No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
Accelerated epigenetic aging in Down syndrome
Steve Horvath, Paolo Garagnani, Maria Giulia Bacalini and 8 more
Aging Cell · 2015 · CC BY
Abstract
Summary Down Syndrome ( DS ) entails an increased risk of many chronic diseases that are typically associated with older age. The clinical manifestations of accelerated aging suggest that trisomy 21 increases the biological age of tissues, but molecular evidence for this hypothesis has been sparse. Here, we utilize a quantitative molecular marker of aging (known as the epigenetic clock) to demonstrate that trisomy 21 significantly increases the age of blood and brain tissue (on average by 6.6 years, P = 7.0 × 10 −14 ).
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Down Syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of all or part of a third copy of chromosome 21 (trisomy 21; +21). It is not only associated with intellectual disability but also with a group of clinical manifestations of ‘accelerated aging’ (Devenny et al.,; Patterson & Cabelof,; Moran, ). Adults with DS have a specific list of conditions with accelerated age at onset, including premature skin wrinkling, greying of hair, hypogonadism, early menopause, hypothyroidism, declining immune function, and Alzheimer's disease. However, as recently reviewed (Zigman, ), accelerated aging in DS is atypical and segmental, involving some but not all organs and tissues. Of particular interest are the brain (Lott & Head,; Teipel & Hampel, ) and the immune system (Cuadrado & Barrena, ). Certain functional abnormalities of lymphocytes can be interpreted as precocious immunosenescence (Kusters et al., ) but alternative interpretations are possible (Cuadrado & Barrena, ).
Due to the limited availability of biomarkers of aging, it has been difficult to rigorously test whether DS is associated with accelerated aging effects, per se, versus specific vulnerabilities to conditions typically associated with old age (e.g., increased risk for Alzheimer's disease). One basic tenet is that a suitable biomarker of aging should detect accelerated aging effects in tissues (e.g., brain and blood) that exhibit clinical manifestations of accelerated aging in DS subjects.
Telomere length can be used as a molecular aging marker and (Vaziri et al., ) reported that DS cases exhibited shorter leukocyte telomere length (LTL) than control subjects, with more recent data suggesting that shorter telomere length is associated with the presence of both dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults with DS (Jenkins et al., ). However, one study found no evidence that cultured skin fibroblasts from DS subjects attained replicative senescence (a telomere length-dependent phenomenon) earlier than those from controls (Kimura et al., ).
Here, we study a new type of molecular marker of aging, our recently developed ‘epigenetic clock’, which is based on DNA methylation (DNAm) levels (Horvath, ). The epigenetic clock has several advantages over other methods. It is quantitative, it overcomes the technical difficulties that plague telomere length measurements and is applicable in all types and sources of tissues, importantly including cryopreserved banked specimens (Horvath, ). This epigenetic clock, which we defined by studying DNAm in series of human tissues across a range of chronological ages, is a prediction method of chronological age based on the DNAm levels of 353 specific CpGs. In normal individuals, the predicted (estimated) age is referred to as DNAm age. DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age across sorted cell types (CD4 T cells, monocytes, neurons), complex tissues (e.g., blood, brain, liver) (Horvath,; Horvath et al., ). The epigenetic clock can be applied to two commercially standardized methylation platforms: the Illumina 450K and the 27K arrays.
Our 4 DNAm data sets are described in Table1 and in the Methods. DNA methylation levels were assessed in peripheral blood leukocytes (data set 1; 27K array), various brain regions (from DS subjects, Alzheimer's disease subjects and controls, data set 2; 450K array), whole blood (data set 3; 450K array) and buccal epithelium (data set 4; 27K arrays).
As expected, DNAm age has a strong positive correlation with chronological age in the control samples (0.74 < r < 0.95, Fig.1a–d). Therefore, we were able to define a measure of age acceleration as the residual resulting from a linear model that regressed DNAm age on chronological age in controls. By construction, this measure of age acceleration is not correlated with chronological age and takes on a positive value for samples whose DNAm age is higher than expected.
