No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species
Keith R Bradnam, Joseph N Fass, Anton Alexandrov and 88 more
Gigascience · 2013 · CC BY
Abstract
Background. The process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly.
Results. In Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies.
Conclusions. Many current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
Full text
Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:
Read at PubMed CentralReferences 78
- 1.
Bentley DR Whole-genome re-sequencingCurr Opin Genet Dev2006 16545552
Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2006.10.009
- 2.
Haussler D O'Brien SJ Ryder OA Barker FK Clamp M Crawford AJ Hanner R Hanotte O Johnson WE McGuire JA Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10 000 vertebrate speciesJ Hered2009 100659674
Not in our library10.1093/jhered/esp086
- 3.
i5K - ArthropodBase wikihttp://www.arthropodgenomes.org/wiki/i5K
Not in our library
- 4.
Kumar S Schiffer PH Blaxter M 959 Nematode Genomes: a semantic wiki for coordinating sequencing projectsNucleic Acids Res2012 40D1295D1300
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr826
- 5.
Pevzner PA Tang H Waterman MS An Eulerian path approach to DNA fragment assemblyProc Natl Acad Sci2001 9897489753
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.171285098
- 6.
Butler J MacCallum I Kleber M Shlyakhter IA Belmonte MK Lander ES Nusbaum C Jaffe DB ALLPATHS: De novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreadsGenome Res2008 18810820
Not in our library10.1101/gr.7337908
- 7.
Zerbino DR Birney E Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphsGenome Res2008 18821829
Not in our library10.1101/gr.074492.107
- 8.
Simpson JT Wong K Jackman SD Schein JE Jones SJM Birol I ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence dataGenome Res2009 1911171123
Not in our library10.1101/gr.089532.108
- 9.
- 10.
Li R Fan W Tian G Zhu H He L Cai J Huang Q Cai Q Li B Bai Y Zhang Z Zhang Y Wang W Li J Wei F Li H Jian M Li J Zhang Z Nielsen R Li D Gu W Yang Z Xuan Z Ryder OA Leung FC-C Zhou Y Cao J Sun X Fu Y The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genomeNature2010 463311317
Not in our library10.1038/nature08696
- 11.
Simpson JT Durbin R Efficient de novo assembly of large genomes using compressed data structuresGenome Res2011 223549556
Not in our library10.1101/gr.126953.111
- 12.
Li H Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assemblyBioinformatics2012 2818381844
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts280
- 13.
Miller JR Koren S Sutton G Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing dataGenomics2010 95315
Not in our library10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001
- 14.
Henson J Tischler G Ning Z Next-generation sequencing and large genome assembliesPharmacogenomics2012 13901915
Not in our library10.2217/pgs.12.72
- 15.
Narzisi GAM Bud M Comparing de novo genome assembly: the long and short of itPLoS One2011 6e19175
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0019175
- 16.
Paszkiewicz K Studholme DJ De novo assembly of short sequence readsBrief Bioinform2010 11457472
Not in our library10.1093/bib/bbq020
- 17.
Alkan C Sajjadian S Eichler EE Limitations of next-generation genome sequence assemblyNat Methods2011 86165
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1527
- 18.
Baker M De novo genome assembly: what every biologist should knowNat Methods2012 9333337
Not in our library
- 19.
Birney E Assemblies: the good, the bad, the uglyNat Methods2011 85960
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth0111-59
- 20.
Claros MG Bautista R Guerrero-Fernández D Benzerki H Seoane P Fernández-Pozo N Why assembling plant genome sequences is so challengingBiology2012 1439459
Not in our library10.3390/biology1020439
- 21.
Schatz MC Witkowski J McCombie WR Current challenges in de novo plant genome sequencing and assemblyGenome Biol2012 1317
Not in our library10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-243
- 22.
Schlebusch S Illing N Next generation shotgun sequencing and the challenges of de novo genome assemblySouth African Journal of Science2012 1088
Not in our library
- 23.
Bresler M Sheehan S Chan AH Song YS Telescoper: de novo assembly of highly repetitive regionsBioinformatics2012 28i311i317
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts399
- 24.
Li YI Copley2012 Scaffolding low quality genomes using orthologous protein sequences. Bioinformatics: RR
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts661
- 25.
Kelley D Salzberg S Detection and correction of false segmental duplications caused by genome mis-assemblyGenome Biol2010 11R28
Not in our library10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r28
- 26.
dnGASP[http://cnag.bsc.es/]
Not in our library
- 27.
