No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Transcription Factors and Plants Response to Drought Stress: Current Understanding and Future Directions

Rohit Joshi, Shabir H. Wani, Balwant Singh and 5 more

Frontiers in Plant Science · 2016 · Review

doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01029

Abstract

Increasing vulnerability of plants to a variety of stresses such as drought, salt and extreme temperatures poses a global threat to sustained growth and productivity of major crops. Of these stresses, drought represents a considerable threat to plant growth and development. In view of this, developing staple food cultivars with improved drought tolerance emerges as the most sustainable solution toward improving crop productivity in a scenario of climate change. In parallel, unraveling the genetic architecture and the targeted identification of molecular networks using modern "OMICS" analyses, that can underpin drought tolerance mechanisms, is urgently required. Importantly, integrated studies intending to elucidate complex mechanisms can bridge the gap existing in our current knowledge about drought stress tolerance in plants. It is now well established that drought tolerance is regulated by several genes, including transcription factors (TFs) that enable plants to withstand unfavorable conditions, and these remain potential genomic candidates for their wide application in crop breeding. These TFs represent the key molecular switches orchestrating the regulation of plant developmental processes in response to a variety of stresses. The current review aims to offer a deeper understanding of TFs engaged in regulating plant's response under drought stress and to devise potential strategies to improve plant tolerance against drought.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

1The 21st century agriculture is facing a daunting challenge of attaining nearly up to 70% increase in crop productivity by 2050. Also, crop productivity needs to witness up to 40% increase by 2015 in view of the cultivated area being increasingly affected by stresses. Frequent changes in climatic conditions also affect the crop yield (such as flooding after high temperature), which led scientists to undertake research on this aspect in recent time around the world. Among the various abiotic factors challenging crop production globally, drought stress is increasingly playing a crucial role. Drought is a meteorological term and is commonly defined as a combined interplay of reduced rainfall, decreasing ground water table, limiting water availability with rise in temperature. With global climatic vagaries registering escalated frequency, the global drought incidence is likely to swell beyond 20% by the end of this century, especially in Central and South American corn belt, and Central and Western Europic regions. Similarly in South Asia, where more than 75% of the farmers are dependent on rainfed agriculture, a damage of about US$ 84 billion is predicted owing to the global climate change. Most of the crops are susceptible to drought stress, resulting in more than 50% yield losses. In South and Southeast Asia, drought stress causes about 40% annual loss in productivity, which results in 58% of income loss. Similarly, regional climate change models showed Mediterranean regions and Middle East among the ‘Hot-spots’ of severe drought, directly affecting crop failures and livestock death. Brazil, which is the second highest producer (40%) of soybean has lost greater than 20% of their productivity because of the occurrence of drought during 2003–2005. The uneven distribution of rainfall and ground water shortage often create drought stress conditions in the environment, which eventually leads to an enormous decrease in the grain yield potential.

2Upon exposure to drought, plants manifest multiple impairments including cell injury through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and increasing cellular temperature, which result in an increase in the viscosity of cellular contents, alterations in the protein–protein interactions, protein aggregation, and denaturation. Cell shrinkage followed by a marked decline in cellular volume becomes evident as an instant symptom caused by dehydration. Besides, greater accumulation of solutes causes toxicity and negatively affects functioning of some enzymes, often leading to reduced photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE). Under prolonged dehydration, plants exhibit leaf rolling followed by wilting and bleaching that eventually result in death of the plant. Reproductive stages, i.e., flowering as well as seed development are especially sensitive to drought stress. A reduction in number of grains per spike, grain filling duration, and dry matter accumulation, leading to decreased grain weight in barley kernels has already been reported earlier. Recently, leaf area, leaf weight as well as leaf growth rate were also reported to hold great relevance while breeding crops grown under Mediterranean environmental conditions such as drought stress. Substantial progress has already been made to enhance crop productivity using conventional breeding methods. However, development of drought tolerant cultivars using conventional breeding approach is greatly restricted by low heritability of drought tolerance, narrow genetic variation existing in the crop’s exploitable genetic pool, complex and multigenic nature of this trait and high magnitude of environmental interactions.

3Considering global food security, immediate assessment of drought stress impact and innovative techniques to breed tolerant and productive cultivars under dramatically changing climate are essentially warranted. As a means to provide crop-based answer to burgeoning issues like food insecurity and malnutrition, cereals constitute a vital role as major fraction in the diet, especially in developing nations. Rice, wheat and maize are major cereal crops in the world; therefore less water availability exerts profound consequences. Development of advanced genotypes with improved stress tolerance and wider adaptability is a simple, cost-effective and eco-friendly approach to cope with drought stressed scenarios.

4Drought tolerance is an outcome of a series of molecular, cellular, and physiological processes including induction/repression of various genes that cause accumulation of various osmolytes, improved antioxidant system, reduced transpiration, inhibited shoot growth, and decreased tillering. Besides, the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is reported to be abundant under water-deficit conditions and this in turn causes stomata closure and induces expression of various stress-related genes. It has been shown that drought inducible gene expression is also governed by ABA-independent regulatory system. Plant’s ability to cope with water deficit depends largely on its water status, which changes with environmental conditions. Thus, incorporating drought stress tolerance in crops becomes imperative under changing climatic conditions and it could be a promising approach to meet the global food demand. In this context, unraveling the molecular mechanisms that control the perception and transduction of stress signals to initiate adaptive responses is crucial for engineering drought stress tolerance in plants.

5Notable progress has been made toward this end by utilizing modern genetics and functional genomics approaches such as transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics and consequently, various drought stress responsive genes have been identified and characterized in crops. These key genes mainly code for proteins that have either metabolic or regulatory roles, such as those involved in detoxification, osmolyte biosynthesis, proteolysis of cellular substrates, water channel, ion transporter, heat shock protein (HSP), and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) protein. On the other hand, the regulatory class primarily comprises of TFs (AREB, AP2/ERF, NAC, bZIP, MYC, and MYB), signaling protein kinases [mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPK), calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPK), receptor protein kinases, ribosomal protein kinases, and transcription regulation protein kinases] and protein phosphatases (phosphoesterases and phospholipase), which synchronize signal transduction and expression of genes during stress responses. Various desiccation-induced genes have been characterized, including those encoding ABA biosynthetic pathway, osmo-protectants such as proline, trehalose, mannitol, ectoine, glycine betaine providing tolerance to cellular dehydration, cellular enzymes, signaling proteins, and TFs. Several of these regulatory genes including TFs were found to play essential roles in multiple abiotic stress responses via regulating downstream stress-responsive genes. As illustrated in Figure 1, TFs regulate gene expression through binding to cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region of different stress-related genes. Thus, genetic modification of the expression of these regulatory genes can greatly influence plant stress tolerance because they further regulate many downstream stress-responsive genes at a given time. Among these regulatory genes, stress-responsive TFs have gained widespread attention on account of their significant role in plant stress tolerance and allelic variations were examined across Indian wild rice population by researchers in genes with respect to abiotic stresses. In this article, we elaborate on the key TFs that contribute toward drought stress tolerance, and their networks, cross-talks and potential utilization in crop improvement programs.

Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Plant’s Response toward Drought Stress

6The response of any crop to drought stress depends primarily on the growth stage and WUE. For example, reproductive stage is considered critically susceptible to drought stress in various crops. As sessile organisms, plants have evolved several defense mechanisms involving various molecular, physiological and biochemical alterations in response to low soil moisture. Visible symptoms describing drought tolerance include leaf rolling, stay green ability, epicuticular wax deposition, closing of stomata, enhanced root length leading to higher WUE, photochemical quenching, photoinhibition resistance, osmotic adjustment, and membrane stabilization at the cellular level. Leaf rolling, a foremost symptom, constitutes an initial survival mechanism against osmotic stress that can minimize canopy temperature and transpiration rate, thereby improving WUE. Thus, species maintaining higher relative water content (RWC) under osmotic stress are reported to be less susceptible to low water potential, and thus retain their growth and productivity. It was also observed that crop growth is primarily supported by the soil moisture surrounding plant root system. Therefore, total root area being directly affected by the decreased soil water content deserves greater attention. It was reported that osmotic stress-induced premature differentiation caused growth inhibition of primary roots and allows outgrowth of lateral roots. A range of biochemical changes have also shown in response to drought stress, including higher accumulation of osmolytes, ROS, antioxidant species, and antioxidative enzymes. These osmolytes are reported to have principal role in maintaining enzyme activity and membrane stability under osmotic stress.

7Drought stress in plants occurs either due to poor quantity of water, i.e., little rainfall or due to insufficient quality of water, i.e., saline habitats. As a means to survive under water stress conditions, plants respond by alteration in expression of several genes and regulate them through complex transcriptional networks. It is therefore imperative to dissect stress regulatory mechanisms and to pinpoint the key regulators that could eventually be harnessed to breed or engineer stress tolerant plants. By analyzing plant genomes and employing modern OMICS tools, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, significant progress has been made in elucidating the stress signaling pathways involved in drought stress response. Few of these genes associated with these transcriptional networks have been characterized in various molecular studies and have been found to be key contributors toward drought stress tolerance in transgenic plants.

8The signaling pathway of any abiotic stress involves certain key steps such as signal perception, transduction, responsiveness, combined with activation of physiological, and metabolic reactions. In this process, plant cells first perceive stress stimulus through sensors or receptors localized mostly at the cell membrane. Then, the receiver signaling molecules activate the intracellular ones through second messengers like calcium ions, inositol phosphate, ROS, cyclic nucleotides (cAMP and cGMP), sugars and nitric oxide. Subsequently, these second messengers initiate the corresponding signaling pathways to transduce the signals. The phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins regulated by protein kinases and phosphatases, respectively, is a significant and effective mechanism in several signal transduction pathways. For example, the MAPKs and CDPKs are well known for their role in drought stress signaling pathways. At the end of the phosphorylation cascade, TFs are activated or suppressed by protein kinases or phosphatases, and directly regulate the expression of an array of downstream genes by interacting with the specific cis-elements in their promoter region. In addition, TFs themselves are regulated at the transcription level by other upstream components and after several modifications at the post-transcription level, such as ubiquitination and sumoylation, they form a complex regulatory network which modulates the expression of stress responsive genes, regulating various physiological and metabolic processes. In the past few decades, considerable research has been carried out toward identification and characterization of different TFs that contribute toward drought stress response.

