Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Recent advances in understanding Streptomyces

Keith F. Chater

F1000Research · 2016 · Review

doi:10.12688/f1000research.9534.1

Abstract

About 2,500 papers dated 2014–2016 were recovered by searching the PubMed database for Streptomyces , which are the richest known source of antibiotics. This review integrates around 100 of these papers in sections dealing with evolution, ecology, pathogenicity, growth and development, stress responses and secondary metabolism, gene expression, and technical advances. Genomic approaches have greatly accelerated progress. For example, it has been definitively shown that interspecies recombination of conserved genes has occurred during evolution, in addition to exchanges of some of the tens of thousands of non-conserved accessory genes. The closeness of the association of Streptomyces with plants, fungi, and insects has become clear and is reflected in the importance of regulators of cellulose and chitin utilisation in overall Streptomyces biology. Interestingly, endogenous cellulose-like glycans are also proving important in hyphal growth and in the clumping that affects industrial fermentations. Nucleotide secondary messengers, including cyclic di-GMP, have been shown to provide key input into developmental processes such as germination and reproductive growth, while late morphological changes during sporulation involve control by phosphorylation. The discovery that nitric oxide is produced endogenously puts a new face on speculative models in which regulatory Wbl proteins (peculiar to actinobacteria) respond to nitric oxide produced in stressful physiological transitions. Some dramatic insights have come from a new model system for Streptomyces developmental biology, Streptomyces venezuelae , including molecular evidence of very close interplay in each of two pairs of regulatory proteins. An extra dimension has been added to the many complexities of the regulation of secondary metabolism by findings of regulatory crosstalk within and between pathways, and even between species, mediated by end products. Among many outcomes from the application of chromosome immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis and other methods based on “next-generation sequencing” has been the finding that 21% of Streptomyces mRNA species lack leader sequences and conventional ribosome binding sites. Further technical advances now emerging should lead to continued acceleration of knowledge, and more effective exploitation, of these astonishing and critically important organisms.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The majority of antibiotics used in medicine, veterinary practice, and agriculture originate from Streptomyces bacteria. Genomic analysis has shown that any one strain has the potential to make tens of such secondary metabolites, and metagenomic analysis has revealed vast numbers of relevant biosynthetic gene sets,. These organisms are therefore being studied ever more intensively in the expectation that they will contribute significantly to the provision of new therapeutic agents to combat the global emergence of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria, as well as providing other bioactive agents with medical applications. However, this is only one aspect of the interest and importance of streptomycetes. Ecologically, streptomycetes have key roles in the natural recycling of the globally abundant cell walls of fungi and plants. Some of them have evolved intimate partnerships with insects or plants, and a few have acquired pathogenic attributes. The interplay of these associations with Streptomyces molecular physiology is a strong theme in this review and has been underpinned by continuing in-depth analysis of the model organism Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), which has been studied genetically for about 60 years.

Unusually for bacteria, streptomycetes grow as branching hyphal filaments to form a mat of fungus-like mycelium, from which emerge aerial branches that bear chains of spores ( Figure 1). Very significant progress has been made recently in the analysis of this complex growth and development in both S. coelicolor and the emerging model species Streptomyces venezuelae, which sporulates very readily, even in liquid culture.

These two model organisms are providing new insights into how antibiotic production is integrated into overall physiology, taking advantage of the fact that, among the more than 20 secondary metabolites of S. coelicolor, two are pigmented antibiotics (the polyketide actinorhodin [ACT] and the red tripyrrole prodiginines [RED]), while S. venezuelae makes chloramphenicol and the polyketide jadomycin. These studies have pointed to an unexpected role for antibiotics themselves as regulatory ligands mediating autoregulation, cross-regulation, and interspecies interactions.

This wide-ranging topical snapshot of the genus has been compiled from a selection of the approximately 2,500 papers about Streptomyces published in 2014–2016. Where possible, I have cited review articles that provide context to the recent advances. In concentrating on whole organism physiology and evolution, I have excluded certain major Streptomyces research areas, notably taxonomy, systematics, and natural product chemistry.

More than just soil organisms…

Streptomycetes, which are abundant in soil, are believed to have originated around 400 million years ago, when the land was being colonised by green plants. Their major role in the solubilisation of cell wall or surface components of plants, fungi, and insects suggests that they played a part in the composting of early land plants and hence in the formation of primeval soil. This conserved ecology over evolutionary time is reflected at the genome level: for example, Streptomyces reticuli, which is particularly active in cellulose degradation, has an estimated 456 genes for proteins involved in the binding, degradation, and utilisation of cellulose and other complex and simple carbohydrates. S. coelicolor also has eight genes for cellulase-like proteins, at least one of which is a true cellulase, even though S. coelicolor cannot grow with cellulose as its sole carbon source. This situation is widespread among streptomycetes, prompting speculation that most isolates have evolved to live in mixed, cooperating communities, within which only a few species are competent to release amenable products from native cellulose. In addition, streptomycetes have had a long evolutionary association with fungi, with fungal cell walls being a key source of nutrition; thus, S. coelicolor has (at least) 13 chitinases regulated by the important global regulator DasR, which coordinates many aspects of Streptomyces biology in response to the chitin-derived ligands N-acetylglucosamine or N-acetylglucosamine-phosphate, –, as well as two chitosanases and a dedicated oligoglucosamine uptake system that are regulated independently of DasR.

Reinforcing their close association with plants (reviewed in ), streptomycetes are abundantly represented in metagenomic analysis of the rhizosphere, and they are among the most frequent endophytes: a search of PubMed for “Streptomyces endophyte” yielded 74 papers published in the last 15 years, with 38 dated 2013–2016. Many studies have focused on endophytes from traditional medicinal plants, often in the hope that the endophytes may be responsible for the medicinal properties (e.g. – ). Indeed, Streptomyces endophytes produce various antagonists of plant disease agents and pests such as bacteria, fungi, and insects, consistent with potentially ancient adaptive benefits that might be turned to agricultural and medical use in the modern world. Streptomycetes may also stimulate plant growth,, sometimes by producing phytohormones (e.g., ). Endophytic streptomycetes are also found in diverse non-medicinal dicot plants, and in monocots including rice, suggesting (but not proving) that such interactions may date back hundreds of millions of years. Metagenomic evidence of particularly exuberant diversity of soil streptomycetes at low latitudes, might reflect greater plant and insect diversity in the tropics (along with some degree of specificity in interactions between Streptomyces and plants or insects).

Streptomycetes are partners in other mutualistic interactions involving plants. Inoculation of the rhizosphere of rooted oak cuttings with Streptomyces sp. AcH 505 not only stimulated mycorrhizal development but also elicited plant defence mechanisms, leading to increased resistance to powdery mildew infection. Streptomycetes are also carried by ants that cultivate black food yeasts inside cavities (“domatia”) in host plants. In this mutualism, the plants secrete sugary exudates to the ants and yeasts, while the ants ward off predators and generally clean up their host. The streptomycetes produce inhibitors of other, unwanted, fungi that might invade the domatia. In a broad survey, the streptomycetes involved in these plant–ant interactions fell into just four distinct taxa, while many other taxa were unrepresented, implying specific adaptations. Other cases of insect-borne streptomycetes preventing unwanted fungal invasion have been extensively reported in the last 20 years, such as in the cases of leaf-cutter ants and beewolf wasps: in the latter case, some degree of co-evolution of hosts and microbes has been taking place for perhaps 68 million years,. Streptomycetes isolated from associations with diverse arthropods that feed on plant biomass are also highly enriched for two taxa having the ability to degrade cellulose completely, compared to random soil isolates, suggesting that this ability is valuable in the symbiosis.

The production of antibiotics by streptomycetes has long suggested that they may be formidable competitors in natural environments, but it was a surprise that, when growing on agar spread with other bacteria, the growing hyphal tips of most strains caused local lysis of what can reasonably be interpreted as their prey. Such predatory activity may add a new perspective to the benefits of streptomycetes to plants and insect mutualistic partners.

