Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature

as members of the H3A Working Group on Ethics, Paulina Tindana, Jantina de Vries and 9 more (opens in a new tab)

BMC Medical Ethics · 2015 · Review

doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Background. Community engagement has been recognised as an important aspect of the ethical conduct of biomedical research, especially when research is focused on ethnically or culturally distinct populations. While this is a generally accepted tenet of biomedical research, it is unclear what components are necessary for effective community engagement, particularly in the context of genomic research in Africa.

Methods. We conducted a review of the published literature to identify the community engagement strategies that can support the successful implementation of genomic studies in Africa. Our search strategy involved using online databases, Pubmed (National Library of Medicine), Medline and Google scholar. Search terms included a combination of the following: community engagement, community advisory boards, community consultation, community participation, effectiveness, genetic and genomic research, Africa, developing countries.

Results. A total of 44 articles and 1 thesis were retrieved of which 38 met the selection criteria. Of these, 21 were primary studies on community engagement, while the rest were secondary reports on community engagement efforts in biomedical research studies. 34 related to biomedical research generally, while 4 were specific to genetic and genomic research in Africa.

Conclusion. We concluded that there were several community engagement strategies that could support genomic studies in Africa. While many of the strategies could support the early stages of a research project such as the recruitment of research participants, further research is needed to identify effective strategies to engage research participants and their communities beyond the participant recruitment stage. Research is also needed to address how the views of local communities should be incorporated into future uses of human biological samples. Finally, studies evaluating the impact of CE on genetic research are lacking. Systematic evaluation of CE strategies is essential to determine the most effective models of CE for genetic and genomic research conducted in African settings.

References 52

  1. 1.
    Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries · 2007
    No notice
  2. 2.

    Emanuel E, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;185(5):930-7.

    Not in our library10.1086/381709 (opens in a new tab)

  3. 3.

    Dickert N, Sugarman J. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1123-7.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2004.058933 (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    Lakes KD, Vaughan E, Pham J, Tran T, Jones M, Baker D, et al. Community member and faith leader perspectives on the process of building trusting relationships between communities and researchers. Clin Transl Sci. 2014;7(1):20-8.

    Not in our library10.1111/cts.12136 (opens in a new tab)

  5. 5.

    Tindana PO, Rozmovits L, Boulanger RF, Bandewar SV, Aborigo RA, Hodgson AV, et al. Aligning community engagement with traditional authority structures in global health research: a case study from northern Ghana. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(10):1857-67.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2011.300203 (opens in a new tab)

  6. 6.

    Family Health International. Community involvement in international research: lessons learned from the HIV Prevention Trials Network. 2006.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.
    Taking tissue seriously means taking communities seriously · 2007
    Not checked
  8. 8.

    The HapMap Consortium. Integrating science and ethics in the International HapMap Project. Nat Rev Gene. 2004;5:467-675.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg1351 (opens in a new tab)

  9. 9.

    Wonkam A, Njamnshi AK, Angwafo FF. Knowledge and attitudes concerning medical genetics amongst physicians and medical students in Cameroon (sub-Saharan Africa). Genet Med. 2006;8(6):331-8.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.gim.0000223542.97262.21 (opens in a new tab)

  10. 10.
    Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience · 2012
    Not checked
  11. 11.

    Rotimi C, Leppert M, Matsuda I, Zeng C, Zhang H, Adebamowo C, et al. Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project. Community Genet. 2007;10(3):186-98.

    Not in our library10.1159/000101761 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.

    Aceme N. Ethical and practical challenges surrounding genetic and genomic research in developing countries. Acta Tropica. 2009;112:S21-31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.034 (opens in a new tab)

  13. 13.

    Marsh VM, Kamuya DK, Parker MJ, Molyneux CS. Working with concepts: the role of community in international collaborative biomedical research. Public Health Ethics. 2011;4(1):26-39.

    Not in our library10.1093/phe/phr007 (opens in a new tab)

  14. 14.
    Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries · 2011
    No notice
  15. 15.

    Participants in the Community Engagement and Consent Workshop, Kilifi, Kenya, March 2011. Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts. JERHRE. 2013;8(4):1-18.

    Not in our library10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1 (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.
    Beginning community engagement at a busy biomedical research programme: Experiences from the KEMRI CGMRC-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya · 2008
    No notice
  17. 17.

    Chantler T, Otewa F, Onyango P, Okoth B, Odhiambo F, Parker M, et al. Ethical challenges that arise at the community interface of health research: village reporters’ experiences in Western Kenya. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(1):30-7.

    Not in our library10.1111/dewb.12023 (opens in a new tab)

  18. 18.