TFs Can Induce a Range of Stress Responsive Genes in Plants

9The multifarious signaling pathways of water stress in plants consist of several proteins, i.e., TFs, enzymes, functional proteins, molecular chaperones, and metabolites. Genetic engineering approaches to mitigate the challenge of drought stress in plants involve the overexpression of these TFs, enzymes and other metabolites. In recent years, a wide range of TF families holding relevance with drought stress response have been identified. During the signal transduction, TFs directly regulate the expression of the associated genes via serving as molecular switches. These TFs interact specifically with cis-elements located in the promoter region of the genes they regulate. In plants, a large proportion of genes in the genome (up to 10%) potentially encode TFs, which are categorized into different gene families such as AREB, DREB, MYB, WRKY, NAC, and bZIP based on the distinct structure of their DNA-binding domain. In Arabidopsis nearly 6% of the proteome is dedicated to TFs. Among these TF genes, several have been reported to respond under drought stress through pathways dependent/independent of ABA. Promising results have been obtained concerning engineering of some TF genes with an aim to improve tolerance against drought stress. In this section, we describe major TF families known to be responsible for drought stress tolerance and discuss the scope for manipulating them in order to obtain transgenic plants with enhanced drought tolerance.

AREB/ABF TFs

10Several research groups have elucidated the molecular mechanism related to drought stress transcriptional networks in plants. Under osmotic stress conditions, detailed molecular analyses have found abscisic acid-responsive element binding protein (AREB)/ABFs (ABRE binding factor) as a major transcriptional activator modulating the expression of genes during ABA signaling. ABA-responsive gene expression is controlled by a conserved ABRE (PyACGTGG/TC) cis-element in its promoter region (Figure 1). Studies have revealed the essential role of several ABRE or its combinations with coupling elements (CE) during ABA-responsive genes expression. Structurally, AREB/ABFs consist of four SnRK2 phosphorylation sites containing conserved domains that regulate ABA-dependent gene expression. It was found that vascular tissue specific cells produce ABA and transfer them to target cells. It was also demonstrated that ABA is synthesized within guard cells and vascular tissue specific cells. In Arabidopsis, five genes are known to code for NCED (9-cis-epoxy carotenoid dioxygenase), a major enzyme in ABA biosynthesis and expression. Of these, NCED3 showed higher expression under dehydration and was reported to be under the regulation of an AG-box recognition sequence located 2248 bp upstream to its transcriptional start site. ABA is perceived by an ABA-bound PYL/PYR/RCARs receptor complex combined with PP2Cs, and subsequently SnRK2s is released. The activated SnRKs phosphorylate the downstream proteins like AREB/ABF TFs, which then bind to the ABRE cis-element (PyACGTGG/TC). In the absence of ABA, PP2Cs inhibit ABA signaling pathway by dephosphorylating SnRK2s. Of the nine AREB/ABF family members, AREB1/ABF2 regulates ABA signaling during drought stress at the vegetative stage (Figure 1). ABA is essential for proper functioning of AREB1, and ABA-dependent phosphorylation regulates its activity. Overexpression of AREB1 was shown to improve drought tolerance in Arabidopsis, rice and soybean. Recently it was shown that Arabidopsis plants overexpressing wheat transcription factor TaAREB3 have enhanced ABA sensitivity and drought tolerance (Table 1). In primary species, group A PP2Cs have evolved as essential regulators providing osmotic stress tolerance.

AP2/ERF TFs

11APETALA2/Ethylene Response Element binding Factors (AP2/ERF) family covers a large group of plant-specific TFs and is characterized by the presence of a much-conserved AP2/ERF DNA-binding domain. This domain binds with the GCC box, which is a DNA sequence having role in the ethylene-responsive transcription. AP2/ERFBP TFs perform diverse roles in plant biological processes, such as cell proliferation, vegetative and reproductive development, plant hormone responses, and abiotic/biotic stress responses. Genome-wide analyses have resulted in the identification of a multitude of AP2/ERFBP members across several plant species such as 145 in Arabidopsis, 170 in rice, 178 in sorghum, 200 in poplar, 291 in Chinese cabbage, 171 in foxtail millet, and 116 in moso bamboo. Based on the number and similarity of AP2/ERF domains, the family is further categorized into four major subfamilies: AP2 (Apetala 2), RAV (related to ABI3/VP1), DREB (dehydration-responsive element-binding protein), and ERF. Apropos of the plant abiotic and biotic stress response, ERF and DREB subfamilies have been extensively studied. Induced, respectively, by cold and dehydration, DREB1/CBF (with 11 genes in rice) and DREB2 (six genes in rice) function in ABA-independent manner. The promoter analysis of drought stress regulated genes having ABA-independent expression in Arabidopsis illustrated a cis-element with A/GCCGAC sequence (known as DRE/CRT: ). Functional similarities were observed in the downstream genes of DREB1A and DREB2A by microarray analysis, however, differential expression was established during carbohydrate metabolism in transgenic plants. Four orthologs of CBF/DREB1A in rice viz. OsDREB1A, OsDREB1B, OsDREB1C, and OsDREB1D have already been characterized. DREB1/CBF TFs specifically interact with the DRE/CRT and regulate the expression of several abiotic stress-responsive genes. Different studies confirmed that DREB1/CBF genes expression is differentially regulated by other genes like ICE1, HOS1, MYB15, SIZ1, PIF7, CAMTA3, and a clock component. Plants overexpressing DREB1/CBF showed enhanced expression of several stress responsive genes providing improved tolerance toward drought including tomato, chrysanthemum, potato, soybean, rice, tobacco, sugarcane, groundnut, peanut, and wheat. In rice, DREB1/CBF-type TFs conferred higher drought tolerance besides expression of cold-responsive genes. experimentally demonstrated improved survival of NERICA1 (an upland rice cultivar) under drought stress through expressing Arabidopsis DREB1C in the transgenic plants. OsDREB1F is reported to be induced by drought stress and ABA application. Overexpression of OsDREB1G is also known to promote drought tolerance. Similarly, constitutive expression of DREB1/CBF3 in transgenic plants led to improved tolerance against salinity, heat and cold. Higher accumulation of osmoprotectants, such as free proline and soluble sugars were recorded in the transgenic rice plants overexpressing DREB1A. More recently, transgenic tobacco with elevated tolerance level against drought and salt was obtained through over-expression of SsCBF4 from succulent halophyte Suaeda salsa (Table 1). An affymetrix microarray based analysis of transgenic rice plants facilitated the identification of 404 genes as induced or suppressed by DREB1BI when compared to their respective wild types.

12A conserved regulatory mechanism has been established after examining DREB2-type proteins across several crop species such as wheat, maize, rice, barley, and sunflower. Rice harbors six DREB2 family genes while Arabidopsis contains eight DREB2 genes of which DREB2A and DREB2B rendered higher induction under drought stress. The constitutive as well as stress inducible expression of OsDREB2A and OsDREB2B in transgenic plants has resulted in enhanced tolerance toward osmotic stress. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing OsDREB2B displayed enhanced expression of DREB2A target genes and improved tolerance toward drought stress. Taken together, these reports suggest that OsDREB2 is a major gene encoding for DREB2-type TF that holds great importance in stress-responsive gene expression. However, in addition to imparting increased drought tolerance, over expression of DREB2A was reported to cause significant growth defects. In contrast, no growth defects were seen in case of Arabidopsis and soybean transgenics where stress-inducible expression of DREB2A led to enhanced drought tolerance. Under normal condition, DREB2A is regulated by two mechanisms (i) GRF7 (growth-regulating factor7) inhibits expression of DREB2A binding to its short promoter region and (ii) targeted degradation by 26S proteasome mediated proteolysis assisted by DRIP1 (DREB2A- interacting protein1) and DRIP2 protein. In other words, conditional expression of DREB2A under drought stress offers a way to minimize the inefficient loss of energy.

13Besides DREB1A and DREB2 members, various other AP2/ERF-type and AP2/ERF-like TFs were also characterized in rice with an aim to improve abiotic stress tolerance. Likewise, overexpression of Arabidopsis HARDY gene (a subgroup of A-4 AP2/ERF family) in Trifolium led to enhanced osmotic stress tolerance. OsDERF1 has been established as a negative modulator in osmotic adjustment by interacting directly with GCC box located in the promoter of OsERF3. Furthermore, OsERF3 contains an ethylene-responsive element-binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif, which transcriptionally represses the ethylene production along with drought tolerance. Mutant EAR lines showed enhanced ethylene emission and drought tolerance as compared to overexpressing as well as wild type plants. However, reported OsERF4a as a positive regulator of plant growth and drought tolerance in rice. In addition, ectopic expression of tomato JERF3 alleviates soluble sugars and proline with increased drought tolerance in rice. Similarly, overexpression of another AP2/ERF TF showed increased drought, cold, and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic rice (Table 1).

