Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review

Janek Gröhl, Melanie Schellenberg, Kris Dreher and 1 more

Photoacoustics · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100241

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a promising emerging imaging modality that enables spatially resolved imaging of optical tissue properties up to several centimeters deep in tissue, creating the potential for numerous exciting clinical applications. However, extraction of relevant tissue parameters from the raw data requires the solving of inverse image reconstruction problems, which have proven extremely difficult to solve. The application of deep learning methods has recently exploded in popularity, leading to impressive successes in the context of medical imaging and also finding first use in the field of PAI. Deep learning methods possess unique advantages that can facilitate the clinical translation of PAI, such as extremely fast computation times and the fact that they can be adapted to any given problem. In this review, we examine the current state of the art regarding deep learning in PAI and identify potential directions of research that will help to reach the goal of clinical applicability.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 188

  1. 1.

    Wang L.V., Gao L. Photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography: from bench to bedside. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014;16:155-185.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104553

  2. 2.

    Kim C., Erpelding T.N., Jankovic L. Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2010;1(1):278-284.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.1.000278

  3. 3.

    Mallidi S., Luke G.P., Emelianov S. Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):213-221.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.01.006

  4. 4.

    Beard P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus. 2011;1(4):602-631.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028

  5. 5.

    Rosencwaig A., Gersho A. Theory of the photoacoustic effect with solids. J. Appl. Phys. 1976;47(1):64-69.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Li H., Zhuang S., Li D.-a. Benign and malignant classification of mammogram images based on deep learning. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2019;51:347-354.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Zhang J., Chen B., Zhou M. Photoacoustic image classification and segmentation of breast cancer: a feasibility study. IEEE Access. 2018;7:5457-5466.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Quiros-Gonzalez I., Tomaszewski M.R., Aitken S.J. Optoacoustics delineates murine breast cancer models displaying angiogenesis and vascular mimicry. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118(8):1098.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41416-018-0033-x

  9. 9.

    Oh J.-T., Li M.-L., Zhang H.F. Three-dimensional imaging of skin melanoma in vivo by dual-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006;11(3):034032.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.2210907

  10. 10.

    Weight R.M., Viator J.A., Dale P.S. Photoacoustic detection of metastatic melanoma cells in the human circulatory system. Opt. Lett. 2006;31(20):2998-3000.

    Not in our library10.1364/ol.31.002998

  11. 11.

    Zhang C., Maslov K., Wang L.V. Subwavelength-resolution label-free photoacoustic microscopy of optical absorption in vivo. Opt. Lett. 2010;35(19):3195-3197.

    Not in our library10.1364/ol.35.003195

  12. 12.

    Zhang Y., Cai X., Choi S.-W. Chronic label-free volumetric photoacoustic microscopy of melanoma cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010;31(33):8651-8658.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.089

  13. 13.

    Song K.H., Stein E.W., Margenthaler J.A. Noninvasive photoacoustic identification of sentinel lymph nodes containing methylene blue in vivo in a rat model. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008;13(5):054033.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.2976427

  14. 14.

    Erpelding T.N., Kim C., Pramanik M. Sentinel lymph nodes in the rat: noninvasive photoacoustic and us imaging with a clinical us system. Radiology. 2010;256(1):102-110.

    Not in our library10.1148/radiol.10091772

  15. 15.
    Dual-Modality Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging System for Noninvasive Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer · 2015
    No notice
  16. 16.

    Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646-674.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

  17. 17.

    Wang L.V., Wu H.-i. Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging. 2012.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Wang X., Chamberland D.L., Jamadar D.A. Noninvasive photoacoustic tomography of human peripheral joints toward diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. Opt. Lett. 2007;32(20):3002-3004.

    Not in our library10.1364/ol.32.003002

  19. 19.

    Rajian J.R., Girish G., Wang X. Photoacoustic tomography to identify inflammatory arthritis. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(9):096013.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.17.9.096013

  20. 20.

    Jo J., Xu G., Zhu Y. Detecting joint inflammation by an led-based photoacoustic imaging system: a feasibility study. J. Biomed. Opt. 2018;23(11):110501.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.23.11.110501

  21. 21.

