Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology

Richard F. Betzel, Shi Gu, John D. Medaglia and 2 more

Scientific Reports · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/srep30770

Abstract

To meet ongoing cognitive demands, the human brain must seamlessly transition from one brain state to another, in the process drawing on different cognitive systems. How does the brain’s network of anatomical connections help facilitate such transitions? Which features of this network contribute to making one transition easy and another transition difficult? Here, we address these questions using network control theory. We calculate the optimal input signals to drive the brain to and from states dominated by different cognitive systems. The input signals allow us to assess the contributions made by different brain regions. We show that such contributions, which we measure as energy, are correlated with regions’ weighted degrees. We also show that the network communicability, a measure of direct and indirect connectedness between brain regions, predicts the extent to which brain regions compensate when input to another region is suppressed. Finally, we identify optimal states in which the brain should start (and finish) in order to minimize transition energy. We show that the optimal target states display high activity in hub regions, implicating the brain’s rich club. Furthermore, when rich club organization is destroyed, the energy cost associated with state transitions increases significantly, demonstrating that it is the richness of brain regions that makes them ideal targets.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 87

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Honey C.. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 2035–2040 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0811168106

  3. 3.

    Hermundstad A. M.. Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 6169–6174 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1219562110

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Becker C. O.. Accurately predicting functional connectivity from diffusion imaging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.02602 (2015).

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Deco G., Jirsa V. K. & McIntosh A. R. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12, 43–56 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn2961

  7. 7.

    Goñi J.. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 833–838 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1315529111

  8. 8.

    Allen E. A.. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cerebral cortex bhs352 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhs352

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Betzel R. F., Fukushima M., He Y., Zuo X.-N. & Sporns O. Dynamic fluctuations coincide with periods of high and low modularity in resting-state functional brain networks. NeuroImage 127, 287–297 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.001

  11. 11.

    Bassett D. S.. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 7641–7646 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1018985108

  12. 12.

    Braun U.. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 11678–11683 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1422487112

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Wilson H. R. & Cowan J. D. Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical journal 12, 1 (1972 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(72)86068-5

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Marreiros A. C., Kiebel S. J. & Friston K. J. A dynamic causal model study of neuronal population dynamics. Neuroimage 51, 91–101 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.098

  17. 17.

    Freyer F.. Biophysical mechanisms of multistability in resting-state cortical rhythms. The Journal of Neuroscience 31, 6353–6361 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.6693-10.2011

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    Breakspear M., Heitmann S. & Daffertshofer A. Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the kuramoto model. Frontiers in human neuroscience 4 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2010.00190

  20. 20.

    Haimovici A., Tagliazucchi E., Balenzuela P. & Chialvo D. R. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. Physical review letters 110, 178101 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.178101

  21. 21.

    Abdelnour F., Voss H. U. & Raj A. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. Neuroimage 90, 335–347 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.039

  22. 22.

    Mišic B.. Cooperative and competitive spreading dynamics on the human connectome. Neuron 86, 1518–1529 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.035

  23. 23.

    Kalman R. E. Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems. Journal of the Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Series A: Control 1, 152–192 (1963 ).

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Liu Y.-Y., Slotine J.-J. & Barabási A.-L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473, 167–173 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10011

  25. 25.

    Sun J. & Motter A. E. Controllability transition and nonlocality in network control. Physical Review Letters 110, 208701 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.110.208701

  26. 26.

    Rosin B.. Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is superior in ameliorating parkinsonism. Neuron 72, 370–384 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.023

  27. 27.

    Taylor P. N.. Optimal control based seizure abatement using patient derived connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience 9, 202 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.3389/fnins.2015.00202

  28. 28.

    Fox M. D., Halko M. A., Eldaief M. C. & Pascual-Leone A. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcmri) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (tms). Neuroimage 62, 2232–2243 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035

  29. 29.

