Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Conserved Genetic Architecture Underlying Individual Recombination Rate Variation in a Wild Population of Soay Sheep ( Ovis aries )

Susan E Johnston, Camillo Bérénos, Jon Slate and 1 more

Genetics · 2016

doi:10.1534/genetics.115.185553

Abstract

Meiotic recombination breaks down linkage disequilibrium (LD) and forms new haplotypes, meaning that it is an important driver of diversity in eukaryotic genomes. Understanding the causes of variation in recombination rate is important in interpreting and predicting evolutionary phenomena and in understanding the potential of a population to respond to selection. However, despite attention in model systems, there remains little data on how recombination rate varies at the individual level in natural populations. Here we used extensive pedigree and high-density SNP information in a wild population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to investigate the genetic architecture of individual autosomal recombination rates. Individual rates were high relative to other mammal systems and were higher in males than in females (autosomal map lengths of 3748 and 2860 cM, respectively). The heritability of autosomal recombination rate was low but significant in both sexes (h2 = 0.16 and 0.12 in females and males, respectively). In females, 46.7% of the heritable variation was explained by a subtelomeric region on chromosome 6; a genome-wide association study showed the strongest associations at locus RNF212, with further associations observed at a nearby ∼374-kb region of complete LD containing three additional candidate loci, CPLX1, GAK, and PCGF3. A second region on chromosome 7 containing REC8 and RNF212B explained 26.2% of the heritable variation in recombination rate in both sexes. Comparative analyses with 40 other sheep breeds showed that haplotypes associated with recombination rates are both old and globally distributed. Both regions have been implicated in rate variation in mice, cattle, and humans, suggesting a common genetic architecture of recombination rate variation in mammals.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 68

  1. 1.

    Akaike H., 1974 A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19: 716–723.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Aulchenko Y. S. Ripke S. Isaacs A. van Duijn C. M., 2007 GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294–1296.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Barton N. H., 1998 Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986–1990.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Baudat F. Buard J. Grey C. Fledel-Alon A. Ober C., 2010 PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–840.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1183439

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Brandvain Y. Coop G., 2012 Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates. Genetics 190: 709–723.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.111.136721

  8. 8.

    Browning S. R. Browning B. L., 2007 Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81: 1084–1097.

    Not in our library10.1086/521987

  9. 9.

    Burt A., 2000 Sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection: was Weismann right? Evolution 54: 337–351.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00038.x

  10. 10.

    Burt A. Bell G., 1987 Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326: 803–805.

    Not in our library10.1038/326803a0

  11. 11.

    Burt A. Bell G. Harvey P. H., 1991 Sex differences in recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 259–277.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Butler D. G. Cullis B. R. Gilmour A. R. Gogel B. J., 2009 Mixed Models for S Language Environments: ASReml-R Reference Manual. State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane, Australia.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Charlesworth B. Barton N. H., 1996 Recombination load associated with selection for increased recombination. Genet. Res. Cambr. 67: 27–41.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672300033450

  14. 14.

    Clutton-Brock T. Pemberton J. Coulson T. N. Stevenson I. R. MacColl A. D. C., 2004 The sheep of St. Kilda, pp. 17–51 in Soay Sheep: Dynamics and Selection in an Island Population, Vol. 2, edited by Clutton-Brock T. H. Pemberton J. M. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Crow J. F. Kimura M., 1965 Evolution in sexual and asexual populations. Am. Nat. 99: 439–450.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.
    Ensembl 2015 · 2014
    No notice
  17. 17.

    Devlin A. B. Roeder K. Devlin B., 1999 Genomic control for association. Biometrics 55: 997–1004.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x

  18. 18.

    Dumont B. L. Broman K. W. Payseur B. A., 2009 Variation in genomic recombination rates among heterogeneous stock mice. Genetics 182: 1345–1349.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.109.105114

  19. 19.

    Falconer D. S. Mackay T. F. C., 1996 Variance, pp. 122–144 in Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ed. 4 Pearson Prentice Hall, Essex, UK.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Felsenstein J., 1974 The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737–756.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/78.2.737

  21. 21.

    Feulner P. G. D. Gratten J. Kijas J. W. Visscher P. M. Pemberton J. M., 2013 Introgression and the fate of domesticated genes in a wild mammal population. Mol. Ecol. 22: 4210–4221.

    Not in our library10.1111/mec.12378

  22. 22.
  23. 23.

    Goddard M. E. Hayes B. J., 2009 Genomic selection based on dense genotypes inferred from sparse genotypes. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet 18: 26–29.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Green P. Falls K. Crooks S., 1990 Documentation for CRIMAP, Version 2.4. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Hassold T. Hunt P., 2001 To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 280–291.

    Not in our library10.1038/35066065

  26. 26.

    Henderson C. R., 1975 Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423–447.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Hill W. G. Robertson A., 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269–294.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Inoue K. Lupski J. R., 2002 Molecular mechanisms for genomic disorders. Ann. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 3: 199–242.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genom.3.032802.120023

  29. 29.

    Jiang Y. Xie M. Chen W. Talbot R. Maddox J. F., 2014 The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science 344: 1168–1173.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1252806

  30. 30.

    Johnston S. E. Gratten J. Berenos C. Pilkington J. G. Clutton-Brock T. H., 2013 Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502: 93–95.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12489

  31. 31.
  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    Koehler K. E. Hawley R. S. Sherman S. Hassold T., 1996 Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5: 1495–1504.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/5.supplement_1.1495

  34. 34.

    Kong A. Gudbjartsson D. F. Sainz J. Jonsdottir G. M. Gudjonsson S. A., 2002 A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31: 241–247.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng917

  35. 35.