    Knieling F., Neufert C., Hartmann A. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography for assessment of Crohn’s disease activity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376(13):1292.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc1612455

  22. 22.

    Waldner M.J., Knieling F., Egger C. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography in Crohn’s disease: noninvasive imaging of disease activity. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(2):238-240.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.047

  23. 23.

    Lei H., Johnson L.A., Eaton K.A. Characterizing intestinal strictures of Crohn’s disease in vivo by endoscopic photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(5):2542-2555.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.10.002542

  24. 24.

    Niederhauser J.J., Jaeger M., Lemor R. Combined ultrasound and optoacoustic system for real-time high-contrast vascular imaging in vivo. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2005;24(4):436-440.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2004.843199

  25. 25.

    Aguirre A., Ardeshirpour Y., Sanders M.M. Potential role of coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging in ovarian cancer detection and characterization. Transl. Oncol. 2011;4(1):29.

    Not in our library10.1593/tlo.10187

  26. 26.

    Needles A., Heinmiller A., Sun J. Development and initial application of a fully integrated photoacoustic micro-ultrasound system. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2013;60(5):888-897.

    Not in our library10.1109/tuffc.2013.2646

  27. 27.

    Elbau P., Mindrinos L., Scherzer O. Quantitative reconstructions in multi-modal photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography imaging. Inverse Probl. 2017;34(1):014006.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Mandal S., Mueller M., Komljenovic D. Multimodal priors reduce acoustic and optical inaccuracies in photoacoustic imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;108781M.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Wang X., Pang Y., Ku G. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003;21(7):803.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt839

  30. 30.

    Ku G., Wang X., Xie X. Imaging of tumor angiogenesis in rat brains in vivo by photoacoustic tomography. Appl. Opt. 2005;44(5):770-775.

    Not in our library10.1364/ao.44.000770

  31. 31.

    Hu S., Maslov K.I., Tsytsarev V. Functional transcranial brain imaging by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14(4):040503.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.3194136

  32. 32.

    Yao J., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic brain imaging: from microscopic to macroscopic scales. Neurophotonics. 2014;1(1):011003.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.nph.1.1.011003

  33. 33.

    Mohammadi L., Manwar R., Behnam H. Skull’s aberration modeling: towards photoacoustic human brain imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;108785W.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Kim C., Erpelding T.N., Maslov K.I. Handheld array-based photoacoustic probe for guiding needle biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(4):046010.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.3469829

  35. 35.

    Su J.L., Karpiouk A.B., Wang B. Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(2):021309.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.3368686

  36. 36.

    Upputuri P.K., Pramanik M. Recent advances toward preclinical and clinical translation of photoacoustic tomography: a review. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016;22(4):041006.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.22.4.041006

  37. 37.

    Xu M., Wang L.V. Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography. Phys. Rev. E. 2005;71(1):016706.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.71.016706

  38. 38.

    Mozaffarzadeh M., Mahloojifar A., Orooji M. Double-stage delay multiply and sum beamforming algorithm: application to linear-array photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017;65(1):31-42.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2017.2690959

  39. 39.

    Treeby B.E., Cox B.T. k-wave: Matlab toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(2):021314.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.3360308

  40. 40.

    Huang C., Wang K., Nie L. Full-wave iterative image reconstruction in photoacoustic tomography with acoustically inhomogeneous media. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2013;32(6):1097-1110.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2013.2254496

  41. 41.

    Cox B., Laufer J., Beard P. The challenges for quantitative photoacoustic imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2009, vol. 7177. 2009;717713.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Waibel D., Gröhl J., Isensee F. Reconstruction of initial pressure from limited view photoacoustic images using deep learning. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2018, vol. 10494. 2018;104942S.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Buchmann J., Guggenheim J., Zhang E. Characterization and modeling of Fabry-Perot ultrasound sensors with hard dielectric mirrors for photoacoustic imaging. Appl. Opt. 2017;56(17):5039-5046.

    Not in our library10.1364/ao.56.005039

  44. 44.

