Does the data tell the true story? A modelling assessment of early COVID-19 pandemic suppression and mitigation strategies in Ghana.

This paper uses publicly available data and various statistical models to estimate the basic reproduction number ( R 0 ) and other disease parameters for Ghana’s early COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. We also test the effectiveness of government imposition of public health measures to reduce the risk of transmission and impact of the pandemic, especially in the early phase. R 0 is estimated from the statistical model as 3.21 using a 0.147 estimated growth rate [95% C.I.: 0.137–0.157] and a 15-day time to recovery after COVID-19 infection. This estimate of the initial R 0 is consistent with others reported in the literature from other parts of Africa, China and Europe. Our results also indicate that COVID-19 transmission reduced consistently in Ghana after the imposition of public health interventions—such as border restrictions, intra-city movement, quarantine and isolation—during the first phase of the pandemic from March to May 2020. However, the time-dependent reproduction number (R t ) beyond mid-May 2020 does not represent the true situation, given that there was not a consistent testing regime in place. This is also confirmed by our Jack-knife bootstrap estimates which show that the positivity rate over-estimates the true incidence rate from mid-May 2020. Given concerns about virus mutations, delays in vaccination and a possible new wave of the pandemic, there is a need for systematic testing of a representative sample of the population to monitor the reproduction number. There is also an urgent need to increase the availability of testing for the general population to enable early detection, isolation and treatment of infected individuals to reduce progression to severe disease and mortality.

Abstract licence: CC BY

1. 17.

   Pros and cons of estimating the reproduction number from early epidemic growth rate of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 · 2010

2. 23.

   The R0 package: a toolbox to estimate reproduction numbers for epidemic outbreaks · 2012

3. 29.

   Complexity of the Basic Reproduction Number (R 0 ) · 2019

4. 34.

   Estimating epidemic exponential growth rate and basic reproduction number · 2020

5. 42.

   Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of COVID-19 in Korea · 2020

6. 43.

   Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review · 2020

7. 48.

   Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak · 2020

8. 52.

   Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study · 2020

9. 54.

   To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic · 2020

10. 55.

    Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK · 2020

11. 61.

    Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study · 2020

12. 78.

    Quantifying asymptomatic infection and transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using observed cases, serology, and testing capacity · 2021

13. 85.

    Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV (COVID-19): early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic size estimates · 2021

76 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.