In a further illustration of the ecological diversity of streptomycetes, strains adapted to marine conditions are prominent in the microbiota of marine sponges.

Streptomycetes as pathogens: evolution and regulation of potato scab

Not all interactions of streptomycetes with complex eukaryotes are beneficial. Scab disease of potato and other tuber/root crops is caused by several different streptomycetes and (as in many cases of bacterial pathogenesis) involves a laterally acquired pathogenicity island that presumably evolved with the emergence of scab hosts, which are all flowering plants that evolved long after simpler plants had colonised the land. In Streptomyces turgidiscabies, this entire DNA island can excise from the host genome and transfer into a new host, where it can again integrate via a site-specific recombinase at the palindromic sequence 5′-TTCATGAA-3′. The presence of internal copies of this sequence can lead to modular excision of the island. Fixation of the pathogenicity genes in some other potato scab agents ( Streptomyces scabies and Streptomyces acidiscabies) is correlated with degradation of the recombinase gene and/or its target sites or with loss of a module that encodes all the functions needed for mobilisation.

Remarkably, the expression of some of the pathogenicity genes, including those for the phytotoxin thaxtomin, is determined in part by the cellobiose sensor CebR, the universal regulator of Streptomyces cellulolytic genes, integrating pathogenicity-linked cellulolytic activity with more ancient overall responses to cellulose-related metabolites. The connection of pathogenicity with cellulose is further emphasised by the fact that thaxtomin is an inhibitor of plant cellulose synthase. The biosynthetic clusters for thaxtomin and a second phytotoxin, coronafacoyl phytotoxin, are under further control from pathway-specific regulatory genes that appear to respond to plant metabolites and from global regulatory genes ( bld genes that regulate colony differentiation and antibiotic production, see below). In an extension of this regulatory scenario, the induction of a large swathe of glycohydrolytic enzymes of S. scabies is enhanced when cellulose in the medium is supplemented with suberin, a complex lipid- and polyaromatic-containing major component of the potato tuber periderm.

Although scab research has focused on the pathogenicity islands, comparative genomics has revealed 64 other genes that are common to four distinct scab agents but absent from non-pathogens, as well as an exceptionally high proportion of enzymes such as pectinases and cutinases that would aid or take advantage of pathogenicity,.

Genome and pan-genome evolution, the role of recombination, and its molecular basis

Comparative genomics has been dramatically accelerated by the advent of cheap and rapid sequencing (but note that the quality of the deposited Streptomyces genome sequences is variable ). Early deductions about the core and accessory genes of streptomycetes have been refined: the genomes of 17 diverse strains (ranging from 6.7 to 12.3 Mb) contained from 5,382 to 10,022 CDSs, of which 2,018 were universally present (the core genome, which occupies most of the central region of Streptomyces linear chromosomes), with most of the remaining genes being present in only one or a few genomes. This accessory genome totalled 32,574 genes, so the Streptomyces pan-genome comprises at least 34,592 genes. The accessory genes are mostly clustered at the chromosome ends, which are well known to be unstable and subject to replacement by recombination with incoming linear plasmids or conjugally transferred segments of chromosomes from other streptomycetes, but recent analyses have revealed an unexpectedly high level of historical recombination within representative core genes too, resulting in phylogenetic incongruence among these genes,,. The recombination levels detected are high enough to raise the question of whether the evolutionary radiation of the genus has taken place over a significantly shorter time than has been widely accepted. During divergence from common ancestors, such genetic exchange continued at a rate that decreased as divergence increased, generating a reticulate origin of extant streptomycetes, largely defined by a relatively small number of ancestral recombination events. Recombination associated with nascent divergence continues into the near-present, since recombination events detected by genome analysis of independent isolates of the same species are about 100-fold more frequent than those between species. The fixation of particular recombination events is thought to reflect periods of rapid demographic expansion,.

The high frequency of genetic exchange implied by these studies may be because conjugal DNA transfer in streptomycetes is much more efficient than it is in most other bacteria, at least in the laboratory: instead of a complex type IV secretion apparatus transferring single-stranded DNA, streptomycetes employ the products of traB genes encoded by autonomous or chromosomally integrated plasmids to transfer double-stranded DNA. TraB proteins belong to the FtsK/SpoIIIE family needed in many bacteria to complete the segregation of chromosomes into newly formed daughter cells, but, while FtsK/SpoIIIE proteins assemble in the nascent septum, TraB proteins assemble at growing hyphal tips. Transfer, which is ATP dependent, involves the interaction of TraB with short recognition sequences (consensus 5′-GACCCGGA-3′ in plasmid pSVH1): 25 clusters of four such sequences are also spaced along the chromosome of S. coelicolor, accounting for chromosome mobilisation. Initial plasmid transfer is followed by the remarkable spread of the plasmid, sometimes throughout most of the recipient mycelium, in a process in which specialised Spd proteins assemble with TraB in the vegetative septa that occur roughly once every 10–20 μm, ( Figure 2). The importance of TraB for plasmid spread (presumably providing the ATPase-driven motor function lacking from Spd proteins) was nicely demonstrated by showing that the presence of TraB in a recipient permitted efficient spreading following the occasional transfer of a traB-deleted plasmid.

It was a surprise when a recent cytological study showed that plasmid invasion events were associated with contact between the lateral walls of donor and recipient hyphae, and events involving donor tips were not seen. This unexpected result may still be compatible with tip involvement: TraB may also assemble at nascent branch tips, some distance away from leading tips. In any case, the cytological analysis could presumably detect only transfer events that had occurred a significant time earlier, after subsequent plasmid multiplication and spread had already occurred, so the state of hyphae at the time of primary transfer could not be assessed.

Within-species comparative genomics

Generally, comparative genomics of closely related streptomycetes has had little attention, though marine isolates from two distinct sponges were interestingly closely related to the terrestrial Streptomyces albus G derivative J1074 (which is often used for heterologous expression work) in a study identifying candidate marine-adaptation genes present only in the two marine isolates and in some other marine actinomycetes,. Four further J1074-related organisms were subsequently found in 140 Streptomyces genomes available at the time, making this species group the most readily isolated to date,. This provided an opportunity to examine the dynamics of acquisition and loss of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene sets in relatively recent evolution (i.e. within a species group). Ten biosynthetic gene clusters were specific to, and conserved among, the J1074 group, while a roughly equal number showed some degree of isolate specificity,.

Germination is controlled by several second messengers

Spore germination involves the action of “resuscitation-promoting factors” (Rpfs, specialised peptidoglycan hydrolases), probably as part of a peptidoglycan remodelling system. At least one of five partially functionally redundant Rpfs of S. coelicolor is subject to multilevel regulation by different nucleotide second messengers: transcription initiation, controlled by the cAMP-binding protein previously associated with germination; transcriptional attenuation via a riboswitch responsive to cyclic di-AMP; and changing rates of proteolysis in response to levels of ppGpp ( Figure 2).

Importance of cellulose-like glycan synthesis for hyphal growth

Streptomyces growth is unusual, but not unique, among bacteria in taking place at tips through the activities of a protein complex (“polarisome”). The key polarisome component, DivIVA, coordinates aspects of intracellular and cell surface growth in ways that may differ during vegetative and reproductive growth (for reviews, see, ). It is emerging that normal growth and development require deposition at hyphal tips of an uncharacterised glycan through the combined action of a cellulose synthase-like protein (ClsA) and GlxA, the product of the gene downstream of clsA, which is a copper oxidase that may oxidise the glycan as it is secreted ( Figure 2). Like ClsA, GlxA is tip-located at least at some growth stages, though the two proteins have not been analysed together. The synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides soon after germination, under the control of clsA, glxA, and the newly identified locus matAB, is responsible for the aggregation of germlings, leading to the formation of mycelial clumps in submerged culture, a well-known problem in industrial fermentations,.