    Sahlström T., Pulkkinen A., Tick J. Modeling of errors due to uncertainties in ultrasound sensor locations in photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2020;39(6):2140-2150.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2020.2966297

  45. 45.
    Quantitative PA tomography of high resolution 3-D images: Experimental validation in a tissue phantom · 2020
    Not checked
  46. 46.

    Xu M., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006;77(4):041101.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Shao P., Cox B., Zemp R.J. Estimating optical absorption, scattering, and Grueneisen distributions with multiple-illumination photoacoustic tomography. Appl. Opt. 2011;50(19):3145-3154.

    Not in our library10.1364/ao.50.003145

  48. 48.
    Eigenspectra optoacoustic tomography achieves quantitative blood oxygenation imaging deep in tissues · 2016
    No notice
  49. 49.

    Kazakeviciute A., Ho C.J.H., Olivo M. Multispectral photoacoustic imaging artifact removal and denoising using time series model-based spectral noise estimation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2016;35(9):2151-2163.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2016.2550624

  50. 50.

    Cox B.T., Arridge S.R., Köstli K.P. Two-dimensional quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction of absorption distributions in scattering media by use of a simple iterative method. Appl. Opt. 2006;45(8):1866-1875.

    Not in our library10.1364/ao.45.001866

  51. 51.

    Brochu F.M., Brunker J., Joseph J. Towards quantitative evaluation of tissue absorption coefficients using light fluence correction in optoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2016;36(1):322-331.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2016.2607199

  52. 52.

    Kirchner T., Gröhl J., Maier-Hein L. Context encoding enables machine learning-based quantitative photoacoustics. J. Biomed. Opt. 2018;23(5):056008.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.23.5.056008

  53. 53.

    Shen D., Wu G., Suk H.-I. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2017;19:221-248.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442

  54. 54.

    Liu X., Faes L., Kale A.U. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit. Health. 2019;1(6):e271-e297.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30123-2

  55. 55.

    Tajbakhsh N., Jeyaseelan L., Li Q. Embracing imperfect datasets: a review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 2020;63:101693.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.media.2020.101693

  56. 56.
    A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification · 2019
    No notice
  57. 57.

    Cai C., Deng K., Ma C. End-to-end deep neural network for optical inversion in quantitative photoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 2018;43(12):2752-2755.

    Not in our library10.1364/ol.43.002752

  58. 58.

    Gröhl J., Kirchner T., Adler T. Estimation of Blood Oxygenation with Learned Spectral Decoloring for Quantitative Photoacoustic Imaging (LSD-qPAI). 2019.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.
    Model-Based Learning for Accelerated, Limited-View 3-D Photoacoustic Tomography · 2018
    No notice
  60. 60.

    Pan S.J., Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009;22(10):1345-1359.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.
    The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare · 2019
    No notice
  62. 62.

    Ross T., Zimmerer D., Vemuri A. Exploiting the potential of unlabeled endoscopic video data with self-supervised learning. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2018;13(6):925-933.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11548-018-1772-0

  63. 63.

    Çiçek Ö., Abdulkadir A., Lienkamp S.S. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2016;424-432.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    Kato M., Teshima T., Honda J. Learning from positive and unlabeled data with a selection bias. International Conference on Learning Representations. 2018.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Gu J., Wang Z., Kuen J. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognit. 2018;77:354-377.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    Ronneberger O., Fischer P., Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2015;234-241.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Jacques S.L. Coupling 3D Monte Carlo light transport in optically heterogeneous tissues to photoacoustic signal generation. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(4):137-142.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pacs.2014.09.001

  68. 68.

    Fang Q., Boas D.A. Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units. Opt. Express. 2009;17(22):20178-20190.

    Not in our library10.1364/oe.17.020178

  69. 69.

    Dehghani H., Eames M.E., Yalavarthy P.K. Near infrared optical tomography using NIRFAST: algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 2009;25(6):711-732.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.1162

  70. 70.

    Schweiger M., Arridge S.R. The Toast++ software suite for forward and inverse modeling in optical tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014;19(4):040801.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.19.4.040801

  71. 71.