    Kong A. Barnard J. Gudbjartsson D. F. Thorleifsson G. Jonsdottir G., 2004 Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans. Nat. Genet. 36: 1203–1206.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1445

  36. 36.

    Kong A. Thorleifsson G. Stefansson H. Masson G. Helgason A., 2008 Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Science 319: 1398–1401.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1152422

  37. 37.

    Kong A. Thorleifsson G. Frigge M. L. Masson G. Gudbjartsson D. F., 2014 Common and low-frequency variants associated with genome-wide recombination rate. Nat. Genet. 46: 11–16.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2833

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Li Y. Willer C. J. Ding J. Scheet P. Abecasis G. R., 2010 MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet. Epidemiol. 34: 816–834.

    Not in our library10.1002/gepi.20533

  40. 40.
  41. 41.

    Maddox J. F. Davies K. P. Crawford A. M. Hulme D. J. Vaiman D., 2001 An enhanced linkage map of the sheep genome comprising more than 1000 loci. Genome Res. 11: 1275–1289.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.135001

  42. 42.

    Mank J. E., 2009 The evolution of heterochiasmy: the role of sexual selection and sperm competition in determining sex-specific recombination rates in eutherian mammals. Genet. Res. 91: 355–363.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672309990255

  43. 43.

    Manolio T. A. Colling F. S. Cox N. J. Goldstein D. B. Hindorff L. A., 2009 Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461: 747–753.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08494

  44. 44.

    McPhee C. P. Robertson A., 1970 The effect of suppressing crossing-over on the response to selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 16: 1–16.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672300002238

  45. 45.

    Morelli M. A. Cohen P. E., 2005 Not all germ cells are created equal: aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis. Reproduction 130: 761–781.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep.1.00865

  46. 46.

    Moskvina V. Schmidt K. M., 2008 On multiple-testing correction in genome-wide association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 32: 567–573.

    Not in our library10.1002/gepi.20331

  47. 47.

    Muller H., 1964 The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1: 2–9.

    Not in our library10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8

  48. 48.

    Muñoz-Fuentes V. Marcet-Ortega M. Alkorta-Aranburu G. Linde Forsberg C. Morrell J. M., 2015 Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32: 510–523.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msu322

  49. 49.

    Nagamine Y. Pong-Wong R. Navarro P. Vitart V. Hayward C., 2012 Localising loci underlying complex trait variation using regional genomic relationship mapping. PLoS One 7: e46501.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0046501

  50. 50.

    Nagaoka S. I. Hassold T. J. Hunt P. A., 2012 Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 493–504.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3245

  51. 51.

    Nagel A. C. Fischer P. Szawinski J. Rosa M. K. L. Preiss A., 2012 Cyclin G is involved in meiotic recombination repair in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Sci. 125: 5555–5563.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.113902

  52. 52.

    Otto S. P. Barton N. H., 2001 Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55: 1921–1931.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01310.x

  53. 53.

    Otto S. P. Lenormand T., 2002 Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 252–261.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg761

  54. 54.

    Paigen K. Petkov P., 2010 Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 221–233.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2712

  55. 55.

    Parisi S. Mckay M. J. Molnar M. Thompson M. A. van der Spek P. J., 1999 Rec8p, a meiotic recombination and sister chromatid cohesion phosphoprotein of the Rad21p family conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 3515–3528.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.19.5.3515

  56. 56.

    Pausch H. Aigner B. Emmerling R. Edel C. Götz K.-U., 2013 Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population. Genet. Sel. Evol. 45: 3.

    Not in our library10.1186/1297-9686-45-3

  57. 57.

    Poissant J. Hogg J. T. Davis C. S. Miller J. M. Maddox J. F., 2010 Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep. BMC Genomics 11: 524.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-11-524

  58. 58.

    Preston B. T. Stevenson I. R. Pemberton J. M. Wilson K., 2001 Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409: 681–682.

    Not in our library10.1038/35055617

  59. 59.

    Reynolds A. Qiao H. Yang Y. Chen J. K. Jackson N., 2013 RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat. Genet. 45: 269–278.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2541

  60. 60.

    Ross-Ibarra J., 2004 The evolution of recombination under domestication: a test of two hypotheses. Am. Nat. 163: 105–112.

    Not in our library10.1086/380606

  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.

    Shin J. Blay S. McNeney B. Graham J., 2006 LDheatmap: an R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J. Stat. Softw. 16: Code Snippet 3.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    Stevenson I. R. Marrow B. Preston B. T. Pemberton J. M. Wilson K., 2004 Adaptive reproductive strategies, pp. 243–275 in Soay Sheep: Dynamics and Selection in an Island Population, Vol. 2, edited by Clutton-Brock T. H. Pemberton J. M. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Tankimanova M. Hultén M. A. Tease C., 2004 The initiation of homologous chromosome synapsis in mouse fetal oocytes is not directly driven by centromere and telomere clustering in the bouquet. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 105: 172–181.

    Not in our library10.1159/000078187

  66. 66.

    Trivers R., 1988 Sex differences in rates of recombination and sexual selection, pp. 270–286 in The Evolution of Sex, edited by Michod R. Levin B. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, MA.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Yang J. Lee S. H. Goddard M. E. Visscher P. M., 2011 GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88: 76–82.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011

  68. 68.

    Yokobayashi S. Liang C. Y. Kohler H. Nestorov P. Liu Z., 2013 PRC1 coordinates timing of sexual differentiation of female primordial germ cells. Nature 495: 236–240.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11918

Cited by papers we hold 8

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.