No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.
antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters
Tilmann Weber, Kai Blin, Srikanth Duddela and 10 more
Nucleic Acids Research · 2015 · CC BY
Abstract
Microbial secondary metabolism constitutes a rich source of antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, insecticides and other high-value chemicals. Genome mining of gene clusters that encode the biosynthetic pathways for these metabolites has become a key methodology for novel compound discovery. In 2011, we introduced antiSMASH, a web server and stand-alone tool for the automatic genomic identification and analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters, available at http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org. Here, we present version 3.0 of antiSMASH, which has undergone major improvements. A full integration of the recently published ClusterFinder algorithm now allows using this probabilistic algorithm to detect putative gene clusters of unknown types. Also, a new dereplication variant of the ClusterBlast module now identifies similarities of identified clusters to any of 1172 clusters with known end products. At the enzyme level, active sites of key biosynthetic enzymes are now pinpointed through a curated pattern-matching procedure and Enzyme Commission numbers are assigned to functionally classify all enzyme-coding genes. Additionally, chemical structure prediction has been improved by incorporating polyketide reduction states. Finally, in order for users to be able to organize and analyze multiple antiSMASH outputs in a private setting, a new XML output module allows offline editing of antiSMASH annotations within the Geneious software.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
The secondary metabolism of bacteria and fungi is a rich source of bioactive chemical compounds with great potential for pharmaceutical, agricultural and nutritional applications. For example, in the field of antiinfectives, almost 70% of the drugs currently in medical use are such secondary metabolites or their derivatives. The genes encoding the biosynthetic pathways that are responsible for the production of these secondary metabolites are usually clustered together on the chromosome in biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). In recent years, genome mining of such BGCs has become a key methodology to identify new molecules, leading to the discovery of dozens of novel compounds. A variety of computational tools have been developed to support scientists in this field. Most of the available tools are dedicated to the analysis of specific classes of secondary metabolites. For example, ClustScan, NP.searcher and SBSPKS focus on non-ribosomal peptide and polyketide biosynthesis pathways, while BAGEL3 focuses on ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs). While most tools primarily focus on prokaryotic pathways, SMURF also addresses fungal secondary metabolite producers. For a comprehensive review of tools for the genomic analysis of secondary metabolism, see Weber. Since 2011, the antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis SHell (antiSMASH) has served as a comprehensive web server and a stand-alone tool for the automatic genomic identification and analysis of BGCs of any type, thus facilitating rapid genome mining of a wide range of bacterial and fungal strains. Here, we report the third version of antiSMASH, which has undergone several key improvements.
Integration with ClusterFinder
A key limitation to the original antiSMASH BGC detection algorithm was that, despite many major classes of secondary metabolites being covered by its detection logic (see Supplementary Tables S1 and S2), it was still limited to the detection of known types of BGCs. To overcome this limitation, the ClusterFinder algorithm was recently published. ClusterFinder uses a hidden Markov model to probabilistically predict BGC-like regions in genomes based on the frequencies of observed PFAM domains inside and outside a comprehensive set of known BGCs. The key assumption of the algorithm is that even the biosynthetic pathways for unknown compound families that are very different from known secondary metabolites utilize the same broad enzyme families (e.g., oxidoreductases and methyltransferases) for the catalysis of key reactions. While ClusterFinder has a somewhat higher false positive rate than the original version of antiSMASH, it has been shown to effectively identify BGCs for entirely new classes of chemicals.
From a user perspective, the most convenient way to analyze genomes using ClusterFinder is to inspect its results alongside those of antiSMASH, so that all detailed classification and analysis features offered by antiSMASH are included in the workflow. Hence, we fully integrated ClusterFinder into antiSMASH, including detailed input variables to tune the sensitivity and specificity. Also, the clusters detected by ClusterFinder are further categorized into saccharide (‘Cf_saccharide’), fatty acid (‘Cf_fatty_acid’) and putative (‘Cf_putative’) biosynthetic types, according to the classification rules defined by Cimermancic et al.. Altogether, the antiSMASH web server now provides access to both a very specific algorithm that can accurately detect BGCs belonging to a large number of known classes and a highly sensitive algorithm that effectively identifies potentially novel types of BGCs.
