Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Oct 8, 2020.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Nov 3, 2026 · Read the notice

Age and life expectancy clocks based on machine learning analysis of mouse frailty

Michael B. Schultz, Alice E. Kane, Sarah J. Mitchell and 7 more

Nature Communications · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2019.12.20.884452

Abstract

The identification of genes and interventions that slow or reverse aging is hampered by the lack of non-invasive metrics that can predict the life expectancy of pre-clinical models. Frailty Indices (FIs) in mice are composite measures of health that are cost-effective and non-invasive, but whether they can accurately predict health and lifespan is not known. Here, mouse FIs are scored longitudinally until death and machine learning is employed to develop two clocks. A random forest regression is trained on FI components for chronological age to generate the FRIGHT ( Fr ailty I nferred G eriatric H ealth T imeline) clock, a strong predictor of chronological age. A second model is trained on remaining lifespan to generate the AFRAID ( A nalysis of Frai lty and D eath) clock, which accurately predicts life expectancy and the efficacy of a lifespan-extending intervention up to a year in advance. Adoption of these clocks should accelerate the identification of longevity genes and aging interventions.

References 71

  1. 1.

    Butler RN, et al. Aging: the reality: biomarkers of aging: from primitive organisms to humans. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004;59:B560-B567.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/59.6.b560

  2. 2.

    Rantanen T, et al. Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2000;55:168-173.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/55.3.m168

  3. 3.

    Bittner V, et al. Prediction of mortality and morbidity with a 6-minute walk test in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. JAMA. 1993;270:1702-1707.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Alpert, A. et al. A clinically meaningful metric of immune age derived from high-dimensional longitudinal monitoring. Nat. Med. 25, 487–495 (2019).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0381-y

  5. 5.

    Martínez de Toda I, Vida C, Sanz San Miguel L, De la Fuente M. When will my mouse die? Life span prediction based on immune function, redox and behavioural parameters in female mice at the adult age. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2019;182:111125.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mad.2019.111125

  6. 6.

    Mather KA, Jorm AF, Parslow RA, Christensen H. Is telomere length a biomarker of aging? A review. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2011;66 A:202-213.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glq180

  7. 7.

    Krištić J, et al. Glycans are a novel biomarker of chronological and biological ages. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014;69:779-789.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glt190

  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Horvath S, Raj K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018;19:371-384.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3

  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Whitehead JC, et al. A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans. J. Gerontol. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014;69:621-632.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glt136

  15. 15.

    Kane AE, Keller KM, Heinze-Milne S, Grandy SA, Howlett SE. A murine frailty index based on clinical and laboratory measurements: links between frailty and pro-inflammatory cytokines differ in a sex-specific manner. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2019;74:275-282.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/gly117

  16. 16.

    Feridooni HAA, et al. The impact of age and frailty on ventricular structure and function in C57BL/6J mice. J. Physiol. 2017;595:3721-3742.

    Not in our library10.1113/jp274134

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Kane A, et al. Impact of longevity interventions on a validated mouse clinical frailty index. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016;71:333-339.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glu315

  19. 19.

    Klemera P, Doubal S. A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006;127:240-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mad.2005.10.004

  20. 20.

    Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45:5-32.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Keller K, Kane A, Heinze-Milne S, Grandy SA, Howlett SE. Chronic treatment with the ACE inhibitor enalapril attenuates the development of frailty and differentially modifies pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in aging male and female C57BL/6 mice. J. Gerontol. A. 2019;74:1149-1157.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/gly219

  22. 22.

    Harrison DE, et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature. 2009;460:392-395.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08221

  23. 23.

    Miller RA, et al. Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-I and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance. Aging Cell. 2005;4:119-125.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00152.x

  24. 24.

    Orentreich N, Matias J, DeFelice A, Zimmerman J. Low methionine ingestion by rats extends life span. J. Nutr. 1993;123:269-274.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/123.2.269

  25. 25.

    Sun L, Sadighi Akha AA, Miller RA, Harper JM. Life-span extension in mice by preweaning food restriction and by methionine restriction in middle age. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2009;64:711-722.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/glp051

  26. 26.

    Horvath S, Levine AJ. HIV-1 infection accelerates age according to the epigenetic clock. J. Infect. Dis. 2015;212:1563-1573.

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiv277

  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    Petkovich DA, et al. Using DNA methylation profiling to evaluate biological age and longevity interventions. Cell Metab. 2017;25:954-960.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.016

  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Baumann CW, Kwak D, Thompson LDV. Assessing onset, prevalence and survival in mice using a frailty phenotype. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10:4042-4053.

    Not in our library10.18632/aging.101692

  37. 37.

    Trammell RA, Toth LA. Markers for predicting death as an outcome for mice used in infectious disease research. Comp. Med. 2011;61:492-498.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Ray MA, Johnston NA, Verhulst S, Trammell RA, Toth LA. Identification of markers for imminent death in mice used in longevity and aging research. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2010;49:282-288.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Ingram DK, Archer JR, Harrison DE, Reynolds MA. Physiological and behavioral correlates of lifespan in aged C57BL/6J mice. Exp. Gerontol. 1982;17:295-303.

    Not in our library10.1016/0531-5565(82)90019-5

  40. 40.

    Miller RA. Biomarkers of aging: prediction of longevity by using age-sensitive T-cell subset determinations in a middle-aged, genetically heterogeneous mouse population. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001;56:180-186.

    Not in our library10.1093/gerona/56.4.b180

All 71 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.