ARS Conceptual Framework for AI-Driven Systematic Reviews in Sports Science and Medicine
Tiago Fernandes, Marta Castañer, Oleguer Camerino · Apunts: Educación Física y Deportes · 2025
Abstract onlyNot checked
Decision Sciences: papers
Filters2 filters applied
Status
- No notice
- Not checked
- From publisher notices and Retraction Watch. Not checked means nobody has looked yet.
Year
Readable here
Licence
7 papersQuestions on this topic
Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi et al. · Health Research Policy and Systems · 2020
Abstract onlyNot checked
Reproducible research practices, openness and transparency in health economic evaluations: study protocol for a cross-sectional comparative analysis
Brian Hutton, Ferrán Catalá-López, Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo et al. · BMJ Open · 2020
Abstract onlyNot checked
Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Jenny T van der Steen, Gerben ter Riet, Cornelis A van den Bogert et al. · F1000Research · 2019
Abstract onlyNot checked
Optimality quality control thresholds for effective management of multiple sclerosis
Kalpana Polisetty, Tirupathi Rao Padi · Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (SJST) · 2020
Abstract onlyNot checked
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
Christopher J. Colvin, Ruth Garside, Megan Wainwright et al. · Implementation Science · 2018
Full textCC BY
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data
Jane Noyes, Andrew Booth, Simon Lewin et al. · Implementation Science · 2018
Full textCC BY