Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Evaluating community engagement in global health research: the need for metrics

the Ethics Working Group of the HIV Prevention Trials Network, Kathleen M. MacQueen, Anant Bhan and 3 more

BMC Medical Ethics · 2015

doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0033-9

Abstract

Background. Community engagement in research has gained momentum as an approach to improving research, to helping ensure that community concerns are taken into account, and to informing ethical decision-making when research is conducted in contexts of vulnerability. However, guidelines and scholarship regarding community engagement are arguably unsettled, making it difficult to implement and evaluate.

Discussion. We describe normative guidelines on community engagement that have been offered by national and international bodies in the context of HIV-related research, which set the stage for similar work in other health related research. Next, we review the scholarly literature regarding community engagement, outlining the diverse ethical goals ascribed to it. We then discuss practical guidelines that have been issued regarding community engagement. There is a lack of consensus regarding the ethical goals and approaches for community engagement, and an associated lack of indicators and metrics for evaluating success in achieving stated goals. To address these gaps we outline a framework for developing indicators for evaluating the contribution of community engagement to ethical goals in health research.

Summary. There is a critical need to enhance efforts in evaluating community engagement to ensure that the work on the ground reflects the intentions expressed in the guidelines, and to investigate the contribution of specific community engagement practices for making research responsive to community needs and concerns. Evaluation mechanisms should be built into community engagement practices to guide best practices in community engagement and their replication across diverse health research settings.

References 54

  1. 1.

    Ahmed SM, Palermo A-GS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1380-7.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2009.178137

  2. 2.

    NBAC. Ethical and policy issues in international research: clinical trials in developing countries. Volume I: report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 2001.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    NIAID. Recommendations for Community Involvement in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Research: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health. 2009.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Wellcome Trust. Ethics and Society. Wellcome Trust, London. 2011. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/Funding/Ethics-and-society/index.htm. Accessed June 4 2015.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Singer PA, Taylor AD, Daar AS, Upshur RE, Singh JA, Lavery JV. Grand challenges in global health: the ethical, social and cultural program. PLoS Med. 2007;4(9).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pmed.0040265

  6. 6.
    Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries · 2007
    No notice
  7. 7.

    Fagnan LJ, Davis M, Deyo RA, Werner JJ, Stange KC. Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):476-83.

    Not in our library10.1097/acm.0b013e3181cd2ed3

  8. 8.

    Ramsay M, de Vries J, Soodyall H, Norris SA, Sankoh O, as members of the HAC. Ethical issues in genomic research on the African continent: experiences and challenges to ethics review committees. Hum Genomics. 2014;8(1):15.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40246-014-0015-x

  9. 9.

    Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(5):930-7.

    Not in our library10.1086/381709

  10. 10.

    Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701-11.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.283.20.2701

  11. 11.

    Participants in the Community Engagement and Consent Workshop Kilifi Kenya. Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013;8(4):1-18.

    Not in our library10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1

  12. 12.

    UNAIDS. Ethical considerations in HIV preventive vaccine research. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2000.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    UNAIDS/WHO. Ethical considerations in biomedical HIV prevention trials. Geneva: UNAIDS, World Health Organization; 2007.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    UNAIDS, AVAC. Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials. 2011.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens. Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for TB Drug Trials; 2012.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Boulanger RF, Seidel S, Lessem E, Pyne-Mercier L, Williams SD, Mingote LR, et al. Engaging communities in tuberculosis research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(6):540–5. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70042-2.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70042-2

  17. 17.

    Mamotte N, Wassenaar D, Koen J, Essack Z. Convergent ethical issues in HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria vaccine trials in Africa: Report from the WHO/UNAIDS African AIDS Vaccine Programme's Ethics, Law and Human Rights Collaborating Centre consultation, 10–11 February 2009, Durban, South Africa. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11:3.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-11-3

  18. 18.

    Rennie S, Sugarman J. HIV Prevention Trials Network Guidance for Research, NIAID. 2009.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Department of Health. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials with Human Participants in South Africa. 2006.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Weijer C, Emanuel EJ. ETHICS: Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research. Science. 2000;289(5482):1142-4.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.289.5482.1142

  21. 21.

    Dickert N, Sugarman J. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1123-7.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.2004.058933

  22. 22.

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    CIOMS. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. World Health Organization. 2002.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    King KF, Kolopack P, Merritt MW, Lavery JV. Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15(1):84.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-15-84

  25. 25.

    Cox LE, Rouff JR, Svendsen KH, Markowitz M, Abrams DL. Community advisory boards: their role in AIDS clinical trials. Health Soc Work. 1998;23(4):290-7.

    Not in our library10.1093/hsw/23.4.290

  26. 26.

    Strauss RP, Sengupta S, Quinn SC, Goeppinger J, Spaulding C, Kegeles SM, et al. The role of community advisory boards: involving communities in the informed consent process. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(12):1938-43.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.91.12.1938

  27. 27.

    Quinn SC. Ethics in public health research: protecting human subjects: the role of community advisory boards. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(6):918-22.

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.94.6.918

  28. 28.

    Reddy P, Buchanan D, Sifunda S, James S, Naidoo N. The role of community advisory boards in health research: Divergent views in the South African experience. SAHARA J. 2010;7(3):2-8.

    Not in our library10.1080/17290376.2010.9724963

  29. 29.

    Vreeman R, Kamaara E, Kamanda A, Ayuku D, Nyandiko W, Atwoli L, et al. A qualitative study using traditional community assemblies to investigate community perspectives on informed consent and research participation in western Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;13:23.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-13-23

  30. 30.

    Molyneux CS, Wassenaar DR, Peshu N, Marsh K. 'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)…!': community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(2):443-54.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.003

  31. 31.

    MacQueen KM, Namey E, Chilongozi DA, Mtweve SP, Mlingo M, Morar N, et al. Community perspectives on care options for HIV prevention trial participants. AIDS Care. 2007;19(4):554-60.

    Not in our library10.1080/09540120601035284

  32. 32.

    Woodsong C, Macqueen K, Namey E, Sahay S, Morar N, Mlingo M, et al. Women's autonomy and informed consent in microbicides clinical trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006;1(3):11-26.

    Not in our library10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.11

  33. 33.

    Tindana P, Molyneux CS, Bull S, Parker M. Ethical issues in the export, storage and reuse of human biological samples in biomedical research: perspectives of key stakeholders in Ghana and Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:76.

    Not in our library10.1186/1472-6939-15-76

  34. 34.

    Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(5):1029-37.

    Not in our library10.1002/ajmg.a.34414

  35. 35.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of Community Engagement (1st edition). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1997.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee, Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of community engagement. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2011.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Community Partners. Recommendations for Community Engagement in HIV/AIDS Research. A guide for communities and researchers. Version 2.0.: Office of HIV/AIDS Network Coordination (HANC), National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; 2014.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Lavery JV, Tinadana PO, Scott TW, Harrington LC, Ramsey JM, Ytuarte-Nunez C, et al. Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26(6):279-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pt.2010.02.009

  39. 39.

    H3Africa Working Group on Ethics and Regulatory Issues. H3Africa Guidelines for Community Engagement: Human Heredity and Health (H3Africa) Consortium; 2014.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.
    Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature · 2015
    No notice
All 54 references

Cited by papers we hold 6

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.