No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
DNA-PKcs: A Multi-Faceted Player in DNA Damage Response
Xiaoqiao Yue, Chenjun Bai, Dafei Xie and 2 more
Frontiers in Genetics · 2020 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinase family, which can phosphorylate more than 700 substrates. As the core enzyme, DNA-PKcs forms the active DNA-PK holoenzyme with the Ku80/Ku70 heterodimer to play crucial roles in cellular DNA damage response (DDR). Once DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) occur in the cells, DNA-PKcs is promptly recruited into damage sites and activated. DNA-PKcs is auto-phosphorylated and phosphorylated by Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated at multiple sites, and phosphorylates other targets, participating in a series of DDR and repair processes, which determine the cells’ fates: DSBs NHEJ repair and pathway choice, replication stress response, cell cycle checkpoints, telomeres length maintenance, senescence, autophagy, etc. Due to the special and multi-faceted roles of DNA-PKcs in the cellular responses to DNA damage, it is important to precisely regulate the formation and dynamic of its functional complex and activities for guarding genomic stability. On the other hand, targeting DNA-PKcs has been considered as a promising strategy of exploring novel radiosensitizers and killing agents of cancer cells. Combining DNA-PKcs inhibitors with radiotherapy can effectively enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy, offering more possibilities for cancer therapy.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Eukaryotic cells are constantly encountering various endogenous (e.g., DNA replication errors) and exogenous (ionizing radiation, chemical carcinogens, and UV) stresses of genomic DNA damage. DNA damage includes base damage, pyrimidine dimer formation, single or double strand breaks, etc. Among them, DNA double strand break (DSB) is the most serious and dangerous threat that affects the stability of the genome and cell fate. Failure to make timely and precise repairs can lead to accumulation of residual DNA damage, mutations, rearrangements, and/or loss of chromosomes, which can lead to a series of cellular consequences such as cell death, senescence, transformation, mutagenesis, or carcinogenesis. Fortunately, cells have evolved several precise DNA damage response (DDR) and repair machineries to deal with various types of DNA damages. DDRs include DNA damage sensing, initiating DNA damage signaling cascades, remodeling and relaxing chromatin around DSBs, recruiting DNA repair proteins to the damaged site, activating cell cycle checkpoints, and repairing DSB. DNA repair defects are closely related to a series of human diseases and aging. The DSBs repair pathways of eukaryotic cells mainly include the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR) and alternative end-joining.
DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is an important player in the NHEJ pathway and was also found to function in multiple nodes of DDRs. DNA-activated/or DNA-dependent protein kinase was first reported in 1985 by. They discovered this protein by chance, finding that addition of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) into the cell extracts increased the phosphorylation of certain proteins. In 1990, and identified the DNA-PK catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) with hsp90 or casein as phosphorylation substrate bait. DNA-PKcs is an abundant protein with 50,000–100,000 molecules per cell in humans. PRKDC gene mutations in patients or expression of kinase-dead DNA-PKcs protein in mice causes severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). DNA-PKcs, Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM), and ATM and RAD3 related (ATR) belong to the family of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinase (PIKK), which plays significant roles in DNA damage repair. They all harbor similar domain compositions, including a N-terminal HEAT-repeat rich segment followed by the conserved FRAP-ATM-TRRAP (FAT) domain, the kinase domain, the PIKK regulatory domain (PRD) and the FAT C-terminal motif (FATC; ). DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR preferentially phosphorylate the S/T-Q motif (serine or threonine residue followed by a glutamine). DNA-PKcs and ATM mainly mediate the repair of DNA double-strand breaks through NHEJ and HR, respectively, while ATR responds to the stalled DNA replication forks and DNA single-strand breaks. Whereas, a series of reports indicated that DNA-PKcs is also required for optimal replication stress response.
This review mainly summarized and discussed the updated accomplishments about DNA-PKcs research, including post-translation modifications and activity regulation of DNA-PKcs and its involvements in DDRs. Furthermore, considering the special role of DNA-PKcs in the DDR, we have also reviewed the progress on exploration of DNA-PKcs inhibitors as radiosensitizers for cancer radiotherapy.
