No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology

Richard F. Betzel, Shi Gu, John D. Medaglia and 2 more

Scientific Reports · 2016 · CC BY

Abstract

To meet ongoing cognitive demands, the human brain must seamlessly transition from one brain state to another, in the process drawing on different cognitive systems. How does the brain’s network of anatomical connections help facilitate such transitions? Which features of this network contribute to making one transition easy and another transition difficult? Here, we address these questions using network control theory. We calculate the optimal input signals to drive the brain to and from states dominated by different cognitive systems. The input signals allow us to assess the contributions made by different brain regions. We show that such contributions, which we measure as energy, are correlated with regions’ weighted degrees. We also show that the network communicability, a measure of direct and indirect connectedness between brain regions, predicts the extent to which brain regions compensate when input to another region is suppressed. Finally, we identify optimal states in which the brain should start (and finish) in order to minimize transition energy. We show that the optimal target states display high activity in hub regions, implicating the brain’s rich club. Furthermore, when rich club organization is destroyed, the energy cost associated with state transitions increases significantly, demonstrating that it is the richness of brain regions that makes them ideal targets.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 87

1.
Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex · 2008
No notice
2.
Honey C.. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 2035–2040 (2009 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0811168106
3.
Hermundstad A. M.. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 6169–6174 (2013 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219562110
4.
Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves · 2016
No notice
5.
Becker C. O.. Accurately predicting functional connectivity from diffusion imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.02602 (2015).
Not in our library
6.
Deco G., Jirsa V. K. & McIntosh A. R. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12, 43–56 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1038/nrn2961
7.
Goñi J.. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 833–838 (2014 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1315529111
8.
Allen E. A.. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral cortex bhs352 (2012 ).
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhs352
9.
Transient brain activity disentangles fMRI resting-state dynamics in terms of spatially and temporally overlapping networks · 2015
No notice
10.
Betzel R. F., Fukushima M., He Y., Zuo X.-N. & Sporns O. Dynamic fluctuations coincide with periods of high and low modularity in resting-state functional brain networks. NeuroImage 127, 287–297 (2016 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.001
11.
Bassett D. S.. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 7641–7646 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1018985108
12.
Braun U.. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 11678–11683 (2015 ).
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1422487112
13.
A Functional Cartography of Cognitive Systems · 2015
No notice
14.
Wilson H. R. & Cowan J. D. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical journal 12, 1 (1972 ).
Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(72)86068-5
15.
The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields · 2008
No notice
16.
Marreiros A. C., Kiebel S. J. & Friston K. J. A dynamic causal model study of neuronal population dynamics. Neuroimage 51, 91–101 (2010 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.098
17.
Freyer F.. Biophysical mechanisms of multistability in resting-state cortical rhythms. The Journal of Neuroscience 31, 6353–6361 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.6693-10.2011
18.
Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks · 2016
No notice
19.
Breakspear M., Heitmann S. & Daffertshofer A. Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the kuramoto model. Frontiers in human neuroscience 4 (2010 ).
Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2010.00190
20.
Haimovici A., Tagliazucchi E., Balenzuela P. & Chialvo D. R. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. Physical review letters 110, 178101 (2013 ).
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.178101
21.
Abdelnour F., Voss H. U. & Raj A. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. Neuroimage 90, 335–347 (2014 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.039
22.
Mišic B.. Cooperative and competitive spreading dynamics on the human connectome. Neuron 86, 1518–1529 (2015 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.035
23.
Kalman R. E. Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Series A: Control 1, 152–192 (1963 ).
Not in our library
24.
Liu Y.-Y., Slotine J.-J. & Barabási A.-L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473, 167–173 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1038/nature10011
25.
Sun J. & Motter A. E. Controllability transition and nonlocality in network control. Physical Review Letters 110, 208701 (2013 ).
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.208701
26.
Rosin B.. Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is superior in ameliorating parkinsonism. Neuron 72, 370–384 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.023
27.
Taylor P. N.. Optimal control based seizure abatement using patient derived connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience 9, 202 (2015 ).
Not in our library10.3389/fnins.2015.00202
28.
Fox M. D., Halko M. A., Eldaief M. C. & Pascual-Leone A. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcmri) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (tms). Neuroimage 62, 2232–2243 (2012 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035
29.
Yan G., Ren J., Lai Y.-C., Lai C.-H. & Li B. Controlling complex networks: How much energy is needed? Physical review letters 108, 218703 (2012 ).
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.218703
30.
Wang W.-X., Ni X., Lai Y.-C. & Grebogi C. Optimizing controllability of complex networks by minimum structural perturbations. Physical Review E 85, 026115 (2012 ).
Not in our library10.1103/physreve.85.026115
31.
Cowan N. J., Chastain E. J., Vilhena D. A., Freudenberg J. S. & Bergstrom C. T. Nodal dynamics, not degree distributions, determine the structural controllability of complex networks. PloS one 7, e38398 (2012 ).
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0038398
32.
Pósfai M., Liu Y.-Y., Slotine J.-J. & Barabási A.-L. Effect of correlations on network controllability. Scientific reports 3 (2013 ).
Not in our library10.1038/srep01067
33.
Ruths J. & Ruths D. Control profiles of complex networks. Science 343, 1373–1376 (2014 ).
Not in our library10.1126/science.1242063
34.
Pasqualetti F., Zampieri S. & Bullo F. Controllability metrics, limitations and algorithms for complex networks. Control of Network Systems, IEEE Transactions on 1, 40–52 (2014 ).
Not in our library
35.
Controllability of structural brain networks · 2015
No notice
36.
Yeo B. T.. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of neurophysiology 106, 1125–1165 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1152/jn.00338.2011
37.
van den Heuvel M. P. & Sporns O. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. The Journal of neuroscience 31, 15775–15786 (2011 ).
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3539-11.2011
38.
Lin C. T. Structural controllability. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 19, 201–208 (1974 ).
Not in our library
39.
Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V. & Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Current opinion in neurobiology 10, 232–237 (2000 ).
Not in our library10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7
40.
Silvanto J. & Muggleton N. G. New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 39, 549–552 (2008 ).
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.008

All 87 references

Cited by papers we hold 9

Receptor-informed network control theory links LSD and psilocybin to a flattening of the brain’s control energy landscape · 2022
No notice
Brain network dynamics during working memory are modulated by dopamine and diminished in schizophrenia · 2021
No notice
Temporal sequences of brain activity at rest are constrained by white matter structure and modulated by cognitive demands · 2020
No notice
Multimodal network dynamics underpinning working memory · 2020
No notice
Distance-dependent consensus thresholds for generating group-representative structural brain networks · 2019
No notice
Connectomics of bipolar disorder: a critical review, and evidence for dynamic instabilities within interoceptive networks · 2018
Corrected
The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: Accounting for the cost of wiring · 2017
No notice
Developmental increases in white matter network controllability support a growing diversity of brain dynamics · 2017
No notice
Cliques and cavities in the human connectome · 2017
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.