No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Model Calculations of Aerosol Transmission and Infection Risk of COVID-19 in Indoor Environments

Jos Lelieveld, Frank Helleis, Stephan Borrmann and 7 more

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2020 · CC BY

Abstract

The role of aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 viruses in airborne transmission of COVID-19 has been debated. The aerosols are transmitted through breathing and vocalization by infectious subjects. Some authors state that this represents the dominant route of spreading, while others dismiss the option. Here we present an adjustable algorithm to estimate the infection risk for different indoor environments, constrained by published data of human aerosol emissions, SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, infective dose and other parameters. We evaluate typical indoor settings such as an office, a classroom, choir practice, and a reception/party. Our results suggest that aerosols from highly infective subjects can effectively transmit COVID-19 in indoor environments. This “highly infective” category represents approximately 20% of the patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We find that “super infective” subjects, representing the top 5–10% of subjects with a positive test, plus an unknown fraction of less—but still highly infective, high aerosol-emitting subjects—may cause COVID-19 clusters (>10 infections). In general, active room ventilation and the ubiquitous wearing of face masks (i.e., by all subjects) may reduce the individual infection risk by a factor of five to ten, similar to high-volume, high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtering. A particularly effective mitigation measure is the use of high-quality masks, which can drastically reduce the indoor infection risk through aerosols.

References 83

1.
Indirect Virus Transmission in Cluster of COVID-19 Cases, Wenzhou, China, 2020 · 2020
No notice
2.
Jayaweera M., Perera H., Gunawardana B., Manatunge J. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: A critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environ. Res. 2020;188:109819.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envres.2020.109819
3.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
Not in our library
4.
Lloyd-Smith J.O., Schreiber S.J., Kopp P.E., Getz W.M. Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature. 2005;438:355-359.
Not in our library10.1038/nature04153
5.
Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary · 2019
No notice
6.
Nishiura H., Oshitani H., Kobayashi T., Saito T., Sunagawa T., Matsui T., Wakita T., Suzuki M., MHLW COVID-19 Response Team. Closed environments facilitate secondary transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). medRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library
7.
Morawska L., Milton D.K. It is time to address airborne transmission of COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;6:ciaa939.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa939
8.
Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19 · 2020
Corrected
9.
Auger K.A., Shah S.S., Richardson T., Hartley D., Hall M., Warniment A., Timmons K., Bosse D., Ferris S.A., Brady P.W., et al. Association between statewide school closure and COVID-19 incidence and mortality. JAMA. 2020;324:859-870.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.14348
10.
Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollma P., Rothe C., et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465-469.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x
11.
Estimating infectiousness throughout SARS-CoV-2 infection course · 2021
No notice
12.
Jacot D., Greub G., Jaton K., Opota O. Viral load of SARS-1 CoV-2 across patients and compared to other respiratory viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020.
Not in our library10.1016/j.micinf.2020.08.004
13.
Davies N.G., Klepac P., Liu Y., Prem K., Jit M., Eggo R.M., CMMID COVID-19 Working Group. Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics. Nat. Med. 2020;26:1205-1211.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9
14.
Mizumoto K., Omori R., Nishiura H. Age specificity of cases and attack rate of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). medRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library
15.
Viner R.M., Russell S.J., Croker H., Packer J., Ward J., Stansfield C., Mytton O., Bonell C., Booy R. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2020;4:397-404.
Not in our library10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30095-x
16.
Klompas M., Baker M.A., Rhee C. Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Theoretical Considerations and Available Evidence. JAMA. 2020;324:441-442.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.12458
17.
Howard-Reed C., Wallace L.A., Ott W.R. The effect of opening windows on air change rates in two homes. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2011;52:147-159.
Not in our library10.1080/10473289.2002.10470775
18.
Cheng Y., Ma N., Witt C., Rapp S., Wild P., Andreae M.O., Pöschl U., Su H. Distinct regimes of particle and virus abundance explain face mask efficacy for COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library
19.
Johnson G.R., Morawska L., Ristovski Z.D., Hargreaves M., Mengersen K., Chao C.Y.H., Wan M.P., Li Y., Xie X., Katoshevski D., et al. Modality of human expired aerosol size distributions. J. Aerosol Sci. 2011;42:839-851.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.07.009
20.
