CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
Sally Hopewell, An-Wen Chan, Gary S Collins et al. · BMJ · 2025
Full textCC BY
Decision Sciences
Filters3 filters applied
Topic
Status
Year
Readable here
Study type
19 papers2 CorrectedQuestions on this topic
Corrected Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Fiona Campbell, Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2023
Full textCC BY
From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology
Kristi K Westphaln, Wendy Regoeczi, Marie Masotya et al. · MethodsX · 2021
Full textCC BY
IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves
Na Liu, Yanhong Zhou, J. Jack Lee · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2021
Full textCC BY
Global Research Trends on Prostate Diseases and Erectile Dysfunction: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study
Chengquan Ma, Hao Su, Hongjun Li · Frontiers in Oncology · 2021
Full textCC BY
A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019
Andrew T. Jebb, Vincent Ng, Louis Tay · Frontiers in Psychology · 2021 · Review
Full textCC BY
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt et al. · Journal of the Medical Library Association · 2021
Full textCC BY
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration
Veronika W Skrivankova, Rebecca C Richmond, Benjamin A R Woolf et al. · BMJ · 2021
Full textCC BY
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2021 · Meta-analysis
Full textCC BY
Mapping Knowledge Structure and Themes Trends of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis
Haiyang Wu, Kunming Cheng, Qiang Guo et al. · Frontiers in Medicine · 2021
Full textCC BY
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
Timothy M Errington, Maya Mathur, Courtney K Soderberg et al. · eLife · 2021 · Meta-analysis
Full textCC BY
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Shona Kirtley, Siw Waffenschmidt et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2021
Full textCC BY
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Lin-Lu Ma, Yun-Yun Wang, Zhi-Hua Yang et al. · Military Medical Research · 2020 · Review
Full textCC BY
COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study
L. B. Mokkink, M. Boers, C. P. M. van der Vleuten et al. · BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2020
Full textCC BY
Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension
Samantha Cruz Rivera, Xiaoxuan Liu, An-Wen Chan et al. · Nature Medicine · 2020 · Review
Full textCC BY
CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis
Theodoros Papakonstantinou, Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Julian P. T. Higgins et al. · Campbell Systematic Reviews · 2020
Full textCC BY
Materials Cloud, a platform for open computational science
Leopold Talirz, Snehal Kumbhar, Elsa Passaro et al. · Scientific Data · 2020
Full textCC BY
Corrected Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese
Feifei Huang, Huijun Wang, Zhihong Wang et al. · BMC Psychiatry · 2020
Full textCC BY
CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
Adriani Nikolakopoulou, Julian P. T. Higgins, Theodoros Papakonstantinou et al. · PLOS Medicine · 2020
Full textCC BY