Not checked for notices yet.

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study

Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi and 6 more

Health Research Policy and Systems · 2020

doi:10.1186/s12961-020-00624-7

References 50

1.
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed · 2016
No notice
2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
3.
A scoping review of rapid review methods · 2015
No notice
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews · 2010
No notice
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
13.
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking · 2009
No notice
14.
How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? · 2009
No notice
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
18.
National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need? · 2010
No notice
19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
23.
Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach · 2012
No notice
24.
All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more · 2015
No notice
25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
31.
What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review · 2016
No notice
32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
38.
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both · 2017
No notice
39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library

All 50 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.