Yan J., Grantham M., Pantelic J., De Mesquita P.J.B., Albert B., Liu F., Ehrman S., Milton D.K., EMIT Consortium. Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:1081-1086.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1716561115
21.
Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness · 2019
No notice
22.
Borak J. Airborne transmission of COVID-19. Occup. Med. 2020;70:297-299.
Not in our library10.1093/occmed/kqaa080
23.
Modelling aerosol transport and virus exposure with numerical simulations in relation to SARS-CoV-2 transmission by inhalation indoors · 2020
No notice
24.
Morawska L., Johnson G.R., Ristovski Z.D., Hargreaves M., Mengersen K., Corbett S., Chao C.Y.H., Li Y., Katoshevski D. Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities. J. Aerosol Sci. 2009;40:256-269.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.11.002
25.
Gregson F.K.A., Watson N.A., Orton C.M., Haddrell A.E., McCarthy L.P., Finnie T.J.R., Gent N., Donaldson G.C., Shah P.L., Calder J.D., et al. Comparing the Respirable Aerosol Concentrations and Particle Size Distributions Generated by Singing, Speaking and Breathing. ChemRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library10.26434/chemrxiv.12789221.v1
26.
Asadi S., Wexler A.S., Cappa C.D., Barreda S., Bouvier N.M., Ristenpart W.D. Effect of voicing and articulation manner on aerosol particle emission during human speech. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0227699.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0227699
27.
Mürbe D., Fleischer M., Lange J., Rotheudt H., Kriegel M. Aerosol emission is increased in professional singing. Preprint. 2020.
Not in our library10.14279/depositonce-10374
28.
Riediker M., Tsai D.-H. Estimation of viral aerosol emissions from simulated individuals with asymptomatic to moderate Coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e2013807.
Not in our library10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13807
29.
Fernandez M.O., Thomas R.J., Garton N.J., Hudson A., Haddrell A., Reid J.R. Assessing the airborne survival of bacteria in populations of 10 aerosol droplets with a novel technology. J. Roy. Soc. Int. 2019;16:20180779.
Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2018.0779
30.
Lauer S.A., Grantz K.H., Bin Q., Jones F.K., Zheng Q., Meredith H.R., Azman A.S., Reich N.G., Lessler J. The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: Estimation and application. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020;172:577-582.
Not in our library10.7326/m20-0504
31.
Arons M.M., Hatfield K.M., Reddy S.C., Kimball A., James A., Jacobs J.R., Taylor J., Spicer K., Bardossy A.C., Oakley L.P., et al. For the Public Health–Seattle and King County and CDC COVID-19 Investigation Team 2020. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2081-2090.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2008457
32.
Argyropoulos K.V., Serrano A., Hu J., Black M., Feng X., Shen G., Call M., Kim M.J., Lytle A., Belovarac B., et al. Association of initial viral load in severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) patients with outcome and symptoms. Am. J. Pathol. 2020;190:1881-1887.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.07.001
33.
Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis · 2020
No notice
34.
Pan Y., Zhang D., Yang P., Poon L.L.M., Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:411-412.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30113-4
35.
Pujadas E., Chaudhry F., McBride R., Richter F., Zhao S., Wajnberg A., Nadkarni G., Glicksberg B.S., Houldsworth J., Cordon-Card C. SARS-CoV-2 viral load predicts COVID-19 mortality. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30354-4
36.
To K.K.-W., Tsang O.T.-Y., Leung W.-S., Tam A.R., Wu T.-C., Lung D.C., Yip C.C.-Y., Cai J.-P., Chan J.M.-C., Chik T.S.-H., et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: An observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020;20:565-574.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30196-1
37.
SARS-CoV-2 viral load in sputum correlates with risk of COVID-19 progression · 2020
No notice
38.
He X., Lau E.H.Y., Wu P., Deng X., Wang J., Hao X., Lau Y.C., Wong J.Y., Guan Y., Tan X., et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020;26:672-675.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5
39.
Hamner L., Dubbel P., Capron I., Ross A., Jordan A., Lee J., Lynn J., Ball A., Narwal S., Russell S., et al. High SARS-CoV-2 Attack Rate Following Exposure at a Choir Practice—Skagit County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR. 2020;69:606-610.
Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e6
40.
Miller S.L., Nazaroff W.W., Jimenez J.L., Boerstra A., Buonanno G., Dancer S.J., Kurnitski J., Marr L.C., Morawska L., Noakes C. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event. medRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library10.1111/ina.12751
41.
Van Doremalen N., Bushmaker T., Morris D.H., Holbrook M.G., Gamble A., Williamson B.N., Tamin A., Harcourt J.L., Thornburg N.J., Gerber S.I., et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1564-1567.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc2004973
42.
Experimental aerosol survival of SARS-CoV-2 in artificial saliva and tissue culture media at medium and high humidity · 2020
No notice
43.
Pyankov O.V., Bodnev S.A., Pyankova O., Agranovski I.E. Survival of aerosolized coronavirus in the ambient air. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2018;115:158-163.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.09.009
44.
Casanova L.M., Jeon S., Rutala W.A., Weber D.J., Sobsey M.D. Effects of air temperature and relative humidity on coronavirus survival on surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;76:2712-2717.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.02291-09
45.
Wang B., Wu H., Wan X.-F. Transport and fate of human expiratory droplets—A modeling approach. Phys. Fluids. 2020;32:083307.
Not in our library10.1063/5.0021280
46.
Spena A., Palombi L., Corcione M., Carestia M., Spena V.A. On the optimal indoor air conditions for SARS-CoV-2 Inactivation. An enthalpy-based approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17:6083.
Not in our library10.3390/ijerph17176083
47.
Liu L., Wei J., Li Y., Ooi A. Evaporation and dispersion of respiratory droplets from coughing. Indoor Air. 2017;27:179-190.
Not in our library10.1111/ina.12297
48.
De Gabory L., Alharbia A., Kérimiana M., Lafonc M.-E. The influenza virus, SARS-CoV-2, and the airways: Clarification for the otorhinolaryngologist. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2020;137:291-296.
Not in our library10.1016/j.anorl.2020.05.015
49.
Inthavong K., Ge Q.J., Li X.D., Tu J.T. Detailed predictions of particle aspiration affected by respiratory inhalation and airflow. Atmos. Environ. 2012;62:107-117.
Not in our library10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.071
50.
Dong J., Shang Y., Tian L., Inthavong K., Qiu D., Tu J. Ultrafine particle deposition in a realistic human airway at multiple inhalation scenarios. Int. J Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 2019;35:e3215.
Not in our library10.1002/cnm.3215
51.
Stahlhofen W., Rudolf G., James A.C. Intercomparison of experimental regional aerosol deposition data. J. Aerosol Med. 1989;2:285-308.
Not in our library10.1089/jam.1989.2.285
52.
Asgharian B., Hofmann W., Bergmann R. Particle deposition in a multiple-path model of the human lung. Aer. Sci. Technol. 2010;34:332-339.
Not in our library10.1080/02786820119122
53.
Heyder J. Deposition of inhaled particles in the human respiratory tract and consequences for regional targeting in respiratory drug delivery. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2004;1:315-320.
Not in our library10.1513/pats.200409-046ta
54.
Tsuda A., Henry F.S., Butler J.P. Particle transport and deposition: Basic physics of particle kinetics. Compr. Physiol. 2015;3:1437-1471.
Not in our library10.1002/cphy.c100085
55.
Montoya L.D., Lawrence J., Krishna Murthy G.G., Sarnat J.A., Godleski J.J., Koutrakis P. Continuous measurements of ambient particle deposition in human subjects. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2004;38:980-990.
Not in our library10.1080/027868290519049
56.
Hsiao T.-C., Chuang H.-C., Griffith S.M., Chen S.-J., Young L.H. COVID-19: An aerosol’s point of view from expiration to transmission to viral-mechanism. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020;20:905-910.
Not in our library10.4209/aaqr.2020.04.0154
57.
SARS‐CoV‐2 receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are primarily expressed in bronchial transient secretory cells · 2020
No notice
58.
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis · 2020
No notice
59.
Esposito S., Principi N., Leung C.C., Migliori G.B. Universal use of face masks for success against COVID-19: Evidence and implications for prevention policies. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;55:2001260.
Not in our library10.1183/13993003.01260-2020
60.
Low-cost measurement of face mask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech · 2020
No notice
61.
