Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Zebrafish models in translational research: tipping the scales toward advancements in human health

Jennifer B. Phillips, Monte Westerfield

Disease Models & Mechanisms · 2014 · Review

doi:10.1242/dmm.015545

Abstract

Advances in genomics and next-generation sequencing have provided clinical researchers with unprecedented opportunities to understand the molecular basis of human genetic disorders. This abundance of information places new requirements on traditional disease models, which have the potential to be used to confirm newly identified pathogenic mutations and test the efficacy of emerging therapies. The unique attributes of zebrafish are being increasingly leveraged to create functional disease models, facilitate drug discovery, and provide critical scientific bases for the development of new clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. In this short review and the accompanying poster, we highlight a few illustrative examples of the applications of the zebrafish model to the study of human health and disease.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Since its establishment as a vertebrate model of development nearly 30 years ago, the experimental value of zebrafish has been demonstrated over a broad range of biological research. In the 1990s, large-scale mutagenesis screens provided researchers with thousands of mutants, the phenotypic characterizations of which illuminated numerous cellular events in vertebrate development and foreshadowed the power of zebrafish as a human disease model. The 21st century ushered in the zebrafish genome project, which revealed conserved functions of myriad genes across the vertebrate lineage and identified zebrafish orthologs for 82% of the known human disease genes. The sequenced genome provided the community with targets for reverse genetics through widespread use of morpholinos, antisense oligonucleotides designed to temporarily downregulate gene function by blocking translation or proper splicing. Although sometimes limited by the short efficacy period and confounding off-target effects (reviewed in ), the use of morpholinos in zebrafish research, beginning at the turn of this century, tremendously accelerated zebrafish loss-of-function studies and solidified the relevance of investigating zebrafish orthologs of human disease genes. The well-mapped genome also provided the information necessary to expand the collection of transgenic lines, which, given the optical clarity of zebrafish embryos and larvae, have enabled in vivo study of cellular and molecular processes in breathtaking fluorescent detail. Genome sequencing also revealed a whole-genome duplication event in the teleost lineage, with 25–30% of the duplicated genes having been retained in the zebrafish because of partitioning of functions that were originally performed by the single ancestral gene (subfunctionalization). In addition to contributing to our knowledge of molecular evolution, the presence of duplicated genes with shared function in the zebrafish genome provides the novel opportunity for fine-tuned analyses of gene regulation. Most recently, the development of genome-editing techniques, including transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9, has enabled researchers to induce heritable mutations with remarkable precision (see poster panel 2). Finally, large-scale screens using panels of pharmaceutical compounds or small molecules have been developed over the past several years, where thousands of embryos can be allocated into multi-well plates and exposed to chemicals to test drug dose-response levels, potential for teratogenicity or toxicity, and therapeutic potential of known or novel compounds (see poster panel 2).

In line with the ongoing development of these methodologies, the zebrafish has become increasingly valuable as a translational research model, and is now contributing to hundreds of studies worldwide on human disease mechanisms ranging from autism to vascular disease. The rapid, ex utero development of zebrafish embryos, coupled with the speed and facility with which loss of gene function can be assayed, have been used to great advantage by researchers to conduct in vivo investigations of orthologs of human disease genes. Zebrafish are as accessible and proliferative as cell culture, but also provide a complex, in vivo, functional vertebrate model system. This unique combination of attributes is steadily gaining recognition as laboratories working on human health either in clinical settings or with other model organisms are increasingly including zebrafish studies in their comprehensive analysis of human diseases and potential treatments. This brief review and the accompanying poster summarize some of the key features of the zebrafish model system and highlight some recent examples of its utility in human disease-focused research.