NAC TFs

14The NAC gene family is the largest and plant specific TF family. The NAC acronym is derived from three proteins having a specific NAC domain from petunia, i.e., NAM (no apical meristem) and ATAF1/2 and CUC2 (cup-shaped cotyledon) in Arabidopsis. Characteristically, a NAC TF comprises of a highly conserved DNA binding NAC domain in the N-terminal region and a variable C-terminal transcriptional regulatory region. The NAC domain is linked with DNA binding, nucleus-oriented localization and formation of homodimers or heterodimers with similar domains, while the C-terminal functions in transcriptional regulation. The NAC TFs modulate downstream drought inducible EARLY RESPONSE TO DEHYDRATION1 (ERD1) gene transcription by interacting with NAC recognition sequence (NACRS) having CACG core-DNA binding motif in its promoter. In rice, SNAC1 TFs were reported to confer drought tolerance through regulating downstream genes OsPP18, a PP2C in ABA independent pathways. To date, genome wide characterization has offered numerous putative NAC TFs across different plant species like 204 in Chinese cabbage, 152 in soybean, 152 in maize, 151 in rice, 117 in Arabidopsis and 74 in grape. In rice, several NAC genes were reported to be induced during early stages of salt and drought stresses. The role of NAC TFs in drought stress response is further supported by several transcriptome-based analyses undertaken in different crops; examples include 40 NAC genes in rice, 38 NAC genes in soybean. These stress-responsive NAC genes also showed differential expression patterns such as tissue-specific, developmental stage-specific or stress-specific expression, thereby suggesting their active involvement in the complex signaling networks during plant stress responses. In Arabidopsis, drought tolerance was found to be elevated by overexpressing three genes, i.e., ANACO19, ANACO55, ANACO72. Similarly, overexpression of stress responsive NAC1 (SNAC1) in rice provides tolerance against severe drought stress at the reproductive stage in field conditions without a change in their phenotype or yield penalty. In another study it was found that under drought stress SNAC1 was induced in guard cells and its over-expression reduced transpirational losses due to increased stomatal closure. Highlighting the importance of SNAC1 gene, genetic variation of this gene was assessed among Indian wild rice and as a result, discovery of four haplotypes associated with tolerance might be useful for developing drought tolerant crops. Similarly, OsNAC5 expression was reported to be induced under drought, cold, ABA, and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. Overexpressors of OsNAC5 were reported to serve as transcriptional activators that regulate the stress-responsive gene expression. Function of OsNAC5 in drought tolerance was examined by RNA interference (RNAi) and overexpression study in transgenic rice and Arabidopsis. In addition, OsNAC6/SNAC2 is also known to be induced by cold, drought, salinity and ABA. Furthermore, overexpressing TaNAC2 and TaNAC29 in Arabidopsis resulted in enhanced drought, salt and cold stress tolerance along with higher transcript levels of stress-responsive genes and improved physiological parameters. Contrary to this, OsNAC6 overexpressing rice plants had reduced growth and low yield under normal conditions even though these plants remained tolerant for dehydration and salinity stresses. Based on these studies, OsNAC6 could be established as a potent functional regulator in drought stress response. Interestingly, overexpression of HvSNAC1 in barley not only improved drought tolerance but also provided resistance against fungal infection of Ramularia collo-cygni causing leaf spot.

15Enhanced abiotic stress tolerance in rice caused by overexpressing SNACs was evident when using a root-specific promoter RCc3. Similarly, thicker roots and higher grain yield under drought stress were observed in transgenic rice plants overexpressing OsNAC10, OsNAC5, and OsNAC9/SNAC1 regulated by root specific promoter. Furthermore, microarray analysis of these transgenic plants revealed 62 downstream genes to be differentially expressed, which included P450, Zn-finger, HAK5, 2OG-Fe(II), NCED, NAC, KUP3, calcium-transporting ATPase, germin-like protein, and meristem protein. Of these, only 17 were found to be upregulated. However, as demonstrated by in soybean GmNAC11 was reported to function as a transcriptional activator, whereas GmNAC20 acted as a mild repressor with C-terminal transcriptional activation activity and its overexpression increases lateral root development in transgenic plants. This study established GmNAC20 as a regulator of stress tolerance, which serves by activating DREB/CBF-COR pathway and lateral root formation by modulating auxin signaling genes (Table 1). Thus, precise manipulation of SNACs with suitable promoter offers a promising way to substantially alter drought stress response in plants.

bZIP TFs

16The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family contains a conserved bZIP domain, which is composed of a highly basic nuclear localization and DNA binding region at the N-terminus and a leucine-rich motif for dimerization at the C-terminus. Besides regulating plant growth and development, bZIP TFs remain crucial concerning abiotic stress response such as drought. Members of the bZIP TF family have been isolated and characterized in various eukaryotes. Examples include 17 in Saccharomyces, 31 in Caenorhabditis, 55 in grapevine, 75 in Arabidopsis, 89 in rice, 89 in barley, 92 in sorghum, 96 in Brachypodium distachyon, 125 in maize, and 131 in soybean. Though the physiological role of their homologs with putative zinc finger motif remains unclear, studies on abiotic stress responses have confirmed bZIP TFs to be ABA inducible, i.e., these regulate the expression of stress-related genes in ABA-dependent manner after binding with the promoter region of specific ABRE.

17characterized a novel gene ThZF1 from Thellungiella halophila that encodes a functional TF. It contains two conserved Cys-2/His-2 regions with conserved DNA-binding motif similar to the members of Arabidopsis ZFP family. Drought and salinity are reported to induce the transcription of this gene. Ectopic expression of ThZF1 in Arabidopsis mutant azf2 revealed its similarity with Arabidopsis AZF2 in plant development and downstream gene regulation. Likewise, transgenic rice plants overexpressing OsbZIP16 exhibited significantly higher drought tolerance at both seedling and tillering stages. Under drought stress conditions its downstream drought-inducible genes showed significantly higher expression levels in transgenics than the corresponding wild types. Though OsbZIP16 is reported to be ABA-inducible, overexpression of OsbZIP16 renders transgenic plants more sensitive to ABA. A recent study in Arabidopsis revealed that overexpression of TabZIP60 improved plant’s tolerance against stresses like drought, salt and freezing along with increasing sensitivity to ABA.

18Similarly, OsbZIP23, a close relative of Arabidopsis homologs ABF/AREB, was reported to be a principle regulator of ABA-dependent pathways. Rice plants overexpressing OsbZIP23 caused greater ABA sensitivity at both germination and post-germination stages along with increased drought and salt stress tolerance. Microarray analysis showed differential expression of several downstream genes including stress-related TFs, protein kinases, dehydrins and LEA proteins. OsbZIP46 also belong to the subfamily of OsbZIP23 and its constitutively active form OsbZIP46CA1 was developed by mutating OsbZIP46 domain D. Rice plants overexpressing OsbZIP46CA1 showed enhanced drought tolerance. Differentially expressed downstream genes different from those of OsbZIP23 downstream genes were uncovered through a microarray analysis, which in turn suggested independent regulatory mechanisms of OsbZIP46CA1 and OsbZIP23. In contrast, growth of OsbZIP23 or OsbZIP46CA1 overexpressing rice plants is reduced under drought stress. Furthermore, ABF3 belonging to similar subfamily as OsbZIP46 and OsbZIP23 improved drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. OsbZIP16 and OsbZIP71 are classified into group IV of the rice bZIP subfamily. After ABA treatment transgenic rice plants overexpressing OsbZIP16 showed enhanced drought tolerance and reduced plant growth. However, OsbZIP71 overexpressing rice transgenics with a constitutive promoter or a stress-inducible RD29A promoter showed enhanced drought, salt, and osmotic stress tolerance. Collectively, these reports confirmed the involvement of bZIP TFs in ABA signaling, which could be harnessed for developing better genotypes endowed with drought tolerance.

Interactions among Multiple TFs

19Drought stress is an unpredictable event and it varies in severity and duration. This results in both general and specific effects on plant growth and development. Thus, plant response toward drought stress is dynamic, which involves multiple stress perception and signal transduction pathways, which may crosstalk at various steps in the pathways. For this reason, plants have evolved complex regulatory mehanisms, including metabolic adjustment and gene expression toward physiological and morphological adaptation. Moreover, extensive overlap between signal interactions and adaptation mechanisms can be both synergistic and antagonistic, resulting in positive and negative functional outcomes. This type of regulation allows cell to respond rapidly to changes such as drought stress. TFs are of key importance in these signaling cascades and in generating specificity in stress responses. Interactions among different TFs have made significant advances over recent years and were documented recently by. The TFs control transcription of their downstream genes by interacting with other proteins and binding to a consensus sequence in promoters. Identification of these downstream genes becomes imperative to elucidate molecular machineries of gene activation or repression (Figure 1).

20Drought responsive gene promoters contain a DRE/CRT motif where ABA-independent DREB/CBF TF binds and act as a coupling element for ABRE in ABA-dependent gene expression. It was already shown that DREB1A/CBF3, DREB2A, and DREB2C proteins interact with AREB/ABF. Thus, there exists a crosstalk between ABA-dependent and independent signaling and regulatory pathways (Figure 1). Under osmotic stress conditions, AREB/ABF TFs and SnRK2s regulate the transcriptional activation of DREB2A gene, suggesting a complex interaction between DREB and AREB regulatory regions at the transcript and protein level. Similar interactions were also reported in between AREB/ABFs and NACs. In addition, regulation of ABA-dependent gene expression of ABRE regulons by SNAC TFs was confirmed when reported that Arabidopsis SNAC transcription factor ATAF1 directly modulates ABA biosynthetic gene NCED3. By contrast, SNAC gene promoter contains ABRE region. Under dehydration and osmotic stress, ANAC096 was also found to interact with ABF2/AREB1 and ABF4/AREB2. Furthermore, correlation among DREB/CBFs and AP2/ERFs at the transcript levels was also confirmed when Arabidopsis ERF1 was shown to regulate transcript expression of a gene by coupling with two different cis-elements, the GCC box and DRE/CRT during stress response. Recently, it was shown that bZIP TFs VEG2 and FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD) interact with nuclear protein CONSTANS (CO) and positively regulate signaling of flowering activator FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) proteins. TFs activate several functional genes encoding wide range of proteins involved in osmolyte production, ROS scavenging and detoxification, macromolecule protection and ubiquitination. As envisaged by, such versatility in TFs functioning might have evolved to ensure plants’ longevity, survival and reproductive success under environmental stresses. Our current knowledge about these target genes stems mainly from the studies performed using large-scale transcriptome analyses in plants that overexpress TFs. Deeper analyses can better elucidate their roles under drought response.