Membranous structures appear to subdivide the cytoplasm of vegetative hyphae into compartments

The recent application of advanced microscopic methods has suggested that vesicular, DNA-impermeable membranous structures may delimit compartments in vegetative hyphae in the absence of conventional septa, may account for the viability of some hyphal fragments of ftsZ mutants, and may be implicated in the heterogeneous staining of vegetative hyphae with vital stains (interpreted as programmed death – ) ( Figure 2). These intriguing observations raise questions of how the structures are placed in time and space, how they affect the spread of plasmids through the mycelium (see above), and whether they might limit the spread of initially tip-localised phage infections. Addressing such questions may require inventive genetic approaches.

Complex and subtle influences on the initiation of aerial development, involving transcription, proteolysis, and hormone-like molecules

The onset of reproductive aerial growth is sensitive to diverse stresses and signals. In S. coelicolor, most of the nine σ B-like sigma factors (compared to four in Bacillus subtilis) are involved in stress responses and/or differentiation. There is growing evidence of complex crosstalk interactions among the even larger number of anti-sigma and anti-anti-sigma factors for this class of σ factor, and it has been suggested that the signal input to regulate these interactions may involve some of the variable, but always multiple, collection of whiJ-like gene sets present in Streptomyces genomes: the clusters include anti-sigma genes of this type and have been implicated in development and antibiotic production,. In one such cluster, which is known to influence antibiotic production and differentiation, a small RNA antisense to the Sco4676–4677 intergenic region has been found to have complicated regulatory effects on Sco4676–4677 expression.

Furthermore, particularly since the discovery that actinomycetes have a eukaryotic-like proteasome system, with ubiquitinylation of targets being replaced by pupylation, regulation at the level of protein degradation is becoming increasingly apparent. This has been reinforced by the cataloguing of pupylation/proteasome targets and the phenotypes of mutants in the system, which show changes in differentiation and antibiotic production levels –. Presumably, controlled proteolysis is involved in the death of some hyphal compartments that accompanies stages of growth and development.

It has been known for decades that in Streptomyces griseus the repression of a central developmental regulatory gene, adpA, by the TetR-like protein ArpA is relieved by the accumulation of A-factor, an extracellular hormone-like gamma-butyrolactone (GBL). It now seems that adpA in most, perhaps all, other streptomycetes may be subject to regulation by similar ArpA-like repressors, but with species-specific GBL ligands, permitting coordinated sporulation of one species without triggering sporulation of nearby different species. In an opposite scenario, S. coelicolor and S. venezuelae produce an identical GBL called SCB1 and SVB1, respectively, making it possible for them to respond to each other,.

Spectacular insights using a new model organism, Streptomyces venezuelae: time-lapse cell biology, heterodimeric regulatory proteins, global regulation by a cyclic di-GMP receptor, and developmental differences between species

Streptomyces colony development has usually been studied on solid agar medium, since S. coelicolor (like many other streptomycetes) does not undergo a full developmental cycle in liquid culture. Studies of surface-grown cultures are bedevilled by developmental asynchrony and heterogeneity, which are particularly problematic for high-resolution biochemical analysis, including “omic” approaches to the definition of the regulons controlled by developmental regulatory genes. These problems have been circumvented by the adoption of S. venezuelae, which grows very rapidly and undergoes comprehensive and near-synchronous differentiation in liquid culture, including under coverslips. In a first illustration of the value of this system, a detailed time-lapse study has shown that the ParA and ParB chromosome segregation proteins play an important coordinating role in the transition from ongoing aerial growth to growth cessation and the onset of sporulation septation, and even have opposing influences on the rate of tip extension and eventual length of pre-sporulation hyphae. Further advances are promised by the development of a microfluidics system that allows continuous direct observation of fluorescently marked key proteins through the entire developmental cycle.

Submerged sporulation has allowed the highly successful combined application of microarray-based transcriptomics and chromosome immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis to reveal two exciting and novel cases of very close interactions between different developmental regulators. In one case, an atypical response regulator, BldM, has two rounds of activity: first, it forms a homodimer to activate other developmental regulatory genes and morphogenetic functions needed for aerial hyphae to grow and, second, it forms a heterodimer with another atypical response regulator, WhiI, to activate genes needed for the aerial hyphae to turn into spore chains. In another case, with wide implications for all actinomycetes including pathogenic mycobacteria, two enigmatic proteins conserved across all actinomycetes have been found to bind to the same target promoters, activating some and repressing others. These proteins are WhiA, which is also present in Gram-positive Firmicutes and has a structure closely similar to that of eukaryotic homing endonucleases (but lacking key catalytic residues), and WhiB, the archetype of the large “Wbl” family of iron-sulphur proteins represented throughout actinomycetes but found nowhere else (other Wbl proteins conserved among streptomycetes include two other developmental regulators, WblA and WhiD). The ChIP-seq/transcriptome profiles of targets of Bld and Whi regulators in S. venezuelae have provided many clues about the nature and coordination of the components contributing actively to development –.

It is likely that BldM, WhiI, WhiA, and WhiB respond to different signal inputs, and the elucidation of these signals is a major challenge (but see the next section). These four developmental activators, and most of the well-known developmental regulatory bld and whi genes and many of their targets, are among the large number of genes directly controlled by BldD, a master repressor of development whose regulatory ligand has been revealed as cyclic di-GMP. This important discovery begins to provide an explanation for the presence of eight actual or predicted diguanylate cyclase genes in S. coelicolor, some with associated cyclic di-GMP phosphodiesterase domains. Notably, the [BldD] 2:[cyclic di-GMP] 4 complex is structurally new to science,.

Although it is highly probable that the developmental programmes of all streptomycetes are broadly the same, some of the details may differ between species. This seems to be the case with whiG, which encodes a sigma factor important in initiating sporulation septation of aerial hyphae. Although whiG transcription depends on WhiA and WhiB in S. venezuelae, in S. coelicolor its transcription was nearly the same in whiA or whiB mutants as in the wild-type. In another example, the promoter of the WhiI-dependent inoA gene of S. coelicolor (for inositol phosphate synthetase) could bind truncated WhiI in vitro, indicating that WhiI could bind DNA in the absence of BldM; yet in ChIP-seq analysis of an S. venezuelae bldM mutant, WhiI did not bind to any targets. Other inter-species differences were previously noted between S. coelicolor and S. griseus. A different kind of surprise concerning the WhiG sigma was the discovery in Streptomyces chattanoogensis that it can bind to target promoters in the absence of RNA polymerase core enzyme, including some in the gene cluster for natamycin production: binding was either to typical WhiG-binding sites or to CGTCA repeat elements, and was needed for gene activation.

Could endogenous nitric oxide have an important developmental regulatory role?

Speculation about a possible role of nitric oxide as a regulatory ligand for WhiB and other Wbl proteins was stimulated by the extremely high affinity for nitric oxide of some Wbl proteins of streptomycetes and mycobacteria, which has been studied in detail at the molecular level –. It has generally been implied that the source of nitric oxide would be exogenous (e.g. produced by eukaryotic hosts as a defence mechanism). However, comparative genomics revealed the general presence in Wbl-containing actinomycetes of other nitric oxide-interacting proteins (or biochemically unstudied homologues) that might be involved in cycling nitric oxide, raising the possibility that endogenous nitric oxide might regulate development by interacting with Wbl proteins.

This model was compromised by the absence of evidence for the conserved endogenous production of nitric oxide across actinomycetes, most of which do not have a conventional nitric oxide synthase. However, endogenous nitric oxide production involving conserved actinobacterial genes has now been convincingly demonstrated in S. coelicolor and mycobacteria, ( Figure 3). Thus, in S. coelicolor, organic nitrogen is converted by an unknown route to nitrate, which is reduced by nitrate reductase to nitrite. This mainly involves NarG2, one of three nitrate reductases in S. coelicolor: NarG2 is predominant in growing hyphae and is induced by moderate hypoxic downshift, while NarG3 has a subordinate role and NarG1 is mainly active during germination. Nitrite was shown in turn to be the source of nitric oxide (albeit again by an unknown route). This source of nitric oxide mirrors a pathway important in eukaryotes, where endogenous nitric oxide is a major physiological signalling molecule, even influencing epigenetic changes.

