Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 5, 2026.

GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update

Rod Peakall, Peter E. Smouse

Bioinformatics · 2012 · CC BY-NC

doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Summary: GenAlEx: Genetic Analysis in Excel is a cross-platform package for population genetic analyses that runs within Microsoft Excel. GenAlEx offers analysis of diploid codominant, haploid and binary genetic loci and DNA sequences. Both frequency-based (F-statistics, heterozygosity, HWE, population assignment, relatedness) and distance-based (AMOVA, PCoA, Mantel tests, multivariate spatial autocorrelation) analyses are provided. New features include calculation of new estimators of population structure: G′ST, G′′ST, Jost’s Dest and F′ST through AMOVA, Shannon Information analysis, linkage disequilibrium analysis for biallelic data and novel heterogeneity tests for spatial autocorrelation analysis. Export to more than 30 other data formats is provided. Teaching tutorials and expanded step-by-step output options are included. The comprehensive guide has been fully revised. Availability and implementation: GenAlEx is written in VBA and provided as a Microsoft Excel Add-in (compatible with Excel 2003, 2007, 2010 on PC; Excel 2004, 2011 on Macintosh). GenAlEx, and supporting documentation and tutorials are freely available at: http://biology.anu.edu.au/GenAlEx. Contact: rod.peakall@anu.edu.au

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 23

  1. 1.

    Banks SC, Peakall R. Genetic spatial autocorrelation can readily detect sex-biased dispersal. Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:2092-2105.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05485.x (opens in a new tab)

  2. 2.

    Double MC, et al. Dispersal, philopatry and infidelity: dissecting local genetic structure in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Evolution. 2005;59:625-635.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2010;10:564-567.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    Hedrick PW. Genetics of Populations. 2005.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Jost L. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 2008;17:4015-4026.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03887.x (opens in a new tab)

  6. 6.

    Jombart T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1403-1405.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 (opens in a new tab)

  7. 7.

    Lewis PO, Zaykin D. Genetic Data Analysis V1.1. 2001.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Meirmans PG. Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution. 2006;60:2399-2402.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW. Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2011;11:5-18.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02927.x (opens in a new tab)

  10. 10.

    Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH. GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2004;4:792-794.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Paradis E. pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:419-420.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp696 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.

    Peakall R, et al. Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution. 2003;57:1182-1195.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00327.x (opens in a new tab)

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Pritchard JK, et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945-959.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 (opens in a new tab)

  15. 15.

    Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2008;8:103-106.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.

    Ryman N, Leimar O. GST is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation—a comment on Jost's D. Mol. Ecol. 2009;18:2084-2087.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04187.x (opens in a new tab)

  17. 17.

    Sherwin W, et al. Measurement of biological information with applications from genes to landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 2006;15:2857-2869.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02992.x (opens in a new tab)

  18. 18.

    Slatkin M. Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008;9:477-485.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2361 (opens in a new tab)

  19. 19.

    Smouse PE, Peakall R. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity. 1999;82:561-573.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180 (opens in a new tab)

  20. 20.

    Smouse PE, Ward RH. A comparison of the genetic infrastructure of the Ye'cuana and Yanomama: a likelihood analysis of genotypic variation among populations. Genetics. 1978;88:611-631.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/88.3.611 (opens in a new tab)

  21. 21.

    Smouse PE, et al. A heterogeneity test for fine-scale genetic structure. Mol. Ecol. 2008;17:3389-3400.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03839.x (opens in a new tab)

  22. 22.

    Weir BS. Genetic Data Analysis. 1990.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Whitlock MC. G'ST and D do not replace FST. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20:1083-1091.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04996.x (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 128

and 108 more

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.