Future Directions

21Here, we highlighted the increasingly important roles of TFs as modern genomic tools to improve plant tolerance toward multiple abiotic stresses. Significant progress has been achieved in deciphering the role of TFs toward tolerance to abiotic stress factors such as drought, and an appreciable number of promising candidates – TF genes have already been identified and validated. Selection of key TFs from such large families and realization of their full potential still remain a strenuous task. Also, development of transgenic plants harboring such TF genes that deliver anticipated level of tolerance in the field conditions still poses a great challenge to the research community. Furthermore, functional redundancy between different TF members might potentially hamper the progress to delineate the functions of an individual member.

22The constitutive over-expression of some TF genes may improve the stress tolerance; however, occasional negative effects in transgenic plants such as dwarfing, late flowering and lower yields should also be taken into account while investing research. Furthermore, the complete regulatory mechanism of individual TF encompassing its upstream and downstream co-regulators, as well as their interactions remain largely obscure. A principle concern is also about the selection of plants, as most of the initial experiments are being performed on model crops like Arabidopsis and tobacco. Focus must be shifted to commercial crops like rice, wheat, maize and other cereal crops, which are predominantly affected by drought stress. In comparison to other crops, rice has shown the highest potential under waterlogging conditions. Although reports are available with improved drought tolerance in transgenic rice under field conditions, further research is required in order to unveil the regulatory mechanism of drought tolerance. Future investigations must focus on pinpointing novel genes that enhance drought tolerance as well as yield. In addition, combination of drought-tolerance with submergence-tolerance in rice is exceptionally useful, as this would allow crop to withstand both drought and waterlogged conditions.

23Another attractive approach for discovering novel candidate genes is to intensively examine the mechanisms that describe drought tolerance in extremophiles, i.e., desert plants. It is important to mention here that up to 38% of total protein functions are still unknown even in well-analyzed plants and a renewed focus in this aspect might led to the discovery of robust candidate genes. Modification in root architecture is another important factor for improving drought tolerant crops. Transcriptome analysis has shown that drought-responsive TFs like REB1/CBF, DREB2, AREB/ABF, and NAC TFs function under drought response and tolerance. Utilizing a balanced crosstalk between these TFs under osmotic stress, overexpression of TFs may affect their signaling pathways. Identification of multiple stress-responsive TF genes and their prioritization by means of comparing expression patterns deserves attention of the scientific community and pinpointing the commonly regulated genes which have been proposed to be essential for universal stress responses or represent points of cross-talk between signaling pathways. Genetic manipulation of these multiple stress-responsive TF genes stands to be a powerful approach for improving plant tolerance than addressing each functional gene individually. Furthermore, the field trials are required to critically evaluate the transgenic plants, especially focusing on their growth and tolerance in the whole life period, which unequivocally remains a deciding factor while developing stress-tolerant crops.

Author Contributions

24SLS-P and AP conceived the review topic. RJ, BS, and AB drafted the manuscript. SW, ZD, and AL participated in the discussion of topic. All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