The recycling of endogenous nitric oxide was also studied by and is illustrated in Figure 3, which also shows how recycling might be connected to the regulatory functions of Wbl proteins. Nitric oxide re-enters the nitrogen oxide cycle via flavohaemoglobin, which oxidises nitric oxide to nitrate. In a feedforward mechanism, nitric oxide is the ligand of NsrR, which represses the hmpA1 and hmpA2 genes for flavohaemoglobin and its own promoter,. Remarkably, the affinity of NsrR for the hmpA promoters is more sensitive to nitric oxide than is its affinity for the nsrR promoter, permitting different strengths of induction of flavohaemoglobin as NO concentration increases. Another dimension of the cycle is provided by the interaction of endogenous nitric oxide with DevS, a protein kinase that activates the cognate response regulator DevR, which in turn activates the narG2 gene for the major nitrate reductase needed for nitric oxide production. Interestingly, an earlier report found that DevS could also phosphorylate the SCO3818 response regulator, which is very similar to DevR, and might therefore also be involved in regulating the nitrogen oxide cycle: orthologues of SCO3818 are very widespread across actinobacteria, whereas DevS orthologues are more sporadic across the phylum ( http://streptomyces.org.uk/actinoblast/).

Artificially engineered production of endogenous nitric oxide triggers the onset of production of at least one secondary metabolite (undecylprodiginines [RED]) by increasing the expression of the major RED pathway activator gene redD, but it inhibits the onset of aerial growth. It remains to be determined whether this is a straightforward reflection of the normal signalling activity of nitric oxide or whether the experimental procedures disrupt the normal balance of the nitrogen oxide cycle. In a further twist, it appears that endogenous nitrite can also serve as an extracellular signal to nearby mycelium.

Regulation of septum positioning and cell wall changes during the formation of spores

Many of the processes involved in sporulation septation and spore maturation require high levels of proteins that might interfere with growth if expressed inappropriately, so mechanisms to prevent untimely expression can be expected. Thus, production of some of these proteins, such as FtsZ, is repressed by the BldD:cyclic di-GMP complex. Timely increased expression of such division genes, presumably triggered by cyclic di-GMP hydrolysis, must also be accompanied by a mechanism for the regular positioning of sporulation septa. New evidence suggests that SepG, a small membrane protein encoded by a gene next to divIVA in many Gram-positive bacteria, provides the most basic anchor yet described for the building of sporulation septa, recruiting protein SsgB, which in turn recruits FtsZ ( Figure 4). After septation, SepG relocalises to the prespore periphery, where it may interact with the cell wall synthesising complex during spore wall remodelling. Five protein kinases, encoded by a cluster of adjacent genes, phosphorylate key proteins of this complex, keeping them inactive until sporulation septation begins: it is assumed that activation involves one or more of the more than 50 phosphatases encoded by the S. coelicolor genome.

The variable size, thinner walls, diffuse nucleoids, and heat sensitivity of sepG mutant spores are intriguingly reminiscent of the phenotype of mutants in the conserved whiD gene, which encodes a Wbl protein whose nitric oxide interactions have been particularly closely studied (e.g. [see above]). Conceivably, sepF could be an important WhiD target ( Figure 4).

Other aspects of cellular biochemistry that change during growth and development: lipids and glycogen

In a new perspective on development, the lipid composition of S. coelicolor differed strikingly when comparing cultures grown on solid or in liquid media, and mutants defective in ornithine lipid biosynthesis showed precocious development and antibiotic production. It would be of interest to apply such an analysis to S. venezuelae.

Studies of carbon storage metabolism in Streptomyces and mycobacteria had revealed a new and widespread pathway for glycogen biosynthesis,. This GlgE pathway is duplicated in most streptomycetes, with the two sets being expressed differently during development, and the pathway generally exists alongside the classical GlgAC pathway. In an exception to this generalisation, S. venezuelae has only one glgE gene set and lacks glgAC. This made it possible to construct glycogen-free mutants, leading to the finding that spores could be generated without the developmental accumulation of glycogen. Sporulation appeared to be normal, unless the strain/medium combination resulted in the accumulation of the toxic GlgE substrate maltose-1-phosphate.

Connecting redox homeostasis to primary metabolism

Global stress responses often involve the action of alternative sigma factors, whose target regulons may be informative in understanding physiological and cell biological adjustments that have evolved to accommodate stresses. Thus, it was recently found that one SigR target, the ndgR gene, encodes a regulator of sulphur assimilation and branched-chain amino acid synthesis. NdgR is presumed to affect redox homeostasis at the levels of precursor and cofactor supply to redox buffering agents such as mycothiol and supply of CoA derivatives of branched-chain fatty acids for membrane biosynthesis.

From global physiology to the expression of biosynthetic genes for secondary metabolites: new global regulators and expanding roles for cluster-situated regulatory genes

As a broad generalisation, antibiotic biosynthetic gene clusters depend on regulatory genes located within the cluster, which are themselves directly regulated by many higher level regulatory proteins, encoded by genes such as the developmental bld genes scattered around the chromosome. New regulators continue to be identified: a TetR-like protein specified by Sco3201 has been found to bind to the promoters of several known developmental and antibiotic biosynthetic genes, and the abrC cluster (Sco4596–8) encoding a response regulator (AbrC3) and two histidine protein kinases has been shown to influence secondary metabolism,. An accumulation of papers has shown that the promoter of the actII-orf4 gene that activates the ACT biosynthetic genes of S. coelicolor binds at least eight, and possibly as many as 12, regulatory proteins, a number to which AbrC3 has been added. A different scenario was observed in the case of the novobiocin biosynthetic genes when heterologously expressed in S. coelicolor: a promoter of these biosynthetic genes (instead of a regulatory gene) was a target for as many as 11 host-specified proteins and the cluster-situated NovG regulatory protein. Only one of these 11 proteins, AbsC, is also known to bind to actII-orf4.

Regulatory genes such as actII-orf4 and novG that are situated within biosynthetic clusters were previously called “pathway specific”, but numerous observations have shown that they may have targets outside the cluster, so their renaming as “cluster-situated regulators” (CSRs) by has proved prescient. In a striking recent example involving Streptomyces avermitilis, a CSR belonging to a class with PAS-LuxR-like domains was shown to interact with genes for different pathways and with many other promoters for housekeeping genes.

Small-molecule ligands for proteins that regulate antibiotic production: feedback and feedforward regulation and crosstalk within and between organisms

Some of the proteins regulating antibiotic production interact with known small-molecule ligands associated with different aspects of primary metabolism. Another widespread scenario is the involvement of diffusible GBL and related signal molecules as the ligands of a subfamily of TetR-like regulators, like the A-factor/ArpA pair of S. griseus (see above). This may operate differently in different species and different pathways. In S. venezuelae, the SVB1 GBL receptor JadR3 has complex interactions with the promoters of both its own biosynthetic genes and jadomycin biosynthetic genes. This results in an integrated feedback and feedforward regulatory scheme that accounts for both the onset of the major period of jadomycin production and its subsequent down-regulation. In S. coelicolor, genome-wide ChIP-seq analysis has revealed an extensive network of regulatory interactions centred on ScbR (GBL receptor) and ScbR2 (pseudo-GBL receptor that binds antibiotics),.