Strikingly, we find that DS subjects exhibit a highly significant age acceleration effect in three independent data sets (P = 0.0048, P = 5.5×10-7, P = 0.00056 Fig.1e–g) involving blood and brain tissue. By contrast, we did not observe a significant age acceleration effect in buccal epithelium (P = 0.26, Fig.1h) which might reflect that clinical manifestations of accelerated aging have not been observed in this tissue. However, we caution the reader that data set 4 only involved 10 cases and 10 controls. Larger studies may succeed at detecting an accelerated aging effect in buccal epithelium.
A meta-analysis applied to the blood and brain data sets shows that DS status is highly significantly (P = 7.0 × 10−14) associated with increased DNAm age (average 6.6 years, Table2).
Data set 2 shows that the brain tissue of DS subjects exhibits significantly higher age acceleration than that of AD subjects or controls (Fig.1f). These results can also be found when restricting attention to samples from the cerebellum, frontal lobe, or other brain regions (Fig. s1).
Data set 3 involved blood from 29 individuals with DS, their mothers and their unaffected siblings. This design allows adjustment for possible confounding effects on DNA methylation patterns deriving from genetic and environmental (lifestyle) factors within families. To properly account for the family relationships, we also fit a mixed effects model to the 29 discordant sib pairs. Specifically, DNAm age was regressed on DS status, chronological age, and a random effects term (intercept) that encoded the sib ship. Using this model, we found that DS status significantly affected DNAm age (P = 0.00029), raising it by 3.86 years ± 1.03 (SE).
Additional analyses examined potential confounders of gender and mean methylation levels. None of these factors contributed significantly to the effect of DS on DNAm age (e.g., Figs S2 and S3, Data S1).
Several studies reported age-dependent defects in the innate and in the adaptive immune system of DS (Kusters et al., ), consisting in altered prevalence of the different lymphocyte subpopulations. In data sets 1, DS status is not significantly associated with blood cell type proportions (Fig. s4m–r). But using the discordant sib pair data from data set 3, we observe that DS subjects exhibit fewer CD4 T cells and B cells (Fig. s5n,p) and more Natural Killer cells (Fig. s5o). Considering that DNA methylation is cell type specific, differences in blood cell counts could confound the relationship between DS status and age acceleration effects. While no significant correlation can be found between proportions of blood cell types and age acceleration in data set 1 (Fig. s4a–f), we observe a significant negative correlation for CD4 T cells (Fig. s5b) and monocytes (Fig. s5e). But differences in blood cell counts do not explain the observed age acceleration effects as can be seen from the fact that DS status remains a significant predictor of DNAm age in a multivariate regression model that includes blood cell counts and chronological age (Table s1). Similarly, the results remain significant (Table s2) when using a ‘reference free’ method that does not require reference libraries of cell types (Houseman et al., ). Further, a structural equation model analysis shows that causal models that posit that changes in blood cell type abundance mediate the effect of DS on age acceleration do not fit our data (Table s3).
Our observed results regarding the relationship between DS status and epigenetic age acceleration do not depend on any particular choice of aging signature (Fig. s6). In particular, they can also be found using an alternative age predictor described in (Hannum et al., ), and using aging signatures from (Teschendorff et al., ) and (Horvath et al., ).
A marginal analysis that related individual CpGs to age, acceleration, and DS status can be found in Figs S7–10 and 2. As the epigenetic clock was constructed as a multivariate predictor, it is not surprising that most of the 353 clock CpGs do not exhibit a consistent age correlation across data sets (Fig. s7a–c). These results demonstrate that the total (epigenetic clock) is more than the sum of its parts. The marginal association of CpGs with epigenetic age acceleration is only moderately (r = 0.41) preserved between data sets 1 and 2 (Fig. s7d–f). Similarly, marginal associations with DS status are moderately preserved across the blood and brain data sets (Fig. s8a–c, e–f).