Salzberg SL Phillippy AM Zimin A Puiu D Magoc T Koren S Treangen TJ Schatz MC Delcher AL Roberts M Marçais G Pop M Yorke JA GAGE: a critical evaluation of genome assemblies and assembly algorithmsGenome Res2012 2255767
Not in our library10.1101/gr.131383.111
- 28.
Earl D Bradnam K St John J Darling A Lin D Fass J Yu HO Buffalo V Zerbino DR Diekhans M Nguyen N Ariyaratne PN Sung WK Ning Z Haimel M Simpson JT Fonseca NA Birol İ Docking TR Ho IY Rokhsar DS Chikhi R Lavenier D Chapuis G Naquin D Maillet N Schatz MC Kelley DR Phillippy AM Koren S Assemblathon 1: a competitive assessment of de novo short read assembly methodsGenome Res2011 21222441
Not in our library10.1101/gr.126599.111
- 29.
The Assemblathon[http://assemblathon.org/]
Not in our library
- 30.
- 31.
Howard JT Koren S Phillippy A Zhou S Schwartz D Schatz M Aboukhalil R Ward JM Li J Li B Fedrigo O Bukovnik L Wang T Wray G Rasolonjatovo I Winer R Knight JR Warren W Zhang G Jarvis ED De novo high-coverage sequencing and annotated assemblies of the budgerigar genomeGigaScience Database2013
Not in our library10.5524/100059
- 32.
Fass JN Korf IK Bradnam KR Jarvis ED Shendure J Hiatt J Kitzman JO Assembled Fosmid sequences used for assessment of Assemblathon 2 entriesGigaScience Database2013
Not in our library10.5524/100062
- 33.
Assemblathon 2 - GitHub analysis code[https://github.com/ucdavis-bioinformatics/assemblathon2-analysis]
Not in our library
- 34.
Reinhardt JA Baltrus DA Nishimura MT Jeck WR Jones CD Dangl JL De novo assembly using low-coverage short read sequence data from the rice pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzaeGenome Res2009 19294305
Not in our library10.1101/gr.083311.108
- 35.
Brent MR Guigó R Recent advances in gene structure predictionCurr Opin Struct Biol2004 14264272
Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.007
- 36.
Sleator RD An overview of the current status of eukaryote gene prediction strategiesGene2010 46114
Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2010.04.008
- 37.
Yandell M Ence D A beginner's guide to eukaryotic genome annotationNat Rev Genet2012 13329342
Not in our library10.1038/nrg3174
- 38.
Parra G Bradnam K Korf I CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomesBioinformatics2007 2310611067
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071
- 39.
Bradnam KR Fass JN Korf IF CEGMA gene predictions for Assemblathon 2 entriesGigaScience Database2013
Not in our library10.5524/100061
- 40.
Parra G Bradnam K Ning Z Keane T Korf I Assessing the gene space in draft genomesNucleic Acids Res2009 37289297
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkn916
Cited by papers we hold 29
- Computational methods for chromosome-scale haplotype reconstruction · 2021Not checked
- Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species · 2021No notice
- Accurate long-read de novo assembly evaluation with Inspector · 2021No notice
- Population Genetic Structure and Gene Expression Plasticity of the Deep-Sea Vent and Seep Squat Lobster Shinkaia crosnieri · 2020Not checked
- Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes · 2020No notice
- Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking · 2019No notice
- Systematic benchmarking of omics computational tools · 2019No notice
- Benchmarking of alignment-free sequence comparison methods · 2019No notice
- Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI) · 2018No notice
- Evaluation of GRCh38 and de novo haploid genome assemblies demonstrates the enduring quality of the reference assembly · 2017No notice
- Comparative analysis of the genomes of Stylophora pistillata and Acropora digitifera provides evidence for extensive differences between species of corals · 2017No notice
- De novo PacBio long-read and phased avian genome assemblies correct and add to reference genes generated with intermediate and short reads · 2017No notice
- An improved genome assembly uncovers prolific tandem repeats in Atlantic cod · 2017No notice
- Contiguous and accurate de novo assembly of metazoan genomes with modest long read coverage · 2016No notice
- Major Improvements to the Heliconius melpomene Genome Assembly Used to Confirm 10 Chromosome Fusion Events in 6 Million Years of Butterfly Evolution · 2016No notice
- The real cost of sequencing: scaling computation to keep pace with data generation · 2016Corrected
- Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets · 2016No notice
- Genomes of coral dinoflagellate symbionts highlight evolutionary adaptations conducive to a symbiotic lifestyle · 2016No notice
- Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage · 2016No notice
- Distinctive expansion of gene families associated with plant cell wall degradation, secondary metabolism, and nutrient uptake in the genomes of grapevine trunk pathogens · 2015No notice
and 9 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.