Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPSs) in Ocean Systems

Alan W. Decho, Tony Gutierrez

Frontiers in Microbiology · 2017 · Review

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00922

Abstract

Microbial cells (i.e. bacteria, archaea, microeukaryotes) in oceans secrete a diverse array of large molecules, collectively called extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) or simply exopolymers. These secretions facilitate attachment to surfaces that lead to the formation of structured 'biofilm' communities. In open-water environments, they also lead to formation of organic colloids, and larger aggregations of cells, called ‘marine snow’. Secretion of EPS is now recognized as a fundamental microbial adaptation, occurring under many environmental conditions, and one that influences many ocean processes. This relatively recent realization has revolutionized our understanding of microbial impacts on ocean systems. EPS occur in a range of molecular sizes, conformations and physical/chemical properties, and polysaccharides, proteins, lipids and even nucleic acids are actively-secreted components. Interestingly, however, the physical ultrastructure of how individual EPS interact with each other is poorly-understood. Together, the EPS matrix molecules form a three-dimensional architecture from which cells may localize extracellular activities and conduct cooperative/ antagonistic interactions that cannot be accomplished efficiently by free-living cells. EPS alter optical signatures of sediments and seawater, and are involved in biogeomineral precipitation and the construction of microbial macrostructures, and horizontal-transfers of genetic information. In the water-column, they contribute to the formation of marine snow, transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), sea-surface microlayer biofilm, and marine oil snow (MOS). Excessive production of EPS occurs during later-stages of phytoplankton blooms as an excess metabolic byproduct and releases a carbon pool that transitions among dissolved-, colloidal-, and gel-states. Some EPS are highly-labile carbon forms, while other forms appear quite refractory to degradation. Emerging studies suggest that EPS contribute to efficient trophic-transfer of environmental contaminants, and may provide a protective refugia for pathogenic cells within marine systems; one that enhances their survival/persistence. Finally, these secretions are prominent in ‘extreme’ environments ranging from sea-ice communities to hypersaline systems to the high-temperatures/pressures of hydrothermal-vent systems. This overview summarizes some of the roles of exopolymer in oceans.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Overview

Microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, archaea, microeukaryotes) reside in ocean systems in an assortment of physical states ranging from free-living cells to complex communities attached to surfaces and to each other. Over the span of different ocean environments, microbial flora take up dissolved organics and ions, and then secrete polymeric organic compounds. These secretions, called exopolymers or extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs), are abundant and become mixed with other forms of organic matter within ocean systems. It was recognized early on, that under the fluctuating, and often less-predictable conditions of natural systems (compared to those of a laboratory culture flask), the attachment of microbes to surfaces, or to each other, offers a degree of environmental stability not experienced by free-living (non-attached) cells. An initial understanding of the purposeful secretion of EPS and their potential stabilizing effects for microbial cells initially emerged during the last century. It is now realized and mostly accepted that many bacteria and other microorganisms occur in a biofilm state; either attached to surfaces or as suspended-aggregates in the water column. EPS, the subject of this overview, consist of a wide range of molecules and provide selective adaptations for the cells that produce them, which in turn, influence broader ocean processes (Figure 1).

EPS: A Microbial Adaptation for Aggregation and Attachment

Extracellular polymeric substance are purposefully produced by microbes: (a) as secretions of biofilms that secure attachment and enhance their local environment, and/or (b) as metabolic-excess waste products. The differences between these two processes is easily discernable but becomes important when addressing the provenance of organic matter and the roles that EPS contribute to ocean systems. It is important to point out that EPS are not an essential component to microbial life (i.e., cells can survive and grow without them), but rather their secretion strongly enhances the survival, metabolic efficiency and adaptation of cells.

The Biofilm State

The term ‘biofilm’ was coined long ago, and refers to microbial cells that have attached to a surface or aggregated with each other, and have secreted a gelatinous matrix of EPS. The ability of a microbial cell, such as a bacterium, to attach, secrete EPS and form a biofilm under laboratory conditions, is well-established. The secretion of EPS (by cells) is a key emergent property of the biofilm; the property that directly influences adaptations that cells utilize to enhance their efficiency and survival. The secretion of an EPS matrix represents, in the broadest sense, an extension of the cell. The presence of EPS facilitates the self-organization of cells into localized communities, and provides biofilm cells with an enhanced capability for: trapping other organics and localizing their digestion by extracellular enzymes, coordinating cell–cell chemical communication [quorum sensing (QS)], facilitating gene-exchange, and provides a degree of physical stability. The EPS often form a localization matrix for other molecules, keeping them in spatial proximity to cells where they can be efficiently utilized.

It is now generally recognized within microbiology that the ‘biofilm state’ is an omnipresent feature of microbial flora in most environments. Biofilms occur under a wide range of conditions and environments, and whose influences span aquatic, terrestrial, the epi- and endo-biont communities of plants and animals, which can be commensal, symbiotic or pathogenic. The cells within a biofilm can move, and periodically reorient themselves in relation to one another, and in doing so can resist invasion by other cells. The EPS matrix of biofilms provides a three-dimensional architecture framework that allows the arrangements of cells movements relative to other microbes as well as positioning among sharp geochemical gradients. This will not be discussed further here, but directly contributes to the remarkable plasticity of biofilm cells. The EPS form a matrix of largely anionic molecules near cells, affording them with a proximal environment that is more stabilizing, and conducive to manipulation by the cell (Table 1), and one that contributes to broader ocean processes. However, in this overview we will not discuss biofilms as systems, except with regard to their secretion of EPS.

Finally, it is important to note that in ocean systems, the microbial communities of aggregates suspended in the water-column, and the sea-surface slick communities of oceans are also biofilms, since these communities contain EPS, and exhibit differing levels of organization. EPS are also secreted as a ‘metabolic by product.’ These are most apparent during the later stages of phytoplankton blooms, and will be discussed further below. Taken together, microbial extracellular secretions are now thought to comprise a large portion of the bioavailable carbon pool in oceans, especially in dissolved forms. The total amount of microbially produced EPS, although difficult to measure accurately and precisely, is likely to be very substantial.

Dissolved and Particulate Organic Carbon in the Ocean

Organic matter in seawater constitutes a complex mixture of compounds in a dissolved and particulate form – respectively, dissolved organic matter (DOM) and particulate organic matter (POM). Both forms serve a source of carbon and nutrients to heterotrophic microorganisms, including to mixotrophic eukaryotic phytoplankton and filter feeders. DOM is the dominant form of carbon in the oceans that can originate from any number of sources, much of which is produced in situ by marine microorganisms (largely eukaryotic phytoplankton and bacteria) and is derived from terrestrial inputs via transportation from river effluents and surface runoff. DOM comprises up to 700 Gt of carbon in the ocean, which is a staggering amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC); so much so that 1% annual change of it in the ocean can produce as much CO2 as that from fossil fuel combustion per annum. Up to 70% of DOM in the oceans averages a molecular weight of <1 kDa and is defined as low-molecular-weight DOM, the bulk of which is refractory and difficult to chemically characterize down to the molecular level. The high-molecular-weight fraction of DOM (>1 kDa) in the oceans contributes about 30% of DOC. It is more labile and thus more readily degraded.

Depending on its physical state in seawater (gel, colloidal, or particulate form), DOC/POC can serve as a surface to which microorganisms attach. Marine snow, which comprises aggregates of >500 μm, is formed in the upper water-column when dead and dying phytoplankton cells come together with other planktonic microorganisms within a matrix of biopolymers. Marine snow is one form of POC that is a key component of the biological pump in the ocean that participates in the redistribution of carbon in marine systems and principally in the flux of fixed carbon to the sea floor. The processing of organic matter, such as marine snow, by bacteria in the ocean significantly affects its vertical flux from the upper water column to the ocean floor, and in turn impacting the global cycling of carbon and the planet’s climate. The transport of organic carbon via sinking of POC from the sea surface to the seafloor is another major component of the “biological pump,” which globally contributes in the exports of ca. 10 Gt C per year from the euphotic zone and accounts for 20% of ocean primary production. However, at depths approaching 2000 m, this flux or organic carbon decreases to about 1% as the other 19% is mineralized and cycled by the “microbial loop.”

In oceanography, organic matter in seawater is operationally defined as “dissolved” (i.e., DOM) if it passes through a 0.7 μm pore size filter; that which is retained on the filter is defined as POM. The diversity of dissolved organic carbon in seawater ranges from ‘truly’ dissolved molecules, such as glucose, to colloidal and transparent gel-like matter, and can also include microorganisms (e.g., micro-algae, bacteria, archaea, viruses) if they too pass through a 0.7 μm pore size filter. The introduction of sensitive analytical techniques for analyzing seawater, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have increased our understanding of the major classes of DOM in the ocean. Methods to recover and characterize DOM and POM are described by.

DOC and POC

The world’s oceans contain a total DOC content that is comparable in mass to the carbon in atmospheric CO2. The oceanic DOC pool comprises a wide spectrum of compounds, much of which is chemically uncharacterized – it could be regarded as a ‘black hole’ in terms of our relatively poor understanding of its chemical composition and from what biogenic sources this massive pool of organic carbon molecules originate. At least among the chemical constituents of oceanic DOC that have been characterized, three major compound classes have been identified: carbohydrates (mono- and polysaccharides or EPS), proteins, and lipids. Much of the DOC in the ocean water column exists as EPS biopolymers (ca. 10–25% of total oceanic DOM) that undergo reversible transition between colloidal and dissolved phases. Based on its predominance throughout the world ocean, it has important implications in microbial interactions and biogeochemical cycles.

Extracellular Polymeric Substance

The synthesis and extracellular release of EPS by eukaryotic phytoplankton and bacteria forms a major component to the total DOC pool in the ocean. EPS can serve a variety of functions, such as in the binding and fate of trace metal-nutrient species, the solubilisation of hydrophobic organic chemicals, and in biofilm formation. Compared to EPS produced by marine eukaryotic phytoplankton and non-marine bacteria, EPS produced by marine bacteria generally contains higher levels of uronic acids, notably D-glucuronic and D-galacturonic acid. This renders these macromolecules highly polyanionic (negatively charged), which may be attributable to any number of anionic groups (e.g., COO-, C–O-, SO4-) and consequently quite reactive in their potential to interact with other chemical species. Nonetheless, the EPS released by some eukaryotic phytoplankton species can also be rich in uronic acids, such as that produced by the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi, which contains up to 20% galacturonic acids of total sugar content.