Direct impacts on human health: new tools to combat cancer and tuberculosis

Of all the stellar zebrafish research in recent years, we have chosen to highlight two fish tales with exceptional impact. The first comes from Leonard Zon and colleagues at Harvard Medical School, whose analysis of the complex genetic milieu of malignancies over the last decade has ushered in the development of powerful cutting-edge tools of the zebrafish field (see poster panel 3; example 2). In 2011, the Zon laboratory used transgenic zebrafish that express a human oncogene, BRAFV600E, under the control of a melanocyte-specific promoter (mitfa) in a background depleted of the well-studied tumor suppressor gene p53 to identify chemical factors that offset aberrant regulation of neural-crest-specific genes. Dysregulation of neural-crest-specific genes is known to contribute to cancers in crest-derived tissues, such as melanocytes (tumors affecting melanocytes are termed melanoma). The group discovered that inhibitors of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibit neural-crest development in larvae, and lead to a significant decrease in cancerous growths in the melanoma-prone zebrafish model. One such DHODH inhibitor used in the study, leflunomide, is an FDA-approved anti-arthritis drug. Based directly on the findings of White and colleagues, along with subsequent verification of DHODH-blocking activity in human and mouse cells, a Phase I/II clinical trial of leflunomide in combination with a previously studied BRAF-inhibitor was initiated and is currently underway for melanoma patients [see also Len Zon’s account of the discovery, in this issue].

Another exemplary zebrafish success story comes from Lalita Ramakrishnan’s group at the University of Washington, who published a series of elegant papers establishing a zebrafish pathogen, Mycobacterium marinum, as a tractable model for the infectious disease tuberculosis (see poster panel 3; example 1). M. marinum, a close genetic relative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, produces inflammatory granulomas in fish similar to those seen in the lung tissue of humans diagnosed with tuberculosis. Studies of the infectious process and host-immune responses of M. marinum can provide key insights into mycobacterial pathogenesis and provide new avenues for the treatment of human tuberculosis. Previous work by the Ramakrishnan group identified human mutations in the inflammatory response factor LTA4H that affect susceptibility to tuberculosis. Specifically, homozygous genotypes with either low or high LTA4H confer a more severe disease phenotype, whereas symptoms in patients with the heterozygous state are milder. Using zebrafish to recreate these genotypic combinations, Tobin and colleagues showed that human tuberculosis patients can succumb to the disease from either a hyper- or hypo-immune response. These studies provide clinicians treating tuberculosis patients with a basis for understanding variable natural history and the opportunity to provide genotype-specific treatment depending on the functional levels of LTA4H (and its downstream target, tumor necrosis factor). Building on these findings, the Ramakrishnan group has now elucidated the inflammatory response pathways that are compromised in these various patient genotypes during mycobacterial infection, implicating mitochondrial reactive oxygen species mediated by the RIP1-RIP3-dependent pathways and identifying currently available pharmaceutical compounds to target these specific response pathways in tuberculosis and other similar infections.

Genetic models on demand and avenues for new disease gene discovery

A PubMed search reveals an abundance of publications that characterize new zebrafish models of known human afflictions. Neurological and psychiatric disorders, cancer (reviewed in ), heart defects (reviewed in;; ), fetal alcohol syndrome, ciliopathies and kidney disorders (reviewed in; ) are but a few of the human diseases currently studied by zebrafish researchers. Other contributions have been made to the field of regenerative medicine, capitalizing on the regenerative capacity of zebrafish fin, retina, heart, kidney and numerous other tissues to identify the genetic factors required for replacing cells lost to injury or disease (; reviewed in; ).

As a paraclinical tool, zebrafish have proven to be incredibly useful for validating the pathogenicity of newly discovered genes or alleles in human patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) technologies have changed the landscape of human genetic disease diagnosis; however, distinguishing a pathogenic allele from a novel, benign polymorphism is a complex process, particularly when insufficient numbers of relatives are available for comparative sequence analysis. The ease with which potentially pathogenic genes can be depleted in zebrafish, often in combination with rescue of loss-of-function mutations by human variants to confirm their disease-causing potential, has been increasingly exploited over the past several years, offering valuable information for clinicians diagnosing Usher syndrome (see poster panel 3; example 4), neurodegenerative diseases, muscular dystrophy, skeletal disease and a broad range of other genetic disorders.

