate Potent ADCC against HIV-1. Viruses (2015 ) 7:5115–32.

    Not in our library10.3390/v7092856

  45. 45.

    Munro JB Gorman J Ma X Zhou Z Arthos J Burton DR Conformational dynamics of single HIV-1 envelope trimers on the surface of native virions. Science (2014 ) 346:759–63.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1254426

  46. 46.

    Pallesen J Wang N Corbett KS Wrapp D Kirchdoerfer RN Turner HL Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2017 ) 114:E7348–E57.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1707304114

  47. 47.
  48. 48.

    Hoffmann M Kleine-Weber H Schroeder S Kruger N Herrler T Erichsen S SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell (2020 ) 181:271–80.e8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

  49. 49.

    Letko M Marzi A Munster V Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol (2020 ) 5:562–9.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y

  50. 50.

    Shang J Ye G Shi K Wan Y Luo C Aihara H Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2. Nature (2020 ) 581:221–4.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2179-y

  51. 51.

    Lan J Ge J Yu J Shan S Zhou H Fan S Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature (2020 ) 581:215–20.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5

  52. 52.

    Wang Q Zhang Y Wu L Niu S Song C Zhang Z Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2. Cell (2020 ) 181:894–904 e9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045

  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    Monteil V Kwon H Prado P Hagelkruys A Wimmer RA Stahl M Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Engineered Human Tissues Using Clinical-Grade Soluble Human ACE2. Cell (2020 ) 181:905–13 e7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.004

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Iwanaga N Cooper L Rong L Beddingfield B Crabtree J Tripp RA Novel ACE2-IgG1 fusions with increased activity against SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.06.15.152157

  57. 57.

    Zhang G Pomplun S Loftis AR Loas A Pentelute B The first-in-class peptide binder to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.03.19.999318

  58. 58.

    Renzi F Ghersi D ACE2 fragment as a decoy for novel SARS-Cov-2 virus. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.06.028647

  59. 59.
  60. 60.

    Duan L Du J Liu X Insights into vaccine development for acquired immune deficiency syndrome from crystal structures of human immunodeficiency virus-1 gp41 and equine infectious anemia virus gp45. Protein Sci (2015 ) 24:1549–59.

    Not in our library10.1002/pro.2750

  61. 61.

    Xia S Yan L Xu W Agrawal AS Algaissi A Tseng CK A pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting the HR1 domain of human coronavirus spike. Sci Adv (2019 ) 5:eaav4580.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aav4580

  62. 62.

    Walls AC Tortorici MA Frenz B Snijder J Li W Rey FA Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol (2016 ) 23:899–905.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3293

  63. 63.
  64. 64.

    Sun Z Ren K Zhang X Chen J Jiang Z Jiang J Mass spectrometry analysis of newly emerging coronavirus HCoV-19 spike S protein and human ACE2 reveals camouflaging glycans and unique post-translational modifications. Engineering (Beijing) (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.014

  65. 65.
  66. 66.

    Stewart-Jones GB Soto C Lemmin T Chuang GY Druz A Kong R Trimeric HIV-1-Env Structures Define Glycan Shields from Clades A, B, and G. Cell (2016 ) 165:813–26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.010

  67. 67.

    Watanabe Y Raghwani J Allen JD Seabright GE Li S Moser F Structure of the Lassa virus glycan shield provides a model for immunological resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2018 ) 115:7320–5.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1803990115

  68. 68.

    Zhang Y Zhao W Mao Y Wang S Zhong Y Su T Site-specific N-glycosylation Characterization of Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Proteins using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.03.28.013276

  69. 69.

    Horiya S MacPherson IS Krauss IJ Recent strategies targeting HIV glycans in vaccine design. Nat Chem Biol (2014 ) 10:990–9.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1685

  70. 70.

    Seabright GE Doores KJ Burton DR Crispin M Protein and Glycan Mimicry in HIV Vaccine Design. J Mol Biol (2019 ) 431:2223–47.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.016

  71. 71.