The polyanionic nature of EPS serves important ecological functions in marine systems. These include microbial adhesion and biofilm formation, the emulsification of hydrocarbon oils and influencing their biodegradation, or mediating the fate and mobility of heavy metals and trace metal nutrients. This wide spectrum of functional activity is reflected not merely in the complex chemistry of these molecules, but also in the diversity of bacterial genera producing them. Overall, the composition of marine EPS varies due to the producing species and physiological stage.

A number of reports have described marine bacterial EPS binding heavy and toxic metal ions such as Cd, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cu, Al, and Ur. Whilst the rationale to many of these studies was commercial, a few have addressed the ecological implications of marine EPS in biogeochemical cycles. In two studies by, ), the authors reported on the heavy metal-binding capacity of EPS produced by hydrothermal vent bacteria, and showed that this might represent a survival strategy for the bacteria by reducing their exposure to toxic metals released from the hydrothermal vents. Major elemental constituents of seawater, such as Na, Mg, Ca, K, Sr and Si, have been shown to be adsorbed by marine bacterial EPS. What ecological implications this may have in marine systems, or indeed to the producing organisms, remains to be more-fully understood.

A key role of polyanionic EPS, particularly in the euphotic zone, is in its potential role in controlling soluble iron (Fe3+) bioavailability. Studies in recent years have shown single anionic residues, such as glucuronic and galacturonic acids, and purified marine bacterial EPS containing high levels of uronic acids, can effectively bind Fe3+ and promote the uptake of this trace metal by eukaryotic phytoplankton. The implications of this are significant because of the abundance of EPS in the ocean and because Fe3+ is an essential trace metal that limits primary production in up to 40% of the open ocean.

A large fraction of the EPS produced by bacteria in the ocean is of glycoprotein composition. The amino acid and peptide components found associated with these glycoprotein biopolymers have been shown to confer amphiphilic characteristics to these macromolecules, and which could explain, at least in part, their ability to interact with hydrophobic species, such as oil hydrocarbons.

Transparent Exopolymer Particle

A special class of EPS that are described as mucopolysaccharides is transparent exopolymer particles (TEPs). It is operational defined based on being retained by a filter with a pore size of >0.4 μm, and based on this, TEP are defined as gel particles. TEP exists in the water column suspended in colloidal form, likely formed via the aggregation of smaller EPS molecules. Aggregation may be mediated by the bridging of divalent cation (Ca2+, Mg2+) and half-ester sulfate (OSO3-) moieties of acidic monomers that constitute individual EPS molecules. TEP is transparent, but because these gel particles are rich in acidic sugars they can be observed under the light microscope after staining with the cationic copper phthalocyanine dye Alcian Blue at pH 2.5.

The abundances of TEP in the ocean water column are on average in the order of 106 per L of seawater, and can reach as high as 108 per L, particularly during periods of phytoplankton blooms. The contribution of TEP to the pool of POC in the upper water column in the Atlantic and Adriatic during certain periods of the year has been shown to be quite significant. A fraction of the TEP pool in the ocean is proteinaceous. It is referred to as Coomassie stainable particles (CSPs) because these gel particles can be stained with the amino acid-specific dye Coomassie Brilliant Blue and observed under the light microscope. The abundances of CSP in coastal waters range between 106 and 108 per L of seawater.

Transparent exopolymer particle contribute significantly to what is described as the marine gel phase. suggested this phase to span a large size spectrum, from colloids to particles of several 100s of micrometers. Its formation has been described to originate from the spontaneous aggregation of DOM molecules into POM within minutes in seawater – a process that may involve crosslinks facilitated by cation bridging between DOM molecules.

Microbial Associates

Particulate organic matter can be described as a “hot spot” for microbial (esp. bacterial) activities in the water column, containing a rich microbial community with abundances reaching up to two orders of magnitude higher than in the surrounding seawater environment. The establishment of a bacterial community within and surrounding (biofilm) POM leads to various levels of microbial interaction that include mutualism and antagonism, as well as cooperative behavior such as QS. A study assessing the phylogenetic diversity of POM-associated versus free-living bacteria from a site ca. 5 km offshore the Santa Barbara coast revealed distinct differences between these communities, with primarily members of the Cytophaga, Planctomyces, and Gammaproteobacteria dominating aggregate particles, whereas Alphaproteobacteria dominated the free-living fraction. Bacteria associated with POM have been shown to exhibit high activities for a range of extracellular enzymes, likely contributing to the hydrolysis of the POM aggregates. Whilst rich in microbial diversity and abundance, POM accounts for only <10% of total bacterial abundance and production in the marine water column, with the majority of bacterial cells occurring in a free-living state.

Studies using oxygen microelectrodes to measure dissolved oxygen in POM aggregates have shown that even the tiniest of marine snow particles can contain anoxic environments. The high extracellular enzyme activities by bacteria associated with POM will deplete oxygen concentrations that create anoxic micro-niches within the aggregates, potentially supporting the growth of obligate anaerobic or microaerophilic microorganisms. It may therefore, be expected that diverse aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms associated with marine snow aggregates would colonize different niches of the aggregates. The formation of an oxygen gradient, which is increasingly more anoxic toward the interior of the aggregates, would pose a strong influence on the stratification of the microbial community. Essentially, the interior of aggregates will be enriched with obligate and/or facultative anaerobes.

Surface Water Droplet Formation, Sea Spray, and Cloud Formation

Biological processes on the sea surface of the ocean can have a direct effect on atmospheric processes, such as modulating CO2 exchange and release of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), that in turn influence the Earth’s climate. CCN are atmospheric particles that serve as nuclei for the formation of cloud droplets by taking up water vapor because they are sufficiently soluble. In the past decade there has been an increasing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that atmospheric marine aerosols contain the same organic species that are found in oceanic DOM. Seawater DOM, much of which comprises phytoplankton exudates and bacterial EPS, can be ejected into the atmosphere when bubbles at the sea surface burst. Bubbles can form by a number of physical forces at the sea surface, ranging from raindrops to breaking waves, which then burst and produce submicron droplets that disperse as aerosol into the atmosphere and carrying with it marine organic species such as microbial cells and DOM. A study by showed that TEP and CSP can accumulate in the sea surface microlayer and subsequently, through bubble bursting, become transported to the atmosphere as marine aerosol. The authors showed that the aerosols contained a large number of semitransparent gel-like particles, in addition to microorganisms, organic and inorganic matter. The semitransparent gel-like particles (primarily TEP and CSP) in the aerosols all contained amino acids, and based on D/L ratios of these acids it was suggested that they originated from phytoplankton exudates.

Several studies have shown that the organic species entrained within marine aerosols collected from various remote ocean sites are of a size range between 70 and 200 nm in diameter. The dominant size range between 50 and 100 nm, is reminiscent of EPS gels found on the sea surface. In a review by covering over 10 years of measurements of ocean-derived aerosol, the authors concluded that the organic species within marine aerosol is composed of EPS, proteins and amino acids, as well as microorganisms and their components. suggested that the solubility continuum of phytoplankton exudates found in seawater is also reflected in marine aerosol, and there is a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis that phytoplankton exudates contribute to the formation of CNN. Upon its entry into the atmosphere through bubble bursting, the entrained organic gel aggregates within the aerosol particles either directly contribute to the CCN pool in the marine boundary layer (MBL) or after they are degraded by ultraviolet light or acidification in the atmosphere.

Recent research by the DROPPS consortium, funded through the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (GOMRI) program, is carrying out experiments attempting to recreate the sea surface microlayer to investigate the potential for petrocarbon (crude oil) to enter the atmosphere. Initial results of this work reveal that crude oil droplets, formed by treatment with dispersants, can burst through physical forces and form aerosolized droplets containing crude oil. This oil-containing aerosol could be carried long distances by wind in the atmosphere and potentially pose health threats to humans and wildlife when inhaled or upon coming in contact with skin.

Marine Oil Snow

Marine oil snow (MOS) is essentially marine snow, with the exception that it distinctively contains oil hydrocarbons. Current knowledge recognizes its formation to be confined to the sea surface where oil slicks form in the event of an oil spill, but further work is needed to determine if MOS can also form in the subsurface. MOS can be described as a mucilaginous organic matter with a “fluffy” or gelatinous off-white appearance that contains oil droplets embedded within its amorphous matrix. Previous reports described evidence of MOS formation during the Ixtoc-I and Tsesis oil spills. However, MOS only recently received considerable attention when copious quantities of it, of macroscopic cm-size dimensions, were observed within 2 weeks of the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) blowout in the Gulf of Mexico – a spill recorded as the worst oil spill disaster in US history. MOS was encountered frequently around the vicinity of surface oil slicks at DWH. It eventually sank to the seafloor in the Gulf of Mexico – a process described termed MOSSFA (Marine Oil Snow Sedimentation and Flocculent Accumulation), which contributed a significant role in the export of crude oil (ca. 14% of the oil released at DWH) to the sediment.

Conjecture still surrounds MOS genesis at DWH and during the Ixtoc-I and Tsesis oil spills, but its formation and sedimentation appears to have been directly associated with the influx of crude oil. In roller-bottle experiments performed under conditions attempting to simulate sea surface oil slicks at the DWH spill, the presence of crude oil was shown to be an important factor in triggering MOS formation, and that MOS acted as hotspots for microorganism and oil-degrading enzyme activities. Bacterial and eukaryotic phytoplankton cells and/or their produced polymers (e.g., EPS) have been reported to induce MOS formation, whilst there are reports describing conflicting results on the role of dispersants in this respect. Figure 2A shows MOS formation in a roller-bottle incubation containing synthetic seawater amended with crude oil and Alteromonas sp. strain TK-46(2) – an oil-degrading and EPS-producing bacterial strain that was found enriched in surface oil slicks in the Gulf of Mexico during the DWH spill. Like TEP, MOS particles can be rich in acidic sugars of polysaccharides, such that may be produced by EPS-producing bacteria like strain TK-46(2) (Figure 2B).