In addition to the exploration of genes that are known to impact human health, the powerful zebrafish model also contributes to the discovery of previously unidentified disease genes. For example, candidate genes obtained from large genome-wide association studies of kidney and platelet dysfunction have been screened in zebrafish to establish specific phenotypic connections to these genetic risk profiles. Reverse genetics screens have also shed light on new molecular partners of known disease genes, not only providing researchers with a greater understanding of the pathways involved in human disorders, but also providing new genetic targets for human geneticists to explore in patients with clinical diagnoses in the absence of a known pathogenic mutation. The potential of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALENs gene-editing techniques has been aptly demonstrated by the successful targeting of human disease genes in pioneering proof-of-concept experiments. Loss-of-function mutations in the transcription factor GATA5 lead to severe congenital heart defects in humans. CRISPR/Cas9 constructs targeting the zebrafish ortholog, gata5, resulted in a variety of biallelic insertions and deletions at that locus, and reproduced the heart development defects characterized in a previously identified gata5 mutant. This work demonstrated the capacity of the CRISPR/Cas9 system not only to generate heritable mutations but also to induce somatic mutations in the injected animals so efficiently that a phenotype can be observed almost immediately. Now increasingly used in zebrafish research, such gene-editing techniques facilitate the rapid creation of new, custom-made mutations to investigate virtually any known or suspected disease gene. Additionally, the emerging availability of online resources such as the Human Phenotype Ontology website (http://www.human-phenotype-ontology.org/) allows cross-referenced searches for mouse and zebrafish models of human disease based on phenotypic parameters.

Netting new therapies for human disease

Beyond these indisputably valuable contributions to understanding developmental processes and the cellular and molecular bases of human diseases, numerous zebrafish models that have been generated for these purposes can now assist in finding new treatments. Chemical screens, such as the targeted method used in the Ramakrishnan Mycobacterium studies, can be employed on a larger scale to look for suppressors or enhancers of a given phenotype. Large numbers of developmentally synchronized, genetically homogenous zebrafish can be screened in microtiter plates, allowing for rapid evaluation of a variety of compounds and dosages in parallel. One screen for chemical effectors of hematopoiesis conducted by the Zon lab in 2007 (see poster panel 3; example 3) identified a role for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in stem cell regulation. As a result of this finding, along with complementary data from mouse models, clinical trials were initiated in which umbilical cord blood was treated with PGE2 prior to transplantation into leukemia or lymphoma patients. The results of the Phase I trial supported the preclinical conclusion that PGE2 promotes proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and increases engraftment, or the acceptance of transplanted cells, in the study subjects. Based on this positive outcome, a Phase II trial is now underway.

Many other high-throughput screens using zebrafish models of ototoxicity, epilepsy and cancer have uncovered new therapeutic candidates, and collectively provide a robust proof-of-principle of the extent to which zebrafish research can directly impact drug discovery.

Summary and outlook

Throughout its history as a model organism, the zebrafish has demonstrated unique utility in embryological, developmental and genetic studies of human disease. It should be noted that some of the advantages of the zebrafish system, such as the presence of duplicated genes or the cellular regeneration potential not present in mammals, might also present limitations to the pursuit of a translational research model for a particular disease (see poster panel 4). Nonetheless, this system has much to offer the translational researcher. The expanding molecular toolkit available to the zebrafish community will continue to enhance our basic understanding of vertebrate organ, tissue, cell and molecular biological functions, and, increasingly, can be applied with ever greater precision to studies directly geared toward understanding and treating human disease. Increasing numbers of zebrafish researchers are collaborating with clinicians, and numerous scientists outside the zebrafish community are turning to zebrafish to enhance their studies as well. A comprehensive approach encompassing complementary use of multiple animal models and medically relevant technology will drive major advances in the improvement of human health in the coming years.

References 74

  1. 1.

    Ablain J. Zon L. I. (2013 ). Of fish and men: using zebrafish to fight human diseases. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 584–586

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.009

  2. 2.

    Austin-Tse C. Halbritter J. Zariwala M. A. Gilberti R. M. Gee H. Y. Hellman N. Pathak N. Liu Y. Panizzi J. R. Patel-King R. S. (2013 ). Zebrafish ciliopathy screen plus human mutational analysis identifies C21orf59 and CCDC65 defects as causing primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 672–686

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.08.015

  3. 3.

    Baraban S. C. Dinday M. T. Hortopan G. A. (2013 ). Drug screening in Scn1a zebrafish mutant identifies clemizole as a potential Dravet syndrome treatment. Nat. Commun. 4, 2410

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms3410

  4. 4.

    Baxendale S. Holdsworth C. J. Meza Santoscoy P. L. Harrison M. R. Fox J. Parkin C. A. Ingham P. W. Cunliffe V. T. (2012 ). Identification of compounds with anti-convulsant properties in a zebrafish model of epileptic seizures. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 773–784

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.010090

  5. 5.

    Bedell V. M. Westcot S. E. Ekker S. C. (2011 ). Lessons from morpholino-based screening in zebrafish. Brief. Funct. Genomics 10, 181–188

    Not in our library10.1093/bfgp/elr021

  6. 6.