Howard J., Huang A., Li Z., Tufekci Z., Zdimal V., Van der Westhuizen H., Von Delft A., Price A., Fridman L., Tang L., et al. Face Masks Against COVID-19: An Evidence Review. Preprints. 2020;2020040203.
Not in our library
62.
Leung N.H.L., Chu D.K.W., Shiu E.Y.C., Chan K.-H., McDevitt J.J., Hau B.J.P., Yen H.-L., Li Y., Ip D.K.M., Peiris J.S.M., et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 2020;26:676-680.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2
63.
MacIntyre C.R., Chughtai A.A. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020;108:103629.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103629
64.
Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic · 2020
No notice
65.
Mueller A.V., Eden M.J., Oakes J.M., Bell C., Fernandez L.A. Quantitative method for comparative assessment of particle filtration efficiency of fabric masks as alternatives to standard surgical masks for PPE. medRxiv. 2020.
Not in our library10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.006
66.
Visualizing the effectiveness of face masks in obstructing respiratory jets · 2020
No notice
67.
Drewnick F., Pikmann J., Fachinger F., Moormann L., Sprang F., Borrmann S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of household materials for homemade face masks: Influence of material properties, particle size, particle electrical charge, face velocity, and leaks. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2020.
Not in our library10.1080/02786826.2020.1817846
68.
Davies A., Thompson K.-A., Giri K., Kafatos G., Walker J., Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: Would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 2013;7:413-418.
Not in our library10.1017/dmp.2013.43
69.
Shakya K.M., Noyes A., Kallin R., Peltie R.E. Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. J. Expo. Sci. 2017;27:352-357.
Not in our library10.1038/jes.2016.42
70.
Kai D., Goldstein G.-P., Morgunov A., Nangalia V., Rotkirch A. Universal masking is urgent in the COVID-19 pandemic: SEIR and agent based models, empirical validation, policy recommendations. arXiv. 2020.
Not in our library
71.
Watanabe T., Bartrand T.A., Weir M.H., Omura T., Haas C.N. Development of a dose-response model for SARS Coronavirus. Risk Anal. 2010;30:1129-1138.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01427.x
72.
Schröder I. COVID-19: A risk assessment perspective. Chem. Health Saf. 2020.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.chas.0c00035
73.
Karimzadeh S., Bhopal R., Huy N.T. Review of viral dynamics, exposure, infective dose, and outcome of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus: Comparison with other respiratory viruses. Preprints. 2020.
Not in our library
74.
Salomoni S., Van den Hoorn W., Hodges P. Breathing and Singing: Objective characterization of breathing patterns in classical singers. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155084.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0155084
75.
Buonanno G., Stabile L., Morawska L. Estimation of airborne viral emission: Quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment. Environ. Int. 2020;141:105794.
Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794
76.
Hao X., Cheng S., Wu D., Lin X., Wang C. Reconstruction of the full transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Nature. 2020;583:420-424.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2554-8
77.
Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality · 2020
Not checked
78.
Fisk W.J. The ventilation problem in schools: Literature review. Indoor Air. 2017;27:1039-1051.
Not in our library10.1111/ina.12403
79.
Liu J., Ning Z., Chen Y., Guo M., Liu Y., Kumar Gali N., Sun L., Duan Y., Cai J., Westerdahl D., et al. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature. 2020;582:557-560.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2271-3
80.
Christopherson D.A., Yao W.C., Lu M., Vijayakumar R., Sedaghat A.R. High-efficiency particulate air filters in the era of COVID-19: Function and efficacy. Am. Acad. Otolaryngol. 2020.
Not in our library10.1177/0194599820941838
81.
Mousavi E.S., Kananizadeh N., Martinello R.A., Sherman J.D. COVID-19 Outbreak and hospital air quality: A systematic review of evidence on air filtration and recirculation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.est.0c03247
82.
Kähler C.J., Fuchs T., Hain R. Können Mobile Raumluftreiniger eine Indirekte SARS-CoV-2 Infektionsgefahr Durch Aerosole Wirksam Reduzieren? 2020.
Not in our library
83.
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. Algorithm to Estimate COVID-19 Infection Risks by Aerosol Transmission in Indoor Environments.
Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission · 2021
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.