Post-translational Modifications and Activation of DNA-PKcs Triggered by DNA Damage Signaling
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit belongs to the PIKKs family, and is a type of DNA-activated serine/threonine protein kinase with a molecular weight of approximately 469 kD encoded by the PRKDC or XRCC7 gene. It forms a holoenzyme DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) with the heterodimer regulatory subunits of Ku70 and Ku80(referred to as Ku together). Ku70 is encoded by XRCC6 gene and Ku80 is encoded by XRCC5. Ku70 and Ku80 have a strong affinity for DNA ends, and they also provide docking sites for other proteins during DDR.
The DNA-PKcs structure consists of an N-terminal region, a circular cradle unit, and a head unit with the kinase domain between FAT (FRAP, ATM, and TRRAP) and FATC domains. Both the N-terminal region and the cradle unit contain HEAT (Huntingtin, Elongation factor 3, regulatory subunit A of PP2A, and TOR1) repeats. Both the ABCDE and PQR phosphorylation clusters fall into the cradle unit (Figure 1;;; ).
The activity and function of DNA-PKcs in end-ligation or NHEJ aretightly regulated by phosphorylation modification. The N-terminal domain has many phosphorylation sites, DNA-PKcs can be auto-phosphorylated or phosphorylated by ATM and ATR. The FAT and FATC domains surround the catalytic domain, stabilize the conformational changes of the catalytic center and regulate kinase activity. As shown in Figure 1, the phosphorylation sites of ABCDE clusters are T2609, S2612, T2620, S2624, T2638, and T2647, and the phosphorylation sites of PQR clusters are S2023, S2029, S2041, S2051, S2053, and S2056. Among them, S2056 and T2609 are two prominent autophosphorylation sites of DNA-PKcs, both are crucial for its activity in DNA repair. The current model suggests that DNA-PKcs S2056 phosphorylation causes conformational changes, thereby promoting DNA-PK disassembly from the DSB site, allowing DNA end ligation, while the ABCDE cluster phosphorylation is required for DNA end resection. Another autophosphorylation site, T3950, is located in the kinase domain and its phosphorylation was suggested to shut down the activity of DNA-PKcs kinase.
In addition to phosphorylation modification, there are also other forms of post-translational modifications on DNA-PKcs (Table 1). Proteomics studies have revealed that DNA-PKcs are widely acetylated and ubiquitinated. Lysine acetylation is an important form of post-translational modifications and is also the most widely studied post-translational modification on histones. Proteomics showed that at least 16 lysine residues were acetylated in the DNA-PKcs. selected eight of them for further research and have confirmed that K3241 and K3260 were acetylated on DNA-PKcs. In addition, our research group also found that both PARylation and neddylation can regulate DNA-PK activity, a neddylation site was identified at K4007 within the kinase domain. PARP1-dependent DNA-PKcs PARylation can be induced by DNA damage signals and affects DNA-PKcs Ser2056 phosphorylation in cells. DNA-PKcs neddylation occurs in the kinase domain and is catalyzed by HUWE1 ligase. In 2014, the ring finger protein 144A (RNF144A) was discovered as the first E3 ubiquitin ligase of cytoplasmic DNA-PKcs. RNF144A is induced in a p53-dependent manner during DNA damage and targets cytoplasmic DNA-PKcs for ubiquitination and degradation.
Considering the close relationship between DNA-PKcs and DSB, it is particularly important to determine the mechanism controlling DNA-PKcs activation. In the cellular response to DSB, Ku heterodimer recognizes and localizes DNA damage sites, and promptly recruits DNA-PKcs. Once DNA-PKcs is recruited, it is activated through phosphorylation in a DNA-dependent manner. The C-terminal 178 amino acid residues of Ku80 is required for Ku80/DNA-PKcs interaction and indispensable for DNA-PKcs activation. DNA-PKcs pushes Ku protein inwards onto the DNA, and then phosphorylates the other components nearby, including its own phosphorylation. DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation can be regulated by N-terminal conformational changes of protein. In addition to the automatic regulation of DNA-PKcs, many other factors are also suggested to be key regulators of DNA-PKcs activity. For example, epidermal growth factor (EGFR) can bind DNA-PKcs and enhance the activity of DNA-PKcs to deal with the damage. The non-kinase regulator protein phosphatase 6 (PP6) and protein phosphatase 1(PP1) is recruited to the DSB site and promotes DNA-PKcs activity through direct interaction and dephosphorylation action. Thus, the activation of DNA-PKcs is not only the result of binding to the broken DNA ends, but also a complex process affected by many factors. The multiple mechanistic ways of activation suggest that there are many unknown functions waiting to be explored in DNA-PKcs in addition to participating in double-strand break repair.