    Braasch I. Postlethwait J. H. (2012 ). Polyploidy in fish and the teleost genome duplication. In Polyploidy and Genome Evolution (ed. Soltis P. S. Soltis D. E. ), pp. 341–383 Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Brannen K. C. Charlap J. H. Lewis E. M. (2013 ). Zebrafish teratogenicity testing. Methods Mol. Biol. 947, 383–401

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-62703-131-8_28

  8. 8.

    Chang N. Sun C. Gao L. Zhu D. Xu X. Zhu X. Xiong J. W. Xi J. J. (2013 ). Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos. Cell Res. 23, 465–472

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2013.45

  9. 9.

    Chen C. H. Durand E. Wang J. Zon L. I. Poss K. D. (2013 ). Zebraflash transgenic lines for in vivo bioluminescence imaging of stem cells and regeneration in adult zebrafish. Development 140, 4988–4997

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.102053

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Cutler C. Multani P. Robbins D. Kim H. T. Le T. Hoggatt J. Pelus L. M. Desponts C. Chen Y. B. Rezner B. (2013 ). Prostaglandin-modulated umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 122, 3074–3081

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2013-05-503177

  12. 12.

    Driever W. Stemple D. Schier A. Solnica-Krezel L. (1994 ). Zebrafish: genetic tools for studying vertebrate development. Trends Genet. 10, 152–159

    Not in our library10.1016/0168-9525(94)90091-4

  13. 13.

    Ducharme N. A. Peterson L. E. Benfenati E. Reif D. McCollum C. W. Gustafsson J.Å. Bondesson M. (2013 ). Meta-analysis of toxicity and teratogenicity of 133 chemicals from zebrafish developmental toxicity studies. Reprod. Toxicol. 41, 98–108

    Not in our library10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.06.070

  14. 14.

    Ebermann I. Phillips J. B. Liebau M. C. Koenekoop R. K. Schermer B. Lopez I. Schäfer E. Roux A. F. Dafinger C. Bernd A. (2010 ). PDZD7 is a modifier of retinal disease and a contributor to digenic Usher syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 1812–1823

    Not in our library10.1172/jci39715

  15. 15.

    Esterberg R. Coffin A. B. Ou H. Simon J. A. Raible D. W. Rubel E. W. (2013 ). Fish in a dish: drug discovery for hearing habilitation. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Models 10

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ddmod.2012.02.001

  16. 16.

    Fang L. Liu C. Miller Y. I. (2014 ). Zebrafish models of dyslipidemia: relevance to atherosclerosis and angiogenesis. Transl. Res. 163, 99–108

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2013.09.004

  17. 17.

    Feng Y. Renshaw S. Martin P. (2012 ). Live imaging of tumor initiation in zebrafish larvae reveals a trophic role for leukocyte-derived PGE2. Curr. Biol. 22, 1253–1259

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.010

  18. 18.

    Force A. Lynch M. Pickett F. B. Amores A. Yan Y. L. Postlethwait J. (1999 ). Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531–1545

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531

  19. 19.

    Gebruers E. Cordero-Maldonado M. L. Gray A. I. Clements C. Harvey A. L. Edrada-Ebel R. de Witte P. A. Crawford A. D. Esguerra C. V. (2013 ). A phenotypic screen in zebrafish identifies a novel small-molecule inducer of ectopic tail formation suggestive of alterations in non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling. PLoS ONE 8, e83293

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0083293

  20. 20.

    Gemberling M. Bailey T. J. Hyde D. R. Poss K. D. (2013 ). The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet. 29, 611–620

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.003

  21. 21.

    Gibbs E. M. Davidson A. E. Telfer W. R. Feldman E. L. Dowling J. J. (2014 ). The myopathy-causing mutation DNM2-S619L leads to defective tubulation in vitro and in developing zebrafish. Dis. Model. Mech. 7, 157–161

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.012286

  22. 22.

    Gieger C. Radhakrishnan A. Cvejic A. Tang W. Porcu E. Pistis G. Serbanovic-Canic J. Elling U. Goodall A. H. Labrune Y. (2011 ). New gene functions in megakaryopoiesis and platelet formation. Nature 480, 201–208

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10659

  23. 23.