    Yan G., Ren J., Lai Y.-C., Lai C.-H. & Li B. Controlling complex networks: How much energy is needed? Physical review letters 108, 218703 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.218703

  30. 30.

    Wang W.-X., Ni X., Lai Y.-C. & Grebogi C. Optimizing controllability of complex networks by minimum structural perturbations. Physical Review E 85, 026115 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.85.026115

  31. 31.

    Cowan N. J., Chastain E. J., Vilhena D. A., Freudenberg J. S. & Bergstrom C. T. Nodal dynamics, not degree distributions, determine the structural controllability of complex networks. PloS one 7, e38398 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0038398

  32. 32.

    Pósfai M., Liu Y.-Y., Slotine J.-J. & Barabási A.-L. Effect of correlations on network controllability. Scientific reports 3 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep01067

  33. 33.

    Ruths J. & Ruths D. Control profiles of complex networks. Science 343, 1373–1376 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1242063

  34. 34.

    Pasqualetti F., Zampieri S. & Bullo F. Controllability metrics, limitations and algorithms for complex networks. Control of Network Systems, IEEE Transactions on 1, 40–52 (2014 ).

    Not in our library

  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Yeo B. T.. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of neurophysiology 106, 1125–1165 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.00338.2011

  37. 37.

    van den Heuvel M. P. & Sporns O. Rich-club organization of the human connectome. The Journal of neuroscience 31, 15775–15786 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3539-11.2011

  38. 38.

    Lin C. T. Structural controllability. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 19, 201–208 (1974 ).

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Pascual-Leone A., Walsh V. & Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Current opinion in neurobiology 10, 232–237 (2000 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7

  40. 40.

    Silvanto J. & Muggleton N. G. New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 39, 549–552 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.008

  41. 41.

    Estrada E. & Hatano N. Communicability in complex networks. Physical Review E 77, 036111 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.77.036111

  42. 42.

    Roberts J. A.. The contribution of geometry to the human connectome. NeuroImage 124, 379–393 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.009

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Laughlin S. B. & Sejnowski T. J. Communication in neuronal networks. Science 301, 1870–1874 (2003 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1089662

  45. 45.

    Niven J. E. & Laughlin S. B. Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. Journal of Experimental Biology 211, 1792–1804 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1242/jeb.017574

  46. 46.
  47. 47.

    van den Heuvel M. P. & Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends in cognitive sciences 17, 683–696 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.012

  48. 48.

    van den Heuvel M. P., Kahn R. S., Goñi J. & Sporns O. High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 11372–11377 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1203593109

  49. 49.

    Betzel R. F.. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102, 345–357 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067

  50. 50.
  51. 51.

    Iturria-Medina Y., Sotero R. C., Canales-Rodrguez E. J., Alemán-Gómez Y. & Melie-Garca L. Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted mri and graph theory. Neuroimage 40, 1064–1076 (2008 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.060

  52. 52.

    Gong G.. Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cerebral cortex 19, 524–536 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhn102

  53. 53.

    Estrada E., Hatano N. & Benzi M. The physics of communicability in complex networks. Physics reports 514, 89–119 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.77.036111

  54. 54.

    Grefkes C. & Fink G. R. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain awr033 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awr033

  55. 55.

    Carrera E. & Tononi G. Diaschisis: past, present, future. Brain awu101 (2014).

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awu101

  56. 56.

    Crofts J. J.. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage 54, 161–169 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.032

  57. 57.

    Sivanandam T. M. & Thakur M. K. Traumatic brain injury: a risk factor for alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 36, 1376–1381 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.013

  58. 58.

    Stam C. J. Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15, 683–695 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn3801

  59. 59.

    Kurzban R., Duckworth A., Kable J. W. & Myers J. An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 661–679 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1017/s0140525x12003196

  60. 60.

    Schneider W. & Shiffrin R. M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. detection, search, and attention. Psychological review 84, 1 (1977 ).

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    Norman D. A. & Shallice T. Attention to action (Springer, 1986 ).

