Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems

Abstract

Mucoadhesion is commonly defined as the adhesion between two materials, at least one of which is a mucosal surface. Over the past few decades, mucosal drug delivery has received a great deal of attention. Mucoadhesive dosage forms may be designed to enable prolonged retention at the site of application, providing a controlled rate of drug release for improved therapeutic outcome. Application of dosage forms to mucosal surfaces may be of benefit to drug molecules not amenable to the oral route, such as those that undergo acid degradation or extensive first-pass metabolism. The mucoadhesive ability of a dosage form is dependent upon a variety of factors, including the nature of the mucosal tissue and the physicochemical properties of the polymeric formulation. This review article aims to provide an overview of the various aspects of mucoadhesion, mucoadhesive materials, factors affecting mucoadhesion, evaluating methods, and finally various mucoadhesive drug delivery systems (buccal, nasal, ocular, gastro, vaginal, and rectal).

References 113

1. 1.

   Good WR. Transdermal nitro-controlled delivery of nitroglycerin via the transdermal route. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1983;9:647-70.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Henriksen I, Green KL, Smart JD, Smistad G, Karlsen J. Bioadhesion of Hydrated Chitosans: An in vitro and in vivo Study. Int J Pharm. 1996;145:231-40.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Leung SH, Robinson JR. The Contribution of anionic polymer structural features related to mucoadhesion. J Control Release. 1988;5:223-31.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Longer MA, Robinson JR. Fundamental aspects of bioadhesion. Pharmacy Int. 1986;7:114-7.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   McBain JW, Hopkins DG. On adhesives and adhesive action. J Phys Chem. 1925;29:188-204.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Pritchard WH, Alder D. Aspects of adhesion 6. 1970;II-23.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Wake WC. Adhesion and the Formulation of Adhesives. 1982.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Deraguin BV, Smilga VP. Adhesion: Fundamentals and Practice. 1969.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Jimenez-Castellanos MR, Zia H, Rhodes CT. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1993;19:143-94.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Duchene D, Touchard F, Peppas NA. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1988;14:283-18.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J Control Release. 1985;2:257-75.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Reinhart CP, Peppas NA. Solute diffusion in swollen membranes ii. influence of crosslinking on diffusion properties. J Memb Sci. 1984;18:227-39.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Ahuja A, Khar RK, Ali J. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997;23:489-515.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Huntsberger JR. Mechanisms of adhesion. J Pain Technol. 1967;39:199-211.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Kinloch AJ. The science of adhesion I.Surface and interfacial aspects. J Material Sci. 1980;15:2141.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Yang X, Robinson JR, Okano T. Bioadhesion in Mucosal Drug Delivery. Biorelated Polymers and Gels. 1998.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SH. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: Structure–property relationships. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1988;5:21-67.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Smart JD, Nicholls TJ, Green KL, Rogers DJ, Cook JD. Lectins in Drug Delivery: a study of the acute local irritancy of the lectins from Solanum tuberosum and helix pomatia. Eur J Pharm Sci. 1999;9:93-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0928-0987(99)00050-0

19. 19.

    Naisbett B, Woodley J. The potential use of tomato lectin for oral drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 1994;107:223-30.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Nicholls TJ, Green KL, Rogers DJ, Cook JD, Wolowacz S, Smart JD. Lectins in ocular drug delivery.An investigation of lectin binding sites on the corneal and conjunctival surfaces. Int J Pharm. 1996;138:175-83.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Hornof M, Weyenberg W, Ludwig A, Bernkop-Schnurch A. A mucoadhesive ophthalmic insert based on thiolated poly(acrylic) acid: Development and in vivo evaluation in human volunteers. J Control Release. 2003;89:419-28.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00135-4

22. 22.

    Albrecht K, Zirm EJ, Palmberger TF, Schlocker W, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Preparation of thiomer microparticles and in vitro evaluation of parameters influencing their mucoadhesive properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2006;32:1149-57.

    Not in our library10.1080/03639040600712334

23. 23.

