Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Genetic Recombination Is Targeted towards Gene Promoter Regions in Dogs

Adam Auton, Ying Rui Li, Jeffrey Kidd and 9 more

PLoS Genetics · 2013 · CC BY

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003984

Abstract

The identification of the H3K4 trimethylase, PRDM9, as the gene responsible for recombination hotspot localization has provided considerable insight into the mechanisms by which recombination is initiated in mammals. However, uniquely amongst mammals, canids appear to lack a functional version of PRDM9 and may therefore provide a model for understanding recombination that occurs in the absence of PRDM9, and thus how PRDM9 functions to shape the recombination landscape. We have constructed a fine-scale genetic map from patterns of linkage disequilibrium assessed using high-throughput sequence data from 51 free-ranging dogs, Canis lupus familiaris. While broad-scale properties of recombination appear similar to other mammalian species, our fine-scale estimates indicate that canine highly elevated recombination rates are observed in the vicinity of CpG rich regions including gene promoter regions, but show little association with H3K4 trimethylation marks identified in spermatocytes. By comparison to genomic data from the Andean fox, Lycalopex culpaeus, we show that biased gene conversion is a plausible mechanism by which the high CpG content of the dog genome could have occurred.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 35

  1. 1.

    Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, et al (2010 ) Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876–879.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1182363

  2. 2.

    Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al (2010 ) PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–840.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1183439

  3. 3.

    Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K (2010 ) Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327: 835.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1181495

  4. 4.

    Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, et al (2011 ) Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472: 375–378.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09869

  5. 5.

    Buard J, Barthes P, Grey C, de Massy B (2009 ) Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J 28: 2616–2624.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2009.207

  6. 6.

    Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV (2012 ) Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485: 642–645.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11089

  7. 7.

    Berg IL, Neumann R, Lam KW, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, et al (2010 ) PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nat Genet 42: 859–863.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.658

  8. 8.

    Berg IL, Neumann R, Sarbajna S, Odenthal-Hesse L, Butler NJ, et al (2011 ) Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 12378–12383.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1109531108

  9. 9.

    Hinch AG, Tandon A, Patterson N, Song Y, Rohland N, et al (2011 ) The landscape of recombination in African Americans. Nature 476: 170–175.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10336

  10. 10.

    Auton A, Fledel-Alon A, Pfeifer S, Venn O, Segurel L, et al (2012 ) A fine-scale chimpanzee genetic map from population sequencing. Science 336: 193–198.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1216872

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J (2009 ) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science 323: 373–375.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1163601

  13. 13.

    Axelsson E, Webster MT, Ratnakumar A, Ponting CP, Lindblad-Toh K (2012 ) Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome. Genome Res 22: 51–63.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.124123.111

  14. 14.

    Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, Donnelly P (2005 ) A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science 310: 321–324.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1117196

  15. 15.

    McVean GA, Myers SR, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Bentley DR, et al (2004 ) The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome. Science 304: 581–584.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1092500

  16. 16.

    Jeffreys AJ, Neumann R, Panayi M, Myers S, Donnelly P (2005 ) Human recombination hot spots hidden in regions of strong marker association. Nat Genet 37: 601–606.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1565

  17. 17.

    Boyko AR, Boyko RH, Boyko CM, Parker HG, Castelhano M, et al (2009 ) Complex population structure in African village dogs and its implications for inferring dog domestication history. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 13903–13908.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0902129106

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    Wong AK, Ruhe AL, Dumont BL, Robertson KR, Guerrero G, et al (2010 ) A comprehensive linkage map of the dog genome. Genetics 184: 595–605.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.109.106831

  20. 20.

    Jensen-Seaman MI, Furey TS, Payseur BA, Lu Y, Roskin KM, et al (2004 ) Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Genome Res 14: 528–538.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.1970304

  21. 21.

    Myers S, Freeman C, Auton A, Donnelly P, McVean G (2008 ) A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nat Genet 40: 1124–1129.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.213

  22. 22.

    The International HapMap Consortium (2007 ) A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449: 851–861.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06258

  23. 23.

    Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, et al (2005 ) Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438: 803–819.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04338

  24. 24.

    Duret L, Galtier N (2009 ) Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 285–311.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-genom-082908-150001

  25. 25.

    Han L, Zhao Z (2009 ) Contrast features of CpG islands in the promoter and other regions in the dog genome. Genomics 94: 117–124.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.04.007

  26. 26.

    Han L, Su B, Li WH, Zhao Z (2008 ) CpG island density and its correlations with genomic features in mammalian genomes. Genome Biol 9: R79.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r79

  27. 27.

    Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau HG, et al (2011 ) A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144: 719–731.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009

  28. 28.

    Tischfield SE, Keeney S (2012 ) Scale matters: the spatial correlation of yeast meiotic DNA breaks with histone H3 trimethylation is driven largely by independent colocalization at promoters. Cell Cycle 11: 1496–1503.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.19733

  29. 29.

    Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y (2005 ) A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438: 374–378.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04112

  30. 30.

    Gray AP (1954) Mammalian hybrids; a check-list with bibliography. Farnham Royal, Bucks,: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. x, 144 p. p.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Li H, Durbin R (2009 ) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

  32. 32.

    McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, et al (2010 ) The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20: 1297–1303.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.107524.110

  33. 33.

    Browning BL, Yu Z (2009 ) Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 85: 847–861.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.004

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Kirkness EF, Bafna V, Halpern AL, Levy S, Remington K, et al (2003 ) The dog genome: survey sequencing and comparative analysis. Science 301: 1898–1903.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1086432

Cited by papers we hold 10

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.