Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells

Yoram Burak, Ila R. Fiete

PLoS Computational Biology · 2009

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000291

Abstract

Grid cells in the rat entorhinal cortex display strikingly regular firing responses to the animal's position in 2-D space and have been hypothesized to form the neural substrate for dead-reckoning. However, errors accumulate rapidly when velocity inputs are integrated in existing models of grid cell activity. To produce grid-cell-like responses, these models would require frequent resets triggered by external sensory cues. Such inadequacies, shared by various models, cast doubt on the dead-reckoning potential of the grid cell system. Here we focus on the question of accurate path integration, specifically in continuous attractor models of grid cell activity. We show, in contrast to previous models, that continuous attractor models can generate regular triangular grid responses, based on inputs that encode only the rat's velocity and heading direction. We consider the role of the network boundary in the integration performance of the network and show that both periodic and aperiodic networks are capable of accurate path integration, despite important differences in their attractor manifolds. We quantify the rate at which errors in the velocity integration accumulate as a function of network size and intrinsic noise within the network. With a plausible range of parameters and the inclusion of spike variability, our model networks can accurately integrate velocity inputs over a maximum of approximately 10-100 meters and approximately 1-10 minutes. These findings form a proof-of-concept that continuous attractor dynamics may underlie velocity integration in the dorsolateral medial entorhinal cortex. The simulations also generate pertinent upper bounds on the accuracy of integration that may be achieved by continuous attractor dynamics in the grid cell network. We suggest experiments to test the continuous attractor model and differentiate it from models in which single cells establish their responses independently of each other.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 50

  1. 1.

    Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser MB, Moser E. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2005;436:801-806.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03721

  2. 2.

    Fuhs MC, Touretzky DS. A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2006;26:4266-4276.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4353-05.2006

  3. 3.

    Burak Y, Fiete I. Do we understand the emergent dynamics of grid cell activity? J Neurosci. 2006;26:9352-9354.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2857-06.2006

  4. 4.

    McNaughton BL, Battaglia FP, Jensen O, Moser EI, Moser MB. Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:663-678.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn1932

  5. 5.

    Burgess N, Barry C, O'Keefe J. An oscillatory interference model of grid cell firing. Hippocampus. 2007;17:801-812.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.20327

  6. 6.

    Hasselmo ME, Giocomo LM, Zilli EA. Grid cell firing may arise from interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons. Hippocampus. 2007;17:1252-1271.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.20374

  7. 7.

    Guanella A, Kiper D, Verschure P. A model of grid cells based on a twisted torus topology. Int J Neural Syst. 2007;17:231-240.

    Not in our library10.1142/s0129065707001093

  8. 8.

    Skaggs WE, Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL. A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 1995;7:173-180.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Seung HS. How the brain keeps the eyes still. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13339-13344.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.23.13339

  10. 10.

    Zhang K. Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2112-2126.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.16-06-02112.1996

  11. 11.

    Samsonovich A, McNaughton BL. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5900-5920.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05900.1997

  12. 12.

    Tsodyks M. Attractor neural network models of spatial maps in hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1999;9:481-489.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1999)9:4<481::aid-hipo14>3.0.co;2-s

  13. 13.

    Goodridge JP, Touretzky DS. Modeling attractor deformation in the rodent head-direction system. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:3402-3410.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3402

  14. 14.

    Xie X, Hahnloser RHR, Seung HS. Double-ring network model of the head-direction system. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002;66:041902.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.66.041902

  15. 15.

    Stringer SM, Rolls ET, Trappenberg TP. Self-organising continuous attractor networks with multiple activity packets, and the representation of space. Neural Netw. 2004;17:5-27.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0893-6080(03)00210-7

  16. 16.

    O'Keefe J, Burgess N. Dual phase and rate coding in hippocampal place cells: theoretical significance and relationship to entorhinal grid cells. Hippocampus. 2005;15:853-866.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.20115

  17. 17.

    Giocomo LM, Zilli EA, Fransen E, Hasselmo ME. Temporal frequency of subthreshold oscillations scales with entorhinal grid cell field spacing. Science. 2007;315:1719-1722.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1139207

  18. 18.

    Mittelstaedt M, Mittelstaedt H. Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften. 1980;67:566-567.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Maaswinkel H, Jarrard LE, Whishaw IQ. Hippocampectomized rats are impaired in homing by path integration. Hippocampus. 1999;9:553-561.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1999)9:5<553::aid-hipo9>3.0.co;2-g

  20. 20.

    Sharp PE, Tinkelman A, Cho J. Angular velocity and head direction signals recorded from the dorsal tegmental nucleus of gudden in the rat: implications for path integration in the head direction cell circuit. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:571-588.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Etienne AS, Jeffery KJ. Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus. 2004;14:180-192.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.10173

  22. 22.