A major development in the regulation of antibiotic production concerns the activities of secondary metabolites themselves as regulatory ligands,. In one recent example from Streptomyces antibioticus, the spirotetronate chlorothricin and some of its biosynthetic intermediates act as regulatory ligands for the CSR ChlF1. In another case involving the aminocoumarin cacibiocin, a repressor of the biosynthetic genes, CabR, loses its DNA-binding activity in the presence of the end product or other aminocoumarins.

Internal cross-pathway regulation mediated by end products has been subjected to closer analysis following the discovery of crosstalk between the chloramphenicol and jadomycin biosynthetic pathways in S. venezuelae. JadR1, the main activator of the jadomycin gene cluster, was implicated in repressing chloramphenicol biosynthesis, but a recent further analysis of this situation revealed that cross-regulation, though still observed, was markedly different when the experiments were done on a different medium. It is not yet known whether these differences involve jadX, another newly identified regulatory gene in the jadomycin cluster. Knocking out jadX prevented the well-known induction of jadomycin production by stress conditions while at the same time putting chloramphenicol biosynthesis under the control of these stresses, and it was shown that both jadomycins and chloramphenicol could interact with JadX. Interestingly, genes for JadX-like proteins are present in some other antibiotic biosynthetic clusters.

In S. coelicolor, ScbR2, a protein closely similar to GBL-binding proteins, has been found to interact with jadomycins from S. venezuelae (and other heterologously produced angucyclines) to relieve the ScbR2-mediated repression both of the global regulatory gene adpA and of redD, encoding an activator of the RED pathway genes. Thus, S. coelicolor can respond to the presence of another species by undergoing developmental changes and switching on antibiotic production. Another example of such a response has been documented for lidamycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces globisporus, involving a widely conserved TetR-like global activator of antibiotic production, AtrA. AtrA directly activates lidamycin biosynthetic genes, but its activity is prevented by binding either a lidamycin biosynthetic intermediate, heptaene, or heterologously produced ACT. Inter-species interactions affecting antibiotic production are proving to be widespread among streptomycetes: a large-scale study of inter-organism interactions revealed many cases of production of secondary metabolites induced by growth close to another species,, and another study found that low levels of lincomycin induced ACT production by S. coelicolor. It will be interesting to see whether ScbR2-, JadR1-, and JadX-like proteins are often involved in such crosstalk, or even in some of the more divergent interactions of streptomycetes with other microbes that continue to emerge from co-culture studies (for recent examples, see – ).

A high-resolution global survey of gene expression in S. coelicolor at different growth stages and the importance of translation-level regulation

Through the use of RNA sequencing to analyse the global transcription profile, and ribosome profiling (ribo-seq) to analyse translation, a near-comprehensive gene expression picture of S. coelicolor at different stages of growth in liquid culture has been obtained. This survey identified most of the transcription start sites in the entire genome, including those for 230 small RNAs. Amazingly, about 21% of protein-coding RNAs are leaderless (and lack conventional ribosome-binding sites). Moreover, clear changes were seen in translation rates between different growth stages, including increased efficiency of translation of mRNAs for major CSR genes at the end of the main growth phase but decreased efficiency for the biosynthetic genes that they control. It is not clear whether these changes reflect different codon usage, a relevant question given that several of the CSR genes for antibiotic production contain the very rare codon TTA,. The protein-level expression of TTA-containing genes is usually dependent on the bldA gene, which encodes the cognate tRNA; abundance of this tRNA increases on the transition into stationary phase,.

In an interesting counterpoint to the bldA story, the TTA codon in ccrA, the CSR gene controlling cephamycin C and clavulanic acid biosynthesis in S. clavuligerus, does not make the production of CcrA bldA-dependent. It has now turned out that many, but not all, TTA-containing genes in S. clavuligerus display the same anomaly. It would perhaps be worth examining the bldA dependence of these genes when introduced into S. coelicolor and of TTA-containing genes from S. coelicolor upon introduction into S. clavuligerus.

Technological advances

The last few years have seen steps forward in the development and application of diverse technologies for the study and exploitation of streptomycetes. The first systems for applying genome editing to streptomycetes will soon accelerate the construction of diverse kinds of mutant –, while the discovery of a CRISPR-Cas system in S. avermitilis may open up new approaches. Along with new strategies for the cloning and deletion of very large segments of Streptomyces DNA, sufficient to encompass almost all antibiotic biosynthetic gene clusters,, procedures are in place to exploit the ever-growing numbers of uncharacterised clusters emanating from genome sequencing, along the lines summarised by and. Bioinformatic tools have been developed to predict the nature of the products of such clusters. One component of systems-based exploitation will be a panel of strong promoters, such as 20 promoters significantly stronger than the widely used ermE* that have been characterised in S. albus G. Another promoter survey has identified promoters with very stable expression levels at different growth stages in two strains of S. coelicolor A3(2) and in other species. These are likely to be valuable standards in transcription studies.

Concluding remarks

The rapid recent progress summarised in this article seems set to accelerate further, particularly in light of the imminent application of powerful additions to the techniques available for Streptomyces research. Research targets will include further elucidation of the ligands that determine the activity of regulatory proteins, the ways in which developmentally important proteolysis is controlled, the search for the molecular factors involved in symbiotic associations, and the structural and functional characterisation of the DivIVA-centred polarisome that determines tip growth. In the course of such studies, an integrated picture of these diverse aspects of Streptomyces biology will begin to emerge. It is likely that this will require increasing input from computational biologists. The accumulating understanding of the biology of these key antibiotic-producing organisms can be expected to facilitate the development of new therapeutic agents in the global struggle against antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

Abbreviations

ACT, actinorhodin; ChIP-seq, chromosome immunoprecipitation sequencing; CSR, cluster-situated regulator; GBL, gamma-butyrolactone; RED, undecylprodiginine.

References 139

  1. 1.

    Charlop-Powers Z Owen JG Reddy BV: Chemical-biogeographic survey of secondary metabolism in soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(10):3757–62.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1318021111

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Hopwood DA: Streptomyces in Nature and Medicine: The Antibiotic Makers. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.2007

    Not in our library10.1093/jhmas/jrn016

  4. 4.

    Chater KF Biró S Lee KJ: The complex extracellular biology of Streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(2):171–98.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00206.x

  5. 5.

    Wibberg D Al-Dilaimi A Busche T: Complete genome sequence of Streptomyces reticuli, an efficient degrader of crystalline cellulose. J Biotechnol. 2016;222:13–4.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.002

  6. 6.

    Lim JH Lee CR Dhakshnamoorthy V: Molecular characterization of Streptomyces coelicolor A(3) SCO6548 as a cellulose 1,4-β-cellobiosidase. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(3): pii: fnv245.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsle/fnv245

  7. 7.

    Book AJ Lewin GR McDonald BR: Evolution of High Cellulolytic Activity in Symbiotic Streptomyces through Selection of Expanded Gene Content and Coordinated Gene Expression. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(6):e1002475.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pbio.1002475

  8. 8.

    Barka EA Vatsa P Sanchez L: Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;80(1):1–43.

    Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00019-15

  9. 9.

    Tenconi E Urem M Świątek-Połatyńska MA: Multiple allosteric effectors control the affinity of DasR for its target sites. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(1):324–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.152

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Viens P Dubeau MP Kimura A: Uptake of chitosan-derived D-glucosamine oligosaccharides in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362(9): pii: fnv048.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsle/fnv048

  12. 12.

    Seipke RF Kaltenpoth M Hutchings MI: Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme? FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(4):862–76.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x

  13. 13.

    Viaene T Langendries S Beirinckx S: Streptomyces as a plant's best friend? FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92(8): pii: fiw119.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsec/fiw119

  14. 14.

    Liu M Abdel-Mageed WM Ren B: Endophytic Streptomyces sp. Y3111 from traditional Chinese medicine produced antitubercular pluramycins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(3):1077–85.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-013-5335-6

  15. 15.