    Haffter P. Granato M. Brand M. Mullins M. C. Hammerschmidt M. Kane D. A. Odenthal J. van Eeden F. J. Jiang Y. J. Heisenberg C. P. (1996 ). The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 1–36

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.123.1.1

  24. 24.

    Hao J. Ao A. Zhou L. Murphy C. K. Frist A. Y. Keel J. J. Thorne C. A. Kim K. Lee E. Hong C. C. (2013 ). Selective small molecule targeting β-catenin function discovered by in vivo chemical genetic screen. Cell Rep. 4, 898–904

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.047

  25. 25.

    Hjeij R. Lindstrand A. Francis R. Zariwala M. A. Liu X. Li Y. Damerla R. Dougherty G. W. Abouhamed M. Olbrich H. (2013 ). ARMC4 mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with randomization of left/right body asymmetry. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 357–367

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.009

  26. 26.

    Hortopan G. A. Dinday M. T. Baraban S. C. (2010 ). Zebrafish as a model for studying genetic aspects of epilepsy. Dis. Model. Mech. 3, 144–148

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.002139

  27. 27.

    Howe K. Clark M. D. Torroja C. F. Torrance J. Berthelot C. Muffato M. Collins J. E. Humphray S. McLaren K. Matthews L. (2013 ). The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496, 498–503

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12111

  28. 28.

    Hruscha A. Krawitz P. Rechenberg A. Heinrich V. Hecht J. Haass C. Schmid B. (2013 ). Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish. Development 140, 4982–4987

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.099085

  29. 29.

    Huang H.-T. Kathrein K. L. Barton A. Gitlin Z. Huang Y.-H. Ward T. P. Hofmann O. Dibiase A. Song A. Tyekucheva S. (2013 ). A network of epigenetic regulators guides developmental haematopoiesis in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1516–1525

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2870

  30. 30.

    Hwang W. Y. Fu Y. Reyon D. Maeder M. L. Tsai S. Q. Sander J. D. Peterson R. T. Yeh J. R. Joung J. K. (2013 ). Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 227–229

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2501

  31. 31.

    Iglesias A. I. Springelkamp H. van der Linde H. Severijnen L. A. Amin N. Oostra B. Kockx C. E. van den Hout M. C. van Ijcken W. F. Hofman A. (2014 ). Exome sequencing and functional analyses suggest that SIX6 is a gene involved in an altered proliferation-differentiation balance early in life and optic nerve degeneration at old age. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 1320–1332

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddt522

  32. 32.

    Ignatius M. S. Chen E. Elpek N. M. Fuller A. Z. Tenente I. M. Clagg R. Liu S. Blackburn J. S. Linardic C. M. Rosenberg A. E. (2012 ). In vivo imaging of tumor-propagating cells, regional tumor heterogeneity, and dynamic cell movements in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Cell 21, 680–693

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.043

  33. 33.

    Jacob J. Ribes V. Moore S. Constable S. C. Sasai N. Gerety S. S. Martin D. J. Sergeant C. P. Wilkinson D. G. Briscoe J. (2014 ). Valproic acid silencing of ascl1b/Ascl1 results in the failure of serotonergic differentiation in a zebrafish model of fetal valproate syndrome. Dis. Model. Mech. 7, 107–117

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.013219

  34. 34.

    Jiang J. Q. Li R. G. Wang J. Liu X. Y. Xu Y. J. Fang W. Y. Chen X. Z. Zhang W. Wang X. Z. Yang Y. Q. (2013 ). Prevalence and spectrum of GATA5 mutations associated with congenital heart disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 165, 570–573

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.039

  35. 35.

    Joung J. K. Sander J. D. (2013 ). TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 49–55

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm3486

  36. 36.

    Kettleborough R. N. Busch-Nentwich E. M. Harvey S. A. Dooley C. M. de Bruijn E. van Eeden F. Sealy I. White R. J. Herd C. Nijman I. J. (2013 ). A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature 496, 494–497

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11992

  37. 37.

    Kimmel C. B. Ballard W. W. Kimmel S. R. Ullmann B. Schilling T. F. (1995 ). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203, 253–310

    Not in our library10.1002/aja.1002030302

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Kou I. Takahashi Y. Johnson T. A. Takahashi A. Guo L. Dai J. Qiu X. Sharma S. Takimoto A. Ogura Y. (2013 ). Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 676–679

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2639

  40. 40.