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Miller E. K. & Cohen J. D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience 24, 167–202 (2001 ).

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

  63. 63.

    Senden M., Deco G., de Reus M. A., Goebel R. & van den Heuvel M. P. Rich club organization supports a diverse set of functional network configurations. Neuroimage 96, 174–182 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.066

  64. 64.

    Collin G., Sporns O., Mandl R. C. & van den Heuvel M. P. Structural and functional aspects relating to cost and benefit of rich club organization in the human cerebral cortex. Cerebral cortex 24, 2258–2267 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bht064

  65. 65.
  66. 66.

    Towlson E. K., Vértes P. E., Ahnert S. E., Schafer W. R. & Bullmore E. T. The rich club of the c. elegans neuronal connectome. The Journal of Neuroscience 33, 6380–6387 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3784-12.2013

  67. 67.

    van den Heuvel M. P. & Sporns O. An anatomical substrate for integration among functional networks in human cortex. The Journal of neuroscience 33, 14489–14500 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2128-13.2013

  68. 68.

    Gollo L. L., Zalesky A., Hutchison R. M., van den Heuvel M. & Breakspear M. Dwelling quietly in the rich club: brain network determinants of slow cortical fluctuations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 370, 20140165 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2014.0165

  69. 69.

    Thomas C.. Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion mri tractography is inherently limited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 16574–16579 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1405672111

  70. 70.

    Reveley C.. Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion mr tractography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, E2820–E2828 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1418198112

  71. 71.

    Pestilli F., Yeatman J. D., Rokem A., Kay K. N. & Wandell B. A. Evaluation and statistical inference for human connectomes. Nature methods 11, 1058–1063 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3098

  72. 72.

    Müller F.-J. & Schuppert A. Few inputs can reprogram biological networks. Nature 478, E4–E4 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10543

  73. 73.

    Luenberger D. Introduction to dynamic systems: theory, models, and applications (1979).

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    Vuksanović V. & Hövel P. Functional connectivity of distant cortical regions: Role of remote synchronization and symmetry in interactions. NeuroImage 97, 1–8 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.039

  75. 75.

    Power J. D.. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.006

  76. 76.

    Bellec P., Rosa-Neto P., Lyttelton O. C., Benali H. & Evans A. C. Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fmri. Neuroimage 51, 1126–1139 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.082

  77. 77.

    Yeh F.-C., Wedeen V. J. & Tseng W.-Y. I. Estimation of fiber orientation and spin density distribution by diffusion deconvolution. Neuroimage 55, 1054–1062 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.087

  78. 78.

    Cammoun L.. Mapping the human connectome at multiple scales with diffusion spectrum mri. Journal of neuroscience methods 203, 386–397 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.031

  79. 79.

    Cieslak M. & Grafton S. Local termination pattern analysis: a tool for comparing white matter morphology. Brain imaging and behavior 8, 292–299 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1007/s11682-013-9254-z

  80. 80.

    Sporns O. & Betzel R. F. Modular brain networks. Annual review of psychology 67 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033634

  81. 81.

    Smith S. M.. Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 13040–13045 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0905267106

  82. 82.

    Crossley N. A.. Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 11583–11588 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1220826110

  83. 83.

    Crofts J. J. & Higham D. J. A weighted communicability measure applied to complex brain networks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface rsif-2008 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2008.0484

  84. 84.

    Kirkpatrick S., Vecchi M. P.. Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.220.4598.671

  85. 85.

    Colizza V., Flammini A., Serrano M. A. & Vespignani A. Detecting rich-club ordering in complex networks. Nature physics 2, 110–115 (2006 ).

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    McAuley J. J., da Fontoura Costa L. & Caetano T. S. Rich-club phenomenon across complex network hierarchies. Applied Physics Letters 91, 084103 (2007 ).

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    Maslov S. & Sneppen K. Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296, 910–913 (2002 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1065103

Cited by papers we hold 9

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.