    Yang X Yang Y Peng T: A new cyclopeptide from endophytic Streptomyces sp. YIM 64018. Nat Prod Commun. 2013;8(12):1753–4.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Conti R Chagas FO Caraballo-Rodriguez AM: Endophytic Actinobacteria from the Brazilian Medicinal Plant Lychnophora ericoides Mart. and the Biological Potential of Their Secondary Metabolites. Chem Biodivers. 2016;13(6):727–36.

    Not in our library10.1002/cbdv.201500225

  17. 17.

    Chen X Pizzatti C Bonaldi M: Biological Control of Lettuce Drop and Host Plant Colonization by Rhizospheric and Endophytic Streptomycetes. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:714.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2016.00714

  18. 18.

    Zloch M Thiem D Gadzala-Kopciuch R: Synthesis of siderophores by plant-associated metallotolerant bacteria under exposure to Cd 2+. Chemosphere. 2016;156:312–25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.130

  19. 19.

    Miao GP Zhu CS Feng JT: Effects of plant stress signal molecules on the production of wilforgine in an endophytic actinomycete isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f. Curr Microbiol. 2015;70(4):571–9.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00284-014-0758-6

  20. 20.

    Shi Y Zhang X Lou K: Isolation, characterization, and insecticidal activity of an endophyte of drunken horse grass, Achnatherum inebrians. J Insect Sci. 2013;13(1):151.

    Not in our library10.1673/031.013.15101

  21. 21.

    Singh SP Gaur R: Evaluation of antagonistic and plant growth promoting activities of chitinolytic endophytic actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants against Sclerotium rolfsii in chickpea. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;121(2):506–18.

    Not in our library10.1111/jam.13176

  22. 22.

    Wang W Zhai Y Cao L: Illumina-based analysis of core actinobacteriome in roots, stems, and grains of rice. Microbiol Res. 2016;190:12–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.micres.2016.05.003

  23. 23.

    Passari AK Chandra P Zothanpuia: Detection of biosynthetic gene and phytohormone production by endophytic actinobacteria associated with Solanum lycopersicum and their plant-growth-promoting effect. Res Microbiol. 2016;167(8):692–705.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.resmic.2016.07.001

  24. 24.

    Mukasheva T Berzhanova R Ignatova L: Bacterial endophytes of Trans-Ili Alatau region's plants as promising components of a microbial preparation for agricultural use. Acta Biochim Pol. 2016;63(2):321–8.

    Not in our library10.18388/abp.2015_1157

  25. 25.

    Tchinda RA Boudjeko T Simao-Beaunoir AM: Morphological, Physiological, and Taxonomic Characterization of Actinobacterial Isolates Living as Endophytes of Cacao Pods and Cacao Seeds. Microbes Environ. 2016;31(1):56–62.

    Not in our library10.1264/jsme2.me15146

  26. 26.

    Peng SM Wang BL Xu JZ: [Effect of different treatment on endophytic bacterial communities in continuous cropping of Chrysanthemum morifoliu]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2014;39(24):4763–8.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Kurth F Mailänder S Bönn M: Streptomyces-induced resistance against oak powdery mildew involves host plant responses in defense, photosynthesis, and secondary metabolism pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014;27(9):891–900.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi-10-13-0296-r

  30. 30.

    Hanshew AS McDonald BR Díaz Díaz C: Characterization of actinobacteria associated with three ant-plant mutualisms. Microb Ecol. 2015;69(1):192–203.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00248-014-0469-3

  31. 31.

    Kaltenpoth M Roeser-Mueller K Koehler S: Partner choice and fidelity stabilize coevolution in a Cretaceous-age defensive symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(17):6359–64.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1400457111

  32. 32.

    Kumbhar C Mudliar P Bhatia L: Widespread predatory abilities in the genus Streptomyces. Arch Microbiol. 2014;196(4):235–48.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00203-014-0961-7

  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Chapleau M Guertin JF Farrokhi A: Identification of genetic and environmental factors stimulating excision from Streptomyces scabiei chromosome of the toxicogenic region responsible for pathogenicity. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(4):501–9.

    Not in our library10.1111/mpp.12296

  36. 36.
  37. 37.

    Cheng Z Bown L Tahlan K: Regulation of coronafacoyl phytotoxin production by the PAS-LuxR family regulator CfaR in the common scab pathogen Streptomyces scabies. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122450.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0122450

  38. 38.

    Bignell DR Francis IM Fyans JK: Thaxtomin A production and virulence are controlled by several bld gene global regulators in Streptomyces scabies. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2014;27(8):875–85.

    Not in our library10.1094/mpmi-02-14-0037-r

  39. 39.

    Padilla-Reynaud R Simao-Beaunoir AM Lerat S: Suberin Regulates the Production of Cellulolytic Enzymes in Streptomyces scabiei, the Causal Agent of Potato Common Scab. Microbes Environ. 2015;30(3):245–53.

    Not in our library10.1264/jsme2.me15034

  40. 40.

    Huguet-Tapia JC Lefebure T Badger JH: Genome Content and Phylogenomics Reveal both Ancestral and Lateral Evolutionary Pathways in Plant-Pathogenic Streptomyces Species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(7):2146–55.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.03504-15

  41. 41.

    Studholme DJ: Genome Update. Let the consumer beware: Streptomyces genome sequence quality. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;9(1):3–7.

    Not in our library10.1111/1751-7915.12344

  42. 42.

    Kim J Kim Y Jeong Y: Comparative Genomics Reveals the Core and Accessory Genomes of Streptomyces Species. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;25(10):1599–605.

    Not in our library10.4014/jmb.1504.04008

  43. 43.

    Doroghazi JR Buckley DH: Widespread homologous recombination within and between Streptomyces species. ISME J. 2010;4(9):1136–43.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2010.45

  44. 44.

    Cheng K Rong X Huang Y: Widespread interspecies homologous recombination reveals reticulate evolution within the genus Streptomyces. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;102:246–54.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ympev.2016.06.004

  45. 45.

    Thoma L Muth G: The conjugative DNA-transfer apparatus of Streptomyces. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(2):224–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.12.020

  46. 46.

    Thoma L Vollmer B Muth G: Fluorescence microscopy of Streptomyces conjugation suggests DNA-transfer at the lateral walls and reveals the spreading of the plasmid in the recipient mycelium. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(2):598–608.

    Not in our library10.1111/1462-2920.13027

  47. 47.

    Seipke RF: Strain-level diversity of secondary metabolism in Streptomyces albus. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116457.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0116457

  48. 48.

    Sexton DL St-Onge RJ Haiser HJ: Resuscitation-promoting factors are cell wall-lytic enzymes with important roles in the germination and growth of Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(5):848–60.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.02464-14

  49. 49.

    St-Onge RJ Haiser HJ Yousef MR: Nucleotide second messenger-mediated regulation of a muralytic enzyme in Streptomyces. Mol Microbiol. 2015;96(4):779–95.

    Not in our library10.1111/mmi.12971

  50. 50.

    Flardh K Richards DM Hempel AM: Regulation of apical growth and hyphal branching in Streptomyces. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(6):737–43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2012.10.012

  51. 51.

    Chandra G Chater KF: Developmental biology of Streptomyces from the perspective of 100 actinobacterial genome sequences. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(3):345–79.

    Not in our library10.1111/1574-6976.12047

  52. 52.

    Chaplin AK Petrus ML Mangiameli G: GlxA is a new structural member of the radical copper oxidase family and is required for glycan deposition at hyphal tips and morphogenesis of Streptomyces lividans. Biochem J. 2015;469(3):433–44.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20150190

  53. 53.

    Liman R Facey PD van Keulen G: A laterally acquired galactose oxidase-like gene is required for aerial development during osmotic stress in Streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54112.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0054112

  54. 54.

    van Dissel D Claessen D Roth M: A novel locus for mycelial aggregation forms a gateway to improved Streptomyces cell factories. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:44.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12934-015-0224-6

  55. 55.