    Crispin M Ward AB Wilson IA Structure and Immune Recognition of the HIV Glycan Shield. Annu Rev Biophys (2018 ) 47:499–523.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biophys-060414-034156

  72. 72.

    Pinto D Park YJ Beltramello M Walls AC Tortorici MA Bianchi S Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody. Nature (2020 ) 583:290–5.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2349-y

  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    Huang Y Owino SO Crevar CJ Carter DM Ross TM N-Linked Glycans and K147 Residue on Hemagglutinin Synergize To Elicit Broadly Reactive H1N1 Influenza Virus Antibodies. J Virol (2020 ) 94:e01432–19.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01432-19

  75. 75.

    Crispin M Doores KJ Targeting host-derived glycans on enveloped viruses for antibody-based vaccine design. Curr Opin Virol (2015 ) 11:63–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.coviro.2015.02.002

  76. 76.

    Wang D Coronaviruses’ sugar shields as vaccine candidates. Curr Trends Immunol (2020 ) 21:17–23.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.
  78. 78.

    Thanh Le T Andreadakis Z Kumar A Gomez Roman R Tollefsen S Saville M The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2020 ) 19:305–6.

    Not in our library10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5

  79. 79.

    Yang R Lan J Huang B A R Lu M Wang W Lack of antibody-mediated cross-protection between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infections. EBioMedicine (2020 ) 58:102890.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102890

  80. 80.

    Anderson DE Tan CW Chia WN Young BE Linster M Low JH Lack of cross-neutralization by SARS patient sera towards SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect (2020 ) 9:900–2.

    Not in our library10.1080/22221751.2020.1761267

  81. 81.

    Lv H Wu NC Tsang OT Yuan M Perera R Leung WS Cross-reactive Antibody Response between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Infections. Cell Rep (2020 ) 31:107725.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107725

  82. 82.

    Jaimes JA Andre NM Chappie JS Millet JK Whittaker GR Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Modeling of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Reveals an Evolutionary Distinct and Proteolytically Sensitive Activation Loop. J Mol Biol (2020 ) 432:3309–25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.009

  83. 83.
  84. 84.

    McLellan JS Chen M Joyce MG Sastry M Stewart-Jones GB Yang Y Structure-based design of a fusion glycoprotein vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus. Science (2013 ) 342:592–8.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1243283

  85. 85.

    Du L He Y Zhou Y Liu S Zheng BJ Jiang S The spike protein of SARS-CoV–a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat Rev Microbiol (2009 ) 7:226–36.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2090

  86. 86.
    SARS Vaccine Development · 2005
    No notice
  87. 87.

    Ma C Su S Wang J Wei L Du L Jiang S From SARS-CoV to SARS-CoV-2: safety and broad-spectrum are important for coronavirus vaccine development. Microbes Infect (2020 ) 2:245–53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micinf.2020.05.004

  88. 88.

    Karthik K Senthilkumar TMA Udhayavel S Raj GD Role of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 and its mitigation strategies for the development of vaccines and immunotherapies to counter COVID-19. Hum Vaccin Immunother (2020 ) 1–6.

    Not in our library10.1080/21645515.2020.1796425

  89. 89.

    Arvin AM Fink K Schmid MA Cathcart A Spreafico R Havenar-Daughton C A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2. Nature (2020 ) 584:353–63.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8

  90. 90.

    Lurie N Saville M Hatchett R Halton J Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. N Engl J Med (2020 ) 382:1969–73.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmp2005630

  91. 91.

    Mandolesi M Sheward DJ Hanke L Ma J Pushparaj P Vidakovics LP SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit vaccination elicits potent neutralizing antibody responses. BioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.07.31.228486

  92. 92.

    Corbett KS Edwards DK Leist SR Abiona OM Boyoglu-Barnum S Gillespie RA SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0

  93. 93.