    Marsh VM, Kamuya DM, Mlamba AM, Williams TN, Molyneux SS. Experiences with community engagement and informed consent in a genetic cohort study of severe childhood diseases in Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11:13.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-11-13 (opens in a new tab)

  19. 19.

    Marsh VM, Kombe F, Fitzpatrick R, Williams TN, Parker M, Molyneux CS. Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):41.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-14-41 (opens in a new tab)

  20. 20.

    H3Africa Consortium. Research capacity. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa. Science. 2014;344(6190):1346-8.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1251546 (opens in a new tab)

  21. 21.

    Cohen E. Community Engagement in Globl Health Research: Case studies from the developing world: The Zomba District, Malawi Case Study. Masters’ Thesis. 2008.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Morin SF, Morfit S, Maiorana A, Aramrattana A, Goicochea P, Mutsambi JM, et al. Building community partnerships: case studies of Community Advisory Boards at research sites in Peru, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. Clin Trials. 2008;5(2):147-56.

    Not in our library10.1177/1740774508090211 (opens in a new tab)

  23. 23.

    Morin SF, Maiorana A, Koester KA, Sheon NM, Richards TA. Community consultation in HIV prevention research: a study of community advisory boards at 6 research sites. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33(4):513-20.

    Not in our library10.1097/00126334-200308010-00013 (opens in a new tab)

  24. 24.

    Reddy P, Buchanan D, Sifunda S, Shamagonam J, Naidoo N. The role of community advisory boards in health research: Divergent views in the South African experience. SAHARA J. 2010;7(3):2-8.

    Not in our library10.1080/17290376.2010.9724963 (opens in a new tab)

  25. 25.

    Cox LE, Rouff JR, Svendsen KH, Markowitz M, Abrams DI. Community advisory boards: their role in AIDS clinical trials. Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. Health Soc Work. 1998;23(4):290-7.

    Not in our library10.1093/hsw/23.4.290 (opens in a new tab)

  26. 26.

    Strauss RP, Sengupta S, Quinn SC, Goeppinger J, Spaulding C, Kegeles SM, et al. The role of community advisory boards: involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(12):1938-43.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.91.12.1938 (opens in a new tab)

  27. 27.

    Shubis K, Juma O, Sharifu R, Burgess B, Abdulla S. Challenges of establishing a Community Advisory Board (CAB) in a low-income, low-resource setting: experiences from Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7:16.

    Not in our library10.1186/1478-4505-7-16 (opens in a new tab)

  28. 28.

    Ntshanga SP, Ngcobo PS, Mabaso ML. Establishment of a Community Advisory Board (CAB) for tuberculosis control and research in the Inanda, Ntuzuma and KwaMashu (INK) area of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa. Health Policy. 2010;95(2-3):211-5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.004 (opens in a new tab)

  29. 29.

    Simon C, Mosavelb M, van Debbie S. Ethical challenges in the design and conduct of locally relevant international health research. Social science &Medicine. 2007;64(9):1960-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.009 (opens in a new tab)

  30. 30.

    Shagi C, Vallely A, Kasindi S, Chiduo B, Desmond N, Soteli S. A model for community representation and participation in HIV prevention trials among women who engage in transactional sex in Africa. AIDS Care. 2008;20(9):1039-49.

    Not in our library10.1080/09540120701842803 (opens in a new tab)

  31. 31.

    Tekola F, Bull SJ, Farsides B, Newport MJ, Adeyemo A, Rotimi CN, et al. Tailoring consent to context: Designing an appropriate consent process for a biomedical study in a low-income setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(7).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000482 (opens in a new tab)

  32. 32.

    Grinker RR, Chambers N, Njongwe N, Lagman AE, Guthrie W, Stronach S, et al. “Communities” in community engagement: lessons learned from autism research in South Korea and South Africa. Autism Res. 2012;5(3):201-10.

    Not in our library10.1002/aur.1229 (opens in a new tab)

  33. 33.

    Mitchell K, Nakamanya S, Kamali A, Whitworth JA. Exploring the community response to a randomized controlled HIV/AIDS intervention trial in rural Uganda. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(3):207-16.

    Not in our library10.1521/aeap.14.3.207.23890 (opens in a new tab)

  34. 34.

    Seeley JA, Kengeya-Kayondo JF, Mulder DW. Community-based HIV/AIDS research–whither community participation? Unsolved problems in a research programme in rural Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(10):1089-95.

    Not in our library10.1016/0277-9536(92)90282-u (opens in a new tab)

  35. 35.

    Bandewar SV, Kimani J, Lavery JV. The origins of a research community in the Majengo Observational Cohort Study, Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:630.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-10-630 (opens in a new tab)

  36. 36.