Strikingly, CpGs that are associated with DS status tend to be correlated with epigenetic age acceleration (Fig.2). For example, we present CpGs that are hypermethylated in DS subjects and have a positive correlation with age acceleration in Fig. s9. These two CpGs correspond to the two magenta triangles in the upper right hand corner of Fig.2d. It is noteworthy that CpG cg12186917 is located on chromosome 21 (near gene CRYZL1). The other CpG cg04455759 is close to gene MRPL42 (mitochondrial ribosomal protein L42) on chromosome 12. We also present two CpGs that are both hypomethylated in DS subjects and have a negative correlation with age acceleration (Fig. s10). These CpGs correspond to the green triangles in the lower left corner of Fig.2d. CpG cg11678767 is located near COL4A6 (type IV alpha 6 collagen isoform A precursor) on the X chromosome, whereas CpG cg20425293 is located near gene SDHD (succinate dehydrogenase complex; subunit D precursor) on chromosome 11. Results for individual CpGs can be found in the Supporting File. A detailed marginal analysis is beyond our scope but we briefly point out that it is already known that DS does not affect global methylation levels in blood (Kerkel et al., ) or buccal epithelium (Jones et al., ).
Due to a lack of transcriptional data, we could not directly correlate epigenetic age acceleration with gene expression levels in this study. Several studies have looked at altered gene expression levels in DS subjects, for example, (Esposito et al.,; Costa et al.,; Letourneau et al., ). (Letourneau et al., ) showed that the nuclear compartments of trisomic cells undergo modifications of the chromatin environment influencing the overall transcriptome.
To the best of our knowledge, the epigenetic clock approach facilitated the first analysis of DS on age-related epigenetic modifications. Our results indicate that DS can be interpreted as segmental progeria, which affects at least two disparate tissues. As it is well known that DS is associated with clinical manifestations of premature aging in brain and to a lesser extent in blood tissue, it is reassuring that we observe significant age acceleration effects in brain (11 years) and blood (4 years) tissue. Future studies should evaluate whether the extent of epigenetic age acceleration relates to the prevalence of age-related conditions across tissues.
References 23
- 1.
Costa V, Angelini C, D'Apice L, Mutarelli M, Casamassimi A, Sommese L, Gallo MA, Aprile M, Esposito R, Leone L, Donizetti A, Crispi S, Rienzo M, Sarubbi B, Calabrò R, Picardi M, Salvatore P, Infante T, DeBerardinis P, Napoli Cl, Ciccodicola A. Massive-Scale RNA-Seq analysis of non ribosomal transcriptome in human trisomy 21. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18493.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0018493
- 2.
Cuadrado E, Barrena MJ. Immune dysfunction in Down's syndrome: primary immune deficiency or early senescence of the immune system? Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996;78:209-214.
Not in our library10.1006/clin.1996.0031
- 3.
Devenny DA, Wegiel J, Schupf N, Jenkins E, Zigman W, Krinsky-McHale SJ, Silverman WP. Dementia of the Alzheimer's type and accelerated aging in Down syndrome. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ. 2005;(14).
Not in our library10.1126/sageke.2005.14.dn1
- 4.
Esposito G, Imitola J, Lu J, De Filippis D, Scuderi C, Ganesh VS, Folkerth R, Hecht J, Shin S, Iuvone T, et al. Genomic and functional profiling of human Down syndrome neural progenitors implicates S100B and aquaporin 4 in cell injury. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17:440-457.
Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddm322
- 5.
Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, Klotzle B, Bibikova M, Fan J-B, Gao Y, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell. 2013;49:359-367.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Horvath S, Erhart W, Brosch M, Ammerpohl O, von Schönfels W, Ahrens M, Heits N, Bell JT, Tsai P-C, Spector TD, et al. Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging of human liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:15538-15543.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1412759111
- 9.
- 10.
Jenkins EC, Ye L, Gu H, Ni SA, Duncan CJ, Velinov M, Pang D, Krinsky-McHale SJ, Zigman WB, Schupf N, et al. Increased “absence” of telomeres may indicate Alzheimer's disease/dementia status in older individuals with Down syndrome. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;440:340-343.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.098
- 11.
Jones M, Fejes A, Kobor M. DNA methylation, genotype and gene expression: who is driving and who is along for the ride? Genome Biol. 2013a;14:126.
Not in our library10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-126
- 12.
Jones MJ, Farre P, McEwen LM, Macisaac JL, Watt K, Neumann SM, Emberly E, Cynader MS, Virji-Babul N, Kobor MS. Distinct DNA methylation patterns of cognitive impairment and trisomy 21 in Down syndrome. BMC Med. Genomics. 2013b;6:58.
