Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Imperfect wound healing sets the stage for chronic diseases

Paul Martin, Carlos Pardo-Pastor, R. Gisli Jenkins and 1 more

Science · 2024 · Review

doi:10.1126/science.adp2974

Abstract

Although the age of the genome gave us much insight about how our organs fail with disease, it also suggested that diseases do not arise from mutations alone; rather, they develop as we age. In this Review, we examine how wound healing might act to ignite disease. Wound healing works well when we are younger, repairing damage from accidents, environmental assaults, and battles with pathogens. Yet, with age and accumulation of mutations and tissue damage, the repair process can devolve, leading to inflammation, fibrosis, and neoplastic signaling. We discuss healthy wound responses and how our bodies might misappropriate these pathways in disease. Although we focus predominantly on epithelial-based (lung and skin) diseases, similar pathways might operate in cardiac, muscle, and neuronal diseases.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 150

  1. 1.

    Virchow R. Die Krankenaften Geschwulste. 1863;255.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Haddow A. Advances in Cancer Research. 1973;16:181-234.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60341-3

  3. 3.

    Flier JS, Underhill LH, Dvorak HF. Tumors: Wounds That Do Not Heal. New England Journal of Medicine. 1986;315:1650-1659.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm198612253152606

  4. 4.

    Martin D, Gutkind JS. Human tumor-associated viruses and new insights into the molecular mechanisms of cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(Suppl 2):S31-42.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2009.351

  5. 5.

    Bister K. Discovery of oncogenes: The advent of molecular cancer research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:15259-15260.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1521145112

  6. 6.

    Jassim A, Rahrmann EP, Simons BD, Gilbertson RJ. Cancers make their own luck: theories of cancer origins. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2023;23:710-724.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41568-023-00602-5

  7. 7.

    Swanton C, et al. Embracing cancer complexity: Hallmarks of systemic disease. Cell. 2024;187:1589-1616.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.009

  8. 8.

    Rahal Z, Scheet P, Kadara H. Somatic Mutations in Normal Tissues: Calm before the Storm. Cancer Discovery. 2024;14:605-609.

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1508

  9. 9.

    Weeden CE, Hill W, Lim EL, Grönroos E, Swanton C. Impact of risk factors on early cancer evolution. Cell. 2023;186:1541-1563.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.013

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    MacCarthy-Morrogh L, Martin P. The hallmarks of cancer are also the hallmarks of wound healing. Sci Signal. 2020;13:eaay8690.

    Not in our library10.1126/scisignal.aay8690

  12. 12.

    Peña OA, Martin P. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2024;25:599-616.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41580-024-00715-1

  13. 13.

    Headland SE, Norling LV. The resolution of inflammation: Principles and challenges. Semin Immunol. 2015;27:149-160.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2015.03.014

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Chen WY, Rogers AA. Recent insights into the causes of chronic leg ulceration in venous diseases and implications on other types of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:434-449.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1524-475x.2007.00250.x

  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Park S, et al. Tissue-scale coordination of cellular behaviour promotes epidermal wound repair in live mice. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:155-163.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3472

  19. 19.

    Turley J, et al. Deep learning reveals a damage signalling hierarchy that coordinates different cell behaviours driving wound re-epithelialisation. Development. 2024;151.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.202943

  20. 20.

    Shaw T, Martin P. Epigenetic reprogramming during wound healing: loss of polycomb-mediated silencing may enable upregulation of repair genes. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:881-886.

    Not in our library10.1038/embor.2009.102

  21. 21.

    Weavers H, Wood W, Martin P. Injury Activates a Dynamic Cytoprotective Network to Confer Stress Resilience and Drive Repair. Curr Biol. 2019;29:3851-3862.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.035

  22. 22.

    Nunan R, et al. Ephrin-Bs Drive Junctional Downregulation and Actin Stress Fiber Disassembly to Enable Wound Re-epithelialization. Cell Rep. 2015;13:1380-1395.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.085

  23. 23.

    Rohani MG, Parks WC. Matrix remodeling by MMPs during wound repair. Matrix Biol. 2015;44-46:113-121.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.002

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    De Lorenzo G, Ferrari S, Cervone F, Okun E. Extracellular DAMPs in Plants and Mammals: Immunity, Tissue Damage and Repair. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:937-950.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.it.2018.09.006

  26. 26.

    Liu L, et al. Induction of neutrophil extracellular traps during tissue injury: Involvement of STING and Toll-like receptor 9 pathways. Cell Prolif. 2019;52:e12579.

    Not in our library10.1111/cpr.12579

  27. 27.

    Willenborg S, et al. Mitochondrial metabolism coordinates stage-specific repair processes in macrophages during wound healing. Cell Metab. 2021;33:2398-2414.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2021.10.004

  28. 28.

    Shook BA, et al. Myofibroblast proliferation and heterogeneity are supported by macrophages during skin repair. Science. 2018;362.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aar2971

  29. 29.

    Mori R, Shaw TJ, Martin P. Molecular mechanisms linking wound inflammation and fibrosis: knockdown of osteopontin leads to rapid repair and reduced scarring. J Exp Med. 2008;205:43-51.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20071412

  30. 30.

    Knipper JA, et al. Interleukin-4 Receptor α Signaling in Myeloid Cells Controls Collagen Fibril Assembly in Skin Repair. Immunity. 2015;43:803-816.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.005

  31. 31.

    Hinz B. The extracellular matrix and transforming growth factor-β1: Tale of a strained relationship. Matrix Biol. 2015;47:54-65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.matbio.2015.05.006

  32. 32.

    Ferguson MW, O’Kane S. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:839-850.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2004.1475

  33. 33.

    Occleston NL, Laverty HG, O’Kane S, Ferguson MW. Prevention and reduction of scarring in the skin by Transforming Growth Factor beta 3 (TGFbeta3): from laboratory discovery to clinical pharmaceutical. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19:1047-1063.

    Not in our library10.1163/156856208784909345

  34. 34.

    Jiang D, Rinkevich Y. Distinct fibroblasts in scars and regeneration. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2021;70:7-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2021.04.005

  35. 35.

    Usansky I, et al. A developmental basis for the anatomical diversity of dermis in homeostasis and wound repair. J Pathol. 2021;253:315-325.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.5589

  36. 36.

    Szpaderska AM, Zuckerman JD, DiPietro LA. Differential injury responses in oral mucosal and cutaneous wounds. J Dent Res. 2003;82:621-626.

    Not in our library10.1177/154405910308200810

  37. 37.

    Cho H, et al. In the face and neck, keloid scar distribution is related to skin thickness and stiffness changes associated with movement. Wound Repair Regen. 2024;32:419-428.

    Not in our library10.1111/wrr.13180

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Lucas T, et al. Differential roles of macrophages in diverse phases of skin repair. J Immunol. 2010;184:3964-3977.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.0903356

  40. 40.

    Komi DEA, Khomtchouk K, Santa Maria PL. A Review of the Contribution of Mast Cells in Wound Healing: Involved Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020;58:298-312.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-019-08729-w

All 150 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.