Despite the interest in MOS formation as a product of spilled oil into the Gulf of Mexico, the microorganisms associated with MOS particles have received less attention. During incubations with uncontaminated deep-water samples collected during the active phase of the DWH oil spill and amended with the dispersant Corexit, reported the formation of MOS, which was dominated by members of the genus Colwellia. In a more in-depth study of the bacterial community associated with MOS, showed that MOS particles contained a bacterial community that was distinctly different from that found freely living (i.e., not associated to MOS) in the surrounding seawater environment. The MOS-associated community was dominated by oil-degrading and EPS-producing members of the Gammaproteobacteria, principally Cycloclasticus, Congregibacter, Haliela, Halomonas and Marinobacter, and included diverse members of the Alphaproteobacteria (principally the Roseobacter clade) and some members within the Bacteroidetes and Planctomycetes. Using CARD-FISH (catalyzed reporter deposition – fluorescence in situ hybridization), MOS particles formed in incubations with Macondo crude oil and the dispersant Corexit were dominated by members of the class Gammaproteobacteria, including the order Alteromonadales, which comprises oil-degrading and EPS-producing taxa. Using Illumina MiSeq sequencing, showed MOS particles formed in subarctic waters to be enrichment with oil-degrading (Alcanivorax, Cycloclasticus, Thalassolituus, Marinobacter) and EPS-producing (Halomonas, Pseudoalteromonas, Alteromonas) bacteria, and included major representation by Psychrobacter and Cobetia with putative oil-degrading/EPS-producing qualities. Collectively, these studies indicate that MOS are hotspots where oil-degrading and EPS-producing bacteria are enriched, and the latter may provide a clue on the role of these organisms in MOS formation through their synthesis and release of ‘sticky’ EPS.

Whilst significant knowledge gaps exist in our understanding on MOS formation and its subsequent sedimentation to the sea floor, the influx of crude oil and its interaction with planktonic microorganisms, as well as with dissolved and colloidal organic polymers, such as TEP, and with nutrient and suspended mineral discharges from river effluents, appear to be important factors that warrant further investigation (see for a review).

Turnover and Stability

Dissolved organic carbon in the ocean can be classified into three broadly defined pools of carbon based on their turnover times: labile, semilabile, and refractory. Collectively, the concentrations of these three DOC pools typically range from 60 to 90 μmol/L in the upper ocean water column, decreasing with depth to 40 μmol/L in the deep sea. Fluctuations in the concentration of DOC in the water column occurs over certain periods of the year, due largely to periods of elevated photosynthetic production since this is the main source that fuels each of these three classes of DOC. The combined effect of biological and physical processes that alter the concentrations of these three pools of DOC is represented in the size-reactivity-continuum model, for which microbial processing of these molecules is the major mechanism that leads to rendering them progressively more recalcitrant.

Labile DOC

Labile DOC in seawater comprises substrates with short residence times (minutes to days) since they are consumed almost as quickly as they are produced or released into the water column. An example of a common labile substrate in seawater is glucose, which is on average found at concentrations from 0.001 to 1.0 μmol/L, depending on the ocean region. Other mono-sugar substrates (monosaccharides) also exist in the water column at concentrations typically ranging from 0.002 to 0.8 μmol C/L. On average across the oceans, glucose is the most abundant simple sugar, with concentrations as high as 187 nM measured in unfiltered water of the Gulf of Mexico, and 490 nM in high-molecular-weight DOM of the equatorial Pacific. Glucose has been shown to contribute significantly in supporting a major fraction of bacterial growth in many ocean systems, though other studies have shown glucose to play a less significant role in this respect. Turnover rates for glucose can depend on the ocean environment, including the availability of certain nutrients, varying from rapid (hours to days) to relatively slow (100s of days). For example, surface waters limited by inorganic phosphorous can limit bacterial consumption of labile DOC, such as glucose, and result in a longer-than-average residence time of the endogenous pool of the labile DOC.

With respect to the chemical composition of POC in seawater, the abundance of glucose may be related to the major roles that this monosaccharide plays in phytoplankton biology – polymers of glucose (glucans) are major storage compounds in phytoplankton. Galactose is the second most abundant sugar in seawater, and polymers of it (galactans) are major structural components of phytoplankton cell walls.

Another simple carbohydrate that also contributes to the total pool of labile DOC in the ocean is mannitol. It is one of the most abundant sugar alcohol compounds in nature; it is found in bacteria, fungi, algae and higher plants, where it often acts as a compatible solute, among conferring other functions. In ocean systems, mannitol is a major product of photosynthetic organisms, like algae, whereupon this polyol is released following cell lysis to join the pool of labile DOC in the ocean.

Carbohydrate concentrations in seawater can be as high as 10 μmol/L and contribute a significant fraction to the pool of labile substrates. Dissolved polysaccharides, such as EPS produced by bacteria and algae, form a major fraction of the total carbohydrates in the water column. Since concentrations of monosaccharides are typically 10-fold lower than dissolved polysaccharides, this suggests they are likely cycled more rapidly. Polysaccharides nonetheless contribute to fueling a major fraction of bacterial activity in some marine environments. On average, however, concentrations of labile DOC are very low (<1 μmol/L), constituting less than 1% of total organic carbon in the upper water column of the ocean. These substrates could potentially sustain oligotrophic microbial populations in regions of poor nutrient availability, such as in the open ocean. Nonetheless, the labile DOC pool is continuously replenished on a yearly basis by trophic (phytoplankton and bacterial excretion) and non-trophic (viral lysis, grazing) processes.

Semilabile DOC

Approximately half of the total pool of DOC in the upper ocean water column is classed as semilabile, and comprises substrates that are consumed over weeks to months. Concentrations of semilabile DOC typically range from 20 to 30 μmol/L in the ocean water column, and because it is consumed over this median time scale, it assumes that this pool of DOC is important in supporting bacterial growth over seasonal to annual time scales. In some ocean systems, such as the Sargasso Sea, the total semilabile DOC can account for as much as 89% of the total DOC. In this study, up to 50% of this semilabile DOC was found to be more resistant to microbial degradation over weeks to months.

Interestingly, DOC produced in high-nutrient environments has been observed to be less susceptible to microbial degradation than that produced in low-nutrient environments. This may relate to the chemical qualities of the DOC produced in these contrasting environments – DOC produced in high-nutrient waters may be more nutrient rich than that produced in low-nutrient waters. Semilabile DOC can accumulate as a result of inorganic nutrient limitation of bacterial growth, primarily from a limitation in. Other studies, however, have not found evidence to support the hypothesis that inorganic nutrient limitation of bacterial growth leads to accumulation of semilabile DOC. Rather, the chemical nature of this DOC class, specifically acting as a poor substrate for bacterial degradation, likely contributes to its accumulation in the water column. This is especially the case in the upper water column where DOC concentrations are higher than in the mesopelagic. This could influence the microbial communities in these contrasting regions of the water column where microbes in the upper water column have been found to degrade semilabile DOC less rapidly than those communities found in the mesopelagic.

Refractory DOC

Much of the DOC in the ocean consists of low-molecular-weight solutes of <1000 Da, the majority of which comprises the refractory pool of DOC that is resistant to microbial degradation over time scales of 1000s of years – anywhere between 4000 and 6000 years – approaching or exceeding that of ocean circulation. Whilst concentrations of labile and semilabile DOC vary with depth, that of refractory DOC averages ca. 40 μmol/L throughout the water column with little to no variation with depth, and likely contributes insignificantly as a source of carbon and energy to bacterioplankton. However, a fraction of refractory DOC at the sea surface is destroyed by ultraviolet irradiation, which results in the release of labile DOC for heterotrophs to consume. The refractory pool contributes to the sequestration of enormous quantities of carbon and acts as a carbon sink in the water column. A recent study combining organic matter size, 14C age and elemental composition of DOC estimated that small refractory molecules in the ocean are produced by microorganisms and at a rate of 0.24 PgC per year, which is on par in magnitude to the burial of organic carbon in sediments.

Major sources of this refractory DOC pool include complex cell fragments and other high-molecular-weight biopolymers produced by cells that are partially or almost totally recalcitrant to biodegradation. During viral lysis of eukaryotic phytoplankton cells, cellular components that are highly refractory to degradation are released into the water column. Similarly, phage-mediated lysis of bacterial cells leads to the release of outer-membrane proteins of the cell envelope, which also are very resistant to degradation. Conversely, highly labile cell components, such as nucleic acids and amino acids, are recycled in the photic zone.

A proportion of the DOC released through cell lysis, including that produced extracellularly by living cells, is converted by chemical mechanisms into humic substances. This complex material is quite resistant to biodegradative processes and contributes to the total pool of refractory organic matter in the water column. Either by agglomeration of these humic substances, or their attachment to other sinking particles, a proportion of this refractory material eventually sinks to the ocean floor and becomes buried. Not all refractory DOC in the marine water column, however, sinks to the seafloor. Rather, most of it remains suspended and circulating in the ocean for years to millennia. In fact, of the fixed organic carbon formed by primary production, only a very small fraction reaches the seafloor; much of it (>99%) is remineralized in the water column through microbial action.

Extracellular polymeric substance produced by marine bacteria, even that which is freshly produced, can be somewhat refractory to microbial degradation or chemical analysis. This is believed to be related to the presence of uronic acids or glycosidic linkages of hexosamines. Such constituents can confer on EPS molecules a high resistance to degradation under acid hydrolysis conditions that are used to chemically analyze them. Some studies analyzing the chemical nature of EPS isolated from cultured marine bacterial strains have shown a major proportion of these macromolecules (up to 80%) can be unaccounted for by chemical analysis.

Physical/Chemical Properties of EPS

Extracellular polymeric substance comprise an expanding plethora of biochemical molecules that interact in many ways and that are, as yet, poorly understood. EPS consist of an array of molecules, ranging from quite large (e.g., >100 kDa) to much smaller (e.g., <10 kDa) polymers. Some of the molecules contribute to the structural stability, gel properties, and pliancy of the greater matrix. We must determine how different types of molecules in this matrix interact with each other in order to provide the observed functional roles of the EPS matrix. An entire rethinking of the extracellular milieu of microorganisms will likely be required. An insightful examination is provided by.

Composition and Physical Properties

From the standpoint of microbial cells, the EPS, especially when in a gel state, form a three-dimensional matrix or scaffold within which cells can orient themselves relative to one another. The presence of certain polymers can afford the matrix physical stability. Polymers such as amyloids and/or eDNA (discussed below) can serve as an architectural framework for the EPS. Each type of EPS component can offer different physical properties. The physical ultrastructure of the EPS matrix has been very difficult to image in a fully hydrated state, owing to its delicate nature. Excellent pioneering efforts have been conducted by using a unique cryo-TEM approach. Recent developments in cryo-TEM and -SEM may provide further insights into this complex matrix.