    Chen WH Strych U Hotez PJ Bottazzi ME The SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Pipeline: an Overview. Curr Trop Med Rep (2020 ) 1–4.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40475-020-00201-6

  94. 94.

    Jiang S Bottazzi ME Du L Lustigman S Tseng CT Curti E Roadmap to developing a recombinant coronavirus S protein receptor-binding domain vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Expert Rev Vaccines (2012 ) 11:1405–13.

    Not in our library10.1586/erv.12.126

  95. 95.
  96. 96.
  97. 97.

    Dai L Zheng T Xu K Han Y Xu L Huang E A Universal Design of Betacoronavirus Vaccines against COVID-19, MERS, and SARS. Cell (2020 ) 182:722–33 e11.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.035

  98. 98.
  99. 99.
  100. 100.
  101. 101.
  102. 102.

    Tortorici MA Veesler D Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv Virus Res (2019 ) 105:93–116.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.aivir.2019.08.002

  103. 103.

    Lu G Hu Y Wang Q Qi J Gao F Li Y Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26. Nature (2013 ) 500:227–31.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12328

  104. 104.

    Walls AC Xiong X Park YJ Tortorici MA Snijder J Quispe J Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion. Cell (2019 ) 176:1026–39 e15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.028

  105. 105.

    Chen WH Tao X Agrawal A Algaissi A Peng BH Pollet J Yeast-Expressed SARS-CoV Recombinant Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD219-N1) Formulated with Alum Induces Protective Immunity and Reduces Immune Enhancement. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.15.098079

  106. 106.

    Yang J Wang W Chen Z Lu S Yang F Bi Z A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity. Nature (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2599-8

  107. 107.

    Robbiani DF Gaebler C Muecksch F Lorenzi JCC Wang Z Cho A Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature (2020 ) 584:437–42.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2456-9

  108. 108.
  109. 109.
  110. 110.

    Liu L Wang P Nair MS Yu J Rapp M Wang Q Potent neutralizing antibodies directed to multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike. Nature (2020 ) 584:450–6.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2571-7

  111. 111.

    Correia BE Bates JT Loomis RJ Baneyx G Carrico C Jardine JG Proof of principle for epitope-focused vaccine design. Nature (2014 ) 507:201–6.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12966

  112. 112.

    Quinlan BD Mou H Zhang L Guo Y He W Ojha A The SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicits a potent neutralizing response without antibody-dependent enhancement. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.10.036418

  113. 113.

    Kwong PD What Are the Most Powerful Immunogen Design Vaccine Strategies? A Structural Biologist’s Perspective. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2017 ) 9: a029470.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a029470

  114. 114.

    Anasir MI Poh CL Structural Vaccinology for Viral Vaccine Design. Front Microbiol (2019 ) 10:738.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2019.00738

  115. 115.

    Grifoni A Weiskopf D Ramirez SI Mateus J Dan JM Moderbacher CR Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell (2020 ) 181:1489–501.e15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015

  116. 116.

    Liu WJ Zhao M Liu K Xu K Wong G Tan W T-cell immunity of SARS-CoV: Implications for vaccine development against MERS-CoV. Antiviral Res (2017 ) 137:82–92.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.11.006

  117. 117.
  118. 118.

    Oja AE Saris A Ghandour CA Kragten NA Hogema BM Nossent EJ Divergent SARS-CoV-2-specific T and B cell responses in severe but not mild COVID-19. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.06.18.159202

  119. 119.
  120. 120.

    Henderson R Edwards RJ Mansouri K Janowska K Stalls V Gobeil S Controlling the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Conformation. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.18.102087

  121. 121.
  122. 122.

    Liu W Chen YH High epitope density in a single protein molecule significantly enhances antigenicity as well as immunogenicity: a novel strategy for modern vaccine development and a preliminary investigation about B cell discrimination of monomeric proteins. Eur J Immunol (2005 ) 35:505–14.