Regulation of DNA Damage Response by DNA-PKcs
Current knowledge displays that DNA-PKcs can function in multiple pathways of cellular DDRs to maintain the genome stability and cell survival.
DNA-PKcs in Non-homologous End Joining
There are two major repair pathways for DSB: NHEJ and HR (Figure 2). NHEJ repair is an error-prone repair pathway and theoretically executes its function throughout the cell cycle, but it is most important during G1 when no homologous template for recombination is available. HR performs under the guidance of an intact homologous template DNA, and it is known as an error-free repair pathway. HR is most active in the S/G2 phase and nearly absent in G1 phase. As a main DSB repair pathway in mammals, NHEJ is initiated by the circular Ku70/Ku80 heterodimer binding to the broken DNA ends. Ku has a high abundance and strong affinity for free DNA. Within a second or less, Ku proteins can associate with any DSB that occurs in the nuclei genomic DNA. The interaction of Ku and broken DNA recruits DNA-PKcs to form DNA-PK complex, then a set of NHEJ downstream factors including Artemis, XRCC4, DNA polymerase X family, and DNA ligase IV to join the broken DNA ends. DNA-PKcs is the only active protein kinase described in the NHEJ pathway, it is autophosphorylated in the presence of DNA termini, Mg2+ and ATP. DNA-PKcs forms a tight complex with Artemis to stimulate the nuclease activity of the latter. In this process, DNA-PKcs phosphorylates the C-terminal inhibitory region of Artemis, facilitating the dissociation of the inhibitory region from the N-terminal catalytic domain. Ionizing radiation-induced DNA DSB broken ends are usually described as “dirty ends” and incompatibility for ends direct ligation caused by chemical modifications and 5′ or 3′ mismatching overhangs. The activated Artemis processes these “dirty ends” for subsequent ligation. DNA-PKcs kinase activity becomes necessary for direct end-ligation of NHEJ in the presence of DNA-PK protein. The DNA-PKcsKD/KD (kinase-dead mutant) cells show severe end-ligation defects.
Usually, NHEJ takes the first action to respond to the DSB. If NHEJ cannot be completed, then DSB “cuts,” where one strand of the DNA duplex is degraded to produce a single-stranded DNA overhang suitable for alternative repair pathways, HR occurs. Experiments have shown that NHEJ is much faster than HR and occurs within 30 min (while HR requires 7 h or more), accounting for approximately 75% of repair events. NHEJ repair does not use sequence homology, regardless of the position or sequence, the DNA break ends are brought together, so this type of repair is prone to errors.
Regulation of DNA-PKcs on the Pathway Choice of DSBs Repair
Homologous recombination repair is initiated by DSB end resection. MRE11 and CtIP together with EXO1 fulfill the DNA end resection process. It is usually acknowledged that the interaction between 53BP1 and BRCA1 is an important factor to control the end resection. BRCA1 antagonizes certain functions of 53BP1 and promotes HR by reducing 53BP1-mediated NHEJ. After end resection, HR uses the undamaged homologous DNA as a template, and recombinase RAD51 invades the homologous DNA strand, resulting in precise repair.