Bacterial and microalgal EPS exist in nature in a range of different physical states, most of which are operationally defined. Capsules consist of polymers that closely surround individual or multiple cells and often serve a protective role. Further away from cells, EPS can exist as tight, dense-gels, to a continuum of physical states from looser-slime to truly dissolved forms. Dissolved forms, in the absence of cells, may condense to microgels in the open ocean; a process that is of significant importance and has been well-summarized in a review. While differences in these physical states are relatively arbitrary, they likely serve very different functions to the microbial cells secreting them. The physical state of EPS results from a combination of the polymer concentrations, types and abundances of ions, composition, and steric availability of functional groups on polymers. Recently, this has been reviewed in greater detail.

Some microbial EPS can exhibit significant viscoelastic properties, being able to stretch and retract in response to an applied force such as intermittent water flow. This property offers the microbial cells contained within a biofilm with a certain degree of physical flexibility and mechanical resiliency. This flexibility is important to the ability of cells to persist on a surface or as an aggregate in the water-column.

Compositional information is a useful starting point for investigating EPS. Strictly speaking, the term EPS is an operational designation that refers to the milieu of ‘larger’ molecules contained in the extracellular matrix in proximity to cells. Many of the molecules contained in natural EPS cannot be conveniently characterized as either protein, lipid or carbohydrate. For this reason, it has been called the ‘dark matter’ of biofilms. It is now known that the EPS matrix can be quite heterogeneous, especially over small spatial scales (see Microdomains within EPS Matrices). It is for this reason that analyses of ‘bulk’ samples will not capture the smaller-scale variability that are critical to understanding the physical and chemical properties of the in situ matrix. When EPS from natural biofilms, for example, are extracted and then reconstituted, the physical (e.g., gel, viscocity, rheology, etc.) properties of the reconstituted EPS often do not readily resemble those of the original biofilm. (In much the same way, a cell cannot be taken apart via extractions, and then put back together as a functioning cell.) This suggests that the molecules within the matrix may have important molecular organization either by purposeful design or by result of the environment. It is important from a functional standpoint, to determine which molecules and molecular interactions contribute to physical properties such as gel formation, rheology, and diffusion-slowing, and chemical properties, such as sorption.

Finally, while matrix is actively secreted by cells, the properties of EPS may be changed post-secretion, modified by geochemical, enzymatic, and photochemical processes, and additionally contain trapped or sorbed molecules. These modifications may have dramatic effects on their physical properties. Thus, EPS under natural conditions exist in a ‘continuum’ of compositional and partial degradation states. Thus, it is imperative that future non-destructive approaches (e.g., Raman spectroscopy) are developed for characterizations of EPS in situ.

Laboratory studies of bacteria secreting EPS show that cells typically produce sugar monomers that are exported, then assembled to the existing polymer outside of the outer membrane. Polymers may consist of single sugar monomers, called homopolymers, or consist of several monomers linked together to form a repeating unit, called heteropolymers. Since several types of repeating units may be generated, this provides the cell with the capability to alter the physical chemical properties by mixing different amounts of repeating units. By changing the building blocks (i.e., repeating units), the polymer composition can be varied. This allows the polymer to have a variable composition and provides the cell the capability to modify its extracellular polymers in response to changing conditions.

At present, there are no specific biosignatures that can be assigned reliably for detection of EPS, simply because similar glycol-based compounds are produced throughout biological systems for many purposes. The secretion of carbohydrates and other glycosylated polymers is not unique to bacteria or even microorganisms; rather, it is a universal biological strategy employed by microalgae, fungi, invertebrate and vertebrate animals, and plants.

Extracellular polymeric substance have often been considered synonymous with ‘exopolysaccharides’ and acronym EPS. This was partially based on the carbohydrate-focus of investigators at the time, and additionally due to the artifact of carbon-rich culture conditions that were used to grow bacteria and obtain abundant quantities of EPS. Much has been learned regarding polysaccharide chemistry from these seminal studies. While polysaccharides are a major component of many natural EPS, they are only a component. The EPS matrix is now known to contain several different major groups of molecules, whose roles and involvement are still under study, and will be discussed briefly below. Hence, much discussion has evolved about what exactly constitutes the EPS matrix. Three points emerge as one studies the EPS of natural systems: (1) Many different types of molecules interact to provide the physical structure, impart chemical properties, and even actively manipulate EPS properties for the cell; (2) EPS-compositional studies should not be limited to culture-based systems; and (3) EPS under natural conditions will likely exist in a continuum of partial-degradation states.

Polysaccharides

The polysaccharide components of EPS are perhaps the best-studied to date. Common carbohydrate components that are often found in EPS include monomers such as D-glucose, D-galactose, D-mannose, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, D-glucuronic acid, D-galacturonic acid, L-guluronic acid, D-mannuronic acid, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and N-acetyl-D-galactosamine. Polysaccharides such as cellulose, alginic acid, dextran, xanthan, and Vibrio exopolysaccharide (VPS) are examples of polysaccharides produced by bacteria (for reviews see;;; ).

The exopolysaccharide portion can exert significant net effects on physical and sorptive properties of EPS. The presence of polar negative-charged groups such as carboxyls, phosphates and sulfate esters can provide negative charges. In certain microbial mat systems, highly sulfated exopolysaccharides have been isolated, and contained up to near 30% (wt/wt) in sulfate.

In the presence of (positive) divalent cations (e.g., Ca2+, Mg2+) they can form cation bridges with adjacent polymers having also negative functional groups. EPS having abundant uronic acids often complex in this manner. Direct linkages between adjacent EPS can also occur. For example, linkages between a cationic polysaccharide and (anionic) extracellular-DNA has been shown to contribute to the physical stability of bacterial biofilms. The abilities of EPS to link with each other is dependent, in part, on pH, the presence of appropriate functional groups, and the steric availability of functional groups.

Microdomains within EPS Matrices

The natural EPS matrix is now known to be heterogeneous over small spatial scales (e.g., μm, even nm). In order to describe small, localized areas that exhibited different properties than the broader matrix, polysaccharide chemists long ago developed the term ‘microdomain.’ The microdomain concept was extended to EPS to begin understanding why intact EPS exhibited very different properties than those of the extracted bulk EPS. Microdomains can result from localized concentrations of certain monomeric components of polymers, and/or differential binding of adjacent polymers to each other. Evidence for microdomains within in situ expolymer matrices has been evidenced by the careful combination of fluorescent lectin probes and confocal scanning laser microscopy. Microdomains are now realized to contribute to the smaller-scale heterogeneity that is observed within both suspended aggregate- and attached-biofilms. The presence of microdomains re-enforces the idea that the EPS matrix is not an amorphous, homogeneous entity, but rather can be structured at several different levels.

Proteins

Proteinacious moieties are common in natural EPS matrices and occur in a variety of molecular forms such as peptides, amino-sugars, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and amyloid proteins. They also can be grouped by their functions and properties such as extracellular enzymes (e-enzymes), membrane vesicle proteins, adhesins, amyloids, hydrophobins, and amphiphiles. It is not well-understood yet, how proteins interact with other matrix molecules to accomplish these apparent functions.

While many proteins and peptides are easily hydrolyzed by microbial heterotrophy, certain proteins and peptides can be quite refractory to degradation. It is now realized that structured refractory complexes, called amyloid fibrils are a common component of EPS. These have not received much attention in oceanic environments but may contribute to a number of forms of refractory organic matter, and the refractory portions of EPS. Here, they may have important functions. Amyloids may form an important, refractory structural component of the EPS matrix.

Amyloids are loosely defined as any fibrillary polypeptide aggregate having a cross-β-quaternary structure, which self-assemble under the right environmental conditions. Amyloid fibrils consist of sets of 4–6 peptides linked together in a twisting, helical (i.e., rope-like) structure that is held together by non-covalent associations. A growing body of evidence supports the idea that amyloid fibrils, sometimes called curli fibers, may be formed from many different proteins (and peptides) and are a generic structure of peptide chain. While amyloid formation has been linked to many human disease processes, they occur in natural microbial systems as a component of EPS. Their formation, at present, is thought to result from non-biological processes.

Extracellular e-DNA

A growing body of research now acknowledges the presence of extracellular forms of deoxyribonucleic acids (eDNA), and their role as an important structural component of the biofilm matrix. Historically, eDNA was thought to result largely from the lysis of cells or release of plasmids. However, seminal studies by showed the presence of eDNA as a part of the EPS. Concentrations of eDNA in sediments are often 3–4 orders of magnitude higher than those in the water-column, and suggest a role in the cycling of P in marine systems. Both eDNA and extracellular nucleases, together, may influence the physical consistency of biofilm EPS. Results of other studies indicated secretion by bacteria of eDNA is an active process. The postulated roles suggest that eDNA may be a bacterial strategy that serves as an abundant structural scaffold within EPS. For example, in non-marine systems, the Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses eDNA bound to a specific cationic extracellular polysaccharide pel to provide structural stability to the EPS of biofilm. Others have suggested an electron-transfer conduit, or substratum for the controlled movement of bound e-Enzymes. Further studies await empirical testing of these ideas. However, an interesting caveat is that a recent study by showed that DNA sorbed to sediments constituted an important source of phosphorus in normally P-limited deep-sea ecosystems. A review on eDNA pools in marine sediments summarizes many important aspects. Finally, DNA has been implicated in long-distance electron transfer processes. A pertinent question that warrants investigation is: does this offer the possibility for long-distance transfer of extracellular electrons through the EPS matrix?

Modifications Post-secretion

Extracellular polymeric substance, once-secreted by cells, are subjected to substantial environmental modifications, perhaps in predictable manners. Degradation of EPS may consist of a multi-step process. The steps likely represent the degradation of different components, ranging from highly labile to relatively refractory, which have different compositions and/or steric availabilities (to extracellular enzymes). A study of EPS produced within lithifying microbial mats showed that initial hydrolyses involved a rapid, and possibly selective, utilization by heterotrophs of certain sugar monomers, and LMW compounds. Certain components of the EPS, such as the uronic acids were highly labile to mat bacteria. Initial heterotrophic degradation of EPS was fueled by the large pool of LMW organics released by cyanobacteria during photosynthesis. This pool was consumed within 4–6 h post-daylight. The results indicated that a rapid, initial degradation occurred, followed by a much slower decomposition, leaving behind a more “refractory remnant” that persist for extended periods. As alluded to above, specific components of EPS such as many polysaccharides should exhibit relatively rapid turnover rates, when compared to more refractory components such as amyloid proteins. Finally, degradation will be affected by the physical properties of the EPS such as their gel versus solution states.

