Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 2, 2026.

Distinct roles for DNA-PK, ATM and ATR in RPA phosphorylation and checkpoint activation in response to replication stress

S. Liu, S. O. Opiyo, K. Manthey and 7 more

Nucleic Acids Research · 2012 · CC BY-NC

doi:10.1093/nar/gks849

Abstract

DNA damage encountered by DNA replication forks poses risks of genome destabilization, a precursor to carcinogenesis. Damage checkpoint systems cause cell cycle arrest, promote repair and induce programed cell death when damage is severe. Checkpoints are critical parts of the DNA damage response network that act to suppress cancer. DNA damage and perturbation of replication machinery causes replication stress, characterized by accumulation of single-stranded DNA bound by replication protein A (RPA), which triggers activation of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) and phosphorylation of the RPA32, subunit of RPA, leading to Chk1 activation and arrest. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) [a kinase related to ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATR] has well characterized roles in DNA double-strand break repair, but poorly understood roles in replication stress-induced RPA phosphorylation. We show that DNA-PKcs mutant cells fail to arrest replication following stress, and mutations in RPA32 phosphorylation sites targeted by DNA-PKcs increase the proportion of cells in mitosis, impair ATR signaling to Chk1 and confer a G2/M arrest defect. Inhibition of ATR and DNA-PK (but not ATM), mimic the defects observed in cells expressing mutant RPA32. Cells expressing mutant RPA32 or DNA-PKcs show sustained H2AX phosphorylation in response to replication stress that persists in cells entering mitosis, indicating inappropriate mitotic entry with unrepaired damage.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 77

  1. 1.

    Allen C, Ashley AK, Hromas R, Nickoloff JA. More forks on the road to replication stress recovery. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;3:4-12.

    Not in our library10.1093/jmcb/mjq049

  2. 2.

    Budzowska M, Kanaar R. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2009;53:17-31.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12013-008-9039-y

  3. 3.

    Popescu NC. Chromosome fragility and instability in human cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 1994;5:121-140.

    Not in our library10.1615/critrevoncog.v5.i2-3.20

  4. 4.

    Shen Z, Nickoloff JA, Wei Q, Li L, Chen DJ. DNA Repair, Genetic Instability, and Cancer. 2007;119-156.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Bosco EE, Mayhew CN, Hennigan RF, Sage J, Jacks T, Knudsen ES. RB signaling prevents replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks following genotoxic insult. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:25-34.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkg919

  6. 6.

    Ward J, Nickoloff JA, Hoekstra MF. DNA Damage and Repair: DNA Repair in Higher Eukaryotes. 1998;Vol. 2:65-84.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Limoli CL, Giedzinski E, Bonner WM, Cleaver JE. UV-induced replication arrest in the xeroderma pigmentosum variant leads to DNA double-strand breaks, g-H2AX* formation, and Mre11 relocalization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:233-238.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.231611798

  8. 8.

    Warmerdam DO, Kanaar R. Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways. Mutat. Res. 2010;704:2-11.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.001

  9. 9.

    Luo Y, Leverson JD. New opportunities in chemosensitization and radiosensitization: modulating the DNA-damage response. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2005;5:333-342.

    Not in our library10.1586/14737140.5.2.333

  10. 10.

    Merry C, Fu K, Wang J, Yeh IJ, Zhang Y. Targeting the checkpoint kinase Chk1 in cancer therapy. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:279-283.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.9.2.10445

  11. 11.

    Karmakar P, Piotrowski J, Brosh RM, Sommers JA, Miller SP, Cheng WH, Snowden CM, Ramsden DA, Bohr VA. Werner protein is a target of DNA-dependent protein kinase in vivo and in vitro, and its catalytic activities are regulated by phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:18291-18302.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m111523200

  12. 12.

    Finnie NJ, Gottlieb TM, Blunt T, Jeggo PA, Jackson SP. DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is absent in xrs-6 cells: implications for site-specific recombination and DNA double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:320-324.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.1.320

  13. 13.

    Peterson SR, Kurimasa A, Oshimura M, Dynan WS, Bradbury EM, Chen DJ. Loss of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase in DNA double-strand-break-repair mutant mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:3171-3174.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.8.3171

  14. 14.

    Sipley JD, Menninger JC, Hartley KO, Ward DC, Jackson SP, Anderson CW. Gene for the catalytic subunit of the human DNA-activated protein kinase maps to the site of the XRCC7 gene on chromosome 8. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:7515-7519.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.92.16.7515

  15. 15.

    Shrivastav M, De Haro LP, Nickoloff JA. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res. 2008;18:134-147.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2007.111

  16. 16.

    Allen C, Kurimasa A, Brenneman MA, Chen DJ, Nickoloff JA. DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:3758-3763.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.052545899

  17. 17.

    Saleh-Gohari N, Bryant HE, Schultz N, Parker KM, Cassel TN, Helleday T. Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:7158-7169.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.25.16.7158-7169.2005

  18. 18.

