Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 141–149 Ecologists and conservation biologists have historically used species–area and distance–decay relationships as tools to predict the spatial distribution of biodiversity and the impact of habitat loss on biodiversity. These tools treat each species as evolutionarily equivalent, yet the importance of species’ evolutionary history in their ecology and conservation is becoming increasingly evident. Here, we provide theoretical predictions for phylogenetic analogues of the species–area and distance–decay relationships. We use a random model of community assembly and a spatially explicit flora dataset collected in four Mediterranean‐type regions to provide theoretical predictions for the increase in phylogenetic diversity – the total phylogenetic branch‐length separating a set of species – with increasing area and the decay in phylogenetic similarity with geographic separation. These developments may ultimately provide insights into the evolution and assembly of biological communities, and guide the selection of protected areas.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 50

1. 1.

   Bryant JA, Lamanna C, Morlon H, Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ, Green JL. Microbes on mountainsides: contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:11505-11511.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0801920105

2. 2.

   Cadotte MW, Davies TJ, Regetz J, Kembel SW, Cleland E, Oakley TH. Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ecological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett. 2010;13:96-105.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01405.x

3. 3.

   Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol. Lett. 2009;12:693-715.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x

4. 4.

   Chave J, Leigh EG. A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002;62:153-168.

   Not in our library10.1006/tpbi.2002.1597

5. 5.

   Chave J, Muller-Landau HC, Levin S. Comparing classical community models: theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. Am. Nat. 2002;159:1-23.

   Not in our library10.1086/324112

6. 6.

   Chave J, Chust G, Thébaud C, Storch D, Marquet P, Brown JH. The importance of phylogenetic structure in biodiversity studies. Scaling Biodiversity. 2007;151-167.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, et al. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science. 2002;295:666-669.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1066854

8. 8.

   Crozier RH. Preserving the information content of species: genetic diversity, phylogeny, and conservation worth. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997;28:243-268.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Crozier RH, Dunnett LJ, Agapow PM. Phylogenetic biodiversity assessment based on systematic nomenclature. Evol. Bioinform. 2005;1:11-36.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Mouquet N. Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol. Lett. 2010;13:1030-1040.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01493.x

11. 11.

    Diniz-Filho JA. Phylogenetic autocorrelation analysis of extinction risks and the loss of evolutionary history in Felidae (Carnivora: Mammalia). Evol. Ecol. 2004;18:273-282.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Faith DP. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 1992;61:1-10.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Ferrier S, Manion G, Elith J, Richardson K. Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Divers. Distrib. 2007;13:252-264.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies TJ, Cowling RM, Faith DP, et al. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature. 2007;445:757-760.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05587

15. 15.

    Graham CH, Fine PVA. Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:1265-1277.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01256.x

16. 16.

    Graham CH, Parra JL, Rahbek C, McGuire JA. Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19673-19678.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0901649106

17. 17.

    Guilhaumon F, Gimenez O, Gaston KJ, Mouillot D. Taxonomic and regional uncertainty in species–area relationships and the identification of richness hotspots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:15458.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0803610105

18. 18.

    Hardy OJ, Senterre B. Characterizing the phylogenetic structure of communities by an additive partitioning of phylogenetic diversity. J. Ecol. 2007;95:493-506.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Heard SB, Cox GH. The shapes of phylogenetic trees of clades, faunas, and local assemblages: exploring spatial pattern in differential diversification. Am. Nat. 2007;169:107-118.

    Not in our library10.1086/512690

20. 20.

    Heard SB, Mooers AO. Phylogenetically patterned speciation rates and extinction risks change the loss of evolutionary history during extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2000;267:613-620.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2000.1046

21. 21.

    Hey J. Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution. 1992;46:627-640.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02071.x

22. 22.

    Jabot F, Chave J. Inferring the parameters of the neutral theory of biodiversity using phylogenetic information and implications for tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 2009;12:239-248.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01280.x

23. 23.

    Kembel SW, Cowan P, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, et al. Picante: tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1463-1464.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166

24. 24.

    Kraft NJB, Ackerly DD. Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecol. Monogr. 2010;80:401-422.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Lozupone C, Knight R. Species divergence and the measurement of microbial diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008;32:557-578.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00111.x

26. 26.

    MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. The Theory of Island Biogeography. 2001.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Mooers A, Atkins RA. Indonesia’s threatened birds: over 500 million years of evolutionary heritage at risk. Anim. Conserv. 2003;6:183-188.

    Not in our library

28. 28.
    A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities · 2008

    No notice
29. 29.
    Inferring the Dynamics of Diversification: A Coalescent Approach · 2010

    No notice
30. 30.

    Nee S. Birth–death models in macroevolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006;37:1-17.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Nee S, May RM. Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science. 1997;278:692-694.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.278.5338.692

32. 32.

    Nekola JC, White PS. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 1999;26:867-878.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Pimm S, Askins R. Forest losses predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:9343-9347.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.20.9343

34. 34.

    Preston FW. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology. 1962;43:185-432.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Proches S, Wilson JRU, Cowling RM. How much evolutionary history in a 10 × 10 m plot? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2006;273:1143-1148.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2005.3427

36. 36.

    Purvis A, Agapow PM, Gittleman JL, Mace GM. Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science. 2000;288:328-330.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.288.5464.328

37. 37.

    Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks TM. Phylogeny and Conservation. 2005.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Pybus OG, Harvey PH. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2000;267:2267-2272.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2000.1278

39. 39.

    Rauch EM, Bar-Yam Y. Estimating the total genetic diversity of a spatial field population from a sample and implications of its dependence on habitat area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9826-9829.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0408471102

40. 40.

    Richardson JE, Weitz FM, Fay MF, Cronk QCB, Linder HP, Reeves G, et al. Rapid and recent origin of species richness in the cape flora of South Africa. Nature. 2001;412:181-183.

    Not in our library10.1038/35084067

41. 41.

    Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ. Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biol. Conserv. 2002;105:103-111.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Rosenzweig ML. Species Diversity in Space and Time. 1995.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    Soutullo A, Dodsworth S, Heard SB, Mooers A. Distribution and correlates of carnivore phylogenetic diversity across the Americas. Anim. Conserv. 2005;8:249-258.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 2009;18:572-592.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.04001.x

45. 45.

    Vane-Wright RI, Humphries CJ, Williams PH. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 1991;55:235-254.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    Webb CO, Donoghue MJ. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2005;5:181-183.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002;33:475-505.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2098-2100.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btn358

49. 49.

    Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2001;268:2211-2220.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2001.1782

50. 50.

    Winter M, Schweigera O, Klotza S, Nentwigc W, Andriopoulosd P, Arianoutsoud M, et al. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:21721-21725.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907088106

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Diversity-triggered deterministic bacterial assembly constrains community functions · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.