How cells select the pathway to execute DSBs repair between HR and NHEJ is a critical issue for efficient and precise repair of DSBs, whereas its mechanism is not fully understood yet. The initiation of DNA end resection is a definite factor that enables the cells to perform HR repair to prevent NHEJ repair. There are many factors that affect the initiation of end resection, but DNA-PKcs phosphorylation status is a clear factor that impacts cells to choose NHEJ or HR. A series of reports indicated that DNA-PKcs can regulate the choice of DSBs repair pathways at multiple biochemical nodes in association with the cell cycle. In the G2 phase of cell cycle, autophosphorylation of DNA-PKcs promotes DNA-PKcs dissociation from the DSBs sites, and facilitates the recruitment of end resection enzymes such as EXO1. DNA-PKcs also promotes end-resection from in vitro analyses. The DNA-PKcs mutant that makes autophosphorylation defective at the ABCDE cluster (DNA-PKcs ABCDE 6A) binds DSBs but precludes the completion of NHEJ, significantly reducing DSB end resection at all DSBs. Whereas in developing lymphocytes, robust end-resection is detected in both DNA-PKcs kinase-dead or the phosphorylation (ABCDE) mutant. ATM kinase activity can compensate for DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation when DNA-PKcs activity is inhibited and promote resection. The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex further stimulates resection in the presence of Ku and DNA-PKcs by recruiting EXO1 and enhancing DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation, and it also inhibits DNA ligase IV/XRCC4-mediated end rejoining. In the S phase of cell cycle, BRCA1 interacts with DNA-PKcs and directly blocks DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation, thus priming DNA end resection for HR and HR factors loading on DSBs (; Figure 2). The interaction of TIP60 histone acetyltransferase and DNA-PKcs prompts the autophosphorylation and activation of DNA-PKcs. We recently revealed that an increased SUMO2 modification of TIP60 K430 mediated by PISA4 E3 ligase hinders its interaction with DNA-PKcs in S phase cells, leading to impediment of DNA-PKcs S2056 autophosphorylation and preferentially employing the HR pathway for DSBs repair in S phase (Figure 3). TIP60 K430R mutation can recover the interaction of DNA-PKcs and TIP60, resulting in abnormally increased phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs S2056 in S phase and dramatical inhibition of HR efficiency.
Meanwhile, HR activity in G1 is restricted. found that DNA-PKcs phosphorylates ATM directly, inhibiting ATM activity and ATM signaling upon DNA damage, providing a possible mechanism of HR restriction in G1 phase. Moreover, our recent report demonstrated that EXO1 protein is strictly suppressed in G1 phase. Increased expression of RBX1 protein prompts the neddylation and activity of cullin1, a key component of the Skp1-Cullin1-F-box (SCF) ubiquitin 3 ligase, and consequently mediates the ubiquitination degradation of EXO1 in G1 phase. Increased DNA-PKcs activity is responsible for increased RBX1 protein expression, and limiting the formation of DSB-end ssDNA by EXO1 and suppressing the HR repair pathway in G1 cells(Figure 3; ).
DNA-PKcs in DNA Replication Stress
In addition to the role in DSB repair, DNA-PKcs is also involved in DNA replication stress response. Cells are particularly susceptible to DNA damage during the process of DNA replication. Almost all forms of DNA damage can disturb the DNA replication and cause replication stress.
Replication stress is defined as any DNA replication barrier that hinders, prevents or terminates DNA synthesis, and can activate the replication stress response to resolve the damage. Replicating stress checkpoint (S-phase checkpoint) involves the gradual activation of damage sensors, mediators and effectors. Replication protein A (RPA) binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), recruiting numerous sensor proteins including ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)-interacting protein (ATRIP), the 9-1-1 DNA clamp complex (RAD9-RAD1-HUS1), topoisomerase II binding protein 1 (TOPBP1) and Ewing tumor-associated antigen 1 (ETAA1), etc., triggers ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) and phosphorylation of RPA32 (a subunit of RPA), leading to Chk1 activation.
DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is necessary for ATR-Chk1 signal transduction. Upon replication stress, the DNA-PKcs is phosphorylated by ATR at the stalled replication forks, leading to transcriptional activation of Claspin expression and Chk1-Claspin complex stability, which is required for the optimal activation of intra S-phase checkpoint. The apoptosis mediator p53-induced protein with a death domain (PIDD) mediates DNA-PKcs recruitment at the stalled replication forks, and promotes the ATR signaling pathway in the cellular response to replication pressure and the cellular resistance to replication pressure. Phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 is a key early step to fully activate ATR in response to replication stress and subsequent replication checkpoint stagnation. DNA-PK is the main kinase that targets Ser4/Ser8 in replication stress. The PIKK phosphorylation of RPA32 plays a key role in replication checkpoint activation, and DNA-PK was considered as an important contributor to this response. In addition, it was reported that ATR was critical in the early S phase, especially in cells under high replication stress; however, ATR can be circumvented by DNA-PKcs and Chk1 under moderate replication stress. They concluded distinct but concerted roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in countering replication stress.