    Zou L, Elledge SJ. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science. 2003;300:1542-1548.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1083430

  19. 19.

    Shao RG, Cao CX, Zhang H, Kohn KW, Wold MS, Pommier Y. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J. 1999;18:1397-1406.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/18.5.1397

  20. 20.

    Block WD, Yu Y, Lees-Miller SP. Phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-like serine/threonine protein kinases (PIKKs) are required for DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of the 32 kDa subunit of replication protein A at threonine 21. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:997-1005.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkh265

  21. 21.

    Wang H, Guan J, Perrault AR, Wang Y, Iliakis G. Replication protein A2 phosphorylation after DNA damage by the coordinated action of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and DNA-dependent protein kinase. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8554-8563.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Robison JG, Elliott J, Dixon K, Oakley GG. Replication protein A and the Mre11.Rad50.Nbs1 complex co-localize and interact at sites of stalled replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:34802-34810.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m404750200

  23. 23.

    Reinhardt HC, Yaffe MB. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009;21:245-255.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.018

  24. 24.

    Fang F, Newport JW. Distinct roles of cdk2 and cdc2 in RP-A phosphorylation during the cell cycle. J. Cell Sci. 1993;106(Pt 3):983-994.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.106.3.983

  25. 25.

    Oakley GG, Patrick SM, Yao J, Carty MP, Turchi JJ, Dixon K. RPA phosphorylation in mitosis alters DNA binding and protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 2003;42:3255-3264.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi026377u

  26. 26.

    Niu H, Erdjument-Bromage H, Pan ZQ, Lee SH, Tempst P, Hurwitz J. Mapping of amino acid residues in the p34 subunit of human single-stranded DNA-binding protein phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase and Cdc2 kinase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:12634-12641.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.272.19.12634

  27. 27.

    Dutta A, Stillman B. cdc2 family kinases phosphorylate a human cell DNA replication factor, RPA, and activate DNA replication. EMBO J. 1992;11:2189-2199.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05278.x

  28. 28.

    Zernik-Kobak M, Vasunia K, Connelly M, Anderson CW, Dixon K. Sites of UV-induced phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of replication protein A from HeLa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:23896-23904.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.272.38.23896

  29. 29.

    Anantha RW, Vassin VM, Borowiec JA. Sequential and synergistic modification of human RPA stimulates chromosomal DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:35910-35923.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m704645200

  30. 30.

    Oakley GG, Loberg LI, Yao J, Risinger MA, Yunker RL, Zernik-Kobak M, Khanna KK, Lavin MF, Carty MP, Dixon K. UV-induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein a depends on DNA replication and expression of ATM protein. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:1199-1213.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.12.5.1199

  31. 31.

    Olson E, Nievera CJ, Klimovich V, Fanning E, Wu X. RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:39517-39533.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m605121200

  32. 32.

    Cruet-Hennequart S, Glynn MT, Murillo LS, Coyne S, Carty MP. Enhanced DNA-PK-mediated RPA2 hyperphosphorylation in DNA polymerase *eta-deficient human cells treated with cisplatin and oxaliplatin. DNA Repair. 2008;7:582-596.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.12.012

  33. 33.

    Wu X, Yang Z, Liu Y, Zou Y. Preferential localization of hyperphosphorylated replication protein A to double-strand break repair and checkpoint complexes upon DNA damage. Biochem. J. 2005;391:473-480.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20050379

  34. 34.

    Oakley GG, Patrick SM. Replication protein A: directing traffic at the intersection of replication and repair. Front. Biosci. 2010;15:883-900.

    Not in our library10.2741/3652

  35. 35.

    Liaw H, Lee D, Myung K. DNA-PK-dependent RPA2 hyperphosphorylation facilitates DNA repair and suppresses sister chromatid exchange. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21424.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0021424

  36. 36.

    Shrivastav M, Miller CA, De Haro LP, Durant ST, Chen BP, Chen DJ, Nickoloff JA. DNA-PKcs and ATM co-regulate DNA double-strand break repair. DNA Repair. 2009;8:920-929.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.05.006

  37. 37.

    Mendez J, Stillman B. Chromatin association of human origin recognition complex, cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins during the cell cycle: assembly of prereplication complexes in late mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:8602-8612.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.20.22.8602-8612.2000

  38. 38.

    Unsal-Kacmaz K, Sancar A. Quaternary structure of ATR and effects of ATRIP and replication protein A on its DNA binding and kinase activities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:1292-1300.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.24.3.1292-1300.2003

  39. 39.

    Nghiem P, Park PK, Kim Y, Vaziri C, Schreiber SL. ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:9092-9097.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.161281798

  40. 40.

    Peng Y, Woods RG, Beamish H, Ye R, Lees-Miller SP, Lavin MF, Bedford JS. Deficiency in the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase causes down-regulation of ATM. Cancer Res. 2005;65:1670-1677.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3451

All 77 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.