    Zacchetti B Willemse J Recter B: Aggregation of germlings is a major contributing factor towards mycelial heterogeneity of Streptomyces. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 27045.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep27045

  56. 56.

    Yagüe P Lopez-Garcia MT Rioseras B: New insights on the development of Streptomyces and their relationships with secondary metabolite production. Curr Trends Microbiol. 2012;8:65–73.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Celler K Koning RI Willemse J: Cross-membranes orchestrate compartmentalization and morphogenesis in Streptomyces. Nat Commun. 2016;7: ncomms11836.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms11836

  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Mingyar E Sevcikova B Rezuchova B: The σ F-specific anti-sigma factor RsfA is one of the protein kinases that phosphorylates the pleiotropic anti-anti-sigma factor BldG in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Gene. 2014;538(2):280–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2014.01.041

  60. 60.

    Hindra Moody MJ Jones SE: Complex intra-operonic dynamics mediated by a small RNA in Streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85856.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0085856

  61. 61.

    Maupin-Furlow JA: Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein modification. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:155–75.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-micro-091313-103447

  62. 62.

    Boubakri H Seghezzi N Duchateau M: The Absence of Pupylation (Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein Modification) Affects Morphological and Physiological Differentiation in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(21):3388–99.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.00591-15

  63. 63.

    Compton CL Fernandopulle MS Nagari RT: Genetic and Proteomic Analyses of Pupylation in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(17):2747–53.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.00302-15

  64. 64.

    Mao XM Ren NN Sun N: Proteasome involvement in a complex cascade mediating SigT degradation during differentiation of Streptomyces coelicolor. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(4):608–13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2013.12.029

  65. 65.

    Niu G Chater KF Tian Y: Specialised metabolites regulating antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces spp. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40(4):554–73.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsre/fuw012

  66. 66.

    Zou Z Du D Zhang Y: A γ-butyrolactone-sensing activator/repressor, JadR3, controls a regulatory mini-network for jadomycin biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94(3):490–505.

    Not in our library10.1111/mmi.12752

  67. 67.

    Nodwell JR: Are you talking to me? A possible role for γ-butyrolactones in interspecies signalling. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94(3):483–5.

    Not in our library10.1111/mmi.12787

  68. 68.

    Schlimpert S Flärdh K Buttner M: Fluorescence Time-lapse Imaging of the Complete S. venezuelae Life Cycle Using a Microfluidic Device. J Vis Exp. 2016; (108):53863.

    Not in our library10.3791/53863

  69. 69.

    Donczew M Mackiewicz P Wróbel A: ParA and ParB coordinate chromosome segregation with cell elongation and division during Streptomyces sporulation. Open Biol. 2016;6(4):150263.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsob.150263

  70. 70.

    Al-Bassam MM Bibb MJ Bush MJ: Response regulator heterodimer formation controls a key stage in Streptomyces development. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(8):e1004554.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1004554

  71. 71.

    Bush MJ Chandra G Bibb MJ: Genome-Wide Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis Shows that WhiB Is a Transcription Factor That Cocontrols Its Regulon with WhiA To Initiate Developmental Cell Division in Streptomyces. MBio. 2016;7(2):e00523–16.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.00523-16

  72. 72.

    Bush MJ Tschowri N Schlimpert S: c-di-GMP signalling and the regulation of developmental transitions in streptomycetes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(12):749–60.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3546

  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    Tran NT Den Hengst CD Gomez-Escribano JP: Identification and characterization of CdgB, a diguanylate cyclase involved in developmental processes in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(12):3100–8.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.01460-10

  75. 75.

    Tschowri N: Cyclic Dinucleotide-Controlled Regulatory Pathways in Streptomyces Species. J Bacteriol. 2016;198(1):47–54.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.00423-15

  76. 76.

    Kelemen GH Brown GL Kormanec J: The positions of the sigma-factor genes, whiG and sigF, in the hierarchy controlling the development of spore chains in the aerial hyphae of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol Microbiol. 1996;21(3):593–603.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02567.x

  77. 77.

    Zhang G Tian Y Hu K: Importance and regulation of inositol biosynthesis during growth and differentiation of Streptomyces. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83(6):1178–94.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08000.x

  78. 78.

    Chater KF Horinouchi S: Signalling early developmental events in two highly diverged Streptomyces species. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48(1):9–15.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03476.x

  79. 79.

    Liu S Yu P Yuan P: Sigma factor WhiG ch positively regulates natamycin production in Streptomyces chattanoogensis L10. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(6):2715–26.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-014-6307-1

  80. 80.

    Green J Rolfe MD Smith LJ: Transcriptional regulation of bacterial virulence gene expression by molecular oxygen and nitric oxide. Virulence. 2014;5(8):794–809.

    Not in our library10.4161/viru.27794

  81. 81.

    Crack JC Green J Thomson AJ: Iron-sulfur clusters as biological sensors: the chemistry of reactions with molecular oxygen and nitric oxide. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47(10):3196–205.

    Not in our library10.1021/ar5002507

  82. 82.

    Chen Z Hu Y Cumming BM: Mycobacterial WhiB6 Differentially Regulates ESX-1 and the Dos Regulon to Modulate Granuloma Formation and Virulence in Zebrafish. Cell Rep. 2016;16(9):2512–24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.080

  83. 83.

    Serrano PN Wang H Crack JC: Nitrosylation of Nitric-Oxide-Sensing Regulatory Proteins Containing [4Fe-4S] Clusters Gives Rise to Multiple Iron-Nitrosyl Complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55(47):14575–14579.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201607033

  84. 84.

    Sasaki Y Oguchi H Kobayashi T: Nitrogen oxide cycle regulates nitric oxide levels and bacterial cell signaling. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 22038.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep22038

  85. 85.

    Cunningham-Bussel A Zhang T Nathan CF: Nitrite produced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages in physiologic oxygen impacts bacterial ATP consumption and gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(45):E4256–65.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1316894110

  86. 86.

    Cunningham-Bussel A Bange FC Nathan CF: Nitrite impacts the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in response to isoniazid and hydrogen peroxide. Microbiologyopen. 2013;2(6):901–11.

    Not in our library10.1002/mbo3.126

  87. 87.

    Fischer M Falke D Pawlik T: Oxygen-dependent control of respiratory nitrate reduction in mycelium of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol. 2014;196(23):4152–62.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.02202-14

  88. 88.

    Lundberg JO Weitzberg E Gladwin MT: The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(2):156–67.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd2466

  89. 89.

    Vasudevan D Bovee RC Thomas DD: Nitric oxide, the new architect of epigenetic landscapes. Nitric Oxide. 2016;59:54–62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.niox.2016.08.002

  90. 90.

    Crack JC Munnoch J Dodd EL: NsrR from Streptomyces coelicolor is a nitric oxide-sensing [4Fe-4S] cluster protein with a specialized regulatory function. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(20):12689–704.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.643072

  91. 91.

    Crack JC Svistunenko DA Munnoch J: Differentiated, Promoter-specific Response of [4Fe-4S] NsrR DNA Binding to Reaction with Nitric Oxide. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(16):8663–72.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.693192

  92. 92.

    Wang W Shu D Chen L: Cross-talk between an orphan response regulator and a noncognate histidine kinase in Streptomyces coelicolor. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;294(2):150–6.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01563.x

  93. 93.
  94. 94.

    Ladwig N Franz-Wachtel M Hezel F: Control of Morphological Differentiation of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) by Phosphorylation of MreC and PBP2. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0125425.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0125425

  95. 95.

    Molle V Palframan WJ Findlay KC: WhiD and WhiB, homologous proteins required for different stages of sporulation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol. 2000;182(5):1286–95.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.182.5.1286-1295.2000

  96. 96.

    Sandoval-Calderón M Nguyen DD Kapono CA: Plasticity of Streptomyces coelicolor Membrane Composition Under Different Growth Conditions and During Development. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1465.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2015.01465

  97. 97.