    Schwab J., Antholzer S., Nuster R. Deep learning of truncated singular values for limited view photoacoustic tomography. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;1087836.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Schwab J., Antholzer S., Nuster R. Real-time Photoacoustic Projection Imaging Using Deep Learning. 2018.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    Schwab J., Antholzer S., Haltmeier M. Learned backprojection for sparse and limited view photoacoustic tomography. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;1087837.

    Not in our library

  74. 74.

    Antholzer S., Schwab J., Bauer-Marschallinger J. NETT regularization for compressed sensing photoacoustic tomography. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;108783B.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Antholzer S., Haltmeier M. Discretization of learned NETT regularization for solving inverse problems. 2020.

    Not in our library10.3390/jimaging7110239

  76. 76.

    Li H., Schwab J., Antholzer S. NETT: solving inverse problems with deep neural networks. Inverse Probl. 2020;36(6).

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Yang C., Lan H., Gao F. Accelerated photoacoustic tomography reconstruction via recurrent inference machines. 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2019;6371-6374.

    Not in our library10.1109/embc.2019.8856290

  78. 78.

    Manwar R., Hosseinzadeh M., Hariri A. Photoacoustic signal enhancement: towards utilization of low energy laser diodes in real-time photoacoustic imaging. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3498.

    Not in our library10.3390/s18103498

  79. 79.

    Anas E.M.A., Zhang H.K., Audigier C. Robust photoacoustic beamforming using dense convolutional neural networks. Simulation, Image Processing, and Ultrasound Systems for Assisted Diagnosis and Navigation. 2018;3-11.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    Lan H., Yang C., Jiang D. Reconstruct the photoacoustic image based on deep learning with multi-frequency ring-shape transducer array. 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2019;7115-7118.

    Not in our library10.1109/embc.2019.8856590

  81. 81.

    Lan H., Zhou K., Yang C. Ki-GAN: knowledge infusion generative adversarial network for photoacoustic image reconstruction in vivo. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2019;273-281.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Lan H., Zhou K., Yang C. Hybrid neural network for photoacoustic imaging reconstruction. 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2019;6367-6370.

    Not in our library10.1109/embc.2019.8857019

  83. 83.

    Lan H., Jiang D., Yang C. Y-net: hybrid deep learning image reconstruction for photoacoustic tomography in vivo. Photoacoustics. 2020;20:100197.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100197

  84. 84.

    Goodfellow I., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M. Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2014;2672-2680.

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Guan S., Khan A.A., Sikdar S. Limited View and Sparse Photoacoustic Tomography for Neuroimaging with Deep Learning. 2019.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-65235-2

  86. 86.

    Kim M.W., Jeng G.-S., Pelivanov I. Deep-learning image reconstruction for real-time photoacoustic system. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2020.2993835

  87. 87.

    Reiter A., Bell M.A.L. A machine learning approach to identifying point source locations in photoacoustic data. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2017, vol. 10064. 2017;100643J.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    Johnstonbaugh K., Agrawal S., Abhishek D. Novel deep learning architecture for optical fluence dependent photoacoustic target localization. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;108781L.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Johnstonbaugh K., Agrawal S., Durairaj D.A. A deep learning approach to photoacoustic wavefront localization in deep-tissue medium. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1109/tuffc.2020.2964698

  90. 90.

    Shan H., Wang G., Yang Y. Simultaneous reconstruction of the initial pressure and sound speed in photoacoustic tomography using a deep-learning approach. Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXII, vol. 11105. 2019;1110504.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Jeon S., Kim C. Deep learning-based speed of sound aberration correction in photoacoustic images. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, vol. 11240. 2020;112400J.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    Davoudi N., Deán-Ben X.L., Razansky D. Deep learning optoacoustic tomography with sparse data. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019;1(10):453-460.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.
    Deep learning for photoacoustic tomography from sparse data · 2018
    No notice
  94. 94.

    Guan S., Khan A., Sikdar S. Fully dense UNet for 2D sparse photoacoustic tomography artifact removal. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2019;24.