Dereplication and comparison with known pathways
Another key new feature in antiSMASH is a dedicated module to compare identified BGCs with those encoding the biosynthetic pathways for known compounds. Previously, this was partially possible using the built-in ClusterBlast module, but as the output contains hits against all BGCs in the database, it is often not immediately obvious whether a BGC has been experimentally characterized or not. Hence, we have now included a dedicated KnownClusterBlast module (Figure 1) that compares identified BGCs with the comprehensive dataset of known BGCs (currently 1172 in total) from the ‘Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster’ (MIBiG) community project (Medema et al., submitted for publication; see http://mibig.secondarymetabolites.org for a full overview and additional info on these BGCs). This is a very important feature as (i) dereplication of existing compounds is crucial for effective discovery of novel natural products instead of finding the same molecules repeatedly, and (ii) comparative analysis of unknown and known gene clusters may provide hints concerning the function of certain genes within the cluster, inferred from homology.
Identification and analysis of enzyme active sites
With the new ‘Active Site Finder’ module, it is possible to identify and annotate conserved amino acid motifs, for example active sites or product-determining key residues of biosynthetic enzymes. The active sites are annotated in the exported Genbank and/or EMBL files. Identified active sites are also displayed in the ‘Gene’ drop-down windows or in the cluster details view of the antiSMASH results web page. The motifs are defined in an XML file that can easily be extended on local antiSMASH installations. Currently, the following motifs are recognized by the active site finder module: active sites for ketosynthase (KS) domains, acyltransferase (AT) domains, dehydratase (DH) domains, ketoreductase (KR) domains, acyl-carrier protein (ACP) domains, thioesterases and cytochrome P450 oxygenases; and predictions based on key residues: ACP-type beta-branching/non-branching, ketoreductase domain (D-/L-) stereochemistry and enoyl reductase domain (2S/2R) stereochemistry.
Improvements in chemical structure prediction
Another important feature of antiSMASH has been its ability to display chemical structures of secondary metabolites predicted from the annotated BGCs. In this new version, we made two major improvements to generate more precise chemical structures by considering the effects of ketoreductase, dehydratase and enoylreductase that influence the redox status of keto groups in polyketides, and trans-AT type type I PKS logic. These corrections laid a foundation for further improvement in the display of more sophisticated structures of secondary metabolites. As before, predicted structures for NRPS and PKS clusters assume NRPS/PKS co-linearity and do not yet predict possible cyclizations or other post-NRPS/-PKS tailoring reactions.
Future developments toward genome-scale metabolic modeling of secondary metabolite biosynthesis
In the next phase of antiSMASH development, one major focus will be the automated integration of the predicted secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways into genome-scale models of metabolism. As a first step in this direction, antiSMASH 3.0 already includes an interface to EFICAz2.5, which predicts Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers for all the metabolic genes in the submitted genome. In addition, a prototype functionality has been added for the automated generation of prokaryotic draft genome-scale metabolic models, following the established approach of homology-based modeling. This will be the basis for further developments toward the integration of secondary metabolic pathways (Kim H.U. et al., unpublished results).
BiosynML output for offline editing
Researchers usually submit single gene clusters, complete genomes or collections of scaffolds to antiSMASH. Hence, the antiSMASH results are frequently not endpoints of their workflow, but are used as input for additional downstream analyses and may also undergo manual curation. We have added the BiosynML output module to export detailed antiSMASH analysis results in XML format, which serves as a container for interfacing to custom analysis workflows and also enables offline archiving of results. The use of BiosynML output is exemplified by a plugin (available from http://www.biosynml.de/) for the widely used desktop software Geneious, thereby allowing users to import antiSMASH-annotated sequences, to organize their pathway collection and to manually refine gene cluster information (Figure 2). Typical tasks performed during offline editing of pathways include the manual assignment of incorporated building blocks on the basis of experimental evidence, grouping of biosynthetic domains into functional modules (typically for modular PKS and NRPS gene clusters) and additional domain-specific analysis, e.g. by sequence alignments and inspection of signature motifs. In addition, the BiosynML plugin can handle direct antiSMASH job submission and result retrieval. Moreover, it also assists with the deposition of MIBiG-compliant gene clusters in the course of the ongoing MIBiG community initiative (Medema et al., submitted for publication). Finally, the BiosynML format aims to facilitate the prototyping of custom bioinformatic workflows by providing structured access to antiSMASH annotation results.
Improved nomenclature and detection of RiPPs and polyketides
For a number of compound classes, such as polyketides and RiPPs, we have updated the nomenclature and corresponding detection logic (Supplementary Table S1). For lanthipeptides, we have improved the prediction of modification reactions, lanthionine bridge count and finished peptide masses. For other RiPPs, the community-agreed nomenclature recently published by van der Donk et al. has been adopted. For polyketides and lipids, specific BGC classes have been added that are responsible for the biosynthesis of (dialkyl)resorcinols, aryl polyenes, ladderane lipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Also, new domain types have been added for the domain representation of modular polyketide synthases and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, including, e.g. branching, crotonase and pyran synthase domains (Supplementary Table S3). These updates ensure that the antiSMASH output pages reflect the latest developments in the field.
