Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Seasonal transmission potential and activity peaks of the new influenza A(H1N1): a Monte Carlo likelihood analysis based on human mobility

Duygu Balcan, Hao Hu, Bruno Goncalves and 9 more

BMC Medicine · 2009

doi:10.1186/1741-7015-7-45

Abstract

Background. On 11 June the World Health Organization officially raised the phase of pandemic alert (with regard to the new H1N1 influenza strain) to level 6. As of 19 July, 137,232 cases of the H1N1 influenza strain have been officially confirmed in 142 different countries, and the pandemic unfolding in the Southern hemisphere is now under scrutiny to gain insights about the next winter wave in the Northern hemisphere. A major challenge is pre-empted by the need to estimate the transmission potential of the virus and to assess its dependence on seasonality aspects in order to be able to use numerical models capable of projecting the spatiotemporal pattern of the pandemic.

Methods. In the present work, we use a global structured metapopulation model integrating mobility and transportation data worldwide. The model considers data on 3,362 subpopulations in 220 different countries and individual mobility across them. The model generates stochastic realizations of the epidemic evolution worldwide considering 6 billion individuals, from which we can gather information such as prevalence, morbidity, number of secondary cases and number and date of imported cases for each subpopulation, all with a time resolution of 1 day. In order to estimate the transmission potential and the relevant model parameters we used the data on the chronology of the 2009 novel influenza A(H1N1). The method is based on the maximum likelihood analysis of the arrival time distribution generated by the model in 12 countries seeded by Mexico by using 1 million computationally simulated epidemics. An extended chronology including 93 countries worldwide seeded before 18 June was used to ascertain the seasonality effects.

Results. We found the best estimate R0 = 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64 to 1.88) for the basic reproductive number. Correlation analysis allows the selection of the most probable seasonal behavior based on the observed pattern, leading to the identification of plausible scenarios for the future unfolding of the pandemic and the estimate of pandemic activity peaks in the different hemispheres. We provide estimates for the number of hospitalizations and the attack rate for the next wave as well as an extensive sensitivity analysis on the disease parameter values. We also studied the effect of systematic therapeutic use of antiviral drugs on the epidemic timeline.

Conclusion. The analysis shows the potential for an early epidemic peak occurring in October/November in the Northern hemisphere, likely before large-scale vaccination campaigns could be carried out. The baseline results refer to a worst-case scenario in which additional mitigation policies are not considered. We suggest that the planning of additional mitigation policies such as systematic antiviral treatments might be the key to delay the activity peak in order to restore the effectiveness of the vaccination programs.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 52

  1. 1.

    Eubank S, Guclu H, Kumar VS, Marathe MV, Srinivasan A, Toroczkai Z, Wang N. Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks. Nature. 2004;429:180-184.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02541

  2. 2.

    Ferguson NM, Cummings DA, Fraser C, Cajka JC, Cooley PC, Burke DS. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature. 2006;442:448-452.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04795

  3. 3.

    Germann TC, Kadau K, Longini IM, Macken CA. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5935-5940.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0601266103

  4. 4.
    Modeling the Worldwide Spread of Pandemic Influenza: Baseline Case and Containment Interventions · 2007
    No notice
  5. 5.

    Fraser C, Donnelly CA, Cauchemez S, Hanage WP, Van Kerkhove MD, Hollingsworth TD, Griffin J, Baggaley RF, Jenkins HE, Lyons EJ, Jombart T, Hinsley WR, Grassly NC, Balloux F, Ghani AC, Ferguson NM, Rambaut A, Pybus OG, Lopez-Gatell H, Alpuche-Aranda CM, Chapela IB, Zavala EP, Guevara DM, Checchi F, Garcia E, Hugonnet S, Roth C, WHO Rapid Pandemic Assessment Collaboration. Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A(H1N1): early findings. Science. 2009;324:1557-1561.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1176062

  6. 6.

    Cruz-Pacheco G, Duran L, Esteva L, Minzoni A, Lopez-Cervantes M, Panayotaros P, Ahued Ortega A, Villasenor Ruiz I. Modelling of the influenza A(H1N1)v outbreak in Mexico City, April-May 2009, with control sanitary measures. Euro Surveill. 2009;14:19254.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    World Health Organization: Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 briefing note 3 (revised): changes in reporting requirements for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Khan K, Arino J, Hu W, Raposo P, Sears J, Calderon F, Heidebrecht C, Macdonald M, Liauw J, Chan A, Gardam M. Spread of a novel influenza A(H1N1) virus via global airline transportation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:212-214.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc0904559

  9. 9.

    Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious diseases in humans. 1992.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Balcan D, Colizza V, Gonçalves B, Hu H, Ramasco JJ, Vespignani A. Multiscale mobility networks and the large scale spreading of infectious diseases. arXiv. 2009.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0906910106

  11. 11.

    Boelle PY, Bernillon P, Desenclos JC. A preliminary estimation of the reproduction ratio for new influenza A(H1N1) from the outbreak in Mexico, March-April 2009. Euro Surveill. 2009;14:19205.

    Not in our library10.2807/ese.14.19.19205-en

  12. 12.

    Nishiura H, Castillo-Chavez C, Safan M, Chowell G. Transmission potential of the new influenza A(H1N1) virus and its age-specificity in Japan. Euro Surveill. 2009;14:19227.

    Not in our library10.2807/ese.14.22.19227-en

  13. 13.

    Nishiura H, Wilson NM, Baker MG. Estimating the reproduction number of the novel influenza A virus (H1N1) in a Southern Hemisphere setting: preliminary estimate in New Zealand. NZ Med J. 2009;122:1-5.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Rvachev LA, Longini IM. A mathematical model for the global spread of influenza. Math Biosci. 1985;75:3-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/0025-5564(85)90064-1

  15. 15.

    Grais RF, Hugh Ellis J, Glass GE. Assessing the impact of airline travel on the geographic spread of pandemic influenza. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:1065-1072.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1026140019146

  16. 16.

    Hufnagel L, Brockmann D, Geisel T. Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:15124-15129.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0308344101

  17. 17.
    Delaying the International Spread of Pandemic Influenza · 2006
    No notice
  18. 18.
    Controlling Pandemic Flu: The Value of International Air Travel Restrictions · 2007
    No notice
  19. 19.

    Flahault A, Vergu E, Coudeville L, Grais R. Strategies for containing a global influenza pandemic. Vaccine. 2006;24:6751-6755.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.079

  20. 20.

    Viboud C, Bjornstad O, Smith DL, Simonsen L, Miller MA, Grenfell BT. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science. 2006;312:447-451.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1125237

  21. 21.

    Flahault A, Valleron A-J. A method for assessing the global spread of HIV-1 infection based on air travel. Math Popul Stud. 1991;3:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1080/08898489209525336

  22. 22.

    Colizza V, Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Vespignani A. The role of airline transportation network in the prediction and predictability of global epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:2015-2020.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0510525103

  23. 23.

    Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Columbia University.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    International Air Transport Association.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Official Airline Guide.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:3747-3752.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0400087101

  27. 27.

    Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu S-N. Spatial Tessellations - Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. 2000.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Keeling MJ, Rohani P. Estimating spatial coupling in epidemiological systems: a mechanistic approach. Ecol Lett. 2002;5:20-29.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00268.x

  29. 29.

    Sattenspiel L, Dietz K. A structured epidemic model incorporating geographic mobility among regions. Math Biosci. 128;71-91.

    Not in our library10.1016/0025-5564(94)00068-b

  30. 30.

    Longini IM, Halloran ME, Nizam A, Yang Y. Containing pandemic influenza with antiviral agents. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:623-633.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwh092

  31. 31.

    Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson NM, Lemaitre M, Cauchemez S, Leach S, Valleron AJ. Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:775-785.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwm375

  32. 32.

    Longini IM, Nizam A, Xu S, Ungchusak K, Hanshaoworakul W, Cummings DAT, Halloran ME. Containing pandemic influenza at the source. Science. 2005;309:1083-1087.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1115717

  33. 33.

    Brote de infeccion respiratoria aguda en La Gloria, Municipio de Perote, Mexico. Secretaria de Salud, Mexico.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    World Health Organization. WHO Weekly. Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84:197-202.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    CDC Interim guidance for clinicians on identifying and caring for patients with swine-origin influenza A(H1N1) virus infection (2009).

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team, Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a Novel Swine-origin Influenza A(H1N1) Virus in Humans. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2605-2615.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0903810

  37. 37.

    Roberts MJ, Heesterbeek JAP. Model-consistent estimation of the basic reproduction number from the incidence of an emerging infection. J Math Biol. 2007;55:803-816.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00285-007-0112-8

  38. 38.

    Wallinga J, Lipsitch M. How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274:599-604.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2006.3754

  39. 39.

    Gani R, Hughes H, Fleming D, Griffin T, Medlock J, Leach S. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1355-1362.

    Not in our library10.3201/eid1109.041344

  40. 40.

    Elveback LR, Fox JP, Ackerman E, Langworthy A, Boyd M, Gatewood L. An influenza simulation model for immunization studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;103:152-165.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112213

All 52 references

Cited by papers we hold 15

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.