    Not in our library10.1109/jbhi.2019.2912935

  95. 95.

    Farnia P., Mohammadi M., Najafzadeh E. High-quality photoacoustic image reconstruction based on deep convolutional neural network: towards intra-operative photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express. 2020;6(4).

    Not in our library10.1088/2057-1976/ab9a10

  96. 96.
    Domain Transform Network for Photoacoustic Tomography from Limited-view and Sparsely Sampled Data · 2020
    Not checked
  97. 97.

    Vu T., DiSpirito A., Li D. Deep Image Prior for Sparse-Sampling Photoacoustic Microscopy. 2020.

    Not in our library

  98. 98.

    Zhou J., He D., Shang X. Photoacoustic Microscopy with Sparse Data Enabled by Convolutional Neural Networks for Fast Imaging. 2020.

    Not in our library

  99. 99.

    DiSpirito A., Li D., Vu T. Reconstructing Undersampled Photoacoustic Microscopy Images Using Deep Learning. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2020.3031541

  100. 100.

    Antholzer S., Haltmeier M., Nuster R. Photoacoustic image reconstruction via deep learning. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2018, vol. 10494. 2018;104944U.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    Antholzer S., Schwab J., Haltmeier M. Deep Learning Versus ℓ1-Minimization for Compressed Sensing Photoacoustic Tomography. 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). 2018;206-212.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    Deng H., Wang X., Cai C. Machine-learning enhanced photoacoustic computed tomography in a limited view configuration. Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies II, vol. 11186. 2019;111860J.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Zhang H., Hongyu L., Nyayapathi N. A new deep learning network for mitigating limited-view and under-sampling artifacts in ring-shaped photoacoustic tomography. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2020;84:101720.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101720

  104. 104.
    Compensating for visibility artefacts in photoacoustic imaging with a deep learning approach providing prediction uncertainties · 2021
    Not checked
  105. 105.

    Lan H., Yang C., Gao F. Better Than Ground-Truth? Photoacoustic Image Reconstruction Beyond Supervised to Compensate Limit-View and Remove Artifacts. 2020.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    Lu T., Chen T., Gao F. LV-GAN: a deep learning approach for limited-view optoacoustic imaging based on hybrid datasets. J. Biophotonics. 2020;e202000325.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbio.202000325

  107. 107.

    Allman D., Reiter A., Bell M.A.L. Photoacoustic source detection and reflection artifact removal enabled by deep learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2018;37(6):1464-1477.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2829662

  108. 108.

    Shan H., Wang G., Yang Y. Accelerated correction of reflection artifacts by deep neural networks in photo-acoustic tomography. Appl. Sci. 2019;9(13):2615.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.
    Deep-learning-based motion-correction algorithm in optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy · 2019
    Not checked
  110. 110.

    Gutta S., Kadimesetty V.S., Kalva S.K. Deep neural network-based bandwidth enhancement of photoacoustic data. J. Biomed. Opt. 2017;22(11):116001.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.22.11.116001

  111. 111.

    Awasthi N., Jain G., Kalva S.K. Deep neural network based sinogram super-resolution and bandwidth enhancement for limited-data photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1109/tuffc.2020.2977210

  112. 112.

    Zhao H., Ke Z., Chen N. A new deep learning method for image deblurring in optical microscopic systems. J. Biophotonics. 2020;13(3):e201960147.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbio.201960147

  113. 113.
    Deep Learning Enables Superior Photoacoustic Imaging at Ultralow Laser Dosages · 2021
    Not checked
  114. 114.

    Rajendran P., Pramanik M. Deep learning approach to improve tangential resolution in photoacoustic tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2020;11(12):7311-7323.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.410145

  115. 115.

    Vu T., Li M., Humayun H. A generative adversarial network for artifact removal in photoacoustic computed tomography with a linear-array transducer. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020;245.

    Not in our library10.1177/1535370220914285

  116. 116.

    Singh M.K.A., Sivasubramanian K., Sato N. Deep learning-enhanced LED-based photoacoustic imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, vol. 11240. 2020;1124038.