Back-end and library updates
The job management and dispatch infrastructure (https://bitbucket.org/antismash/runsmash) of the antiSMASH web server (https://bitbucket.org/antismash/websmash) have been redesigned to be more flexible when adding new features to antiSMASH and to increase speed and scalability. While the old MySQL-based job queue has reliably served around 90,000 jobs since the antiSMASH 1.0 publication in July 2011, the number of jobs submitted per month is still steadily increasing. In the seven weeks since the start of 2015, the new Redis-based queue has handled over 6000 jobs already, while being more flexible when adding new features to antiSMASH. A number of third-party tools, libraries and databases used by antiSMASH were updated to their latest version: BioPython 1.65, PFAM database 27.0 and NCBI BLAST+ 2.2.30. The ClusterBlast database was updated to include clusters detected from the latest GenBank release. Additionally, the ClusterBlast routines now use DIAMOND to calculate the cluster comparisons more quickly.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
With the newly introduced features, antiSMASH is now even more comprehensive than it was before (Table 1), and will be useful for the discovery of new secondary metabolites as well as for metabolic engineering. Still, there are several important future challenges ahead. For example, chemical structure prediction is at the moment still limited to the ‘core’ peptides and polyketides that are off-loaded from modular assembly-lines, while cyclization and tailoring reactions are difficult to accurately predict. Perhaps a combinatorial strategy will make this possible in the near future, leading to a result consisting of multiple possible end compounds (as previously done to some extent in NP.searcher). Another important remaining challenge is to scale up antiSMASH to allow the simultaneous analysis of large numbers of genomes and metagenomes; the development of automated BGC networking could be a key technology to make this possible. In the coming years, we will strive to continuously upgrade antiSMASH in order to incorporate the latest insights and technologies, so that natural product researchers will always have access to a state-of-the-art tool for the comprehensive identification and analysis of BGCs. We invite the community to join us in these efforts by contributing new algorithms and analysis tools as antiSMASH plugins. This will ensure that the community as a whole will benefit from an integrated and centralized online usage environment.
AVAILABILITY
http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org// This website is free and open to all users and there is no login requirement. Source code is available from https://bitbucket.org/antismash/antismash/.
References 26
- 1.
Newman D.J., Cragg G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J. Nat. Prod. 2012;75:311-335.
Not in our library10.1021/np200906s
- 2.
Starcevic A., Zucko J., Simunkovic J., Long P.F., Cullum J., Hranueli D. ClustScan: an integrated program package for the semi-automatic annotation of modular biosynthetic gene clusters and in silico prediction of novel chemical structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:6882-6892.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkn685
- 3.
- 4.
Anand S., Prasad M.V.R., Yadav G., Kumar N., Shehara J., Ansari M.Z., Mohanty D. SBSPKS: structure based sequence analysis of polyketide synthases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W487-W496.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq340
- 5.
Van Heel A.J., de Jong A., Montalbán-López M., Kok J., Kuipers O.P. BAGEL3: automated identification of genes encoding bacteriocins and (non-)bactericidal posttranslationally modified peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W448-W453.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt391
- 6.
Khaldi N., Seifuddin F.T., Turner G., Haft D., Nierman W.C., Wolfe K.H., Fedorova N.D. SMURF: genomic mapping of fungal secondary metabolite clusters. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010;47:736-741.
Not in our library10.1016/j.fgb.2010.06.003
- 7.
Weber T. In silico tools for the analysis of antibiotic biosynthetic pathways. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;304:230-235.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.02.001
- 8.
Medema M.H., Blin K., Cimermancic P., De Jager V., Zakrzewski P., Fischbach M.A., Weber T., Takano E., Breitling R. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W339-W346.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr466
- 9.
Blin K., Medema M.H., Kazempour D., Fischbach M., Breitling R., Takano E., Weber T. antiSMASH 2.0 – a versatile platform for genome mining of secondary metabolite producers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W204-W212.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt449
- 10.
Cimermancic P., Medema M.H., Claesen J., Kurita K., Wieland Brown L.C., Mavrommatis K., Pati A., Godfrey P.A., Koehrsen M., Clardy J., et al. Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell. 2014;158:412-421.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.034
- 11.
Lewis N.E., Nagarajan H., Palsson B.Ø. Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:291-305.
Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2737
- 12.
- 13.
Kumar N., Skolnick J. EFICAz2.5: application of a high-precision enzyme function predictor to 396 proteomes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2687-2688.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts510
- 14.