    Le X. Pugach E. K. Hettmer S. Storer N. Y. Liu J. Wills A. A. DiBiase A. Chen E. Y. Ignatius M. S. Poss K. D. (2013 ). A novel chemical screening strategy in zebrafish identifies common pathways in embryogenesis and rhabdomyosarcoma development. Development 140, 2354–2364

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.088427

  41. 41.

    Liang B. Soka M. Christensen A. H. Olesen M. S. Larsen A. P. Knop F. K. Wang F. Nielsen J. B. Andersen M. N. Humphreys D. (2013 ). Genetic variation in the two-pore domain potassium channel, TASK-1, may contribute to an atrial substrate for arrhythmogenesis. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. [Epub ahead of print]

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.12.014

  42. 42.

    Mahmood F. Fu S. Cooke J. Wilson S. W. Cooper J. D. Russell C. (2013 ). A zebrafish model of CLN2 disease is deficient in tripeptidyl peptidase 1 and displays progressive neurodegeneration accompanied by a reduction in proliferation. Brain 136, 1488–1507

    Not in our library10.1093/brain/awt043

  43. 43.

    McCampbell K. K. Wingert R. A. (2013 ). New tides: using zebrafish to study renal regeneration. Transl. Res. 163, 109–122

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2013.10.003

  44. 44.

    McCarthy N. Wetherill L. Lovely C. B. Swartz M. E. Foroud T. M. Eberhart J. K. (2013 ). Pdgfra protects against ethanol-induced craniofacial defects in a zebrafish model of FASD. Development 140, 3254–3265

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.094938

  45. 45.

    Miesfeld J. B. Link B. A. (2014 ). Establishment of transgenic lines to monitor and manipulate Yap/Taz-Tead activity in zebrafish reveals both evolutionarily conserved and divergent functions of the Hippo pathway. Mech. Dev. [Epub ahead of print]

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mod.2014.02.003

  46. 46.

    Mullins M. C. Hammerschmidt M. Haffter P. Nüsslein-Volhard C. (1994 ). Large-scale mutagenesis in the zebrafish: in search of genes controlling development in a vertebrate. Curr. Biol. 4, 189–202

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00048-8

  47. 47.

    Nasevicius A. Ekker S. C. (2000 ). Effective targeted gene ‘knockdown’ in zebrafish. Nat. Genet. 26, 216–220

    Not in our library10.1038/79951

  48. 48.

    Nguyen A. T. Emelyanov A. Koh C. H. Spitsbergen J. M. Parinov S. Gong Z. (2012 ). An inducible kras(V12) transgenic zebrafish model for liver tumorigenesis and chemical drug screening. Dis. Model. Mech. 5, 63–72

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.008367

  49. 49.

    North T. E. Goessling W. Walkley C. R. Lengerke C. Kopani K. R. Lord A. M. Weber G. J. Bowman T. V. Jang I. H. Grosser T. (2007 ). Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis. Nature 447, 1007–1011

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05883

  50. 50.

    Orellana-Paucar A. M. Afrikanova T. Thomas J. Aibuldinov Y. K. Dehaen W. de Witte P. A. Esguerra C. V. (2013 ). Insights from zebrafish and mouse models on the activity and safety of ar-turmerone as a potential drug candidate for the treatment of epilepsy. PLoS One 8, e81634

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0081634

  51. 51.

    Pan Y. A. Freundlich T. Weissman T. A. Schoppik D. Wang X. C. Zimmerman S. Ciruna B. Sanes J. R. Lichtman J. W. Schier A. F. (2013 ). Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish. Development 140, 2835–2846

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.094631

  52. 52.
  53. 53.

    Peterson R. T. Link B. A. Dowling J. E. Schreiber S. L. (2000 ). Small molecule developmental screens reveal the logic and timing of vertebrate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12965–12969

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.97.24.12965

  54. 54.

    Poureetezadi S. J. Wingert R. A. (2013 ). Congenital and acute kidney disease: translational research insights from zebrafish chemical genetics. General Med. 1, 112

    Not in our library10.4172/2327-5146.1000112

  55. 55.

    Rahn J. J. Bestman J. E. Josey B. J. Inks E.S. Stackley K. D. Rogers C. E. Chou C. J. Chan S. S. (2013 ). Novel vitamin K analogs suppress seizures in zebrafish and mouse models of epilepsy. Neuroscience 259,142–154

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.040

  56. 56.