Sorption, Trapping, and Diffusion-Slowing Properties

Diffusion is a key process in the design of the microbial cell, as it is the primary means by which small organic molecules and ions may be taken up by cells. Diffusion is also of relevance in the movement of signal molecules (i.e., autoinducers) involved in QS, extracellular enzymes, and antimicrobial agents. EPS can be broadly considered a sorptive sponge for the binding, trapping and concentration of organics and ions. Over the small spatial scales of biofilms, the EPS matrix influences the diffusion process. Diffusion is a multi-faceted process that is influenced by temperature, ionic concentrations, etc. A major driver in diffusion, of course, is the relative concentration gradient. The density and properties of the EPS can influence diffusion rates (of ions or molecules) so they can range negligible (compared to diffusion in pure water at the same temperature) to having significantly slowed diffusivities.

Although bulk measurements of diffusivity may be estimated, it is difficult to determine how the smaller-scale variability in EPS densities influence diffusion at these scales. The natural matrix of EPS within aggregates or surface biofilms is often filled with channels, which by microbial design or by environmental influence, enhances mass transfer to/from cells.

A number of investigators have carefully measured diffusion rate constants by monitoring the movement of fluorescent molecules over time using confocal scanning laser microscopy and other approaches. initially used fluorescent molecules and confocal scanning laser microscopy to examine diffusivities and found them to be variable, ranging from those of pure water (d = 1.0) to extreme diffusion-slowing effects (d = 0.02) by the matrix. From a practical standpoint, one can assume there will be variability within an aggregate or attached biofilm. Collectively, these studies have shown that considerable changes occur in the movement of molecules and ions over microspatial distances (i.e., μms), which can relate to the observed heterogeneity that occurs within biofilms.

Physical trapping of organic and inorganic colloids, and nanoparticles also occurs in the EPS matrix. The viscoelastic nature and the dispersed arrangements of EPS at the surface-most fringes of biofilms make them ideal for the physical trapping of colloids, small particles, and/or sorption of ions and molecules. Sorption is influenced by a number of factors. These include pH, the forms and concentrations of ion(s), and the type(s) of ligands (binding sites) and associations (e.g., ionic- and covalent-bonds, van der Waals forces, etc.). The pH can have a strong effect on ionic binding, especially with regard to many EPS. In general, acidic pH tends to inhibit ion binding, while neutral or basic pH tend to promote binding. A caveat is that not all ions bind equally. A second caveat is that certain functional groups bind ions more efficiently at a given pH. For example, as the pH rises to near neutral, more complexation may occur to carboxyl sites. The increase in binding of divalent cations often results in a more cohesive polymeric gel structure.

This pH-dependent sorption process has practical importance in ocean systems (and biofilms) because the most abundant divalent ions in seawater are Ca2+ and Mg2+. These ions often form suitable (bi-dentate) bridges between adjacent EPS molecules having carboxylic acid groups, and can contribute to gel formation or floc (marine snow) formation in the water column. However, other important ions (at a given pH) may ‘outcompete’ Ca2+ and Mg2+ for binding sites. The binding of transition and other metals, such as Th, Cd, Cu, Ag, Fe, and Se, to EPS isolated from different environments, such as hydrothermal vents, microbial mats, and other areas, has been described. Metal binding to EPS of surface floc material (i.e., marine snow) in the surface waters of oceans, and subsequent sinking of flocs may result in significant vertical transport (flux) of trace elements to ocean floor, a process of global biogeochemical significance (as mentioned above).

While ocean seawater is often pH 7.8–8.2, the range of pH over smaller spatial (and temporal) scales can be quite dramatic. In microbial mat systems, where highly active bacterial respiration and photosynthesis occur, the pH has been shown to vary from pH 6.0–10.0 over a 24 h (i.e., diel) cycle. This is due to net photosynthesis during daylight (which raise pH), and net respiration during darkness (which lowers pH). This can result in regular diel changes in the complexation of ions, and hence influence the physical stability of EPS over a 24 h cycle. The diffusion-slowing properties of EPS contribute to the sharp geochemical gradients often observed within aggregate and attached biofilms.

Optical Properties

The biofilm is an organic gel coating (of EPS) on a surface (or within a suspended aggregate) with a collage of cells, and sorbed or localized molecules and ions, colloids, and particulates. All of these different components, individually or interactively, will influence the optical properties (i.e., refraction, scattering, and absorption of photons) of the broader surface (or water). The EPS can be thought of as a “semi-translucent” gel having different densities. Several processes act in concert to alter the optical properties of sediments. First, the polymers themselves appear to decrease the reflectance of the surface. In sediment systems, this can alter the amount of light entering the sediments. This is due to a combination of two processes. First, the gel polymers increase the spacing between sediment grains. This allows more light to enter in the spaces between grains, rather than being reflected from closely packed sediments. Second, the gel state of the polymer acts as a ‘photon trap’ because it mediates a change in refractive index, relative to seawater. This enhances the forward-scattering of photons, relative to back-scattering. This has been termed the ‘biofilm gel-effect’. The functional value is that light may be more homogenously scattered around photosynthetic cells, and allow cells to conduct photosynthesis deeper in sediments (or mats).

As light interacts with a surface, photons are either reflected, scattered, refracted and/or absorbed. Reflectance involves back-scattering of photons at a fixed angle (relative to incident direction of photon). Often photons are ‘scattered’ at many angles relative to the incident. Refraction involves continuing through the surface, but altering the angle (relative to the incident) resulting in a change in refractive index. Absorbance involves the capture of photon energy by surface molecules or atoms. Absorbed photons may be re-emitted, as fluorescence (within pico-sec to nano-secs after absorbance), or released as heat. However, the biofilm is not simply a translucent gel but rather a three-dimensional matrix harboring cells, sorbed, or localized molecules (e.g., scytonemins, amino acids, etc.), colloids, and particulates. Biological chromophores (molecules that absorb light near specific wavelengths) include the purines and pyrimidines of DNA, the ‘ringed’ amino acids (tyrosine, phenylalanine, etc.), and other molecules. The sea surface layer is known to harbor EPS gels. Of special interest will be how the sea-surface layers of EPS influence photon penetration into the underlying water.

Quorum Sensing

Do microbial communities communicate and coordinate activities? Classical microbiology during much of the past century has taught us to understand microbes simply as individual cells. Recently, however, a growing body of evidence supports the idea that bacteria often act in groups, rather than as individuals. When bacteria are attached, their proximity to each other results in the development of interactive relationships ranging from antagonistic to agonistic, and even altruistic. These interactions are often chemically mediated but are tempered by the ever-changing conditions of their local environment. The diffusion-slowing properties of the EPS matrix facilitates the development of such relationships among cells in a way that cannot be accomplished by free-living planktonic cells.

Quorum sensing is a type of bacterial cell–cell communication that involves the exchange of chemical signals among nearby cells to coordinate behaviors that are best conducted in groups. It involves the production, detection, and response by cells to diffusible signaling molecules (i.e., autoinducers). Autoinducers accumulate in the proximal environment as the bacterial population increases. When autoinducer concentration reaches a threshold-level, cells collectively alter gene expression. Many group activities such as bioluminescence, antibiotic production, and EPS secretion are regulated by QS.

Quorum sensing can also be utilized by cells for ‘diffusion-sensing’. This allows bacteria to sense the diffusional properties of its proximal environment, presumably to ‘make decisions’ whether to conduct more metabolically costly processes, such as production and release of extracellular enzymes, plasmids, antibiotics, etc.. Together, these two processes, quorum- and diffusion-sensing, have been termed ‘efficiency sensing’.

The foundation for cell–cell cooperative interactions originally was proposed for explaining the bioluminescence by a marine luminescent bacterium, previously Photobacterium, renamed Vibrio fischeri, and then Aliivibrio fischeri, which was isolated from a small Hawaiian squid. Studies progressively showed that autoinducer molecules, upon reaching a threshold concentration in the medium, triggered changes in gene expression that resulted in bacterial luminescence. Luminescence by populations of symbiotic bacteria, localized in the light organs of the squid, afforded it a selective advantage against predation. The ability to communicate, coordinate, and act as groups, however, does not relinquish the cells as an individual unit. Microbial cells can (and do) still act as individual cells. This amazing flexibility likely contributes to the tremendous success and resiliency of bacteria.

In open surface-water ocean environments, QS can have large-scale effects, especially when in overwhelming abundances. An obvious example of this was the ‘milky ocean’ that was observed at night by satellite off of Somalia, Africa. The milky ocean, which was 100s of square km in size, was due to QS-triggered bioluminescence in ocean surface populations of bacteria.

Several different classes of chemical signals exist. Most were described from the study of infection-causing bacteria. These include acylhomoserine lactones (AHL), unique oligopeptides, furanosyl borate diesters (Autoinducer-2), and gamma-butyrolactones. The AHLs comprise a class of approximately 18 different types of signal molecules that are released into the surrounding environment, and eventually bind to an intracellular receptor protein, whose complex then triggers changes in gene expression. AHLs in marine environments have been found in sponges, microbial mats and marine snow. Interestingly, signals such as AHLs are prone to inactivation under certain environmental conditions such as high pH (>8.0). It is not known how fluctuating conditions (e.g., pH, oxidants, desiccation, photocatalytic degradation) in natural environments influence chemical signaling and coordination of microbial activities. Signaling, however, will likely be localized and most pronounced within EPS matrices, and within planktonic aggregates.

Signaling using AHLs, for example, is not limited to heterotrophic bacteria. Rather it has been found in photosynthetic cyanobacteria and Archaea. Importantly, it is now realized that this form of cell–cell communication can occur in single-species population, but may also be utilized by inter-Kingdom consortia, such as plant-microbe and animal–microbe associations. Contrastingly, molecules that may act as signals for some bacteria, may act as antibiotics against other bacteria. A final note is that currently only several classes of signaling molecules (e.g., AHLs, AI-2, and peptides, diffusible signal factors (DSFs), etc.) are known (;, for review). However, QS and similar interactions via chemical signaling are likely to occur using a variety of signals; most of which may be unknown at present.

Extracellular Vesicles and Gene-Exchange

Bacteria possess the capability to bud-off portions of their cell membranes, which are then released as extracellular vesicles. The vesicles provide bacteria with the ability to package molecules within a surrounding lipid membrane, and release them in their surrounding extracellular environment, and localize them within the EPS matrix. This can provide a protective ‘minefield’ against antibiotics, preserve extracellular signals and plasmids, and provide other functions as well. The presence of extracellular vesicles within biofilms, and specifically the EPS matrix, is now realized to be quite common. The vesicle composition is often similar to the plasma membrane (Gram-positives) or outer cell membrane (in Gram-negatives), but additionally contain specific proteins as part of the vesicle. The vesicles can package a wide range of molecules such as eDNA, RNA, e-enzymes, antibiotics, and signal molecules, and likely provide protective effects for the packaged molecules they carry.