    Chandra G Chater KF Bornemann S: Unexpected and widespread connections between bacterial glycogen and trehalose metabolism. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 6):1565–72.

    Not in our library10.1099/mic.0.044263-0

  98. 98.

    Miah F Bibb MJ Barclay JE: Developmental delay in a Streptomyces venezuelae glgE null mutant is associated with the accumulation of α-maltose 1-phosphate. Microbiology. 2016;162(7):1208–19.

    Not in our library10.1099/mic.0.000296

  99. 99.

    Kim JN Jeong Y Yoo JS: Genome-scale analysis reveals a role for NdgR in the thiol oxidative stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):116.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12864-015-1311-0

  100. 100.

    Liu G Chater KF Chandra G: Molecular regulation of antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77(1):112–43.

    Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00054-12

  101. 101.

    Xu D Waack P Zhang Q: Structure and regulatory targets of SCO3201, a highly promiscuous TetR-like regulator of Streptomyces coelicolor M145. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450(1):513–8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.003

  102. 102.
  103. 103.

    Rico S Santamaría RI Yepes A: Deciphering the regulon of Streptomyces coelicolor AbrC3, a positive response regulator of antibiotic production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(8):2417–28.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.03378-13

  104. 104.

    Bekiesch P Franz-Wachtel M Kulik A: DNA affinity capturing identifies new regulators of the heterologously expressed novobiocin gene cluster in Streptomyces coelicolor M512. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(10):4495–509.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-016-7306-1

  105. 105.

    Huang J Shi J Molle V: Cross-regulation among disparate antibiotic biosynthetic pathways of Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58(5):1276–87.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04879.x

  106. 106.

    Vicente CM Payero TD Santos-Aberturas J: Pathway-specific regulation revisited: cross-regulation of multiple disparate gene clusters by PAS-LuxR transcriptional regulators. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(12):5123–35.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-015-6472-x

  107. 107.

    Li X Wang J Li S: ScbR- and ScbR2-mediated signal transduction networks coordinate complex physiological responses in Streptomyces coelicolor. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 14831.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep14831

  108. 108.

    Li X Yu T He Q: Binding of a biosynthetic intermediate to AtrA modulates the production of lidamycin by Streptomyces globisporus. Mol Microbiol. 2015;96(6):1257–71.

    Not in our library10.1111/mmi.13004

  109. 109.

    Li Y Li J Tian Z: Coordinative Modulation of Chlorothricin Biosynthesis by Binding of the Glycosylated Intermediates and End Product to a Responsive Regulator ChlF1. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(10):5406–17.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.695874

  110. 110.

    Wolański M Łebkowski T Kois-Ostrowska A: Two transcription factors, CabA and CabR, are independently involved in multilevel regulation of the biosynthetic gene cluster encoding the novel aminocoumarin, cacibiocin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(7):3147–64.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-015-7196-7

  111. 111.

    Xu G Wang J Wang L: "Pseudo" gamma-butyrolactone receptors respond to antibiotic signals to coordinate antibiotic biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(35):27440–8.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.143081

  112. 112.

    Sekurova ON Zhang J Kristiansen KA: Activation of chloramphenicol biosynthesis in Streptomyces venezuelae ATCC 10712 by ethanol shock: insights from the promoter fusion studies. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:85.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12934-016-0484-9

  113. 113.

    Robertson AW Forget SM Martinez-Farina CF: JadX is a Disparate Natural Product Binding Protein. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(7):2200–8.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.5b11286

  114. 114.

    Wang W Ji J Li X: Angucyclines as signals modulate the behaviors of Streptomyces coelicolor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(15):5688–93.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1324253111

  115. 115.

    Abrudan MI Smakman F Grimbergen AJ: Socially mediated induction and suppression of antibiosis during bacterial coexistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(35):11054–9.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1504076112

  116. 116.

    Cornforth DM Foster KR: Antibiotics and the art of bacterial war. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(35):10827–8.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1513608112

  117. 117.

    Imai Y Sato S Tanaka Y: Lincomycin at Subinhibitory Concentrations Potentiates Secondary Metabolite Production by Streptomyces spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(11):3869–79.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.04214-14

  118. 118.

    Bertrand S Bohni N Schnee S: Metabolite induction via microorganism co-culture: a potential way to enhance chemical diversity for drug discovery. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(6):1180–204.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.03.001

  119. 119.

    Schäberle TF Orland A König GM: Enhanced production of undecylprodigiosin in Streptomyces coelicolor by co-cultivation with the corallopyronin A-producing myxobacterium, Corallococcus coralloides. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36(3):641–8.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10529-013-1406-0

  120. 120.

    Vargas-Bautista C Rahlwes K Straight P: Bacterial competition reveals differential regulation of the pks genes by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(4):717–28.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.01022-13

  121. 121.

    Traxler MF Kolter R: Natural products in soil microbe interactions and evolution. Nat Prod Rep. 2015;32(7):956–70.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5np00013k

  122. 122.
  123. 123.

    Chater KF Chandra G: The use of the rare UUA codon to define "expression space" for genes involved in secondary metabolism, development and environmental adaptation in streptomyces. J Microbiol. 2008;46(1):1–11.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12275-007-0233-1

  124. 124.

    Chandra G Chater KF: Evolutionary flux of potentially bldA-dependent Streptomyces genes containing the rare leucine codon TTA. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;94(1):111–26.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10482-008-9231-5

  125. 125.

    Jensen SE: Biosynthesis of clavam metabolites. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39(10):1407–19.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10295-012-1191-0

  126. 126.

    Ferguson NL Peña-Castillo L Moore MA: Proteomics analysis of global regulatory cascades involved in clavulanic acid production and morphological development in Streptomyces clavuligerus. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43(4):537–55.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10295-016-1733-y

  127. 127.

    Zeng H Wen S Xu W: Highly efficient editing of the actinorhodin polyketide chain length factor gene in Streptomyces coelicolor M145 using CRISPR/Cas9-CodA(sm) combined system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(24):10575–85.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-015-6931-4

  128. 128.

    Liu Y Tao W Wen S: In Vitro CRISPR/Cas9 System for Efficient Targeted DNA Editing. MBio. 2015;6(6):e01714–15.

    Not in our library10.1128/mbio.01714-15

  129. 129.

    Tong Y Charusanti P Zhang L: CRISPR-Cas9 Based Engineering of Actinomycetal Genomes. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(9):1020–9.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.5b00038

  130. 130.

    Huang H Zheng G Jiang W: One-step high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2015;47(4):231–43.

    Not in our library10.1093/abbs/gmv007

  131. 131.

    Qiu Y Wang S Chen Z: An Active Type I-E CRISPR-Cas System Identified in Streptomyces avermitilis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149533.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0149533

  132. 132.

    Du D Wang L Tian Y: Genome engineering and direct cloning of antibiotic gene clusters via phage ϕBT1 integrase-mediated site-specific recombination in Streptomyces. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 8740.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep08740

  133. 133.
  134. 134.

    Baltz RH: Genetic manipulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis for improved production in Streptomyces and other actinomycetes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43(2–3):343–70.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10295-015-1682-x

  135. 135.

    Breitling R Takano E: Synthetic Biology of Natural Products. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(10): pii: a023994.

    Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a023994

  136. 136.
  137. 137.

    Luo Y Zhang L Barton KW: Systematic Identification of a Panel of Strong Constitutive Promoters from Streptomyces albus. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4(9):1001–10.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.5b00016

  138. 138.

    Li S Wang W Li X: Genome-wide identification and characterization of reference genes with different transcript abundances for Streptomyces coelicolor. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 15840.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep15840

  139. 139.

    Willemse J Borst JW de Waal E: Positive control of cell division: FtsZ is recruited by SsgB during sporulation of Streptomyces. Genes Dev. 2011;25(1):89–99.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.600211

Cited by papers we hold 6

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.