    Magnus M, Franks J, Griffith S, Arnold MP, Goodman K, Wheeler DP, et al. Engaging, Recruiting, and Retaining Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in Research Studies: Don’t Underestimate the Importance of Staffing-Lessons Learned From HPTN 061, the BROTHERS Study. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan 9. (South Africa).

    Not in our library10.1097/phh.0000000000000025 (opens in a new tab)

  37. 37.

    Nakibinge S, Maher D, Katende J, Kamali A, Grosskurth H, Seeley J. Community engagement in health research: two decades of experience from a research project on HIV in rural Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(2):190-5.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02207.x (opens in a new tab)

  38. 38.

    Okello G, Jones C, Bonareri M, Ndegwa SN, McHaro C, Kengo J, et al. Challenges for consent and community engagement in the conduct of cluster randomized trial among school children in low income settings: experiences from Kenya. Trials. 2013;14:142.

    Not in our library10.1186/1745-6215-14-142 (opens in a new tab)

  39. 39.

    Tedrow VA, Zelaya CE, Kennedy CE, Morin SF, Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Sweat MD, et al. No “magic bullet”: exploring community mobilization strategies used in a multi-site community based randomized controlled trial: Project Accept (HPTN 043). AIDS Behav. 2012;16(5):1217-26.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10461-011-0009-9 (opens in a new tab)

  40. 40.

    Kamanda A, Embleton L, Ayuku D, Atwoli L, Gisore P, Ayaya S, et al. Harnessing the power of the grassroots to conduct public health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from western Kenya in the adaptation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:91.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-13-91 (opens in a new tab)

  41. 41.

    Mosavel M, Simon C, van Stade D, Buchbinder M. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(12):2577-87.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.041 (opens in a new tab)

  42. 42.

    Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173-202.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 (opens in a new tab)

  43. 43.

    Nyika A, Chilengi R, Ishengoma D, Mtenga S, Thera MA, Sissoko MS, et al. Engaging diverse communities participating in clinical trials: case examples from across Africa. Malar J. 2010;9:86.

    Not in our library10.1186/1475-2875-9-86 (opens in a new tab)

  44. 44.

    Boga M, Davies A, Kamuya D, Kinyanjui SM, Kivaya E, Kombe F, et al. Strengthening the informed consent process in international health research through community engagement: the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Experience. PLoS Med. 2011;8(9).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pmed.1001089 (opens in a new tab)

  45. 45.

    Kamuya DM, Marsh V, Kombe FK, Geissler PW, Molyneux SC. Engaging communities to strengthen research ethics in low-income settings: selection and perceptions of members of a network of representatives in coastal Kenya. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(1):10-20.

    Not in our library10.1111/dewb.12014 (opens in a new tab)

  46. 46.

    Marsh V, Kombe F, Fitzpatrick R, Molyneux S, Parker M. Managing misaligned paternity findings in research including sickle cell disease screening in Kenya: ‘consulting communities’ to inform policy. Soc Sci Med. 2013;96:192-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.028 (opens in a new tab)

  47. 47.

    Kamuya DM, Theobald SJ, Munywoki PK, Koech D, Geissler WP, Molyneux SC. Evolving friendships and shifting ethical dilemmas: fieldworkers’ experiences in a short term community based study in Kenya. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(1):1-9.

    Not in our library10.1111/dewb.12009 (opens in a new tab)

  48. 48.

    Lang TA, Gould J, von Seidlein L, Lusingu JP, Mshamu S, Ismael S, et al. Approaching the community about screening children for a multicentre malaria vaccine trial. Int Health. 2012;4(1):47-54.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.inhe.2011.10.003 (opens in a new tab)

  49. 49.

    Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and M.. Public engagement with science? Local understandings of a vaccine trial in the Gambia. J Biosoc Sci. 2006;38(1):103–16.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0021932005000945 (opens in a new tab)

  50. 50.

    Lavery JV, Tindana PO, Scott TW, Harrington LC, Ramsey JM, Ytuarte-Nunez C, et al. Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26(6):279-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pt.2010.02.009 (opens in a new tab)

  51. 51.

    Stadler J, Dugmore C, Venables E, MacPhail C, Delany-Moretlwe S. Cognitive mapping: using local knowledge for planning health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:96.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2288-13-96 (opens in a new tab)

  52. 52.

    Koen J, Essack Z, Slack C, Lindegger G, Newman PA. ‘It looks like you just want them when things get rough’: civil society perspectives on negative trial results and stakeholder engagement in HIV prevention trials. Dev World Bioeth. 2013;13(3):138-48.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00338.x (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 4

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.