No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.
Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers
Jack H. Buckner, Gerardo Chowell, Michael R. Springborn
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021 · CC BY
Abstract
Significance Vaccines are a key intervention to reduce the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccine supply and administration capacity will initially be limited. Due to these constraints, it is critical to understand how vaccine deployment can be targeted to minimize the overall burden of disease. In this paper, we solve for optimal dynamic strategies to allocate a limited supply of vaccines over a population differentiated by age and essential worker status that minimizes the number of total deaths, years of life lost, or infections. We find that older essential workers are typically targeted first. However, depending on the objective and alternative model scenarios considered, younger essential workers may be prioritized to control spread or seniors to directly control mortality.
Full text
Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:
Read at PubMed CentralReferences 43
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abc5312
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmsb2005114
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abe5938
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmp2005630
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1175570
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9
- 10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4573
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1101/2020.08.14.20175257
- 16.
- 17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1101/2020.08.07.20170456
- 19.
- 20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002964
- 21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.17226/25914
- 23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1101/2020.06.29.20142851
- 24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2009412117
- 25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwt196
- 26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.11.032
- 32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.3138/jammi-2020-0030
- 34.
- 35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.11366
- 37.
- 38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1101/2020.06.30.20142877
- 39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 4
- Optimal spatial evaluation of a pro rata vaccine distribution rule for COVID-19 · 2023Not checked
- Novel dynamic fuzzy Decision-Making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients · 2022Not checked
- Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review · 2021Not checked
- Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus · 2021No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.