Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes COVID-19 and is spread person-to-person through close contact. We aimed to investigate the effects of physical distance, face masks, and eye protection on virus transmission in health-care and non-health-care (eg, community) settings. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimum distance for avoiding person-to-person virus transmission and to assess the use of face masks and eye protection to prevent transmission of viruses. We obtained data for SARS-CoV-2 and the betacoronaviruses that cause severe acute respiratory syndrome, and Middle East respiratory syndrome from 21 standard WHO-specific and COVID-19-specific sources. We searched these data sources from database inception to May 3, 2020, with no restriction by language, for comparative studies and for contextual factors of acceptability, feasibility, resource use, and equity. We screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. We did frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses and random-effects meta-regressions. We rated the certainty of evidence according to Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020177047. Findings Our search identified 172 observational studies across 16 countries and six continents, with no randomised controlled trials and 44 relevant comparative studies in health-care and non-health-care settings (n=25 697 patients). Transmission of viruses was lower with physical distancing of 1 m or more, compared with a distance of less than 1 m (n=10 736, pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·18, 95% CI 0·09 to 0·38; risk difference [RD] −10·2%, 95% CI −11·5 to −7·5; moderate certainty); protection was increased as distance was lengthened (change in relative risk [RR] 2·02 per m; p interaction =0·041; moderate certainty). Face mask use could result in a large reduction in risk of infection (n=2647; aOR 0·15, 95% CI 0·07 to 0·34, RD −14·3%, −15·9 to −10·7; low certainty), with stronger associations with N95 or similar respirators compared with disposable surgical masks or similar (eg, reusable 12–16-layer cotton masks; p interaction =0·090; posterior probability >95%, low certainty). Eye protection also was associated with less infection (n=3713; aOR 0·22, 95% CI 0·12 to 0·39, RD −10·6%, 95% CI −12·5 to −7·7; low certainty). Unadjusted studies and subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed similar findings. Interpretation The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support physical distancing of 1 m or more and provide quantitative estimates for models and contact tracing to inform policy. Optimum use of face masks, respirators, and eye protection in public and health-care settings should be informed by these findings and contextual factors. Robust randomised trials are needed to better inform the evidence for these interventions, but this systematic appraisal of currently best available evidence might inform interim guidance. Funding World Health Organization.

Cited by papers we hold 46

• Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses · 2023
  No notice
• Skrining Potensi Essential Oil Cananga odorata dalam Penghambatannya Terhadap ACE II dan TMPRSS2 sebagai Anti Covid-19: Pendekatan In Silico · 2023
  Not checked
• Impact of age, sex and medical history on adverse reactions to the first and second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Japan: a cross-sectional study · 2022
  Not checked
• Pela Ciência, contra os cientistas? Negacionismo e as disputas em torno das políticas de saúde durante a pandemia · 2022
  Not checked
• The impact of FFP3 respirators on the blood saturation · 2022
  Not checked
• Effect of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy on insomnia in convalescent patients with COVID-19: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. · 2022
  Not checked
• Epidemiological changes in infectious diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Korea: a systematic review · 2022
  Not checked
• Tea and tea drinking: China’s outstanding contributions to the mankind · 2022
  No notice
• A mobile swabbing booth to address Singapore GPs’ concerns about swabber protection: human-centred design during the COVID-19 pandemic · 2021
  Not checked
• Negative attitudes about facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: The dual importance of perceived ineffectiveness and psychological reactance · 2021
  No notice
• Use of masks in public places in Poland during SARS-Cov-2 epidemic: a covert observational study · 2021
  Not checked
• Psychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes and Transmission Prevention Behaviors: Working During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic · 2021
  Not checked
• Heterogeneity in transmissibility and shedding SARS-CoV-2 via droplets and aerosols · 2021
  No notice
• Vaping, SARS-CoV-2, and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome: A Perfect Storm · 2021
  Not checked
• Assessing the risk of COVID-19 from multiple pathways of exposure to SARS-CoV-2: Modeling in health-care settings and effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions · 2021
  Not checked
• SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during delivery of childhood vaccination campaigns: a modelling study · 2021
  Not checked
• COVID-19 en pediatría: valoración crítica de la evidencia · 2021
  Not checked
• SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Professionals and General Population During “First Wave” of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in Sicily, Italy · 2021
  Not checked
• Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review · 2021
  No notice
• Global Trends in Norovirus Genotype Distribution among Children with Acute Gastroenteritis · 2021
  No notice

and 26 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.