DNA-PKcs in Autophagy
Autophagy is a physiological degradation mechanism of cells through which autophagic vesicles can deliver unfolded proteins and damaged organelles to lysosomes to eliminate them. Autophagy plays an important role in different DDR pathways. Inhibition of DNA-PKcs by bromovanin, a vanillin derivative, exhibited a potent antiproliferation effect through induction of both apoptosis and autophagy in HepG2 cells. reported that relative low-dose IR induced massive autophagic cell death in M059J cells that lack DNA-PKcs. The treatment of M059K cells with DNA-PKcs antisense oligonucleotides caused radiation-induced autophagy and radiosensitized the cells. Similar observations were also obtained by study. Inactivation or depression of DNA-PKcs increases ionizing radiation-induced cell autophagy as well as occurrence of cell apoptosis. It was found that DNA-PKcs interacts with the AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) complex and phosphorylates nucleotide-sensing γ1 subunit (protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit gamma) PRKAG1/AMPKγ1 at Ser192 and Thr284, thereby facilitating the AMPK complex activation by STK11 at lysosomal and autophagy.
The Association of DNA-PKcs With Telomeres
Telomeres are DNA–protein complexes located at the ends of chromosomes in eukaryotic cells. The major function of telomeres is to maintain the stability and integrity of chromosomes. The telomere sequence has unique characteristics, making telomeres susceptible to various DNA damages induced by the external environment and genotoxins. Any abnormality in telomere function may lead to cell aging/senescence and canceration. Telomeres can sense both intrinsic and extrinsic stresses and its dysfunction drives cell senescence. DNA-PKcs plays a role in telomere maintenance and is necessary for telomere capping. reported that hTR-mediated DNA-PKcs stimulation and subsequent hnRNP A1 phosphorylation affect the cell cycle-dependent distribution of telomeric repeat-containing RNA (TERRA) on telomeres by promoting the removal of TERRA in telomeres, which is important for the S-phase process, thereby promoting efficient telomere replication and capping. In cells lacking DNA-PKcs, uncapped telomeres are inappropriately detected and processed as DSB, and therefore not only participate in spontaneous telomere-telomere fusion, but also participate in ionizing radiation induction Telomere-DSB fusion event. The association between accelerated telomere shortening and decreased expression of DDR genes, including DNA-PKcs, Mre11, Xrcc4, etc, was found in the accelerated thymic aging of a rat model of developmental programming, suggesting DNA-PKcs may affect aging by maintaining telomeres integrity.
DNA-PKcs Functions in Cell Cycle Checkpoints
When DDR occurs, the PIKK kinases ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs coordinately play the role of maintaining genome integrity. These kinases control the repair of the broken DNA ends and transmit the damage signal through the tumor suppressor p53, CHK1/CHK2 and so on to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, or aging. In this process, DNA-PKcs works by affecting G2/M DNA damage checkpoint in ATM deficient cells. In ATM knockdown human mammary epithelial cells, either DNA-PK inhibitor treatment or RNAi knockdown of DNA-PKcs significantly attenuated G2 checkpoint. In ATM-deficient AT5BIVA cells, DNA-PKcs inhibition led to a prolonged G2/M arrest. This phenotype could also be an indirect effect of no repair due to DNA-PKcs inhibitory role in ATM phosphorylation in DDR. Inactivation of DNA-PKcs strikingly attenuated the ionizing radiation-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 or Chk2/T68 in ATM-deficient cells.
Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated, ATR, and DNA-PKcs can directly phosphorylate p53. ATM and ATR phosphorylate p53 through checkpoint kinases 2 (CHK2) and checkpoint kinases 1 (CHK1), respectively. p53 stability is mainly regulated by oncoprotein MDM2, a key negative regulator of p53. Under non-stress conditions, MDM2 and p53 N-terminal domain form a stable complex. MDM2-mediated proteasome degradation keeps p53 at a low level.