25The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 200

1.
Abogadallah G. M. Nada R. M. Malinowski R. Quick P. (2011 ). Overexpression of HARDY, an AP2/ERF gene from Arabidopsis, improves drought and salt tolerance by reducing transpiration and sodium uptake in transgenic Trifolium alexandrinum L. Planta 233 1265–1276.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-011-1382-3
2.
Aguado A. Capote N. Romero F. Dodd I. C. Colmenero-Flores J. M. (2014 ). Physiological and gene expression responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants differ according to irrigation placement. Plant Sci. 227 37–44.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.009
3.
Al-Abdallat A. M. Ayad J. Y. Elenein J. A. Al Ajlouni Z. Harwood W. A. (2014 ). Overexpression of the transcription factor HvSNAC1 improves drought tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol. Breed. 33 401–414.
Not in our library10.1007/s11032-013-9958-1
4.
Alqudah A. M. Samarah N. H. Mullen R. E. (2010 ). “Drought stress effect on crop pollination, seed set, yield and quality,” in Alternative Farming Systems, Biotechnology, Drought Stress and Ecological Fertilization Vol. 6 ed. Lichtfouse E. (New York, NY: Springer), 193–213.
Not in our library
5.
Alqudah A. M. Schnurbusch T. (2015 ). Barley leaf area and leaf growth rates are maximized during the pre-anthesis phase. Agronomy 5 107–129.
Not in our library10.3390/agronomy5020107
6.
Anbazhagan K. Bhatnagar-Mathur P. Vadez V. Dumbala S. R. Kishor P. B. Sharma K. K. (2015 ). DREB1A overexpression in transgenic chickpea alters key traits influencing plant water budget across water regimes. Plant Cell Rep. 34 199–210.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-014-1699-z
7.
Atkinson N. J. Urwin P. E. (2012 ). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 63 3523–3543.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ers100
8.
Augustine S. M. Ashwin Narayan J. Syamaladevi D. P. Appunu C. Chakravarthi M. Ravichandran V. (2015 ). Overexpression of EaDREB2 and pyramiding of EaDREB2 with the pea DNA helicase gene (PDH45) enhance drought and salinity tolerance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). Plant Cell Rep. 34 247–263.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-014-1704-6
9.
Plant MYB Transcription Factors: Their Role in Drought Response Mechanisms · 2015
No notice
10.
Bang S. W. Park S. H. Jeong J. S. Kim Y. S. Jung H. Ha S. H. (2013 ). Characterization of the stress-inducible OsNCED3 promoter in different transgenic rice organs and over three homozygous generations. Planta 237 211–224.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-012-1764-1
11.
Barbosa E. G. G. Leite J. P. Marin S. R. R. Marinho J. P. Carvalho J. F. C. Fuganti-Pagliarini R. (2013 ). Overexpression of the ABA-Dependent AREB1 transcription factor from Arabidopsis thaliana improves soybean tolerance to water deficit. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 31 719–730.
Not in our library10.1007/s11105-012-0541-4
12.
Barlow M. B. Zaitchik S. Paz E. Black J. E. Hoell A. (2015 ). A review of drought in the middle east and southwest asia. J. Climate [Epub ahead of print].
Not in our library10.1175/jcli-d-13-00692.1
13.
Bauer H. Ache P. Lautner S. Fromm J. Hartung W. Al-Rasheid K. A. (2013 ). The stomatal response to reduced relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis. Curr. Biol. 23 53–57.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.022
14.
Behnam B. Iuchi S. Fujita M. Fujita Y. Takasaki H. Osakabe Y. (2013 ). Characterization of the promoter region of an Arabidopsis gene for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase involved in dehydration-inducible transcription. DNA Res. 20 315–324.
Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dst012
15.
Bhargava S. Sawant K. (2013 ). Drought stress adaptation: metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression. Plant Breed. 132 21–32.
Not in our library10.1111/pbr.12004
16.
Bhatnagar-Mathur P. Rao J. S. Vadez V. Dumbala S. R. Rathore A. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2014 ). Transgenic peanut overexpressing the DREB1A transcription factor has higher yields under drought stress. Mol. Breed. 33 327–340.
Not in our library10.1007/s11032-013-9952-7
17.
Bohra A. Sahrawat K. L. Kumar S. Joshi R. Parihar A. K. Singh U. (2015 ). Genetics- and genomics-based interventions for nutritional enhancement of grain legume crops: status and outlook. J. Appl. Genet. 56 151–161.
Not in our library10.1007/s13353-014-0268-z
18.
Buchanan B. B. Gruissem W. Vickers K. Jones R. L. (2015 ). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
Not in our library
19.
Cai Y. Chen X. Xie K. Xing Q. Wu Y. Li J. (2014 ). Dlf1, a WRKY transcription factor, is involved in the control of flowering time and plant height in rice. PLoS ONE 9:e102529
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0102529
20.
Chen H. Liu L. Wang L. Wang S. Cheng X. (2016 ). VrDREB2A, a DREB-binding transcription factor from Vigna radiata, increased drought and high-salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Res. 129 263–273.
Not in our library10.1007/s10265-015-0773-0
21.
Chen J. Q. Meng X. P. Zhang Y. Xia M. Wang X. P. (2008 ). Over-expression of OsDREB genes lead to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnol. Lett. 30 2191–2198.
Not in our library10.1007/s10529-008-9811-5
22.
Chen L. Song Y. Li S. Zhang L. Zou C. Yu D. (2012 ). The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819 120–128.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002
23.
Chen X. Chen Z. Zhao H. Zhao Y. Cheng B. Xiang Y. (2014 ). Genome-wide analysis of soybean HD-Zip gene family and expression profiling under salinity and drought treatments. PLoS ONE 9:e87156
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0087156
24.
Cheng L. Li X. Huang X. Ma T. Liang Y. Ma X. (2013 ). Overexpression of sheepgrass R1-MYB transcription factor LcMYB1 confers salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 70 252–260.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.025
25.
Choi H. Hong J. Ha J. Kang J. Kim S. Y. (2000 ). ABFs, a family of ABA-responsive element binding factors. J. Biol. Chem. 275 1723–1730.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.275.3.1723
26.
Cui M. Zhang W. Zhang Q. Xu Z. Zhu Z. Duan F. (2011 ). Induced over-expression of the transcription factor OsDREB2A improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 49 1384–1391.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.09.012
27.
Danquah A. de Zelicourt A. Colcombet J. Hirt H. (2014 ). The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnol. Adv. 32 40–52.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006
28.
Datta K. Baisakh N. Ganguly M. Krishnan S. Yamaguchi Shinozaki K. Datta S. K. (2012 ). Overexpression of Arabidopsis and rice stress genes’ inducible transcription factor confers drought and salinity tolerance to rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10 579–586.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00688.x
29.
de Paiva Rolla A. A. de Fátima Corrêa Carvalho J. Fuganti-Pagliarini R. Engels C. do Rio A. Marin S. R. (2014 ). Phenotyping soybean plants transformed with rd29A:AtDREB1A for drought tolerance in the greenhouse and field. Transgenic Res. 23 75–87.
Not in our library10.1007/s11248-013-9723-6
30.
Dong M. A. Farré E. M. Thomashow M. F. (2011 ). Circadian clock-associated 1 and late elongated hypocotyl regulate expression of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 7241–7246.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1103741108
31.
Du F. Shi H. Zhang X. Xu X. (2014 ). Responses of reactive oxygen scavenging enzymes, proline and malondialdehyde to water deficits among six secondary successional seral species in Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE 9:e98872
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0098872
32.
Dubouzet J. G. Sakuma Y. Ito Y. Kasuga M. Dubouzet E. G. Miura S. (2003 ). OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J. 33 751–763.
Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01661.x
33.
Edmeades G. O. (2013 ). Progress in Achieving and Delivering Drought Tolerance in Maize- An Update. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.
Not in our library
34.
Engels C. Fuganti-Pagliarini R. Marin S. R. Marcelino-Guimarães F. C. Oliveira M. C. Kanamori N. (2013 ). Introduction of the rd29A:AtDREB2A CA gene into soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) and its molecular characterization in leaves and roots during dehydration. Genet. Mol. Biol. 36 556–565.
Not in our library10.1590/s1415-47572013000400015
35.
Fang Z. Zhang X. Gao J. Wang P. Xu X. Liu Z. (2015 ). A Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) DRE-Binding transcription factor gene, FeDREB1 enhances freezing and drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 33 1510–1525.
Not in our library10.1007/s11105-015-0851-4
36.
Farooq M. Basra S. M. A. Wahid A. Cheema Z. A. Cheema M. A. Khaliq A. (2008 ). Physiological role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine to improve drought tolerance in fine grain aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194 325–333.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1439-037x.2008.00323.x
37.
Farooq M. Gogoi N. Barthakur S. Baroowa B. Bharadwaj N. Alghamdi S. S. (2016 ). Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J. Agron. Crop Sci.
Not in our library10.1111/jac.12169
38.
Franco-Zorrilla J. M. López-Vidriero I. Carrasco J. L. Godoy M. Vera P. Solano R. (2014 ). DNA-binding specificities of plant transcription factors and their potential to define target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 2367–2372.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1316278111
39.
Breeding and Domesticating Crops Adapted to Drought and Salinity: A New Paradigm for Increasing Food Production · 2015
No notice
40.
Fujita Y. Fujita M. Satoh R. Maruyama K. Parvez M. M. Seki M. (2005 ). AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABREdependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17 3470–3488.
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.105.035659
41.
Fujita Y. Fujita M. Shinozaki K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2011 ). ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 124 509–525.
Not in our library10.1007/s10265-011-0412-3
42.
Fujita Y. Yoshida T. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2013 ). Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 147 15–27.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01635.x
43.
Gao S. Q. Chen M. Xu Z. S. Zhao C. P. Li L. Xu H. J. (2011 ). The soybean GmbZIP1 transcription factor enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 75 537–553.
Not in our library10.1007/s11103-011-9738-4
44.
Golldack D. Lüking I. Yang O. (2011 ). Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant Cell Rep. 30 1383–1391.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-011-1068-0
45.
Gosal S. S. Wani S. H. Kang M. S. (2010 ). Biotechnology and crop improvement. J. Crop Improv. 24 153–217.
Not in our library10.1080/15427520903584555
46.
Hao Y. J. Wei W. Song Q. X. Chen H. W. Zhang Y. Q. Wang F. (2011 ). Soybean NAC transcription factors promote abiotic stress tolerance and lateral root formation in transgenic plants. Plant J. 68 302–313.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04687.x
47.
Hill C. B. Taylor J. D. Edwards J. Mather D. Bacic A. Langridge P. (2013 ). Whole-genome mapping of agronomic and metabolic traits to identify novel quantitative trait Loci in bread wheat grown in a water-limited environment. Plant Physiol. 162 1266–1281.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.113.217851
48.
Hirayama T. Shinozaki K. (2010 ). Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 61 1041–1052.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04124.x
49.
Overexpression of a Stress-Responsive NAC Transcription Factor Gene ONAC022 Improves Drought and Salt Tolerance in Rice · 2016
No notice
50.
Hsieh T. H. Li C. W. Su R. C. Cheng C. P. Sanjaya Tsai Y. C. (2010 ). A tomato bZIP transcription factor, SlAREB, is involved in water deficit and salt stress response. Planta 231 1459–1473.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-010-1147-4
51.
Hu H. Dai M. Yao J. Xiao B. Li X. Zhang Q. (2006 ). Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 12987–12992.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0604882103
52.
Huang G. T. Ma S. L. Bai L. P. Zhang L. Ma H. Jia P. (2012 ). Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39 969–987.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-011-0823-1
53.
TaNAC29, a NAC transcription factor from wheat, enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis · 2015
No notice
54.
Ishizaki T. Maruyama K. Obara M. Fukutani A. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Ito Y. (2013 ). Expression of Arabidopsis DREB1C improves survival, growth, and yield of upland New Rice for Africa (NERICA) under drought. Mol. Breed. 31 255–264.
Not in our library10.1007/s11032-012-9785-9
55.
Ito Y. Katsura K. Maruyama K. Taji T. Kobayashi M. Seki M. (2006 ). Functional analysis of rice DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors involved in cold-responsive gene expression in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 47 141–153.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pci230
56.
Iwaki T. Guo L. Ryals J. A. Yasuda S. Shimazaki T. Kikuchi A. (2013 ). Metabolic profiling of transgenic potato tubers expressing Arabidopsis dehydration response element-binding protein 1A (DREB1A). J. Agric. Food Chem. 61 893–900.
Not in our library10.1021/jf304071n
57.
Jakoby M. Weisshaar B. Dröge-Laser W. Vicente-Carbajosa J. Tiedemann J. Kroj T. (2002 ). bZIP Research Group. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 7 106–111.
Not in our library10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02223-3
58.
Jan A. Maruyama K. Todaka D. Kidokoro S. Abo M. Yoshimura E. (2013 ). OsTZF1 a CCCH-tandem zinc finger protein, confers delayed senescence and stress tolerance in rice by regulating stress-related genes. Plant Physiol. 161 1202–1216.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.205385
59.
Jensen M. K. Lindemose S. de Masi F. Reimer J. J. Nielsen M. Perera V. (2013 ). ATAF1 transcription factor directly regulates abscisic acid biosynthetic gene NCED3 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Open Bio 3 321–327.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fob.2013.07.006
60.
Jeong J. S. Kim Y. S. Baek K. H. Jung H. Ha S. H. Do Choi Y. (2010 ). Root-specific expression of OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice under field drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 153 185–197.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.154773
61.
Jeong J. S. Kim Y. S. Redillas M. C. Jang G. Jung H. Bang S. W. (2013 ). OsNAC5 overexpression enlarges root diameter in rice plants leading to enhanced drought tolerance and increased grain yield in the field. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11 101–114.
Not in our library10.1111/pbi.12011
62.
Jha U. C. Chaturvedi S. K. Bohra A. Basu P. S. Khan M. S. Barh D. (2014 ). Abiotic stresses, constraints and improvement strategies in chickpea. Plant Breed. 133 163–178.
Not in our library10.1111/pbr.12150
63.
Ji H. Liu L. Li K. Xie Q. Wang Z. Zhao X. (2014 ). PEG-mediated osmotic stress induces premature differentiation of the root apical meristem and outgrowth of lateral roots in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 65 4863–4872.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/eru255
64.
Jia Z. Lian Y. Zhu Y. He J. Cao Z. Wang G. (2009 ). Cloning and characterization of a putative transcription factor induced by abiotic stress in Zea mays. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8 6764–6771.
Not in our library10.5897/ajb09.1280
65.
Jin J. Zhang H. Kong L. Gao G. Luo J. (2014 ). PlantTFDB 3.0: a portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 D1182–D1187.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt1016
66.
Jin X. F. Jiong A. S. Peng R. H. Liu J. G. Gao F. Chen J. M. (2010 ). OsAREB1 an ABRE binding protein responding to ABA and glucose, has multiple functions in Arabidopsis. BMB Rep. 43 34–39.
Not in our library10.5483/bmbrep.2010.43.1.034
67.