Not in our library10.1186/1755-8794-6-58
- 13.
Kerkel K, Schupf N, Hatta K, Pang D, Salas M, Kratz A, Minden M, Murty V, Zigman WB, Mayeux RP, et al. Altered DNA Methylation in Leukocytes with Trisomy 21. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001212.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1001212
- 14.
Kimura M, Cao X, Skurnick J, Cody M, Soteropoulos P, Aviv A. Proliferation dynamics in cultured skin fibroblasts from Down syndrome subjects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005;39:374-380.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.023
- 15.
Kusters MA, Verstegen RH, de Vries E. Down syndrome: is it really characterized by precocious immunosenescence? Aging Dis. 2011;2:538-545.
Not in our library
- 16.
Letourneau A, Santoni FA, Bonilla X, Sailani MR, Gonzalez D, Kind J, Chevalier C, Thurman R, Sandstrom RS, Hibaoui Y, et al. Domains of genome-wide gene expression dysregulation in Down's syndrome. Nature. 2014;508:345-350.
Not in our library10.1038/nature13200
- 17.
Lott IT, Head E. Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome: factors in pathogenesis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2005;26:383-389.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.08.005
- 18.
Moran J. Aging and Down Syndrome. 2013.
Not in our library
- 19.
Patterson D, Cabelof DC. Down syndrome as a model of DNA polymerase beta haploinsufficiency and accelerated aging. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2012;133:133-137.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mad.2011.10.001
- 20.
Teipel S, Hampel H. Neuroanatomy of Down syndrome in vivo: a model of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Behav. Genet. 2006;36:405-415.
Not in our library10.1007/s10519-006-9047-x
- 21.
Teschendorff AE, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ramus SJ, Weisenberger DJ, Shen H, Campan M, Noushmehr H, Bell CG, Maxwell AP, et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res. 2010;20:440-446.
Not in our library10.1101/gr.103606.109
- 22.
Vaziri H, Schachter F, Uchida I, Wei L, Zhu X, Effros R, Cohen D, Harley CB. Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1993;52:661-667.
Not in our library
- 23.
Zigman WB. Atypical aging in Down syndrome. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2013;18:51-67.
Not in our library10.1002/ddrr.1128
Cited by papers we hold 43
- DNA methylation variations of DNA damage response in glioblastoma: NSUN5 modulates tumor-intrinsic cytosolic DNA-sensing and microglial behavior · 2025Not checked
- Epigenetic age prediction · 2021No notice
- Inflammation, epigenetics, and metabolism converge to cell senescence and ageing: the regulation and intervention · 2021No notice
- DNA Methylation Biomarkers in Aging and Age-Related Diseases · 2020No notice
- Epigenetic measures of ageing predict the prevalence and incidence of leading causes of death and disease burden · 2020No notice
- Age and life expectancy clocks based on machine learning analysis of mouse frailty · 2020Corrected
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Neuroinflammation: Intertwined Roads to Neurodegeneration · 2020No notice
- Screening for genes that accelerate the epigenetic aging clock in humans reveals a role for the H3K36 methyltransferase NSD1 · 2019Not checked
- Telomere Biology and Human Phenotype · 2019No notice
- DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan · 2019No notice
- The epigenetic clock as a predictor of disease and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis · 2019No notice
- An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan · 2018No notice
- Epigenetic clock for skin and blood cells applied to Hutchinson Gilford Progeria Syndrome and ex vivo studies · 2018No notice
- Partial reprogramming induces a steady decline in epigenetic age before loss of somatic identity · 2018No notice
- Cell‐free DNA as a biomarker of aging · 2018No notice
- Brain age and other bodily ‘ages’: implications for neuropsychiatry · 2018No notice
- A multi-tissue full lifespan epigenetic clock for mice · 2018No notice
- The Continuum of Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Common Mechanisms but Different Rates · 2018No notice
- GWAS of epigenetic aging rates in blood reveals a critical role for TERT · 2018No notice
- Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors · 2017No notice
and 23 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.