Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations

Abstract

Evolutionary responses are required for tree populations to be able to track climate change. Results of 250 years of common garden experiments show that most forest trees have evolved local adaptation, as evidenced by the adaptive differentiation of populations in quantitative traits, reflecting environmental conditions of population origins. On the basis of the patterns of quantitative variation for 19 adaptation‐related traits studied in 59 tree species (mostly temperate and boreal species from the Northern hemisphere), we found that genetic differentiation between populations and clinal variation along environmental gradients were very common (respectively, 90% and 78% of cases). Thus, responding to climate change will likely require that the quantitative traits of populations again match their environments. We examine what kind of information is needed for evaluating the potential to respond, and what information is already available. We review the genetic models related to selection responses, and what is known currently about the genetic basis of the traits. We address special problems to be found at the range margins, and highlight the need for more modeling to understand specific issues at southern and northern margins. We need new common garden experiments for less known species. For extensively studied species, new experiments are needed outside the current ranges. Improving genomic information will allow better prediction of responses. Competitive and other interactions within species and interactions between species deserve more consideration. Despite the long generation times, the strong background in quantitative genetics and growing genomic resources make forest trees useful species for climate change research. The greatest adaptive response is expected when populations are large, have high genetic variability, selection is strong, and there is ecological opportunity for establishment of better adapted genotypes.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 213

1. 1.

   Acevedo-Rodriguez R, Vargas-Hernandez JJ, Lopez-Upton J, Mendoza JV. Effect of geographic origin and nutrition on shoot prenology of Mexican Douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga sp.) seedlings. Agrociencia. 2006;40:125-137.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Aitken SN, Whitlock MC. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2013;44.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang TL, Curtis-McLane S. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications. 2008;1:95-111.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00013.x

4. 4.

   Alberto F, Niort J, Derory J, Lepais O, Vitalis R, Galop D, Kremer A. Population differentiation of sessile oak at the altitudinal front of migration in the French Pyrenees. Molecular Ecology. 2010;19:2626-2639.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04631.x

5. 5.

   Alberto F, Bouffier L, Louvet JM, Lamy JB, Delzon S, Kremer A. Adaptive responses for seed and leaf phenology in natural populations of sessile oak along an altitudinal gradient. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2011;24:1442-1454.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02277.x

6. 6.

   Alleaume-Benharira M, Pen IR, Ronce O. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species’ range: interactions between drift and gene flow. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2006;19:203-215.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00976.x

7. 7.

   Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 2010;259:660-684.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Andalo C, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J. The impact of climate change on growth of local white spruce populations in Quebec. Forest Ecology and Management. 2005;205:169-182.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Angert AL. The niche, limits to species’ distributions, and spatiotemporal variation in demography across the elevation ranges of two monkeyflowers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106:19693-19698.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0901652106

10. 10.

    van Asch M, Visser ME. Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony. Annual Review of Entomology. 2007;52:37-55.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091418

11. 11.

    van Asch M, Tienderen PH, Holleman LJM, Visser ME. Predicting adaptation of phenology in response to climate change, an insect herbivore example. Global Change Biology. 2007;13:1596-1604.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhjalmsson BJ, et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature. 2010;465:627-631.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08800

13. 13.

    Barton NH. Clines in polygenic traits. Genetical Research. 1999;74:223-236.

    Not in our library10.1017/s001667239900422x

14. 14.

    Barton N, Silvertown J, Antonovics J. Adaptation at the edge of a species’ range. Integrating Genetics and Ecology an A Spatial Context. 2001;365-392.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Barton NH, Keightley PD. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2002;3:11-21.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg700

16. 16.

    Basler D, Körner C. Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2012;165:73-81.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Benito-Garzón M, Alia R, Robson TM, Zavala MA. Intra-specific variability and plasticity influence potential tree species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011;20:766-778.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Beuker E, Valtonen E, Repo T. Seasonal variation in the frost hardiness of Scots pine and Norway spruce in old provenance experiments in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management. 1998;107:87-98.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Björklund M, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Bach LA, Lundberg P, Stenseth NC. Quantitative trait evolution and environmental change. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4521.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0004521

20. 20.

    Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Nilsson O. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science. 2006;312:1040-1043.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1126038

21. 21.
    Epigenetic regulation of adaptive responses of forest tree species to the environment · 2013

    No notice
22. 22.

    Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Annals of Forest Science. 2006;63:625-644.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Bridle JR, Polechova J, Kawata M, Butlin RK. Why is adaptation prevented at ecological margins? New insights from individual-based simulations. Ecology Letters. 2010;13:485-494.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01442.x

24. 24.

    Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, et al. The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time. Science. 2009;325:714-718.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1174276

25. 25.

    Burger R, Lynch M. Evolution and extinction in a changing environments - a quantitative genetic analysis. Evolution. 1995;49:151-163.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05967.x

26. 26.

    Caffarra A, Donelly A, Chuine I. Modelling the timing of Betula pubescens budburst. II. Integrating the complex effects of photoperiod into process-based models of budburst. Climate Research. 2011;46:159-170.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. Elements of Evolutionary Genetics. 2010.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Cheddadi R, Vendramin GG, Litt T, et al. Imprints of glacial refugia in the modern genetic diversity of Pinus sylvestris. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2006;15:271-282.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Chen J, Källman T, Gyllenstrand N, Lascoux M. New insights on the speciation history and nucleotide diversity of three boreal spruce species and a Tertiary relict. Heredity. 2009;104:3-14.

    Not in our library10.1038/hdy.2009.88

30. 30.

    Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science. 2011;333:1024-1026.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1206432

31. 31.

    Chevin L-M, Lande R. When do adaptive plasticity and genetic evolution prevent extinction of a density-regulated population? Evolution. 2010;64:1143-1150.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00875.x

32. 32.
    Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory · 2010

    No notice
33. 33.

    Chmura DJ. Phenology differs among Norway spruce populations in relation to local variation in altitude of maternal stands in the Beskidy Mountains. New Forests. 2006;32:21-31.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Chuine I, Beaubien EG. Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecology Letters. 2001;4:500-510.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Conner JK, Franks R, Stewart C. Expression of additive genetic variances and covariances for wild radish floral traits: comparison between field and greenhouse environments. Evolution. 2003;57:487-495.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01540.x

36. 36.

    Cornelius J. Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Canadian Journal of Forest. Research. 1994;24:372-379.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Cumbie WP, Eckert AJ, Wegrzyn JL, Whetten R, Neale DB, Goldfarb B. Association genetics of carbon isotope discrimination, height, and foliar nitrogen in a natural population of Pinus taeda L. Heredity. 2011;107:105-114.

    Not in our library10.1038/hdy.2010.168

38. 38.

    Davis MB, Shaw RG. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate changes. Science. 2001;292:673-679.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.292.5517.673

39. 39.

    De Carvalho D, Ingvarsson PK, Joseph J, et al. Admixture facilitates adaptation from standing variation in the European aspen (Populus tremula L.), a widespread forest tree. Molecular Ecology. 2010;19:1638-1650.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04595.x

40. 40.

    Deans JD, Harvey FJ. Frost hardiness of 16 European provenances of sessile oak growing in Scotland. Forestry. 1996;69:5-11.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 10

• A candidate gene association analysis identifies SNPs potentially involved in drought tolerance in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) · 2021
  Not checked
• Assessing adaptive and plastic responses in growth and functional traits in a 10‐year‐old common garden experiment with pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) suggests that directional selection can drive climatic adaptation · 2020
  Not checked
• Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change · 2020
  No notice
• Pervasive admixture between eucalypt species has consequences for conservation and assisted migration · 2019
  Not checked
• Morpho-physiological variation of white spruce seedlings from various seed sources and implications for deployment under climate change · 2016
  Not checked
• Adaptation and plasticity in aboveground allometry variation of four pine species along environmental gradients · 2016
  Not checked
• Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees · 2015
  No notice
• Characterisation of adaptive genetic diversity in environmentally contrasted populations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (river red gum). · 2014
  Not checked
• The interaction between freezing tolerance and phenology in temperate deciduous trees · 2014
  No notice
• Evolutionary and plastic responses to climate change in terrestrial plant populations · 2013
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.