Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12

Abstract

A significant number of surgical patients are at risk of intra- or post-operative complications or both, which are associated with increased lengths of stay, costs, and mortality. Reducing these risks is important for the individual patient but also for health-care planners and managers. Insufficient tissue perfusion and cellular oxygenation due to hypovolemia, heart dysfunction or both is one of the leading causes of perioperative complications. Adequate perioperative management guided by effective and timely hemodynamic monitoring can help reduce the risk of complications and thus potentially improve outcomes. In this review, we describe the various available hemodynamic monitoring systems and how they can best be used to guide cardiovascular and fluid management in the perioperative period in high-risk surgical patients.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 103

1. 1.

   Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 2008;372:139-44.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60878-8

2. 2.

   Jhanji S, Thomas B, Ely A, Watson D, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM. Mortality and utilisation of critical care resources amongst high-risk surgical patients in a large NHS trust. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:695-700.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05560.x

3. 3.
   Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom · 2006

   No notice
4. 4.

   Lobo SM, de Oliveira NE. Clinical review: What are the best hemodynamic targets for noncardiac surgical patients? Crit Care. 2013;17:210.

   Not in our library10.1186/cc11861

5. 5.

   Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg. 2005;242:326-41.

   Not in our library10.1097/01.sla.0000179621.33268.83

6. 6.

   Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1392-402.

   Not in our library10.1213/ane.0b013e3181eeaae5

7. 7.

   Gurgel ST. do Nascimento P Jr. Maintaining tissue perfusion in high-risk surgical patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1384-91.

   Not in our library10.1213/ane.0b013e3182055384

8. 8.

   Cecconi M, Corredor C, Arulkumaran N, Abuella G, Ball J, Grounds RM, et al. Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy-what is the evidence in surgical patients? The effect on different risk groups. Crit Care. 2013;17:209.

   Not in our library10.1186/cc11823

9. 9.

   Jhanji S, Lee C, Watson D, Hinds C, Pearse RM. Microvascular flow and tissue oxygenation after major abdominal surgery: association with post-operative complications. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:671-7.

   Not in our library10.1007/s00134-008-1325-z

10. 10.

    Marjanovic G, Villain C, Juettner E, zur Hausen A, Hoeppner J, Hopt UT, et al. Impact of different crystalloid volume regimes on intestinal anastomotic stability. Ann Surg. 2009;249:181-5.

    Not in our library10.1097/sla.0b013e31818b73dc

11. 11.

    Kulemann B, Timme S, Seifert G, Holzner PA, Glatz T, Sick O, et al. Intraoperative crystalloid overload leads to substantial inflammatory infiltration of intestinal anastomoses - a histomorphological analysis. Surgery. 2013;154:596-603.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.010

12. 12.

    Nessim C, Sideris L, Turcotte S, Vafiadis P, Lapostole AC, Simard S, et al. The effect of fluid overload in the presence of an epidural on the strength of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res. 2013;183:567-73.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.030

13. 13.

    Pizov R, Eden A, Bystritski D, Kalina E, Tamir A, Gelman S. Hypotension during gradual blood loss: waveform variables response and absence of tachycardia. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:911-8.

    Not in our library10.1093/bja/aes300

14. 14.

    Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, et al. Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15:229.

    Not in our library10.1186/cc10291

15. 15.
    Association between systemic hemodynamics and septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective observational study · 2013

    No notice
16. 16.

    Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172-8.

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.07-2331

17. 17.

    Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1333-7.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000214677.76535.a5

18. 18.

    Thiele RH, Bartels K, Gan TJ. Cardiac output monitoring: a contemporary assessment and review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:177-85.

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000000608

19. 19.
    Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists · 2011

    No notice
20. 20.

    Repesse X, Bodson L, Vieillard-Baron A. Doppler echocardiography in shocked patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19:221-7.

    Not in our library10.1097/mcc.0b013e3283602344

21. 21.

    Maltais S, Costello WT, Billings FT, Bick JS, Byrne JG, Ahmad RM, et al. Episodic monoplane transesophageal echocardiography impacts postoperative management of the cardiac surgery patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:665-9.

    Not in our library10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.012

22. 22.

    Rhodes A, Cusack RJ, Newman PJ, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:256-64.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-002-1206-9

23. 23.

    Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:472-7.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67061-4

24. 24.

    Harvey S, Young D, Brampton W, Cooper AB, Doig G, Sibbald W, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003408.

    Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd003408.pub2

25. 25.

    Shah MR, Hasselblad V, Stevenson LW, Binanay C, O’Connor CM, Sopko G, et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2005;294:1664-70.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.294.13.1664

26. 26.

    Vincent JL, Pinsky MR, Sprung CL, Levy M, Marini JJ, Payen D, et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:3093-6.

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e31818c10c7

27. 27.

    Vincent JL. The pulmonary artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26:341-5.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10877-012-9389-2

28. 28.

    Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement - dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:227-36.

    Not in our library10.1097/00000542-198103000-00010

29. 29.

    Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:434-40.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.ob013e318161fec4

30. 30.

    Oren-Grinberg A. The PiCCO Monitor. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48:57-85.

    Not in our library10.1097/aia.0b013e3181c3dc11

31. 31.

    Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, Simon TP, Geisen M, Hoeft A, et al. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:573-9.

    Not in our library10.1093/bja/aet116

32. 32.

    Cecconi M, Fawcett J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2008;8:3.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2253-8-3

33. 33.

    Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:498-504.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-008-1292-4

34. 34.

    Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care. 2009;13:R32.

    Not in our library10.1186/cc7739

35. 35.
    Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during elective total hip arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia · 2011

    No notice
36. 36.

    Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1834-41.

    Not in our library10.1097/00003246-200208000-00027

37. 37.

    Scolletta S, Bodson L, Donadello K, Taccone FS, Devigili A, Vincent JL, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by pulse wave analysis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1025-33.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-013-2861-8

38. 38.

    Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, Ciappi F, Lazzeri C, Peris A, et al. Cardiac output by arterial pulse contour: reliability under hemodynamic derangements. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:642-6.

    Not in our library10.1510/icvts.2008.200451

39. 39.

    Penaz J. Criteria for set point estimation in the volume clamp method of blood pressure measurement. Physiol Res. 1992;41:5-10.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE. The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:131-41.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11517-008-0359-2

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Current concepts of perioperative monitoring in high-risk surgical patients: a review · 2019
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.