    Not in our library

  117. 117.

    Anas E.M.A., Zhang H.K., Kang J. Enabling fast and high quality LED photoacoustic imaging: a recurrent neural networks based approach. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2018;9(8):3852-3866.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.9.003852

  118. 118.

    Sharma A., Pramanik M. Convolutional neural network for resolution enhancement and noise reduction in acoustic resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2020;11(12):6826-6839.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.411257

  119. 119.

    Tang K., Li B., Zhang J. Denoising method for photoacoustic microscopy using deep learning. SPIE Future Sensing Technologies, vol. 11525. 2020;115252P.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    Hariri A., Alipour K., Mantri Y. Deep Learning Improves Contrast in Low-Fluence Photoacoustic Imaging. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.395683

  121. 121.

    Awasthi N., Prabhakar K.R., Kalva S.K. PA-Fuse: deep supervised approach for the fusion of photoacoustic images with distinct reconstruction characteristics. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2019;10(5):2227-2243.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.10.002227

  122. 122.
    Deep Learning for Computer Vision: A Brief Review · 2018
    No notice
  123. 123.

    Cox B., Laufer J., Beard P. Quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction using fluence dependent chromophores. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2010;1(1):201-208.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.1.000201

  124. 124.

    Gröhl J., Kirchner T., Adler T. Confidence estimation for machine learning-based quantitative photoacoustics. J. Imaging. 2018;4(12):147.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Chen T., Lu T., Song S. A deep learning method based on U-Net for quantitative photoacoustic imaging. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, vol. 11240. 2020;112403V.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    Dogdas B., Stout D., Chatziioannou A.F. Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007;52(3):577.

    Not in our library10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/003

  127. 127.

    Bench C., Hauptmann A., Cox B.T. Toward accurate quantitative photoacoustic imaging: learning vascular blood oxygen saturation in three dimensions. J. Biomed. Opt. 2020;25(8):085003.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.25.8.085003

  128. 128.

    Nölke J.-H., Adler T., Gröhl J. Invertible Neural Networks for Uncertainty Quantification in Photoacoustic Imaging. 2020.

    Not in our library

  129. 129.

    Olefir I., Tzoumas S., Restivo C. Deep learning based spectral unmixing for optoacoustic imaging of tissue oxygen saturation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2020;39.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2020.3001750

  130. 130.

    Yang C., Gao F. Eda-net: dense aggregation of deep and shallow information achieves quantitative photoacoustic blood oxygenation imaging deep in human breast. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2019;246-254.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    Yang C., Lan H., Zhong H. Quantitative photoacoustic blood oxygenation imaging using deep residual and recurrent neural network. 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). 2019;741-744.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    Luke G.P., Hoffer-Hawlik K., Van Namen A.C. O-Net: A Convolutional Neural Network for Quantitative Photoacoustic Image Segmentation and Oximetry. 2019.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Hoffer-Hawlik K., Luke G.P. absO2luteU-Net: Tissue Oxygenation Calculation Using Photoacoustic Imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks. 2019.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    Ren Z., Liu G., Ding Y. Effects of multiple factors on the photoacoustic detection of glucose based on artificial neural network. Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics VIII, vol. 10820. 2018;108201E.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    Liu T., Ren Z., Zhang C. Combined effect of multiple factors on the photoacoustic detection of glucose solution based on neural networks. AOPC 2020: Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging; and Biomedical Optics, vol. 11566. 2020;115660W.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    Ma X., Cao M., Shen Q. Adipocyte size evaluation based on photoacoustic spectral analysis combined with deep learning method. Appl. Sci. 2018;8(11):2178.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    Durairaj D.A., Agrawal S., Johnstonbaugh K. Unsupervised deep learning approach for photoacoustic spectral unmixing. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, vol. 11240. 2020;112403H.

    Not in our library

  138. 138.

    Matsuo M., Matsumoto S., Mitchell J.B. Magnetic resonance imaging of the tumor microenvironment in radiotherapy: perfusion, hypoxia, and metabolism. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2014;24(3):210-217.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.02.002

  139. 139.