Joo J. Choi H. J. Lee Y. H. Kim Y. K. Song S. I. (2013 ). A transcriptional repressor of the ERF family confers drought tolerance to rice and regulates genes preferentially located on chromosome 11. Planta 238 155–170.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-013-1880-6
68.
Joshi R. Karan R. (2013 ). “Physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance in plants,” in Molecular Approaches in Plant Abiotic Stress, eds Gaur R. K. Sharma P. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 209–231.
Not in our library
69.
Joshi R. Karan R. Singla-Pareek S. L. Pareek A. (2016a ). Ectopic expression of Pokkali phosphoglycerate kinase-2 (OsPGK2-P) improves yield in tobacco plants under salinity stress. Plant Cell Rep. 35 27–41.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-015-1864-z
70.
Joshi R. Singh B. Bohra A. Chinnusamy V. (2016b ). “Salt stress signalling pathways: specificity and crosstalk,” in Managing Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Molecular and Genomic Perspectives, eds Wani S. H. Hossain M. A. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 51–78.
Not in our library
71.
Joshi R. Shukla A. Sairam R. K. (2011 ). In vitro screening of rice genotypes for drought tolerance using polyethylene glycol. Acta Physiol. Plant. 33 2209–2217.
Not in our library10.1007/s11738-011-0760-6
72.
Joshi R. Ramanarao M. V. Bedre R. Sanchez L. Pilcher W. Zandkarimi H. (2015 ). “Salt adaptation mechanisms of halophytes: improvement of salt tolerance in crop plants,” in Elucidation of Abiotic Stress Signaling in Plants: Functional Genomics Perspectives Vol. 2 ed. Pandey G. K. (New York, NY: Springer), 243–280.
Not in our library
73.
Kang J. Y. Choi H. I. Im M. Y. Kim S. Y. (2002 ). Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper proteins that mediate stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 14 343–357.
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.010362
74.
Khattab H. I. Emam M. A. Emam M. M. Helal N. M. Mohamed M. R. (2014 ). Effect of selenium and silicon on transcription factors NAC5 and DREB2A involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice. Biol. Plant. 58 265–273.
Not in our library10.1007/s10535-014-0391-z
75.
Khazaei H. Street K. Bari A. Mackay M. Stoddard F. L. (2013 ). The FIGS (focused identification of germplasm strategy) approach identifies traits related to drought adaptation in Vicia faba genetic resources. PLoS ONE 8:e63107
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0063107
76.
Kholová J. Hash C. T. Kočová M. Vadez V. (2011 ). Does a terminal drought tolerance QTL contribute to differences in ROS scavenging enzymes and photosynthetic pigments in pearl millet exposed to drought? Environ. Expt. Bot. 71 99–106.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.11.001
77.
Kidokoro S. Watanabe K. Ohori T. Moriwaki T. Maruyama K. Mizoi J. (2015 ). Soybean DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors function in heat and drought as well as cold stress-responsive gene expression. Plant J. 81 505–518.
Not in our library10.1111/tpj.12746
78.
Kim J. S. Mizoi J. Yoshida T. Fujita Y. Nakajima J. Ohori T. (2011 ). An ABRE promoter sequence is involved in osmotic stress-responsive expression of the DREB2A gene, which encodes a transcription factor regulating drought-inducible genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 52 2136–2146.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcr143
79.
Kim S. Kang J. Y. Cho D. I. Park J. H. Kim S. Y. (2004 ). ABF2 an ABRE-binding bZIP factor, is an essential component of glucose signaling and its overexpression affects multiple stress tolerance. Plant J. 40 75–87.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02192.x
80.
Kobayashi F. Maeta E. Terashima A. Kawaura K. Ogihara Y. Takumi S. (2008 ). Development of abiotic stress tolerance via bZIP-type transcription factor LIP19 in common wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 59 891–905.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ern014
81.
Komatsu K. Suzuki N. Kuwamura M. Nishikawa Y. Nakatani M. Ohtawa H. (2013 ). Group A PP2Cs evolved in land plants as key regulators of intrinsic desiccation tolerance. Nat. Commun. 4:2219
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms3219
82.
Kuromori T. Sugimoto E. Shinozaki K. (2014 ). Intertissue signal transfer of abscisic acid from vascular cells to guard cells. Plant Physiol. 164 1587–1592.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.114.235556
83.
Lata C. Mishra A. K. Muthamilarasan M. Bonthala V. S. Khan Y. Prasad M. (2014 ). Genome-wide investigation and expression profiling of AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). PLoS ONE 9:e113092
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0113092
84.
Le D. T. Nishiyama R. Watanabe Y. Mochida K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Shinozaki K. (2011 ). Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the plant-specific NAC transcription factor family in soybean during development and dehydration stress. DNA Res. 18 263–276.
Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsr015
85.
Lee S. J. Kang J. Y. Park H. J. Kim M. D. Bae M. S. Choi H. I. (2010 ). DREB2C interacts with ABF2 a bZIP protein regulating abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and its overexpression affects abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 153 716–727.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.154617
86.
Lenka S. K. Katiyar A. Chinnusamy V. Bansal K. C. (2011 ). Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9 315–327.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00560.x
87.
Li T. Angeles O. Radanielson A. MarcaidaIII M. Manalo E. (2015 ). Drought stress impacts of climate change on rainfed rice in South Asia. Climatic Change 133 709–720.
Not in our library10.1007/s10584-015-1487-y
88.
Liao Y. Zou H. F. Wei W. Hao Y. J. Tian A. G. Huang J. (2008 ). Soybean GmbZIP44 GmbZIP62 and GmbZIP78 genes function as negative regulator of ABA signaling and confer salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta 228 225–240.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-008-0731-3
89.
Structure, Function and Networks of Transcription Factors Involved in Abiotic Stress Responses · 2013
No notice
90.
Overexpression of Rice NAC Gene SNAC1 Improves Drought and Salt Tolerance by Enhancing Root Development and Reducing Transpiration Rate in Transgenic Cotton · 2014
No notice
91.
Liu H. Zhou X. Dong N. Liu X. Zhang H. Zhang Z. (2011 ). Expression of a wheat MYB gene in transgenic tobacco enhances resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum, and to drought and salt stresses. Funct. Integr. Genomics 11 431–443.
Not in our library10.1007/s10142-011-0228-1
92.
Genome-wide analysis and expression profile of the bZIP transcription factor gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) · 2014
No notice
93.
Liu J. H. Peng T. Dai W. (2014 ). Critical cis-acting elements and interacting transcription factors: key players associated with abiotic stress responses in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 32 303–317.
Not in our library10.1007/s11105-013-0667-z
94.
Liu Q. L. Dong F. L. Xiao F. Wu J. Li Z. J. (2012 ). Isolation and molecular characterization of DgZFP2: a gene encoding a Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein in chrysanthemum. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7 4499–4504.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-009-9886-7
95.
Liu Q. L. Xu K. D. Ma N. Zeng L. Zhao L. J. (2010 ). Isolation and functional characterization of DgZFP: a gene encoding a Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein in chrysanthemum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 37 1137–1142.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-009-9886-7
96.
Liu X. Chu Z. (2015 ). Genome-wide evolutionary characterization and analysis of bZIP transcription factors and their expression profiles in response to multiple abiotic stresses in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Genomics 16:227
Not in our library10.1186/s12864-015-1457-9
97.
bZIPs and WRKYs: two large transcription factor families executing two different functional strategies · 2014
No notice
98.
Lucas S. Durmaz E. Akpinar B. A. Budak H. (2011 ). The drought response displayed by a DRE-binding protein from Triticum dicoccoides. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 49 346–351.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.016
99.
Luo L. J. Zhang Q. F. (2001 ). The status and strategy on drought resistance of rice. Chin. J. Rice Sci. 15 209–214.
Not in our library
100.
Mao X. Zhang H. Qian X. Li A. Zhao G. Jing R. (2012 ). TaNAC2 a NAC-type wheat transcription factor conferring enhanced multiple abiotic stress tolerances in Arabidopsis. J. Expt. Bot. 63 2933–2946.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/err462
101.
Maruyama K. Todaka D. Mizoi J. Yoshida T. Kidokoro S. Matsukura S. (2012 ). Identification of cis-acting promoter elements in cold-and dehydration-induced transcriptional pathways in Arabidopsis, rice, and soybean. DNA Res. 19 37–49.
Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsr040
102.
Matsukura S. Mizoi J. Yoshida T. Todaka D. Ito Y. Maruyama K. (2010 ). Comprehensive analysis of rice DREB2-type genes that encode transcription factors involved in the expression of abiotic stress-responsive genes. Mol. Genet. Genomics 283 185–196.
Not in our library10.1007/s00438-009-0506-y
103.
McGrann G. R. D. Steed A. Burt C. Goddard R. Lachaux C. Bansal A. (2015 ). Contribution of the drought tolerance-related Stress-responsive NAC1 transcription factor to resistance of barley to Ramularia leaf spot. Mol. Plant Pathol. 16 201–209.
Not in our library10.1111/mpp.12173
104.
Mei Y. Lizhong X. (2011 ). Isolation and characterization of a drought-inducible promoter Oshox24P in rice. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 30 525–531.
Not in our library
105.
Mendelsohn R. (2014 ). The impact of climate change on agriculture in Asia. J. Integ. Agric. 13 660–665.
Not in our library10.1016/s2095-3119(13)60701-7
106.
Mishra A. K. Singh V. P. (2010 ). A review of drought concepts. J. Hydrol. 391 202–216.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012
107.
Mishra S. Singh B. Panda K. Singh B. P. Singh N. Misra P. (2016 ). Association of SNP haplotypes of HKT family genes with salt tolerance in indian wild rice germplasm. Rice 9:15
Not in our library10.1186/s12284-016-0083-8
108.
Mittler R. Blumwald E. (2010 ). Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 61 443–462.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-12116
109.
Miyakawa T. Fujita Y. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Tanokura M. (2013 ). Structure and function of abscisic acid receptors. Trends Plant Sci. 18 259–266.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2012.11.002
110.
Mizoi J. Ohori T. Moriwaki T. Kidokoro S. Todaka D. Maruyama K. (2013 ). GmDREB2A; 2 a canonical DEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN2-type transcription factor in soybean, is posttranslationally regulated and mediates dehydration-responsive element-dependent gene expression. Plant Physiol. 161 346–361.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.112.204875
111.
Mizoi J. Shinozaki K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2012 ). AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819 86–96.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.08.004
112.
Mochida K. E. Yoshida T. A. Sakurai T. E. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. A. Shinozaki K. A. Tran L. S. (2009 ). In silico analysis of transcription factor repertoire and prediction of stress responsive transcription factors in soybean. DNA Res. 16 353–369.
Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsp023
113.
Morimoto K. Mizoi J. Qin F. Kim J. S. Sato H. Osakabe Y. (2013 ). Stabilization of Arabidopsis DREB2A is required but not sufficient for the induction of target genes under conditions of stress. PLoS ONE 8:e80457
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0080457
114.
Morran S. Eini O. Pyvovarenko T. Parent B. Singh R. Ismagul A. (2011 ). Improvement of stress tolerance of wheat and barley by modulation of expression of DREB/CBF factors. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9 230–249.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00547.x
115.
Moumeni A. Satoh K. Venuprasad R. Serraj R. Kumar A. Leung H. (2015 ). Transcriptional profiling of the leaves of near-isogenic rice lines with contrasting drought tolerance at the reproductive stage in response to water deficit. BMC Genomics 16:1110
Not in our library10.1186/s12864-015-2335-1
116.
Nakashima K. Jan A. Todaka D. Maruyama K. Goto S. Shinozaki K. (2014a ). Comparative functional analysis of six drought-responsive promoters in transgenic rice. Planta 239 47–60.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-013-1960-7
117.
Nakashima K. Tran L. S. P. Nguyen D. V. Fujita M. Maruyama K. Todaka D. (2007 ). Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant J. 51 617–630.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03168.x
118.
Nakashima K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2013 ). ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep. 32 959–970.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-013-1418-1
119.
The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat · 2014
No notice
120.
Nijhawan A. Jain M. Tyagi A. K. Khurana J. P. (2008 ). Genomic survey and gene expression analysis of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family in rice. Plant Physiol. 146 333–350.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.107.112821
121.
Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants · 2013
No notice
122.
Oh S. J. Song S. I. Kim Y. S. Jang H. J. Kim S. Y. Kim M. (2005 ). Arabidopsis CBF3/DREB1A and ABF3 in transgenic rice increased tolerance to abiotic stress without stunting growth. Plant Physiol. 138 341–351.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.104.059147
123.
Pardo J. M. (2010 ). Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21 185–196.
Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.005
124.
Pareek A. Sopory S. K. Bohnert H. K. Govindjee (2010 ). Abiotic Stress Adaptation in Plants: Physiolgical, Molecular and Genomic Foundation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Not in our library
125.
Paul S. Gayen D. Datta S. K. Datta K. (2015 ). Dissecting root proteome of transgenic rice cultivars unravels metabolic alterations and accumulation of novel stress responsive proteins under drought stress. Plant Sci. 234 133–143.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.02.006
126.
Pennisi E. (2008 ). Plant genetics. The blue revolution, drop by drop, gene by gene. Science 320 171–173.
Not in our library10.1126/science.320.5873.171
127.
Pérez-Clemente R. M. Vives V. Zandalinas S. I. López-Climent M. F. Muñoz V. Gómez-Cadenas A. (2013 ). Biotechnological approaches to study plant responses to stress. Biomed Res. Int. 2013:654120
Not in our library10.1155/2013/654120
128.
Phuong N. D. Tuteja N. Nghia P. T. Hoi P. X. (2015 ). Identification and characterization of a stress-inducible gene OsNLI-IF enhancing drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Curr. Sci. 109 541–551.
Not in our library
129.
Pourabed E. Golmohamadi F. G. Monfared P. S. Razavi S. M. Shobbar Z. S. (2015 ). Basic leucine zipper family in barley: genome-wide characterization of members and expression analysis. Mol. Biotechnol. 57 12–26.
Not in our library10.1007/s12033-014-9797-2
130.
Prasch C. M. Sonnewald U. (2015 ). Signaling events in plants: stress factors in combination change the picture. Environ. Expt. Bot. 114 4–14.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.020
131.
Puckette M. C. Weng H. Mahalingam R. (2007 ). Physiological and biochemical responses to acute ozone-induced oxidative stress in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45 70–79.
Not in our library10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.12.004
132.
Puranik S. Sahu P. P. Srivastava P. S. Prasad M. (2012 ). NAC proteins: regulation and role in stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 17 369–381.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.004
133.
Qin F. Shinozaki K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2011 ). Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 52 1569–1582.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcr106
134.