Under DNA damage stresses, p53 and MDM2 dissociate and p53 accumulates in the nucleus. p53 functions as a transcription factor to promote the expression of genes involved in DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and aging to maintain genome integrity. found that the DNA-PKcs/Ku/p53 complex may act as a sensor for DNA strand breaks caused by the incorporation of drug molecules, and then transduce signals to trigger apoptosis. found that the activation of DNA-PKcs led to the phosphorylation and activation of Akt/PKB, which subsequently led to the inactivation of GSK-3β. As a result, MDM2 is phosphorylated and p53 accumulation increases. In this regard, DNA-PKcs modulates the p53-dependent apoptosis after DNA damage. At the same time, there are two negative feedback loops between p53 and MDM2 and wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) to regulate the level of p53 protein. Wip1 de-phosphorylates MDM2 and downregulates p53 protein levels by stabilizing MDM2, facilitating its access to p53.
Targeting DNA-PKcs to Reprogram the Cellular Radiosensitivity
In the past century, radiation therapy has become the main treatment for cancer. Statistically, about 50–70% of malignant tumor patients in the world are receiving radiotherapy. However, the existence of radioresistance of cancer cells greatly hampers the efficacy and application of tumor radiotherapy. Radiation resistance is conducive to normal cells to escape the damage caused by ionizing radiation, but it is not conducive to the radiotherapy of malignant tumors.
The ability of cancer cells to repair DNA damage is a crucial factor that determines their sensitivity to radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Inhibiting the repair ability of cancer cells offers a strategy to reduce the radiation resistance of cells and improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.
DNA-dependent protein kinase has become an attractive therapeutic target in various cancer treatments, especially when used in combination with genotoxic chemotherapy or ionizing radiation. Studies have shown that targeting DNA-PKcs with various inhibitors can effectively enhance radiotherapy, and many small molecule inhibitors of DNA-PKcs have been developed and shown to be effective radiosensitizers in vitro (Table 2). One of the earliest identified inhibitors was wortmannin, which was isolated in 1957. It was defined as an effective non-competitive PI3K irreversible inhibitor in 1993, but it also targets other members of the PIKK family, including DNA-PKcs, ATM, ATR. The DNA-PK inhibitor NU7026 was reported to potentiate topo II poisons in treatment of leukemia through inhibition of NHEJ and G2/M checkpoint arrest. In preclinical evaluation of DNA-PK inhibitor NU7441, it showed sufficient chemosensitization and radiosensitization with either etoposide, doxorubicin or ionizing radiation. A highly selective DNA-PK inhibitor, AZD7648 showed efficient sensitization on radiation or doxorubicin in xenograft and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. M3814 inhibits DNA-PK catalytic activity and sensitizes various cancer cell lines to ionizing radiation (IR) and DSB inducers. In addition, LY3023414 and CC-115 are both mTOR inhibitors, but they also have inhibitory effects on DNA-PKcs and other PI3KK. It can be envisioned that the inhibition of DNA-PK shows considerable prospects in anti-tumor resistance. However, DNA-PK inhibitors are usually limited by poor pharmacokinetics: these compounds have poor solubility and unstable metabolism in the body, resulting in short serum half-life. Development of new compounds with better performance is a key step in obtaining effective anti-cancer drugs.
Future Perspectives
Over the decades, DNA-PKcs has been revealed to play multi-faceted roles and has been proved to be an essential regulator in the processes of DDR, however, there are still many unresolved questions. How does the interaction of DNA-PKcs and Ku-DNA complex leads to activation of DNA-PK protein kinase activity? There are a large number of sites and forms of post-translation modifications (PTMs) on DNA-PKcs, how these PTMs are inter-related and regulated, and how they influence DNA-PKcs functions. Are there any other DNA-PK substrates yet to be discovered? It is worth to draw the panorama of function-related DNA-PKcs interaction networks. The use of DNA-PK inhibitors for cancer therapy will not only inhibit the activity of DNA-PK in cancer cells, but also inhibit the activity of DNA-PK in normal cells. How to solve this problem? Ongoing exploration of DNA-PKcs’ multi-facet roles in DDR and besides will greatly contribute to our overall understanding of cancer and the discovery of new therapies.
Author Contributions
P-KZ conceived and designed this study. XY drafted the initial manuscript. CB and DX reviewed and commented the manuscript. TM and P-KZ critically revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References 142
- 1.
Achanta G. Pelicano H. Feng L. Plunkett W. Huang P. (2001 ). Interaction of p53 and DNA-PK in response to nucleoside analogues: potential role as a sensor complex for DNA damage. Cancer Res. 61 8723–8729.
Not in our library
- 2.