    Peppas NA, Little MD, Huang Y, Wise DL. Bioadhesive Controlled Release Systems. Handbook of pharmaceutical controlled release technology. 2000;255-69.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Gurny R, Meyer JM, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: Design, testing and analysis. Biomaterials. 1984;5:336-40.

    Not in our library10.1016/0142-9612(84)90031-0

25. 25.

    Gudeman L, Peppas NA. Preparation and characterisation of ph- sensitive, interpenetrating networks of poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(acrylic acid). J Appl Polym Sci. 1995;55:919-28.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    McCarron PA, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF, Andrews GP, Zawislak A, Price JH. Influence of plasticiser type and storage conditions on the properties of poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic anhydride) bioadhesive films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004;91:1576-89.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Park H, Robinson JR. Physicochemical properties of water soluble polymers important to mucin/epithelium adhesion. J Control Release. 1985;2:47-7.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Blanco Fuente H, AnguianoIgea S, OteroEspinar FJ, BlancoMendez J. In-vitro bioadhesion of carbopol hydrogels. Int J Pharm. 1996;142:169-74.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Donnelly RF, McCarron PA, Tunney MM, Woolfson AD. Potential of photodynamic therapy in treatment of fungal infections of the mouth.design and characterisation of a mucoadhesive patch containing toluidine Blue O. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;86:59-69.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2006.07.011

30. 30.

    Smart JD. An in vitro assessment of some mucoadhesive dosage forms. Int J Pharm. 1991;73:69-74.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Kamath KR, Park K, Swarbrick J, Boylan JC. Mucosal Adhesive Preparations. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. 1992;133.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Lehr CM, Poelma FG. An Estimate of turnover time of intestinal mucus gel layer in the Rat in situ Loop. Int J Pharm. 1991;70:235.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Park K, Park H, Lenaerts V, Gurney R. Test methods of bioadhesion, Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. 1990.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    McCarron PA, Donnelly RF, Zawislak A, Woolfson AD, Price JH, McClelland R. Evaluation of a Water-soluble Bioadhesive patch for photodynamic therapy of vulval lesions. Int J Pharm. 2005;293:11-23.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.11.035

35. 35.

    McCarron PA, Donnelly RF, Zawislak A, Woolfson AD. Design and evaluation of a water-soluble bioadhesive patch formulation for cutaneous delivery of 5-aminolevulinic acid to superficial neoplastic lesions. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27:268-79.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2005.10.009

36. 36.

    Donnelly RF, McCarron PA, Zawislak AA, Woolfson AD. Design and physicochemical characterisation of a bioadhesive patch for dose-controlled topical delivery of imiquimod. Int J Pharm. 2006;307:318-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.023

37. 37.

    Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res. 1990;7:491-5.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1015812615635

38. 38.

    Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Lippoli G, Bertoni M, Ferrari F, Caramella C, et al. Influence of mucin type on polymer-mucin rheological interactions. Biometerials. 1995;16:1073-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/0142-9612(95)98903-r

39. 39.

    Hagerstrom H, Paulsson M, Edsman K. Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyte gels in simulated physiological conditions using a rheological method. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;9:301-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0928-0987(99)00070-6

40. 40.

    Rossi S, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride--mucin rheological interaction: Influence of polymer concentration and polymer: Mucin weight ratio. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;12:479-85.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0928-0987(00)00194-9

Cited by papers we hold 6

• Smart bioadhesives for wound healing and closure · 2023
  No notice
• Strategic Approaches for Colon Targeted Drug Delivery: An Overview of Recent Advancements · 2020
  No notice
• Chitosan and its Derivatives for Ocular Delivery Formulations: Recent Advances and Developments · 2020
  No notice
• Penetration Enhancers in Ocular Drug Delivery · 2019
  No notice
• Mucosal Applications of Poloxamer 407-Based Hydrogels: An Overview · 2018
  No notice
• Ophthalmic Drug Dosage Forms: Characterisation and Research Methods · 2014
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.