Qin Y. Wang M. Tian Y. He W. Han L. Xia G. (2012 ). Over-expression of TaMYB33 encoding a novel wheat MYB transcription factor increases salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39 7183–7192.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-012-1550-y
135.
Quan W. Liu X. Wang H. Chan Z. (2016 ). Comparative physiological and transcriptional analyses of two contrasting drought tolerant alfalfa varieties. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1256
Not in our library10.3389/fpls.2015.01256
136.
Rashid M. Guangyuan H. Guangxiao Y. Hussain J. Xu Y. (2012 ). AP2/ERF transcription factor in rice: genome-wide canvas and syntenic relationships between monocots and eudicots. Evol. Bioinform. Online. 8 321–355.
Not in our library10.4137/ebo.s9369
137.
Ray S. Dansana P. K. Bhaskar A. Giri J. Kapoor S. Khurana J. P. (2010 ). “Emerging trends in functional genomics for stress tolerance in crop plants,” in Plant Stress Biology: From Genomics to Systems Biology, ed. Hirt H. (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH), 37–63.
Not in our library
138.
Rayko E. Maumus F. Maheswari U. Jabbari K. Bowler C. (2010 ). Transcription factor families inferred from genome sequences of photosynthetic stramenopiles. New Phytol. 188 52–66.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03371.x
139.
Redillas M. C. Jeong J. S. Kim Y. S. Jung H. Bang S. W. Choi Y. D. (2012 ). The overexpression of OsNAC9 alters the root architecture of rice plants enhancing drought resistance and grain yield under field conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10 792–805.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00697.x
140.
Riechmann J. L. Meyerowitz E. M. (1998 ). The AP2/EREBP family of plant transcription factors. Biol. Chem. 379 633–646.
Not in our library10.1515/bchm.1998.379.6.633
141.
Rusconi F. Simeoni F. Francia P. Cominelli E. Conti L. Riboni M. (2013 ). The Arabidopsis thaliana MYB60 promoter provides a tool for the spatio-temporal control of gene expression in stomatal guard cells. J. Exp. Bot. 64 3361–3371.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/ert180
142.
Saadi S. Todorovic M. Tanasijevic L. Pereira L. S. Pizzigalli C. Lionello P. (2015 ). Climate change and Mediterranean agriculture: impacts on winter wheat and tomato crop evapotranspiration, irrigation requirements and yield. Agric. Water Manag. 147 103–115.
Not in our library10.1016/j.agwat.2014.05.008
143.
Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants · 2016
No notice
144.
Sahoo K. K. Tripathi A. K. Pareek A. Singla-Pareek S. L. (2013 ). Taming drought stress in rice through genetic engineering of transcription factors and protein kinases. Plant Stress 7 60–72.
Not in our library
145.
Samarah H. Alqudah A. (2011 ). Effects of late-terminal drought stress on seed germination and vigor of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 57 27–32.
Not in our library10.1080/03650340903191663
146.
Samarah N. H. Alqudah A. Amayreh J. McAndrews G. (2009a ). The effect of late-terminal drought stress on yield components of four barley cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195 427–441.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00387.x
147.
Samarah N. H. Haddad N. Alqudah A. (2009b ). Yield potential evaluation in chickpea genotypes under late terminal drought in relation to the length of reproductive stage. Italian J. Agron. 3 111–117.
Not in our library10.4081/ija.2009.3.111
148.
Samarah N. H. Mullen R. E. Anderson I. (2009c ). Soluble sugar contents, germination and vigor of soybean seeds in response to drought stress. J. New Seeds 10 63–73.
Not in our library10.1080/15228860902786525
149.
Comparative functional genomics of salt stress in related model and cultivated plants identifies and overcomes limitations to translational genomics. · 2011
Not checked
150.
NAC transcription factors in plant multiple abiotic stress responses: progress and prospects · 2015
No notice
151.
Sharoni A. M. Nuruzzaman M. Satoh K. Shimizu T. Kondoh H. Sasaya T. (2011 ). Gene structures, classification and expression models of the AP2/EREBP transcription factor family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 52 344–360.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcq196
152.
Shavrukov Y. Baho M. Lopato S. Langridge P. (2016 ). The TaDREB3 transgene transferred by conventional crossings to different genetic backgrounds of bread wheat improves drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14 313–322.
Not in our library10.1111/pbi.12385
153.
Singh B. Bohra A. Mishra S. Joshi R. Pandey S. (2015 ). Embracing new-generation ‘omics’ tools to improve drought tolerance in cereal and food-legume crops. Biol. Plant. 59 413–428.
Not in our library10.1007/s10535-015-0515-0
154.
Singh B. P. Jayaswal P. K. Singh B. Singh P. K. Kumar V. Mishra S. (2015a ). Natural allelic diversity in OsDREB1F gene in the Indian wild rice germplasm led to ascertain its association with drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 34 993–1004.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-015-1760-6
155.
Singh B. P. Singh B. Kumar V. Singh P. K. Jayaswal P. K. Mishra S. (2015b ). Haplotype diversity and association analysis of SNAC1 gene in wild rice germplasm. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 75 157–166.
Not in our library10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00025.5
156.
Transcriptional regulation of drought response: a tortuous network of transcriptional factors · 2015
No notice
157.
Song S. Y. Chen Y. Chen J. Dai X. Y. Zhang W. H. (2011 ). Physiological mechanisms underlying OsNAC5-dependent tolerance of rice plants to abiotic stress. Planta 234 331–345.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-011-1403-2
158.
Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) · 2013
No notice
159.
Srivastav A. Mehta S. Lindlof A. Bhargava S. (2010 ). Over-represented promoter motifs in abiotic stress-induced DREB genes of rice and sorghum and their probable role in regulation of gene expression. Plant Signal. Behav. 5 775–784.
Not in our library10.4161/psb.5.7.11769
160.
Takasaki H. Maruyama K. Kidokoro S. Ito Y. Fujita Y. Shinozaki K. (2010 ). The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC5 regulates stress-inducible genes and stress tolerance in rice. Mol. Genet. Genomics 284 173–183.
Not in our library10.1007/s00438-010-0557-0
161.
Tang Y. Liu M. Gao S. Zhang Z. Zhao X. Zhao C. (2012 ). Molecular characterization of novel TaNAC genes in wheat and overexpression of TaNAC2a confers drought tolerance in tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 144 210–224.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01539.x
162.
Tiwari V. Chaturvedi A. K. Mishra A. Jha B. (2015 ). Introgression of the SbASR-1 gene cloned from a halophyte salicornia brachiata enhances salinity and drought endurance in transgenic groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and acts as a transcription factor. PLoS ONE 10:e0131567
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0131567
163.
Todaka D. Nakashima K. Shinozaki K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2012 ). Toward understanding transcriptional regulatory networks in abiotic stress responses and tolerance in rice. Rice 5:6
Not in our library10.1186/1939-8433-5-6
164.
Recent advances in the dissection of drought-stress regulatory networks and strategies for development of drought-tolerant transgenic rice plants · 2015
No notice
165.
Tron S. Bodner G. Laio F. Ridolfi L. Leitner D. (2015 ). Can diversity in root architecture explain plant water use efficiency? A modeling study. Ecol. Model. 312 200–210.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.028
166.
Trujillo L. E. Sotolongo M. Menendez C. Ochogava M. E. Coll Y. Hernandez I. (2008 ). SodERF3, a novel sugarcane ethylene responsive factor (ERF), enhances salt and drought tolerance when overexpressed in tobacco plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 49 512–515.
Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcn025
167.
Umezawa T. Sugiyama N. Takahashi F. Anderson J. C. Ishihama Y. Peck S. C. (2013 ). Genetics and phosphoproteomics reveal a protein phosphorylation network in the abscisic acid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Signal. 6:rs8
Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.2003509
168.
Varshney R. K. Bansal K. C. Aggarwal P. K. Datta S. K. Craufurd P. Q. (2011 ). Agricultural biotechnology for crop improvement in a variable climate: hope or hype? Trends Plant Sci. 16 363–371.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.004
169.
Voesenek L. A. Bailey-Serres J. (2013 ). Flooding tolerance: O2 sensing and survival strategies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16 647–653.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.008
170.
Wan L. Zhang J. Zhang H. Zhang Z. Quan R. Zhou S. (2011 ). Transcriptional activation of OsDERF1 in OsERF3 and OsAP2-39 negatively modulates ethylene synthesis and drought tolerance in rice. PLoS ONE 6:e25216
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0025216
171.
Recent Advances in Utilizing Transcription Factors to Improve Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance by Transgenic Technology · 2016
No notice
172.
Wang J. Li Q. Mao X. Li A. Jing R. Wang C. (2016b ). Wheat transcription factor TaAREB3 participates in drought and freezing tolerances in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 12 257–269.
Not in our library10.7150/ijbs.13538
173.
Wang J. Liu X. Zhang X. Smith P. Li L. Filley T. R. (2016a ). Size and variability of crop productivity both impacted by CO2 enrichment and warming-A case study of 4 year field experiment in a Chinese paddy. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 221 40–49.
Not in our library10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.028
174.
Wang J. Zhou J. Zhang B. Vanitha J. Ramachandran S. Jiang S. Y. (2011 ). Genome-wide expansion and expression divergence of the basic leucine zipper transcription factors in higher plants with an emphasis on sorghum. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53 212–231.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01017.x
175.
Wang Q. Guan Y. Wu Y. Chen H. Chen F. Chu C. (2008 ). Overexpression of a rice OsDREB1F gene increases salt, drought, and low temperature tolerance in both Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 67 589–602.
Not in our library10.1007/s11103-008-9340-6
176.
Wang Z. Cheng K. Wan L. Yan L. Jiang H. Liu S. (2015 ). Genome-wide analysis of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor gene family in six legume genomes. BMC Genomics 16:1053
Not in our library10.1186/s12864-015-2258-x
177.
Wani S. H. Gosal S. S. (2011 ). Introduction of OsglyII gene into Oryza sativa for increasing salinity tolerance. Biol. Plant. 55 536–540.
Not in our library10.1007/s10535-011-0082-y
178.
Wani S. H. Singh N. B. Devi T. R. Haribhushan A. Jeberson S. M. Malik C. P. (2013 ). “Engineering abiotic stress tolerance in plants: extricating regulatory gene complex,” in Conventional and Non-Conventional Interventions in Crop Improvement, eds Malik C. P. Sanghera G. S. Wani S. H. (New Delhi: CABI), 1–19.
Not in our library
179.
Wei K. Chen J. Wang Y. Chen Y. Chen S. Lin Y. (2012 ). Genome-wide analysis of bZIP-encoding genes in maize. DNA Res 19 463–476.
Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dss026
180.
Genetic control of flowering time in legumes · 2015
No notice
181.
Genome-Wide Analysis of the AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Family and the Expression Patterns of DREB Genes in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). · 2015
Not checked
182.
Xiang Y. Tang N. Du H. Ye H. Xiong L. (2008 ). Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 148 1938–1952.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.108.128199
183.
Xu S. Wang X. Chen J. (2007 ). Zinc finger protein 1 (ThZF1) from salt cress (Thellungiella halophila) is a Cys-2/His-2-type transcription factor involved in drought and salt stress. Plant Cell Rep. 26 497–506.
Not in our library10.1007/s00299-006-0248-9
184.
Xu Z. S. Chen M. Li L. C. Ma Y. Z. (2011 ). Functions and application of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in crop improvement. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 53 570–585.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01062.x
185.
Xu Z. Y. Kim S. Y. Kim D. H. Dong T. Park Y. Jin J. B. (2013 ). The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor ANAC096 cooperates with bZIP-type transcription factors in dehydration and osmotic stress responses. Plant Cell 25 4708–4724.
Not in our library10.1105/tpc.113.119099
186.
Xue G.-P. Loveridge C. W. (2004 ). HvDRF1 is involved in abscisic acid-mediated gene regulation in barley and produces two forms of AP2 transcriptional activators, interacting preferably with a CT-rich element. Plant J. 37 326–339.
Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01963.x
187.
Xue G. P. Way H. M. Richardson T. Drenth J. Joyce P. A. McIntyre C. L. (2011 ). Overexpression of TaNAC69 leads to enhanced transcript levels of stress up-regulated genes and dehydration tolerance in bread wheat. Mol. Plant 4 697–712.
Not in our library10.1093/mp/ssr013
188.
Yang W. Liu X. D. Chi X. J. Wu C. A. Li Y. Z. Song L. L. (2011 ). Dwarf apple MbDREB1 enhances plant tolerance to low temperature, drought, and salt stress via both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Planta 233 219–229.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-010-1279-6
189.
Yao D. Zhang X. Zhao X. Liu C. Wang C. Zhang Z. (2011 ). Transcriptome analysis reveals salt-stress-regulated biological processes and key pathways in roots of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Genomics 98 47–55.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.04.007
190.
Yoshida T. Fujita Y. Maruyama K. Mogami J. Todaka D. Shinozaki K. (2015 ). Four Arabidopsis AREB/ABF transcription factors function predominantly in gene expression downstream of SnRK2 kinases in abscisic acid signalling in response to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 38 35–49.
Not in our library10.1111/pce.12351
191.
Yoshida T. Fujita Y. Sayama H. Kidokoro S. Maruyama K. Mizoi J. (2010 ). AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE–dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 61 672–685.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04092.x
192.
You J. Zong W. Hu H. Li X. Xiao J. Xiong L. (2014 ). A STRESS-RESPONSIVE NAC1-regulated protein phosphatase gene rice protein phosphatase18 modulates drought and oxidative stress tolerance through abscisic acid-independent reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 166 2100–2114.
Not in our library10.1104/pp.114.251116
193.
Zhang G. Chen M. Li L. Xu Z. Chen X. Guo J. (2009 ). Overexpression of the soybean GmERF3 gene, an AP2/ERF type transcription factor for increased tolerances to salt, drought and diseases in transgenic tobacco. J. Expt. Bot. 60 3781–3796.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp214
194.
Zhang H. Liu W. Wan L. Li F. Dai L. Li D. (2010 ). Functional analyses of ethylene response factor JERF3 with the aim of improving tolerance to drought and osmotic stress in transgenic rice. Transgenic Res. 19 809–818.
Not in our library10.1007/s11248-009-9357-x
195.
Zhang H. Zhang J. Quan R. Pan X. Wan L. Huang R. (2013 ). EAR motif mutation of rice OsERF3 alters the regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and drought tolerance. Planta 237 1443–1451.
Not in our library10.1007/s00425-013-1852-x
196.
Zhang L. Zhang L. Xia C. Zhao G. Liu J. Jia J. (2015 ). A novel wheat bZIP transcription factor, TabZIP60, confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 153 538–554.
Not in our library10.1111/ppl.12261
197.
Zhang X. Liu X. Wu L. Yu G. Wang X. Ma H. (2015 ). The SsDREB transcription factor from the succulent halophyte Suaeda salsa enhances abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Int. J. Genomics 2015:875497
Not in our library10.1155/2015/875497
198.
Zhu J. K. (2002 ). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53 247–273.
Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp214
199.
Zhuang J. Cai B. Peng R. H. Zhu B. Jin X. F. Xue Y. (2008 ). Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 371 468–474.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.087
200.
Zhuang J. Wang F. Xu Z. S. Xiong A. S. (2015 ). Microarray analysis of different expression profiles between wild-type and transgenic rice seedlings overexpression OsDREB1BI gene. Biologia 70 760–770.
Not in our library10.1515/biolog-20150092

