Toroidal topology of population activity in grid cells

Abstract

The medial entorhinal cortex is part of a neural system for mapping the position of an individual within a physical environment 1 . Grid cells, a key component of this system, fire in a characteristic hexagonal pattern of locations 2 , and are organized in modules 3 that collectively form a population code for the animal’s allocentric position 1 . The invariance of the correlation structure of this population code across environments 4,5 and behavioural states 6,7 , independent of specific sensory inputs, has pointed to intrinsic, recurrently connected continuous attractor networks (CANs) as a possible substrate of the grid pattern 1,8–11 . However, whether grid cell networks show continuous attractor dynamics, and how they interface with inputs from the environment, has remained unclear owing to the small samples of cells obtained so far. Here, using simultaneous recordings from many hundreds of grid cells and subsequent topological data analysis, we show that the joint activity of grid cells from an individual module resides on a toroidal manifold, as expected in a two-dimensional CAN. Positions on the torus correspond to positions of the moving animal in the environment. Individual cells are preferentially active at singular positions on the torus. Their positions are maintained between environments and from wakefulness to sleep, as predicted by CAN models for grid cells but not by alternative feedforward models 12 . This demonstration of network dynamics on a toroidal manifold provides a population-level visualization of CAN dynamics in grid cells.

References 92

1. 1.

   McNaughton BL, Battaglia FP, Jensen O, Moser EI, Moser M-B. Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:663-678.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrn1932

2. 2.

   Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser M-B, Moser EI. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2005;436:801-806.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature03721

3. 3.

   Stensola H, et al. The entorhinal grid map is discretized. Nature. 2012;492:72-78.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature11649

4. 4.

   Fyhn M, Hafting T, Treves A, Moser M-B, Moser EI. Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2007;446:190-194.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature05601

5. 5.

   Yoon K, et al. Specific evidence of low-dimensional continuous attractor dynamics in grid cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:1077-1084.

   Not in our library10.1038/nn.3450

6. 6.

   Gardner RJ, Lu L, Wernle T, Moser M-B, Moser EI. Correlation structure of grid cells is preserved during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:598-608.

   Not in our library10.1038/s41593-019-0360-0

7. 7.

   Trettel SG, Trimper JB, Hwaun E, Fiete IR, Colgin LL. Grid cell co-activity patterns during sleep reflect spatial overlap of grid fields during active behaviors. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:609-617.

   Not in our library10.1038/s41593-019-0359-6

8. 8.

   Fuhs MC, Touretzky DS. A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:4266-4276.

   Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4353-05.2006

9. 9.
   Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells · 2009

   No notice
10. 10.

    Guanella A, Kiper D, Verschure P. A model of grid cells based on a twisted torus topology. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2007;17:231-240.

    Not in our library10.1142/s0129065707001093

11. 11.

    Couey JJ, et al. Recurrent inhibitory circuitry as a mechanism for grid formation. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:318-324.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.3310

12. 12.

    Kropff E, Treves A. The emergence of grid cells: intelligent design or just adaptation? Hippocampus. 2008;18:1256-1269.

    Not in our library10.1002/hipo.20520

13. 13.

    Amari S. Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biol. Cybern. 1977;27:77-87.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00337259

14. 14.

    Ben-Yishai R, Bar-Or RL, Sompolinsky H. Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:3844-3848.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844

15. 15.

    Seung HS. How the brain keeps the eyes still. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:13339-13344.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.23.13339

16. 16.

    Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck JB. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis. J. Neurosci. 1990;10:420-435.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.10-02-00420.1990

17. 17.

    Skaggs WE, Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL. A model of the neural basis of the rat’s sense of direction. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1995;7:173-180.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Redish AD, Elga AN, Touretzky DS. A coupled attractor model of the rodent head direction system. Network. 1996;7:671-685.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Zhang K. Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:2112-2126.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.16-06-02112.1996

20. 20.

    Yoganarasimha D, Yu X, Knierim JJ. Head direction cell representations maintain internal coherence during conflicting proximal and distal cue rotations: comparison with hippocampal place cells. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:622-631.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3885-05.2006

21. 21.

    Peyrache A, Lacroix MM, Petersen PC, Buzsáki G. Internally organized mechanisms of the head direction sense. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:569-575.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.3968

22. 22.

    Rybakken E, Baas N, Dunn B. Decoding of neural data using cohomological feature extraction. Neural Comput. 2019;31:68-93.

    Not in our library10.1162/neco_a_01150

23. 23.

    Chaudhuri R, Gerçek B, Pandey B, Peyrache A, Fiete I. The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:1512-1520.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41593-019-0460-x

24. 24.
    Revealing neural correlates of behavior without behavioral measurements · 2019

    No notice
25. 25.

    Jun JJ, et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature. 2017;551:232-236.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature24636

26. 26.

    Steinmetz NA, et al. Neuropixels 2.0: a miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings. Science. 2021;372:eabf4588.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abf4588

27. 27.

    Kang L, Xu B, Morozov D. Evaluating state space discovery by persistent cohomology in the spatial representation system. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2021;15:616748.

    Not in our library10.3389/fncom.2021.616748

28. 28.

    Sargolini F, et al. Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in entorhinal cortex. Science. 2006;312:758-762.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1125572

29. 29.

    Barry C, Hayman R, Burgess N, Jeffery KJ. Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:682-684.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1905

30. 30.

    Stensola T, Stensola H, Moser M-B, Moser EI. Shearing-induced asymmetry in entorhinal grid cells. Nature. 2015;518:207-212.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14151

31. 31.

    Krupic J, Bauza M, Burton S, Barry C, O’Keefe J. Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry. Nature. 2015;518:232-235.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14153

32. 32.

    Butler WN, Hardcastle K, Giocomo LM. Remembered reward locations restructure entorhinal spatial maps. Science. 2019;363:1447-1452.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aav5297

33. 33.

    Boccara CN, Nardin M, Stella F, O’Neill J, Csicsvari J. The entorhinal cognitive map is attracted to goals. Science. 2019;363:1443-1447.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aav4837

34. 34.

    Latuske P, Toader O, Allen K. Interspike intervals reveal functionally distinct cell populations in the medial entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2015;35:10963-10976.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0276-15.2015

35. 35.

    Newman EL, Hasselmo ME. Grid cell firing properties vary as a function of theta phase locking preferences in the rat medial entorhinal cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014;8:193.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnsys.2014.00193

36. 36.

    Csordás DÉ, Fischer C, Nagele J, Stemmler M, Herz AVM. Spike afterpotentials shape the in vivo burst activity of principal cells in medial entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:4512-4524.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2569-19.2020

37. 37.

    Finkelstein A, et al. Three-dimensional head-direction coding in the bat brain. Nature. 2015;517:159-164.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14031

38. 38.

    Ginosar G, et al. Locally ordered representation of 3D space in the entorhinal cortex. Nature. 2021;596:404-409.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03783-x

39. 39.

    Sussillo D, Barak O. Opening the black box: low-dimensional dynamics in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 2013;25:626-649.

    Not in our library10.1162/neco_a_00409

40. 40.

    Sorscher, B., Mel, G. C., Ocko, S. A., Giocomo, L. & Ganguli, S. A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells. Preprint at 10.1101/2020.12.29.424583 (2020).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.003

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Learnable latent embeddings for joint behavioural and neural analysis · 2023
  No notice
• Angular and linear speed cells in the parahippocampal circuits · 2022
  Not checked
• Learning accurate path integration in ring attractor models of the head direction system · 2022
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.