Allen C. Ashley A. K. Hromas R. Nickoloff J. A. (2011 ). More forks on the road to replication stress recovery. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 4–12.
Not in our library10.1093/jmcb/mjq049
- 3.
Anderson C. W. Lees-Miller S. P. (1992 ). The nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase DNA-PK. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2 283–314.
Not in our library
- 4.
Arlander S. J. Greene B. T. Innes C. L. Paules R. S. (2008 ). DNA protein kinase-dependent G2 checkpoint revealed following knockdown of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated in human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 68 89–97.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0675
- 5.
Baskar R. Lee K. A. Yeo R. Yeoh K. W. (2012 ). Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int. J. Med. Sci. 9 193–199.
Not in our library10.7150/ijms.3635
- 6.
Bass K. L. Murray J. M. O’Connell M. J. (2012 ). Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress. J. Cell Sci. 125(Pt 11) 2753–2764.
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.103119
- 7.
Bendell J. C. Varghese A. M. Hyman D. M. Bauer T. M. Pant S. Callies S. (2018 ). A first-in-human phase 1 study of LY3023414, an oral PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 24 3253–3262.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3421
- 8.
Blackford A. N. Jackson S. P. (2017 ). ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: the trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 66 801–817.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015
- 9.
Block W. D. Yu Y. Merkle D. Gifford J. L. Ding Q. Meek K. (2004 ). Autophosphorylation-dependent remodeling of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit regulates ligation of DNA ends. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 4351–4357.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkh761
- 10.
Blunt T. Finnie N. J. Taccioli G. E. Smith G. C. Demengeot J. Gottlieb T. M. (1995 ). Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell 80 813–823.
Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(95)90360-7
- 11.
Boehme K. A. Kulikov R. Blattner C. (2008 ). p53 stabilization in response to DNA damage requires Akt/PKB and DNA-PK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 7785–7790.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0703423105
- 12.
Buisson R. Boisvert J. L. Benes C. H. Zou L. (2015 ). Distinct but concerted roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in countering replication STRESS during S phase. Mol. Cell 59 1011–1024.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029
- 13.
Carter T. Vancurová I. Sun I. Lou W. DeLeon S. (1990 ). A DNA-activated protein kinase from HeLa cell nuclei. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 6460–6471.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.10.12.6460
- 14.
Ceccaldi R. Rondinelli B. D’Andrea A. D. (2016 ). Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends Cell Biol. 26 52–64.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009
- 15.
Chang H. H. Y. Pannunzio N. R. Adachi N. Lieber M. R. (2017 ). Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18 495–506.
Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2017.48
- 16.
Chang H. H. Lieber M. R. (2016 ). Structure-specific nuclease activities of Artemis and the Artemis: DNA-PKcs complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 4991–4997.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkw456
- 17.
Chatzidoukaki O. Goulielmaki E. Schumacher B. Garinis G. A. (2020 ). DNA damage response and metabolic reprogramming in health and disease. Trends Genet. 36 777–791.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2020.06.018
- 18.
Chen B. P. Uematsu N. Kobayashi J. Lerenthal Y. Krempler A. Yajima H. (2007 ). Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is essential for DNA-PKcs phosphorylations at the Thr-2609 cluster upon DNA double strand break. J. Biol. Chem. 282 6582–6587.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m611605200
- 19.
Chiruvella K. K. Liang Z. Wilson T. E. (2013 ). Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5:a012757.
Not in our library10.1101/cshperspect.a012757
- 20.
Chow H. M. Herrup K. (2015 ). Genomic integrity and the ageing brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16 672–684.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn4020
- 21.
Crowe J. L. Shao Z. Wang X. S. Wei P. C. Jiang W. Lee B. J. (2018 ). Kinase-dependent structural role of DNA-PKcs during immunoglobulin class switch recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 8615–8620.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1808490115
- 22.
Crowe J. L. Wang X. S. Shao Z. Lee B. J. Estes V. M. Zha S. (2020 ). DNA-PKcs phosphorylation at the T2609 cluster alters the repair pathway choice during immunoglobulin class switch recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 22953–22961.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2007455117
- 23.
Daido S. Yamamoto A. Fujiwara K. Sawaya R. Kondo S. Kondo Y. (2005 ). Inhibition of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit radiosensitizes malignant glioma cells by inducing autophagy. Cancer Res. 65 4368–4375.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-4202
- 24.