Cited by papers we hold 13

Drought Tolerance in Plants: Physiological and Molecular Responses · 2024
No notice
Integrated transcriptome and methylome analyses reveal the molecular regulation of drought stress in wild strawberry (Fragaria nilgerrensis) · 2022
Not checked
Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants: From Source to Sink · 2022
No notice
WRKY transcription factors (TFs): Molecular switches to regulate drought, temperature, and salinity stresses in plants · 2022
No notice
Metabolomics and Molecular Approaches Reveal Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants · 2021
No notice
Drought Tolerance in Rice: Focus on Recent Mechanisms and Approaches · 2021
Not checked
Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress · 2021
No notice
ROS Homeostasis in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants · 2020
No notice
Ascophyllum nodosum-Based Biostimulants: Sustainable Applications in Agriculture for the Stimulation of Plant Growth, Stress Tolerance, and Disease Management · 2019
No notice
Survey of Candidate Genes for Maize Resistance to Infection by Aspergillus flavus and/or Aflatoxin Contamination · 2018
Not checked
Characterization of Transcription Factor Gene OsDRAP1 Conferring Drought Tolerance in Rice · 2018
Not checked
NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN 1 enhances drought tolerance in tomato · 2017
No notice
Molecular and Evolutionary Mechanisms of Cuticular Wax for Plant Drought Tolerance · 2017
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.