    Roca F. J. Ramakrishnan L. (2013 ). TNF dually mediates resistance and susceptibility to mycobacteria via mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Cell 153, 521–534

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.022

  57. 57.

    Ryan S. Willer J. Marjoram L. Bagwell J. Mankiewicz J. Leshchiner I. Goessling W. Bagnat M. Katsanis N. (2013 ). Rapid identification of kidney cyst mutations by whole exome sequencing in zebrafish. Development 140, 4445–4451

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.101170

  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Singh S. P. Holdway J. E. Poss K. D. (2012 ). Regeneration of amputated zebrafish fin rays from de novo osteoblasts. Dev. Cell 22, 879–886

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.006

  60. 60.

    Staudt D. Stainier D. (2012 ). Uncovering the molecular and cellular mechanisms of heart development using the zebrafish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 397–418

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155646

  61. 61.

    Staudt D. W. Liu J. Thorn K. S. Stuurman N. Liebling M. Stainier D. Y. (2014 ). High-resolution imaging of cardiomyocyte behavior reveals two distinct steps in ventricular trabeculation. Development 141, 585–593

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.098632

  62. 62.

    Swartz M. E. Wells M. B. Griffin M. McCarthy N. Lovely C. B. McGurk P. Rozacky J. Eberhart J. K. (2013 ). A screen of zebrafish mutants identifies ethanol-sensitive genetic loci. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 694–703

    Not in our library10.1111/acer.12286

  63. 63.

    Tobin D. M. Vary J. C. Jr Ray J. P. Walsh G. S. Dunstan S. J. Bang N. D. Hagge D. A. Khadge S. King M. C. Hawn T. R. (2010 ). The lta4h locus modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish and humans. Cell 140, 717–730

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.013

  64. 64.

    Tobin D. M. Roca F. J. Oh S. F. McFarland R. Vickery T. W. Ray J. P. Ko D. C. Zou Y. Bang N. D. Chau T. T. (2012 ). Host genotype-specific therapies can optimize the inflammatory response to mycobacterial infections. Cell 148, 434–446

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.023

  65. 65.
  66. 66.

    Wang C. Tao W. Wang Y. Bikow J. Lu B. Keating A. Verma S. Parker T. G. Han R. Wen X. Y. (2010 ). Rosuvastatin, identified from a zebrafish chemical genetic screen for antiangiogenic compounds, suppresses the growth of prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 58, 418–426

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.024

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Westhoff J. H. Giselbrecht S. Schmidts M. Schindler S. Beales P. L. Tönshoff B. Liebel U. Gehrig J. (2013 ). Development of an automated imaging pipeline for the analysis of the zebrafish larval kidney. PLoS ONE 8, e82137

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0082137

  69. 69.

    White R. M. Cech J. Ratanasirintrawoot S. Lin C. Y. Rahl P. B. Burke C. J. Langdon E. Tomlinson M. L. Mosher J. Kaufman C. (2011 ). DHODH modulates transcriptional elongation in the neural crest and melanoma. Nature 471, 518–522

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09882

  70. 70.

    White R. Rose K. Zon L. (2013 ). Zebrafish cancer: the state of the art and the path forward. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 624–636

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3589

  71. 71.

    Xiong F. Tentner A. R. Huang P. Gelas A. Mosaliganti K. R. Souhait L. Rannou N. Swinburne I. A. Obholzer N. D. Cowgill P. D. (2013 ). Specified neural progenitors sort to form sharp domains after noisy Shh signaling. Cell 153, 550–561

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.023

  72. 72.

    Zdebik A. A. Mahmood F. Stanescu H. C. Kleta R. Bockenhauer D. Russell C. (2013 ). Epilepsy in kcnj10 morphant zebrafish assessed with a novel method for long-term EEG recordings. PLoS ONE 8, e79765

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0079765

  73. 73.

    Ziv L. Muto A. Schoonheim P. J. Meijsing S. H. Strasser D. Ingraham H. A. Schaaf M. J. Yamamoto K. R. Baier H. (2013 ). An affective disorder in zebrafish with mutation of the glucocorticoid receptor. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 681–691

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2012.64

  74. 74.

    Zon L. (2014 ). From fish tank to bedside in cancer therapy: an interview with Leonard Zon. Dis. Model. Mech. 7, 735–738

    Not in our library10.1242/dmm.016642

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.