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.200425749

  123. 123.
  124. 124.
  125. 125.

    Fauver JR Petrone ME Hodcroft EB Shioda K Ehrlich HY Watts AG Coast-to-Coast Spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the Early Epidemic in the United States. Cell (2020 ) 181:990–6 e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.021

  126. 126.

    Sevajol M Subissi L Decroly E Canard B Imbert I Insights into RNA synthesis, capping, and proofreading mechanisms of SARS-coronavirus. Virus Res (2014 ) 194:90–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2014.10.008

  127. 127.

    Korber B Fischer WM Gnanakaran S Yoon H Theiler J Abfalterer W Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus. Cell (2020 ) 182:812–27.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043

  128. 128.
  129. 129.

    Hu J He CL Gao Q Zhang GJ Cao XX Long QX The D614G mutation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein enhances viral infectivity. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.06.20.161323

  130. 130.

    Yurkovetskiy L Pascal KE Tompkins-Tinch C Nyalile T Wang Y Baum A SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein variant D614G increases infectivity and retains sensitivity to antibodies that target the receptor binding domain. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.07.04.187757

  131. 131.

    Grubaugh ND Hanage WP Rasmussen AL Making Sense of Mutation: What D614G Means for the COVID-19 Pandemic Remains Unclear. Cell (2020 ) 182:794–5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.040

  132. 132.

    Li Q Wu J Nie J Zhang L Hao H Liu S The Impact of Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Spike on Viral Infectivity and Antigenicity. Cell (2020 ) 182:1284–94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.012

  133. 133.

    Weissman D Alameh M-G LaBranche CC Edwards RJ Sutherland L Santra S D614G Spike Mutation Increases SARS CoV-2 Susceptibility to Neutralization. medRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.07.22.20159905

  134. 134.

    Mansbach RA Chakraborty S Nguyen K Montefiori D Korber B Gnanakaran S The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant D614G Favors an Open Conformational State. bioRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.07.26.219741

  135. 135.
  136. 136.
  137. 137.
  138. 138.

    Ho M Perspectives on the development of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Antib Ther (2020 ) 3:109–14.

    Not in our library10.1093/abt/tbaa009

  139. 139.

    Yuan M Wu NC Zhu X Lee CD So RTY Lv H A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science (2020 ) 368:630–3.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb7269

  140. 140.
  141. 141.
  142. 142.

    Li H Zhou Y Zhang M Wang H Zhao Q Liu J Updated Approaches against SARS-CoV-2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2020 ) 64:e00483–20.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.00483-20

  143. 143.

    Saif LJ Vaccines for COVID-19: perspectives, prospects, and challenges based on candidate SARS, MERS, and animal coronavirus vaccines. Euro Med J (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.33590/emj/200324

  144. 144.

    Xu J Jia W Wang P Zhang S Shi X Wang X Antibodies and vaccines against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg Microbes Infect (2019 ) 8:841–56.

    Not in our library10.1080/22221751.2019.1624482

  145. 145.

    Conte C Sogni F Affanni P Veronesi L Argentiero A Esposito S Vaccines against Coronaviruses: The State of the Art. Vaccines (Basel) (2020 ) 8:309.

    Not in our library10.3390/vaccines8020309

  146. 146.

    Juno JA Tan H-X Lee WS Reynaldi A Kelly HG Wragg K Immunogenic profile of SARS-CoV-2 spike in individuals recovered from COVID-19. medRxiv (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.17.20104869

  147. 147.
  148. 148.
  149. 149.
  150. 150.
  151. 151.

    Burton DR What Are the Most Powerful Immunogen Design Vaccine Strategies? Reverse Vaccinology 2.0 Shows Great Promise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2017 ) 9:a030262.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a030262

  152. 152.

    Graham BS Gilman MSA McLellan JS Structure-Based Vaccine Antigen Design. Annu Rev Med (2019 ) 70:91–104.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-med-121217-094234

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.