Gene exchange is an important process among bacteria. The EPS matrix can enhance gene exchange among cells for several reasons. First, conjugation (i.e., a uni-directional exchange of plasmids via a pilus connecting two cells) requires extended contact for a prolonged period of time (approximately 20 min). In open-water systems, this is difficult due to Brownian motion constraints. When localized in a three-dimensional EPS matrix, two cells can remain relatively stationary for prolonged periods of time, which can facilitate conjugative gene exchange. Second, extracellular DNA, used in transformation, can be rapidly degraded once outside of the cell, or strongly sorbed to sediment particles. When DNA is immobilized within EPS, its persistence can be enhanced, and thus increase chances for transformational exchange of DNA among cells. Direct measurements of these two processes, to our knowledge, are not yet available.

Extracellular Enzymes (e-Enzymes) and Hydrolysis products

Degradation of organic matter and its mineralization to CO2 is a fundamental process of bacteria. In many ocean environments, bacteria produce e-enzymes to partially hydrolyze organic matter that becomes sorbed or trapped by the EPS. When conducted efficiently, with minimal loss to the surrounding water, the biofilm can be an efficient external digestion system for the microbial community.

The localization of e-enzymes is a process that is important in open water aggregate- as well as attached-biofilms. In order for efficient diffusional uptake, both enzymes and their hydrolysis products must remain localized in proximity to cells (e.g., approximately 30 μm). EPS provide a matrix to localize both enzymes and their hydrolysis products relatively close to cells. It is not known, however, how e-enzymes remain localized within the EPS matrix. Are they attached (bonded) to polymers with active sites exposed? In studies of other systems, bacteria are known to localize polysaccharases and other e-enzymes. e-Enzymes are also known to be contained within extracellular vesicles, localized within the expolymer matrix, and e-DNA nucleases were found in Vibrio cholerae biofilms. Indeed, elevated microbial activities, such as enzymatic activities, have been reported in marine snow particles at higher-levels than those in surrounding sea water, thus suggesting that marine snow are hotspots for remineralization of organic and inorganic materials.

Insight has been provided through studies of other systems. They showed that extracellular lipase was protected against heat denaturation via complexation with the EPS alginate. Using molecular modeling they were able to show that e-enzymes can be physically bound to EPS, however, the enzyme/EPS bond must occur away from active sites on the enzyme. Finally, this bonding provides enhanced stability against denaturation. However, questions remain, such as: how are enzymatic activities maintained outside the cell? Empirical evidence has been relatively limited. Do the functional equivalents of extracellular chaperones help to maintain activities (i.e., prevent denaturation) of e-enzymes? It is also not known how extracellular enzymes may modify the EPS themselves.

EPS in Microbial Mats and Mineral Precipitation

Microbialites are benthic microbial deposits. Microbial mats, a type of microbialite, are the longest-lived ecosystems that are known to have existed on Earth. Certain fossilized microbialites extend far back in the fossil record (; for review, see ). They are the earliest known macro-fossil evidence of life in the geological record, extending back an estimated 3.4–3.7 gy. They dominate the fossil record for 3 gy, which represents over 80% of the time life has existed on Earth. Recently, the precipitation process has been studied at nanometer spatial scales.

Microbial mats typically exhibit a distinct vertical layering of microbial functional groups that is strongly influenced by externally influenced gradients such as light and geochemical conditions. In most cases, mats are examples of actively metabolizing, highly organized microbial communities, and constitute “high-yield” systems where resources are efficiently recycled amongst its members. These systems, therefore, offer excellent platforms from which to study how EPS may influence the precipitation of carbonate minerals. Thrombolites and tufa deposits are other forms of microbialites.

Extracellular polymeric substances are abundantly present in microbialites, such as mats and contribute to the metabolic efficiency of mat communities. This occurs through their diffusion-slowing properties, light-attenuation, and abilities to influence 3D-architecture, chemical communication, extracellular enzymatic hydrolyses, and biogeochemical mineral precipitation. The details of how this relate to the molecular-scale interaction occurring between ions and the EPS are not, as yet, fully understood.

Carbonate Precipitation

Mats are well-known for their association with the biogeochemical precipitation of minerals such as carbonates (e.g., calcite, aragonite). Present-day examples of precipitating mats include tufa mats, marine stromatolites, and marine thrombolites (see, for review;; ). There are several different mechanisms known to directly or indirectly influence precipitation within mat environments. Microbial communities drive the basic alkalinity engine, which when coupled to the organic matrix of mats, results in biogeomineral precipitation. Activities of several microbial groups, such as cyanobacteria, sulfate reducers, and anoxygenic phototrophs, can ‘promote precipitation,’ while other groups (e.g., aerobic heterotrophs, sulfur oxidizers, and fermenters) can ‘promote dissolution’. Precipitation of CaCO3 occurs in seawater that is near or exceeding supersaturation of carbonate ions, and has basic pH conditions. Cyanobacterial activities, for example, will raise the pH during daylight photosynthesis, which favors localized carbonate precipitation. Specific moieties on EPS, such as acidic groups, can act as nuclei for subsequent CaCO3 precipitation. Even bacterial cells themselves can serve as nucleation sites for precipitation. EPS can bind substantial amounts of free Ca2+ and other minerals such as phosphate and sulfate from the surrounding water. This can result in precipitation of EPS-associated minerals such as apatite [Ca5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH)], struvite (MgNH4PO4⋅6H2O), dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2], and aragonite.

Under some conditions, however, EPS can inhibit precipitation, or even contribute to carbonate dissolution. Cation-binding by EPS removes free Ca2+ ions from solution, through depletion of carbonate minerals from the proximal surroundings. Acidic amino acids, such as aspartic or glutamic acids, and carboxylated polysaccharides (i.e., groups of uronic acids) can act as strong inhibitors of CaCO3 precipitation. The functional groups and their steric availability (to bind ions) are key in this process. The role(s) in carbonate precipitation of specific microbial clades such as sulfate reducers, however, remains controversial, but likely involves different types of community interactions under normal marine, hypersaline, and alkaline conditions.

Marine stromatolites are microbial mats having repeating layers of precipitated micritic laminae produced through interaction of the microbial communities and the environment. In present day, they occur in only a few limited marine environments such as the Bahamas and Shark Bay in Western Australia. Studies extending for over a decade have examined present-day open-water, subtidal, marine stromatolites at Highborne Cay (Bahamas) and showed the surface microbial community consisted of several distinct mat stages (i.e., termed Types 1, 2, and 3), each having very different phenotypic characteristics. The EPS produced during these stages had very different properties and influenced the microbial communities within. In the Type 1 stage, the community exhibited “high growth.” It consisted of dense cyanobacteria with high EPS production that grew (upward) quickly, consuming resources. The abundant EPS resulted in a “sticky” surface that trapped ooid grains (i.e., sediment) washing over the mats during high wave actions; a process that propagated the continued upward growth of the mat. The EPS contained ligands to chelate much of the available free Ca2+ ions. The net result was that EPS in the Type 1 mat inhibited CaCO3 precipitation. When a Type 1 mat transitions to a Type 2 mat, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) increase in their relative abundances. EPS, initially produced by the cyanobacteria, are consumed by SRBs, then re-secreted as different EPS, a process which enhances localized precipitation. Infared (FT-IR) spectral analyses of EPS extracted from the precipitate closely resembles those extracted from SRB mat isolates. Notably, the EPS properties change in the Type 2 mat, becoming “less sticky.” These studies illustrated how the EPS properties of the different mat could influence their properties and growth. The Type 2 mat resembles a classic microbial mat, with less EPS production (or accumulation), and little/no upward growth. The cyanobacteria, SRB, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB), and aerobic heterotrophs become spatially organized, and exhibit a closer metabolically coupling.

With rising levels of atmospheric CO2, efforts are beginning to examine if certain carbonate-precipitating bacteria can be used to sequester (and store) CO2 and understand how microbial mat processes influence C storage.

Sediment Stabilization and Fossil Evidence of Mats

Sediment fluxes in marine systems are affected by many parameters, including sediment grain sizes, physically cohesive muds, and biologically cohesive microbial extracellular polymers. EPS concentrations in marine sediments vary considerably. EPS, especially those from microphytobenthos (e.g., diatomaceous mats), are important in cohesive sediment stability, and resistance against erosion and resuspension. Levels of EPS present in sediments can be a crucial variable to sediment stability. However, more EPS isn’t always better. Interesting experimental studies by showed that lower levels of EPS were more efficient in increasing erosional thresholds than abundant EPS conditions. While is well-established that the cohesive properties of EPS contribute to sediment stability, it is however not well-understood how the molecular-scale interactions of EPS themselves contribute to their cohesiveness. Sediment-inhabiting small animals may indirectly influence sediment stability. For example, increased EPS production was shown to occur in the presence of a grazing nematode. Initial studies suggest that QS (see above) may be involved in biofilm formation in certain diatoms and offers the possibility that QS may contribute to the sediment stabilization process.

Finally, the very same bedform patterns that contribute to sediment stability in present-day sediments (e.g., ripples) also are considered as fossil evidences of sediment stabilization. These include patterns such as microbially induced sedimentary structures (MISSs), which are considered to be indirect fossil remnants that illustrate the very earliest vestiges of microbial mat life through geologic time.

Feeding Studies

It was realized early on that biofilms, and more-specifically their EPS, can represent a potentially labile carbon source for animals ingesting microbial cells. Since many small animals, present in both the water column and sediments of ocean systems, ingest microbial flora as a food source, they will coincidently ingest the closely associated EPS during the feeding process. Many invertebrate taxa are filter-feeders (i.e., straining suspended particles from the water) or deposit-feeders (i.e., ingesting sediments and their organics), therefore will consume microbial flora and their associated EPS as a food. Initial feeding experiments addressing EPS utilization by marine animals were conducted using EPS that were isolated from bacterial cultures grown in the presence of radioactively labeled (14C) substrates. Once the EPS were separated from cells and residual label, EPS were mixed with sediments and fed to animals. Results indicated that EPS comprised a highly labile carbon food source. Examples of such studies involved copepods, polychaete worms, bivalves, and sea stars. Biofilms are even known to be grazed upon by benthic foraminifera.

