The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: Accounting for the cost of wiring

Abstract

Brain networks are expected to be modular. However, existing techniques for estimating a network’s modules make it difficult to assess the influence of organizational principles such as wiring cost reduction on the detected modules. Here we present a modification of an existing module detection algorithm that allowed us to focus on connections that are unexpected under a cost-reduction wiring rule and to identify modules from among these connections. We applied this technique to anatomical brain networks and showed that the modules we detected differ from those detected using the standard technique. We demonstrated that these novel modules are spatially distributed, exhibit unique functional fingerprints, and overlap considerably with rich clubs, giving rise to an alternative and complementary interpretation of the functional roles of specific brain regions. Finally, we demonstrated that, using the modified module detection approach, we can detect modules in a developmental dataset that track normative patterns of maturation. Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that brain networks are composed of modules and provide additional insight into the function of those modules.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 130

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.
   One Rule to Grow Them All: A General Theory of Neuronal Branching and Its Practical Application · 2010

   No notice
10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

12. 12.
    Finding Statistically Significant Communities in Networks · 2011

    No notice
13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

26. 26.
    Efficient Physical Embedding of Topologically Complex Information Processing Networks in Brains and Computer Circuits · 2010

    No notice
27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

39. 39.
    Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks · 2007

    No notice
40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

49. 49.
    Structural and Functional Rich Club Organization of the Brain in Children and Adults · 2014

    No notice
50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

57. 57.
    Specialization Can Drive the Evolution of Modularity · 2010

    No notice
58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

71. 71.
    Controllability of structural brain networks · 2015

    No notice
72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

75. 75.
    Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems · 2006

    No notice
76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

98. 98.
    Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex · 2008

    No notice
99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

100. 100.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

101. 101.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

102. 102.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

103. 103.
     Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory · 2010

     No notice
104. 104.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

105. 105.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

106. 106.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

107. 107.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

108. 108.
     Generative models of the human connectome · 2016

     No notice
109. 109.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

110. 110.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

111. 111.
     Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology · 2016

     No notice
112. 112.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

113. 113.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

114. 114.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

115. 115.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

116. 116.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

117. 117.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

118. 118.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

119. 119.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

120. 120.
     The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: Accounting for the cost of wiring · 2017

     No notice
121. 121.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

122. 122.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

123. 123.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

124. 124.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

125. 125.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

126. 126.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

127. 127.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

128. 128.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

129. 129.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

130. 130.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 5

• Distance-dependent consensus thresholds for generating group-representative structural brain networks · 2019
  No notice
• Graph theory approaches to functional network organization in brain disorders: A critique for a brave new small-world · 2019
  No notice
• Diversity of meso-scale architecture in human and non-human connectomes · 2018
  No notice
• Positive affect, surprise, and fatigue are correlates of network flexibility · 2017
  No notice
• Cliques and cavities in the human connectome · 2017
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.