    Horsman M.R. Measurement of tumor oxygenation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1998;42(4):701-704.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00332-0

  140. 140.

    Moustakidis S., Omar M., Aguirre J. Fully automated identification of skin morphology in raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy using artificial intelligence. Med. Phys. 2019;46(9):4046-4056.

    Not in our library10.1002/mp.13725

  141. 141.

    Lafci B., Merćep E., Morscher S. Efficient segmentation of multi-modal optoacoustic and ultrasound images using convolutional neural networks. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2020, vol. 11240. 2020;112402N.

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    Nitkunanantharajah S., Haedicke K., Moore T.B. Three-dimensional optoacoustic imaging of nailfold capillaries in systemic sclerosis and its potential for disease differentiation using deep learning. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1-9.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-73319-2

  143. 143.

    Wu X., Sanders J., Dundar M. Multi-wavelength photoacoustic imaging for monitoring lesion formation during high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2017, vol. 10064. 2017;100644A.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    Jnawali K., Chinni B., Dogra V. Deep 3D convolutional neural network for automatic cancer tissue detection using multispectral photoacoustic imaging. Medical Imaging 2019: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, vol. 10955. 2019;109551D.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11548-019-02101-1

  145. 145.

    Jnawali K., Chinni B., Dogra V. Transfer learning for automatic cancer tissue detection using multispectral photoacoustic imaging. Medical Imaging 2019: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 10950. 2019;109503W.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11548-019-02101-1

  146. 146.

    Jnawali K., Chinni B., Dogra V. Automatic cancer tissue detection using multispectral photoacoustic imaging. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2020;15(2):309-320.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11548-019-02101-1

  147. 147.

    Zhou X., Feng T., Zhan H. Analysis of photoacoustic signals of hyperosteogeny and osteoporosis. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;1087856.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    Zhang J., Chen B., Zhou M. Photoacoustic image classification and segmentation of breast cancer: a feasibility study. IEEE Access. 2018;7:5457-5466.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Lin Y., Song H., Zheng R. Computer-aided classification system for early endometrial cancer of co-registered photoacoustic and ultrasonic signals. Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics IX, vol. 11190. 2019;111901R.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    Zhang J., Deng K., Chen B. Pathology study for blood vessel of ocular fundus images by photoacoustic tomography. 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). 2018;1-4.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.
    A sparse deep learning approach for automatic segmentation of human vasculature in multispectral optoacoustic tomography · 2020
    Not checked
  152. 152.

    Boink Y.E., Manohar S., Brune C. A partially-learned algorithm for joint photo-acoustic reconstruction and segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2019;39(1):129-139.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2019.2922026

  153. 153.

    Allman D., Assis F., Chrispin J. A deep learning-based approach to identify in vivo catheter tips during photoacoustic-guided cardiac interventions. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2019, vol. 10878. 2019;108785E.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Yuan A.Y., Gao Y., Peng L. Hybrid deep learning network for vascular segmentation in photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2020;11(11):6445-6457.

    Not in our library10.1364/boe.409246

  155. 155.

    Song Z., Fu Y., Qu J. Application of convolutional neural network in signal classification for in vivo photoacoustic flow cytometry. Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics X, vol. 11553. 2020;115532W.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Wilson B.C., Jermyn M., Leblond F. Challenges and opportunities in clinical translation of biomedical optical spectroscopy and imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 2018;23(3):030901.

    Not in our library10.1117/1.jbo.23.3.030901

  157. 157.

    Miotto R., Wang F., Wang S. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236-1246.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbx044

  158. 158.
    Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence · 2019
    No notice
  159. 159.

    Pannucci C.J., Wilkins E.G. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast. Reconstruct. Surg. 2010;126(2):619.

    Not in our library10.1097/prs.0b013e3181de24bc

  160. 160.

    Wirkert S.J., Vemuri A.S., Kenngott H.G. Physiological parameter estimation from multispectral images unleashed. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2017;134-141.

    Not in our library

  161. 161.