Extracellular polymeric substance can act as a ‘sorptive sponge.’ This is due to their ability to bind metals, other ions, and even relatively hydrophobic organic contaminants such as pesticides, which is attributed to the presence of charged moieties (i.e., positive or negatively charged functional groups) or hydrophobic moieties. This can result in the efficient trophic-transfer of metals and pesticides to consumer animals that are ingesting EPS. Together, these moieties serve to sorb and/or trap, and concentrate environmental contaminants. When animals ingest the matrix, coincidentally during their feeding on sediments, cells or flocs, they will consume the sorbed metals and organics as well. EPS have been shown to be an efficient trophic-transfer vehicle for sorbed metals in amphipods, and organic compounds such as pesticides, although most of the latter work has even been conducted in freshwater systems.

Binding of Nanoparticles to EPS and Biofilms

In ocean systems, both natural (e.g., geological) processes and anthropogenic processes result in the generation of extremely small particulates called nanoparticles. Nanoparticles measure 1–100 nm in at least one dimension, and have different physicochemical properties than larger particles. In oceans, nanoparticles occur in the form of metal contaminants, organics, and even degraded plastics and potentially may have long water-column residence times owing to their small sizes. A number of studies are indicating that nanoparticles are efficiently concentrated by biofilms, and more specifically their EPS. Further studies have shown that nanoparticles are taken up by protozoans. Finally, the bioavailability and bioaccumulation of nanoparticles occurs in marine (and freshwater) animals such as snails, bivalves and oligochaetes (for review, see ), all of which coincidently ingest EPS during feeding processes. Therefore, EPS can work as a trophic transfer vehicle for nanoparticles to enter food webs.

EPS Capsules, Survival of Digestion, and the Gut Microbiome

Bacteria often possess EPS capsules surrounding their cells. The presence of capsules is a protective measure for the cells. Studies conducted by Plante and colleagues showed that encapsulated bacteria were less susceptible to digestion during detritivore- and deposit-feeding. showed that protection is afforded to biofilm bacteria during grazing by the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Finally, one understudied aspect of trophic interactions regarding biofilms that is gaining attention involves the roles of resident gut bacteria in consumer animals (including humans). The presence of these bacteria, whose densities and activities may be quite substantial, is often facilitated by EPS capsules and biofilms. Gut bacteria are a source of many new genes, and the diversity and ecological principles driving these microbiomes will be an interesting future area of study.

The Larval Settlement Process and Biofouling

Virtually any type of surface, when placed in seawater becomes fouled with organisms ranging from bacteria to animals and algae; a process known as biofouling. Bacteria and other microbes are generally the initial colonizing organisms of a surface. The presence of a bacterial biofilm often sets the stage for subsequent larval settlement. Understanding how biofilms interact with larval settlement is important to the broader biofouling process, which constitutes a costly ocean-engineering problem.

Studies in marine systems suggest that larval settlement is also a multistep process, which involves initial sensing of specific chemical cues, initial settlement and “tasting” of the surface, and finally more-permanent settlement. The initial sensing step of waterborne cues is a concentration-dependent process.

Presently, data suggest that in many cases, the larval settlement cues are molecules that are produced by adult conspecifics and are concentrated within the surface biofilm matrix or, in some cases, may be produced by the biofilms themselves. Cue(s) can be multifunctional, acting as agonists, antagonists, or toxins. Behaviors and responses of larvae to cues are often species-dependent.

Settlement cues may be localized within the biofilm, and more-specifically by the EPS matrix. Diatom biofilms and the possible involvement of heat-stable settlement cues are involved in the settlement of the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Hydroides sp. are examples of the initial colonizers of open surfaces in warmer water regions. Once they are set, the complexity of colonizing species increases. Settlement cues may be produced by the biofilm itself but has been challenging to verify. The beneficial effect of a specific epibiotic bacterial biofilm on marine animal or plant hosts has been suggested. Coralline red algae, for example, are highly inductive surfaces for the settlement of marine invertebrates, and are now realized to be strongly influenced by the surface microbial flora and their cues.

In contrast, the inhibition of larval settlement seems to be influenced by waterborne or biofilm-associated molecules. This is important to the potential control of biofouling. Early studies noted that many marine animals and macroalgae exhibit reduced biofouling, and suggested that chemical defenses may be involved. More recently, studies have shown that specific chemical inhibitors can be produced by either the host organism (e.g., algae, animal) or by biofilm bacteria growing on the surface of the host. These have included both large and small molecules. In tunicates, proteins produced by biofilm bacteria inhibit further colonization by bacteria. In a series of landmark studies, showed the macroalga Delissia pulchra, was not subject to biofouling. This inhibition (of biofouling) operates by jamming the cell–cell chemical communication pathways of bacteria. As mentioned above, many gram-negative bacteria use AHLs in chemical communication. Release of specific AHL analogs, which are similar in molecular design can “jam” the QS pathway(s) of AHLs. Small halogenated furanones, resembling AHLs, interfered with chemical signaling in bacteria. An ecological function of antifouling molecules produced by plants and animals was postulated (and was tested) by Kjelleberg and colleagues. found large (>100 kDa) polysaccharide-containing molecules, produced by both a host macroalga (Ulva sp.) and Vibrio sp. bacteria, to inhibit larval settlement. These molecules act as a broad-spectrum inhibitor for settlement. This has touched off substantial exploration for chemically based inhibitors of biofouling in both nature and medicine by many laboratories. This infers the complex interaction in biofouling among host organisms, bacterial biofilms, and chemical cues. Since the biofouling of marine surfaces has both positive and negative effects to hatcheries, this area has an emerging impact on aquaculture processes. Finally, work is in progress to understand how climate change may affect processes such as larval settlement.

Extreme Ocean Environments

In extreme and fluctuating conditions, microbes surround themselves with EPS in an effort to add stability to their extracellular environment. The physiological plasticity of microbial cells, combined with their EPS-based adaptations allow microbial life to succeed at the boundaries of where other forms of life can survive.

Low-temperature Sea-ice Communities

In polar regions, metabolic processes are slowed by relatively cold temperatures. It is here that microbes also employ EPS to their advantage. Earlier, pioneering studies in Antarctic systems showed the presence of specific ‘anti-freeze proteins’ (i.e., glycoproteins) within the blood plasma of fish. The proteins would bind to ice crystals as they formed and prevent further growth of damaging ice crystals in the blood. This realization launched many subsequent studies of other organisms, including bacteria.

In Arctic and Antarctic systems, the presence of EPS play key roles as cryoprotectants, for attachment to sea-ice interfaces, and to survive enclosure in ice. Studies of bacterial isolates from sea-ice systems have demonstrated that certain glycoproteins and exopolysaccharides act as cryoprotectants, which inhibit ice crystal nucleation, in addition to securing the attachment of cells to the ice surface. EPS and TEP become routinely embedded in sea-ice and contribute to the survival of microbial cells in these environments. EPS, including TEP can account for the majority of the carbon pool in sea-ice, which is later released during melting, and can even make their way into atmospheric ice.

High-temperature Hydrothermal Vents

Since their initial discovery in 1977, ocean hydrothermal vent systems have received much scientific attention. They are located near specific regions of the ocean spreading centers of tectonic plates, where geothermally heated fluids, enriched in minerals, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and methane are released and mix with much colder surrounding seawater. Mineral deposits form as chimneys, and are surrounded by islands of intense biological activity, where chemosynthetic bacteria and archaea form the base of a food web having a diversity of often unique animals. For these reasons, they have been considered as a possible site for the origin of life on Earth, and as an analog for study in the exploration for possible life elsewhere.

Isolates of bacteria from vent systems demonstrate the capacity for abundant EPS production, perhaps to sequester dissolved minerals and other metals from the surrounding water. EPS, derived from isolate cultures, typically have uronic acid contents as high as 40%, and relatively high molecular masses. It is not yet understood, however, how the EPS may influence the microenvironment of the bacteria and archaea, in terms of e-enzymes, 3D-microspatial development of their communities, and microspatial acidification (to solubilize metal ions). It is not known if the EPS matrix facilitates these processes, and actually may serve to inhibit their precipitation, similarly to those in some shallow-water carbonate environments?

Hypersaline Environments and Desiccation

Hypersaline systems, such as salt ponds, salterns, and hypersaline lagoons, contain well-developed microbial mats. Many of these systems occur in proximity or directly connected to ocean systems, while others are inland. Examples of hypersaline systems are numerous and a few include Salt Pond, San Salvador, Bahamas; Guerrero Negro, Baha California Sur, Mexico; Laguna Tebenquiche, Salar de Atama, Chile; Don Juan Pond [McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica]; Dead Sea; Solar Lake, Sinai, Egypt; Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, Western Australia; Polynesian islands.

The hypersaline environment presents unique challenges to microorganisms, especially in terms of fluctuations in ion concentrations and osmolarity. In addition, many hypersaline mats are exposed to intermittent and/or progressive desiccation. A lack of available water, during the desiccation process, can kill a bacterial cell, largely through denaturation of proteins and destabilization of cell membranes (see, for review). EPS are an abundant component of such mats, and likely provide a degree of protection to mat microbial flora against ion fluctuations and desiccation. Interestingly, studies have shown that bacteria can survive in a desiccated state in salt crystal for 250 my.

In hypersaline mats, EPS occur in the form of capsules surrounding individual cells, or a larger EPS matrix surrounding many cells in a biofilm, which can buffer cells against either dessication or rapid changes in water potential. Salinities in hypersaline ponds are often >300 g/L (e.g., seawater is approximately 32 g/L), but can reach as high as 440 g/L, often with concentrations of individual ions not matching those observed for typical seawater. Here, mat communities often experience extended periods (i.e., days to months) of desiccation that often is followed by a rapid rehydration due to seasonal rain events.

Selective saltation also plays a role in the ability of mats to cope with increasing salinities. This allows less-soluble minerals to be removed from solution, as a function of concentration. The evaporation process that occurs throughout the dry season serves to increase ionic concentrations and promotes the selective precipitation of salts on the mat surface. As ionic concentrations increase, there is a sequential salting-out occurring of less-soluble minerals. For example, much of the Ca2+ is typically removed as gypsum (CaSO4 2H2O) or smaller amounts of calcite (CaCO3). Gypsum begins to precipitate when salinity concentrations reach about 160 ppt. At very high ionic concentrations (>300 ppt) NaCl begins to precipitate.

Some EPS may condense with increasing salinity, and even form a hydrophobic barrier on the surface of the biofilm. This may result in enhanced protection during subsequent desiccation. It has been proposed that the exclusion of ions occurs via the EPS matrix in response to increasing salinity, which is designed to reduce osmotic stress and conserve water within the mat. Desiccation is a process occurring in many areas of marine environments. On the fringes of ocean systems, specifically on the upper reaches of rocky intertidal zones, intermittent desiccation is a common process. The roles of EPS in stabilizing microbial communities require further investigation.