    Alonso A, Llinas RR. Subthreshold Na+-dependent theta-like rhythmicity in stellate cells of entorhinal cortex layer II. Nature. 1989;342:175-177.

    Not in our library10.1038/342175a0

  23. 23.

    Alonso A, Klink R. Differential electroresponsiveness of stellate and pyramidal-like cells of medial entorhinal cortex layer II. J Neurophysiol. 1993;70:128-143.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.128

  24. 24.

    Mitchell SJ, Ranck JBJ. Generation of theta rhythm in medial entorhinal cortex of freely moving rats. Brain Res. 1980;189:49-66.

    Not in our library10.1016/0006-8993(80)90006-2

  25. 25.

    Alonso A, Garcia-Austt E. Neuronal sources of theta rhythm in the entorhinal cortex of the rat. ii. phase relations between unit discharges and theta field potentials. Exp Brain Res. 1987;67:502-509.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00247283

  26. 26.

    Murray JD. Mathematical Biology. 2003.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Cohen M, Grossberg S. Absolute stability of global pattern-formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1983;13:815-826.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Hopfield JJ. Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:3088-3092.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088

  29. 29.

    Softky WR, Koch C. The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J Neurosci. 1993;13:334-350.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00334.1993

  30. 30.

    Shadlen MN, Newsome WT. Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:569-579.

    Not in our library10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0

  31. 31.

    Barry C, Hayman R, Burgess N, Jeffery KJ. Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:682-684.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1905

  32. 32.

    Fyhn M, Hafting T, Treves A, Moser MB, Moser EI. Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2007;446:190-194.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05601

  33. 33.

    Sargolini F, Fyhn M, Hafting T, McNaughton BL, Witter MP, et al. Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in entorhinal cortex. Science. 2006;312:758-762.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1125572

  34. 34.

    Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis. J Neurosci. 1990;10:420-435.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.10-02-00420.1990

  35. 35.

    Taube JS. Head direction cells recorded in the anterior thalamic nuclei of freely moving rats. J Neurosci. 1995;15:70-86.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00070.1995

  36. 36.

    Savelli D, Yoganarasimha D, Knierim J. Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus. 2008;18:1270-1282.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.20511

  37. 37.

    Solstad T, Boccara CN, Kropff E, Moser MB, Moser EI. Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science. 2008;322:1865-1868.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1166466

  38. 38.

    Ernst UA, Pawelzik KR, Sahar-Pikielny C, Tsodyks MV. Intracortical origin of visual maps. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:431-436.

    Not in our library10.1038/86089

  39. 39.

    Amaral DG, Ishizuka N, Claiborne B. Neurons, numbers and the hippocampal network. Prog Brain Res. 1990;83:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61237-6

  40. 40.

    Mulders WH, West MJ, Slomianka L. Neuron numbers in the presubiculum, parasubiculum, and entorhinal area of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1997;385:83-94.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    Augustinack JC, van der Kouwe AJW, Blackwell ML, Salat DH, Wiggins CJ, et al. Detection of entorhinal layer II using 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:489-494.

    Not in our library10.1002/ana.20426

  42. 42.

    Fiete IR, Burak Y, Brookings T. What grid cells convey about rat location. J Neurosci. 2008;28:6856-6871.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5684-07.2008

  43. 43.

    Hevner RF, Wong-Riley MT. Entorhinal cortex of the human, monkey, and rat: metabolic map as revealed by cytochrome oxidase. J Comp Neurol. 1992;326:451-469.

    Not in our library10.1002/cne.903260310

  44. 44.

    Goldenberg TM, Bakay RA, Ribak CE. Electron microscopy of cell islands in layer ii of the primate entorhinal cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1995;355:51-66.

    Not in our library10.1002/cne.903550108

  45. 45.

    Solodkin A, Van Hoesen GW. Entorhinal cortex modules of the human brain. J Comp Neurol. 1996;365:610-617.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19960219)365:4<610::aid-cne8>3.0.co;2-7

  46. 46.

    Witter MP, Moser EI. Spatial representation and the architecture of the entorhinal cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:671-678.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tins.2006.10.003

  47. 47.

    Dickson CT, Biella G, de Curtis M. Evidence for spatial modules mediated by temporal synchronization of carbachol-induced gamma rhythm in medial entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7846-7854.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.20-20-07846.2000

  48. 48.

    Seung HS, Lee DD, Reis BY, Tank DW. Stability of the memory of eye position in a recurrent network of conductance-based model neurons. Neuron. 2000;26:259-271.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81155-1

  49. 49.

    Stringer SM, Rolls ET, Trappenberg TP, de Araujo IET. Self-organizing continuous attractor networks and motor function. Neural Netw. 2003;16:161-182.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00237-x

  50. 50.

    Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser MB, Moser E.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 11

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.