    Ilse M., Tomczak J.M., Louizos C. Diva: domain invariant variational autoencoders. Medical Imaging with Deep Learning. 2020;322-348.

    Not in our library

  162. 162.

    Ruvolo P., Eaton E. Ella: an efficient lifelong learning algorithm. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2013;507-515.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    Chen Z., Liu B. Lifelong machine learning. Synth. Lect. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. 2018;12(3):1-207.

    Not in our library

  164. 164.

    Parisi G.I., Kemker R., Part J.L. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: a review. Neural Netw. 2019;113:54-71.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012

  165. 165.

    Finn C., Abbeel P., Levine S. Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks. 2017.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    Caruana R. Multitask learning. Mach. Learn. 1997;28(1):41-75.

    Not in our library

  167. 167.

    Kendall A., Gal Y., Guyon I., Luxburg U.V., Bengio S. What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30. 2017;5574-5584.

    Not in our library

  168. 168.

    Osawa K., Swaroop S., Khan M.E.E. Practical deep learning with bayesian principles. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019;4287-4299.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.

    Gal Y., Ghahramani Z. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2016;1050-1059.

    Not in our library

  170. 170.

    Ardizzone L., Kruse J., Wirkert S. Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networks. 2018.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    Tick J., Pulkkinen A., Tarvainen T. Image reconstruction with uncertainty quantification in photoacoustic tomography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2016;139(4):1951-1961.

    Not in our library10.1121/1.4945990

  172. 172.

    Tick J., Pulkkinen A., Tarvainen T. Modelling of errors due to speed of sound variations in photoacoustic tomography using a bayesian framework. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express. 2019;6(1):015003.

    Not in our library10.1088/2057-1976/ab57d1

  173. 173.

    Kuleshov V., Fenner N., Ermon S. Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regression. 2018.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    Adler T.J., Ardizzone L., Ayala L. Uncertainty handling in intra-operative multispectral imaging with invertible neural networks. International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning-Extended Abstract Track. 2019.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    Adler T.J., Ayala L., Ardizzone L. Out of distribution detection for intra-operative functional imaging. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging and Clinical Image-Based Procedures. 2019;75-82.

    Not in our library

  176. 176.
    Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine · 2019
    No notice
  177. 177.

    Samek W., Wiegand T., Müller K.-R. Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models. 2017.

    Not in our library

  178. 178.

    Steiner D.F., MacDonald R., Liu Y. Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018;42(12):1636.

    Not in our library10.1097/pas.0000000000001151

  179. 179.

    Regensburger A.P., Fonteyne L.M., Jüngert J. Detection of collagens by multispectral optoacoustic tomography as an imaging biomarker for duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat. Med. 2019;25(12):1905-1915.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0669-y

  180. 180.

    Bohndiek S. Addressing photoacoustics standards. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13(5):298.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.

    Fisher M., Takano K. The penumbra, therapeutic time window and acute ischaemic stroke. Bailliere’s Clin. Neurol. 1995;4(2):279-295.

    Not in our library

  182. 182.

    Gamelin J., Maurudis A., Aguirre A. A real-time photoacoustic tomography system for small animals. Opt. Express. 2009;17(13):10489-10498.

    Not in our library10.1364/oe.17.010489

  183. 183.
    Programmable Real-time Clinical Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging System · 2016
    No notice
  184. 184.

    Kirchner T., Sattler F., Gröhl J. Signed real-time delay multiply and sum beamforming for multispectral photoacoustic imaging. J. Imaging. 2018;4(10):121.

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    Shang R., Hoffer-Hawlik K., Luke G.P. A Two-Step-Training Deep Learning Framework for Real-Time Computational Imaging without Physics Priors. 2020.

    Not in our library10.1364/oe.424165

  186. 186.

    Akkus Z., Cai J., Boonrod A. A survey of deep-learning applications in ultrasound: artificial intelligence-powered ultrasound for improving clinical workflow. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2019;16(9):1318-1328.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.004

  187. 187.

    Tonekaboni S., Joshi S., McCradden M.D. What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Use. 2019.

    Not in our library

  188. 188.
    A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends · 2019
    No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.