Summary: EPS Research Looking Forward

The growing awareness of microbial EPS and their influences on ocean processes are evidenced in this special issue and offers many avenues for future research. It is emphasized here that the secretion of EPS is an adaptive response employed by microbes to enhance their metabolic efficiency and survival. An extensive literature on EPS and biofilms that is available in other areas of microbiology may have relevance to ocean studies.

Finally, there were many aspects of EPS that were not covered in this relatively short overview, but are important to understanding the dynamics of microbial extracellular biology. For example, we have not addressed: (1) EPS as electron-transfer vehicles; (2) the concentration of viruses; (3) molecular pathways of EPS secretion; and (4) the roles of biofilms in the search for life elsewhere. In addition, we anticipate that the roles of EPS in ocean systems will be integrated into the fundamental microbiology of the ocean, and into larger-scale topics such as global climate change, biotechnological applications of EPS, and the search for novel antibiotics and other medicinal compounds.

Author Contributions

All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References 388

  1. 1.

    Aldeek F. Schneider R. Fontaine-Aupart M. P. Mustin C. Lécart S. Merlin C. (2013 ). Patterned hydrophobic domains in the exopolymer matrix of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 1400–1402.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.03054-12

  2. 2.

    Alldredge A. L. Cohen Y. (1987 ). Can microscale chemical patches persist in the sea? Microelectrode study of marine snow, fecal pellets. Science 235 689–691.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.235.4789.689

  3. 3.

    Alldredge A. L. Cole J. J. Caron D. A. (1986 ). Production of heterotrophic bacteria inhabiting macroscopic organic aggregates (marine snow) from surface waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31 68–78.

    Not in our library10.4319/lo.1986.31.1.0068

  4. 4.

    Alldredge A. L. Passow U. Logan B. E. (1993 ). The abundance and significance of a class of large, transparent organic particles in the ocean. Deep Sea Res. 40 1131–1140.

    Not in our library10.1016/0967-0637(93)90129-q

  5. 5.

    Alldredge A. L. Silver M. W. (1988 ). Characteristics, dynamics and significance of marine snow. Prog. Oceanogr. 20 41–82.

    Not in our library10.1016/0079-6611(88)90053-5

  6. 6.

    Allwood A. C. Walter M. R. Burch I. W. Kamber B. S. (2007 ). 3.43 billion-year-old stromatolite reef from the Pilbara Craton of Western Australia: ecosystem-scale insights to early life on Earth. Precambr. Res. 158 198–227.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.013

  7. 7.

    Aluwihare L. I. Repeta D. J. Chen R. F. (1997 ). A major biopolymeric component of dissolved organic carbon in surface seawater. Nature 387 166–169.

    Not in our library10.1038/387166a0

  8. 8.

    Amin S. A. Hmelo L. R. van Tol H. M. Durham B. P. Carlson L. T. Heal K. R. (2015 ). Interaction and signaling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria. Nature 522 98–101.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14488

  9. 9.

    Amon R. M. W. Benner R. (1994 ). Rapid cycling of high-molecular-weight dissolved organic matter in the ocean. Nature 369 549–552.

    Not in our library10.1038/369549a0

  10. 10.

    Amon R. M. W. Benner R. (1996 ). Bacterial utilization of different size classes of dissolved organic matter. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41 41–51.

    Not in our library10.4319/lo.1996.41.1.0041

  11. 11.

    Anton J. Meseguer I. Rodriguezvalera F. (1988 ). Production of an extracellular polysaccharide by Haloferax-mediterranei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54 2381–2386.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.54.10.2381-2386.1988

  12. 12.

    Arnosti C. Ziervogel K. Yang T. Teske A. (2015 ). Oil-derived marine aggregates – hot spots of polysaccharide degradation by specialized bacterial communities. Deep Sea Res. II 129 179–186.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.008

  13. 13.

    Arp G. Reimer A. Reitner J. (2001 ). Photosynthesis-induced biofilm calcification and calcium concentration in Phanerozoic oceans. Science 292 1701–1704.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1057204

  14. 14.

    Arp G. Reimer A. Reitner J. (2003 ). Microbialite formation in seawater of increased alkalinity, Satonda Crater Lake, Indonesia. J. Sed. Res. 73 105–127.

    Not in our library10.1306/071002730105

  15. 15.

    Azam F. Long R. A. (2001 ). Oceanography – Sea snow microcosms. Nature 414 495–498.

    Not in our library10.1038/35107174

  16. 16.

    Baelum J. Borglin S. Chakraborty R. Fortney J. L. Lamendella R. Mason O. U. (2012 ). Deep-sea bacteria enriched by oil and dispersant from the Deepwater Horizon spill. Environ. Microbiol. 14 2405–2416.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02780.x

  17. 17.

    Bao W.-Y. Satuito C. G. Yang J.-L. Kitamura H. (2007 ). Larval settlement and metamorphosis of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in response to biofilms. Mar. Biol. 150 565–574.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00227-006-0383-4

  18. 18.

    Barnhart M. M. Chapman M. R. (2006 ). Curli biogenesis and function. Annu. Revs. Microbiol. 60 131–147.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106

  19. 19.

    Battin T. J. von der Kammer F. Weilhartner A. Ottofuelling S. Hofmann T. (2009 ). Nanostructured TiO2: transport behavior and effects on aquatic microbial communities under environmental conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 8098–8104.

    Not in our library10.1021/es9017046

  20. 20.

    Bauer J. E. Druffel E. R. M. Wolgast D. M. Griffin S. (2002 ). Temporal and regional variability in sources and cycling of DOC and POC in the northwest Atlantic continental shelf and slope. Deep Sea Res. II 49 4387–4419.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0967-0645(02)00123-6

  21. 21.

    Baumgartner L. K. Reid R. P. Dupraz C. Decho A. W. Buckley D. H. Spear J. R. (2006 ). Sulfate reducing bacteria in microbial mats: changing paradigms, new discoveries. Sed. Geol. 185 131–145.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sedgeo.2005.12.008

  22. 22.

    Beech I. B. Cheung C. W. S. (1995 ). Interactions of EPS produced by sulphate-reducing bacteria with metal ions. Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 35 59–72.

    Not in our library10.1016/0964-8305(95)00082-g

  23. 23.

    Bejar V. Calvo C. Moliz J. Diaz-Martinez F. Quesada E. (1996 ). Effect of growth conditions on the rheological properties and chemical composition of Volcaniella eurihalina exopolysaccharide. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 59 77–86.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02787859

  24. 24.

    Benner R. (2002 ). “Chemical composition and reactivity,” in Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter eds Hansell D. A. Carslon C. A. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) 59–90.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135126

  25. 25.

    Benner R. Amon R. M. W. (2015 ). The size-reactivity continuum of major bioelements in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 7 185–205.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135126

  26. 26.

    Benner R. Pakulski J. D. McCarthy M. Hedges J. I. Hatcher P. G. (1992 ). Bulk chemical characteristics of dissolved organic matter in the ocean. Science 255 1561–1564.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.255.5051.1561

  27. 27.

    Benninghoff J. C. Wingender J. Flemming H.-C. Siebers B. (2016 ). “Biofilms X-treme: composition of extracellular polymeric substances in Archaea,” in The Perfect Slime -Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) eds Flemming H.-C. Neu T. R. Wingender J. (London: IWA Publishers) 301–317.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Benzerara K. Menguy N. Lopez-Garcia P. Yoon T.-H. Kazmierczak J. Typiszczak T. (2006 ). Nanoscale detection of organic signatures in carbonate microbialites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 9440–9445.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0603255103

  29. 29.

    Bernhard J. M. Bowser S. S. (1992 ). Bacterial biofilms as a trophic resource for certain benthic foraminifera. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 83 263–272.

    Not in our library10.3354/meps083263

  30. 30.

    Bhaskar P. V. Bhosle N. B. (2005 ). Microbial extracellular polymeric substances in marine biogeochemical processes. Curr. Sci. 88 45–53.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Bhaskar P. V. Bhosle N. B. (2006 ). Bacterial extracellular poly- meric substances (EPS): a carrier of heavy metals in the marine food-chain. Environ. Int. 32 191–198.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2005.08.010

  32. 32.

    Bianchi M. Marty D. Teyssié J. L. Fowler S. W. (1992 ). Strictly aerobic and anaerobic bacteria associated with sinking particulate matter and zooplankton fecal pellets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 88 55–60.

    Not in our library10.3354/meps088055

  33. 33.

    Biermann C. J. (1988 ). Hydrolysis and other cleavages of glycosidic linkages in polysaccharides. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 46 251–271.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-2318(08)60168-7

  34. 34.

    Bigg E. K. (2007 ). Sources, nature, and influence on climate of marine airborne particulates. Environ. Chem. 4 155–161.

    Not in our library10.1071/en07001

  35. 35.

    Bigg E. K. Leck C. (2008 ). The composition of fragments of bubbles bursting at the ocean surface. J. Geophys. Res. 113 D11209

    Not in our library10.1029/2007jd009078

  36. 36.

    Biller S. J. Schubotz F. Roggensack S. E. Thompson A. W. Summons R. E. Chisholm S. W. (2014 ). Bacterial vesicles in marine ecosystems. Science 343 183–186.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1243457

  37. 37.

    Böckelmann U. Janke A. Kuhn R. Neu T. R. Wecke J. Lawrence J. R. (2005 ). Bacterial extracellular DNA forming a defined network-like structure. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 262 31–38.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00361.x

  38. 38.

    Boehm P. D. Fiest D. L. (1980 ). “Aspects of the transport of petroleum hydrocarbons to the offshore benthos during the Ixtoc-I blowout in the Bay of Campeche,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Preliminary Results from the September, 1979 Pierce/Research IXTOC-1Cruises (Boulder, CO: NOAA).

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Boetius A. Anesio A. M. Deming J. W. Mikucki J. A. Rapp J. Z. (2015 ). Microbial ecology of the cryosphere: sea ice and glacial habitats. Nat. Revs. Microbiol. 13 677–690.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3522

  40. 40.

    Bouton A. Vennin E. Boulle J. Pace A. Bourillot R. Thomazo C. (2016 ). Linking the distribution of microbial deposits from the Great Salt Lake (Utah, USA) to tectonic and climatic processes. Biogeosciences 13 5511–5526.

    Not in our library10.5194/bg-13-5511-2016

All 388 references

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.