Daley J. M. Sung P. (2014 ). 53BP1, BRCA1, and the choice between recombination and end joining at DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34 1380–1388.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01639-13
- 25.
Davis A. J. Chi L. So S. Lee K. J. Mori E. Fattah K. (2014 ). BRCA1 modulates the autophosphorylation status of DNA-PKcs in S phase of the cell cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 11487–11501.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gku824
- 26.
Deshpande R. A. Myler L. R. Soniat M. M. Makharashvili N. Lee L. Lees-Miller S. P. (2020 ). DNA-dependent protein kinase promotes DNA end processing by MRN and CtIP. Sci. Adv. 6:eaay0922.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aay0922
- 27.
Ding Q. Reddy Y. V. Wang W. Woods T. Douglas P. Ramsden D. A. (2003 ). Autophosphorylation of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase is required for efficient end processing during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 5836–5848.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.23.16.5836-5848.2003
- 28.
Dobbs T. A. Tainer J. A. Lees-Miller S. P. (2010 ). A structural model for regulation of NHEJ by DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 9 1307–1314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.019
- 29.
Douglas P. Cui X. Block W. D. Yu Y. Gupta S. Ding Q. (2007 ). The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is phosphorylated in vivo on threonine 3950, a highly conserved amino acid in the protein kinase domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 1581–1591.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01962-06
- 30.
Douglas P. Sapkota G. P. Morrice N. Yu Y. Goodarzi A. A. Merkle D. (2002 ). Identification of in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation sites in the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Biochem. J. 368(Pt 1) 243–251.
Not in our library10.1042/bj20020973
- 31.
Douglas P. Zhong J. Ye R. Moorhead G. B. Xu X. Lees-Miller S. P. (2010 ). Protein phosphatase 6 interacts with the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30 1368–1381.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00741-09
- 32.
Falck J. Coates J. Jackson S. P. (2005 ). Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434 605–611.
Not in our library10.1038/nature03442
- 33.
Fang E. F. Scheibye-Knudsen M. Chua K. F. Mattson M. P. Croteau D. L. Bohr V. A. (2016 ). Nuclear DNA damage signalling to mitochondria in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17 308–321.
Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2016.14
- 34.
Featherstone C. Jackson S. P. (1999 ). Ku, a DNA repair protein with multiple cellular functions? Mutat. Res. 434 3–15.
Not in our library10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00006-3
- 35.
- 36.
Gao S. S. Guan H. Yan S. Hu S. Song M. Guo Z. P. (2020 ). TIP60 K430 SUMOylation attenuates its interaction with DNA-PKcs in S-phase cells: facilitating homologous recombination and emerging target for cancer therapy. Sci. Adv. 6:eaba7822.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aba7822
- 37.
Gomes L. R. Menck C. F. M. Leandro G. S. (2017 ). Autophagy roles in the modulation of DNA repair pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:2351.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms18112351
- 38.
Goodarzi A. A. Yu Y. Riballo E. Douglas P. Walker S. A. Ye R. (2006 ). DNA-PK autophosphorylation facilitates Artemis endonuclease activity. Embo J. 25 3880–3889.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7601255
- 39.
Goytisolo F. A. Samper E. Edmonson S. Taccioli G. E. Blasco M. A. (2001 ). The absence of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in mice results in anaphase bridges and in increased telomeric fusions with normal telomere length and G-strand overhang. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 3642–3651.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.21.11.3642-3651.2001
- 40.
Guo Z. Wang S. Xie Y. Han Y. Hu S. Guan H. (2020 ). HUWE1-dependent DNA-PKcs neddylation modulates its autophosphorylation in DNA damage response. Cell Death Dis. 11:400.
Not in our library10.1038/s41419-020-2611-0
Cited by papers we hold 4
- Doxorubicin—An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity · 2023No notice
- A new wave of innovations within the DNA damage response · 2023No notice
- DNA damage response inhibition‐based combination therapies in cancer treatment: Recent advances and future directions · 2022Not checked
- Polyglutamine Expansion in Huntingtin and Mechanism of DNA Damage Repair Defects in Huntington’s Disease · 2022Not checked
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.