Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK

Abstract

Background To mitigate and slow the spread of COVID-19, many countries have adopted unprecedented physical distancing policies, including the UK. We evaluate whether these measures might be sufficient to control the epidemic by estimating their impact on the reproduction number ( R 0 , the average number of secondary cases generated per case). Methods We asked a representative sample of UK adults about their contact patterns on the previous day. The questionnaire was conducted online via email recruitment and documents the age and location of contacts and a measure of their intimacy (whether physical contact was made or not). In addition, we asked about adherence to different physical distancing measures. The first surveys were sent on Tuesday, 24 March, 1 day after a “lockdown” was implemented across the UK. We compared measured contact patterns during the “lockdown” to patterns of social contact made during a non-epidemic period. By comparing these, we estimated the change in reproduction number as a consequence of the physical distancing measures imposed. We used a meta-analysis of published estimates to inform our estimates of the reproduction number before interventions were put in place. Results We found a 74% reduction in the average daily number of contacts observed per participant (from 10.8 to 2.8). This would be sufficient to reduce R 0 from 2.6 prior to lockdown to 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.89) after the lockdown, based on all types of contact and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.22–0.53) for physical (skin to skin) contacts only. Conclusions The physical distancing measures adopted by the UK public have substantially reduced contact levels and will likely lead to a substantial impact and a decline in cases in the coming weeks. However, this projected decline in incidence will not occur immediately as there are significant delays between infection, the onset of symptomatic disease, and hospitalisation, as well as further delays to these events being reported. Tracking behavioural change can give a more rapid assessment of the impact of physical distancing measures than routine epidemiological surveillance.

Cited by papers we hold 18

• Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: A repeated cross-sectional study · 2022
  No notice
• The potential health and economic value of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alongside physical distancing in the UK: a transmission model-based future scenario analysis and economic evaluation · 2021
  Corrected
• Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study · 2021
  No notice
• SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during delivery of childhood vaccination campaigns: a modelling study · 2021
  Not checked
• Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus · 2021
  No notice
• The importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. · 2021
  Not checked
• Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic · 2021
  No notice
• Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England · 2021
  No notice
• Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19 · 2021
  No notice
• Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness during COVID-19 physical distancing measures: A rapid systematic review · 2021
  No notice
• Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era · 2021
  Corrected
• Inferring high-resolution human mixing patterns for disease modeling · 2021
  No notice
• Age groups that sustain resurging COVID-19 epidemics in the United States · 2021
  No notice
• OpenABM-Covid19—An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing · 2021
  No notice
• Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study · 2020
  Corrected
• CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown · 2020
  No notice
• Summary of Guidance for Public Health Strategies to Address High Levels of Community Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and Related Deaths, December 2020 · 2020
  No notice
• Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.