A general framework for the distance–decay of similarity in ecological communities

Abstract

Species spatial turnover, or β ‐diversity, induces a decay of community similarity with geographic distance known as the distance–decay relationship. Although this relationship is central to biodiversity and biogeography, its theoretical underpinnings remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a general framework to describe how the distance–decay relationship is influenced by population aggregation and the landscape‐scale species‐abundance distribution. We utilize this general framework and data from three tropical forests to show that rare species have a weak influence on distance–decay curves, and that overall similarity and rates of decay are primarily influenced by species abundances and population aggregation respectively. We illustrate the utility of the framework by deriving an exact analytical expression of the distance–decay relationship when population aggregation is characterized by the Poisson Cluster Process. Our study provides a foundation for understanding the distance–decay relationship, and for predicting and testing patterns of beta‐diversity under competing theories in ecology.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 53

1. 1.

   Brown JH, Mehlman DW, Stevens GC. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology. 1995;76:2028-2043.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Bryant J, Lamanna C, Morlon H, Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist B, Green J. Microbes on mountainsides: contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. PNAS. 2008.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0801920105

3. 3.

   Chave J, Leigh EG. A spatially explicit neutral model of beta-diversity in tropical forests. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002;62:153-168.

   Not in our library10.1006/tpbi.2002.1597

4. 4.

   Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, et al. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science. 2000;288:1414-1418.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.288.5470.1414

5. 5.

   Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, et al. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science. 2002;295:666-669.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1066854

6. 6.

   Cornell HV, Karlson RH, Hughes TP. Scale-dependent variation in coral community similarity across sites, islands, and island groups. Ecology. 2007;88:1707-1715.

   Not in our library10.1890/06-0742.1

7. 7.

   Cressie NAC. Statistics for Spatial Data. 1993.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Diggle PJ. Statistical Analyses of Spatial Point Patterns. 2003.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Diggle PJ, Gomez-Rubio V, Brown PE, Chetwynd AG, Gooding S. Second-order analysis of inhomogeneous spatial point processes using case–control data. Biometrics. 2007;63:550-557.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00683.x

10. 10.

    Ferrier S, Manion G, Elith J, Richardson K. Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Divers. Distrib. 2007;13:252-264.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM. Pattern and Process in Macroecology. 2000.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Green JL, Ostling A. Endemics–area relationships: the influence of species dominance and spatial aggregation. Ecology. 2003;84:3090-3097.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Green JL, Plotkin JB. A statistical theory for sampling species abundances. Ecol. Lett. 2007;10:1037-1045.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01101.x

14. 14.

    Green JL, Holmes AJ, Westoby M, Oliver I, Briscoe D, Dangerfield M, et al. Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature. 2004;432:747-750.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03034

15. 15.

    Harte J, Kinzig AP. On the implications of species–area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food-web patterns. Oikos. 1997;80:417-427.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Harte J, McCarthy S, Taylor K, Kinzig A, Fischer ML. Estimating species–area relationship from plot to landscape scale using species spatial-turnover data. Oikos. 1999;86:45-54.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    He F, Legendre P. Species diversity patterns derived from species–area models. Ecology. 2002;83:1185-1198.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    He F, Legendre P, LaFrankie J. Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. J. Veg. Sci. 1997;8:105-114.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Houchmandzadeh B, Vallade M. Clustering in neutral ecology. Phys. Rev. E. 2003;68:061912.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.68.061912

20. 20.

    Hubbell SP. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science. 1979;203:1299-1309.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.203.4387.1299

21. 21.

    Hubbell SP. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. 2001.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Jobe RT. Estimating landscape-scale species richness: reconciling frequency- and turnover-based approaches. Ecology. 2008;89:174-182.

    Not in our library10.1890/06-1722.1

23. 23.

    John R, Dalling JW, Harms KE, Yavitt JB, Stallard RF, Mirabello M, et al. Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:864-869.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0604666104

24. 24.

    Krishnamani R, Kumar A, Harte J. Estimating species richness at large spatial scales using data from small discrete plots. Ecography. 2004;27:637-642.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto P. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 2005;4:435-450.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Lennon JJ, Koleff P, GreenwooD JJD, Gaston KJ. The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001;70:966-979.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Levin SA. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 1992;73:1943-1967.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Magurran AE. Measuring Biological Diversity. 2004.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    McGill B, Collins C. A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003;5:469-492.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 2007;10:995-1015.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01094.x

31. 31.

    Mouquet N, Loreau M. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am. Nat. 2003;162:544-557.

    Not in our library10.1086/378857

32. 32.

    Nekola JC, Brown JH. The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. Ecol. Lett. 2007;10:188-196.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01003.x

33. 33.

    Nekola JC, White PS. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 1999;26:867-878.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Novotny V, Miller SE, Hulcr J, Drew RAI, Basset Y, Janda M, et al. Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests. Nature. 2007;448:692-697.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06021

35. 35.

    Ostling A, Harte J, Green JL. Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. Science. 2000;290:671a.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.290.5492.671a

36. 36.

    Plotkin JB, Muller-Landau HC. Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology. 2002;83:3344-3356.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Plotkin JB, Potts MD, Leslie N, Manokaran N, LaFrankie J, Ashton PS. Species–area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. J. Theor. Biol. 2000;207:81-99.

    Not in our library10.1006/jtbi.2000.2158

38. 38.

    Plotkin J, Chave J, Ashton P. Custer analysis of spatial patterns in Malaysian tree species. Am. Nat. 2002;160:629-644.

    Not in our library10.1086/342823

39. 39.

    Potts M, Davies S, Bossert W, Tan S, Supardi M. Habitat heterogeneity and niche structure of trees in two tropical rain forests. Oecologia. 2004;139:1432-1439.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-004-1525-3

40. 40.

    Preston FW. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part II. Ecology. 1962;43:410-432.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Metagenomic insights into surface sediment microbial community and functional composition along a water-depth gradient in a subtropic deep lake · 2025
  Not checked
• Nutrient enrichment modifies temperature-biodiversity relationships in large-scale field experiments · 2016
  No notice
• Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity · 2010
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.