- 15.
Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., Buxton S., Cooper A., Markowitz S., Duran C., et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647-1649.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
- 16.
Arnison P.G., Bibb M.J., Bierbaum G., Bowers A.A., Bugni T.S., Bulaj G., Camarero J.A., Campopiano D.J., Challis G.L., Clardy J., et al. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013;30:108-160.
Not in our library10.1039/c2np20085f
- 17.
Fuchs S.W., Bozhüyük K.A.J., Kresovic D., Grundmann F., Dill V., Brachmann A.O., Waterfield N.R., Bode H.B. Formation of 1, 3-cyclohexanediones and resorcinols catalyzed by a widely occurring ketosynthase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013;52:4108-4112.
Not in our library10.1002/anie.201210116
- 18.
Rattray J.E., Strous M., Op den Camp H.J.M., Schouten S., Jetten M.S., Sinninghe Damsté J.S. A comparative genomics study of genetic products potentially encoding ladderane lipid biosynthesis. Biol. Direct. 2009;4:8.
Not in our library10.1186/1745-6150-4-8
- 19.
Allen E.E., Bartlett D.H. Structure and regulation of the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid synthase genes from the deep-sea bacterium Photobacterium profundum strain SS9. Microbiology. 2002;148:1903-1913.
Not in our library10.1099/00221287-148-6-1903
- 20.
Cock P.J.A., Antao T., Chang J.T., Chapman B.A., Cox C.J., Dalke A., Friedberg I., Hamelryck T., Kauff F., Wilczynski B., et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1422-1423.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
Buchfink B., Xie C., Huson D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods. 2014;12:59-60.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3176
- 24.
Weber T., Charusanti P., Musiol-Kroll E.M., Jiang X., Tong Y., Kim H.U., Lee S.Y. Metabolic engineering of antibiotic factories: new tools for antibiotic production in actinomycetes. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:15-26.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.10.009
- 25.
Doroghazi J.R., Albright J.C., Goering A.W., Ju K.-S., Haines R.R., Tchalukov K.A., Labeda D.P., Kelleher N.L., Metcalf W.W. A roadmap for natural product discovery based on large-scale genomics and metabolomics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:963-968.
Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1659
- 26.
Nguyen D.D., Wu C.H., Moree W.J., Lamsa A., Medema M.H., Zhao X., Gavilan R.G., Aparicio M., Atencio L., Jackson C., et al. MS/MS networking guided analysis of molecule and gene cluster families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:E2611-E2620.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1303471110
Cited by papers we hold 36
- antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation · 2025No notice
- antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation · 2023No notice
- antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities · 2021No notice
- The antiSMASH database version 3: increased taxonomic coverage and new query features for modular enzymes · 2020No notice
- FeGenie: A Comprehensive Tool for the Identification of Iron Genes and Iron Gene Neighborhoods in Genome and Metagenome Assemblies · 2020No notice
- Streptomyces tirandamycinicus sp. nov., a Novel Marine Sponge-Derived Actinobacterium With Antibacterial Potential Against Streptococcus agalactiae · 2019Not checked
- Heterologous Expression of Ilicicolin H Biosynthetic Gene Cluster and Production of a New Potent Antifungal Reagent, Ilicicolin J · 2019Not checked
- The complete genome sequence of the thermophilic bacterium Laceyella sacchari FBKL4.010 reveals the basis for tetramethylpyrazine biosynthesis in Moutai‐flavor Daqu · 2019Not checked
- Thermophiles and Thermozymes · 2019Not checked
- Design and Expression of Specific Hybrid Lantibiotics Active Against Pathogenic Clostridium spp. · 2019Not checked
- Genomic characteristics and comparative genomics analysis of the endophytic fungus Sarocladium brachiariae · 2019Not checked
- antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline · 2019No notice
- Characterization of the biosynthetic gene cluster for cryptic phthoxazolin A in Streptomyces avermitilis. · 2018Not checked
- Discovery of Phloeophagus Beetles as a Source of Pseudomonas Strains That Produce Potentially New Bioactive Substances and Description of Pseudomonas bohemica sp. nov. · 2018Not checked
- The antiSMASH database version 2: a comprehensive resource on secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters · 2018No notice
- Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection · 2018No notice
- Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group · 2018No notice
- Correlating chemical diversity with taxonomic distance for discovery of natural products in myxobacteria · 2018No notice
- Intervene: a tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets · 2017No notice
- Genome Sequencing Reveals the Potential of Achromobacter sp. HZ01 for Bioremediation · 2017Not checked
and 16 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.