Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial

Abstract

Patient participation in medical consultations has been demonstrated to benefit their subsequent psychological well being. Question asking is one way in which patients can be active. We investigated 2 means of promoting cancer patient question asking. One was the provision of a question prompt sheet to patients prior to their initial consultation with their oncologist. The second was the active endorsement and systematic review of the question prompt sheet by their oncologist. 318 patients with heterogeneous cancers, seeing one of 5 medical and 4 radiation oncologists for the first time, were randomised to either receive or not receive a question prompt sheet. Doctors were randomised to either proactively address or passively respond to the question prompt sheet in the subsequent consultation. Anxiety was assessed prior to the consultation. Consultations were audiotaped and content analysed. Anxiety was assessed again immediately following the consultation. Within the next 10 days patients completed questionnaires assessing information needs, anxiety and satisfaction and were given a structured telephone interview assessing information recall. Patients provided with a question prompt sheet asked more questions about prognosis compared with controls and oncologists gave significantly more prognostic information to these patients. Provision of the question prompt sheet prolonged consultations and increased patient anxiety; however, when oncologists specifically addressed the prompt sheet, anxiety levels were significantly reduced, consultation duration was decreased and recall was significantly improved. A patient question prompt sheet, used proactively by the doctor, is a powerful addition to the oncology consultation.

References 19

1. 1.

   Barry C. A., Bradley C. P., Britten N., Stevenson F. A., Barber N. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1246-1250.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246

2. 2.

   Blanchard C. G., Labrecque M. S., Ruckdeschel J. C., Blanchard E. B. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990;65(1):186-192.

   Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<186::aid-cncr2820650136>3.0.co;2-4

3. 3.

   Brody H. Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1985;78(5):380-387.

   Not in our library10.1177/014107688507800507

4. 4.
   Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking · 1999

   No notice
5. 5.

   Butow P. N., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(3):199-204.

   Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058793

6. 6.

   Butow P. N., Kazemi J. N., Beeney L. J., Griffin A. M., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H. When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer. 1996;77(12):2630-2637.

   Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-s

7. 7.

   Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(6):832-836.

   Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832

8. 8.

   Dunn S. M., Butow P. N., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J., Sheldon J. S., Taylor J. J., Sumich M. D. General information tapes inhibit recall of the cancer consultation. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(11):2279-2285.

   Not in our library10.1200/jco.1993.11.11.2279

9. 9.

   Gattellari M., Butow P. N., Tattersall M. H. Informed consent: what did the doctor say? Lancet. 1999;353(9165):1713-1713.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)77027-6

10. 10.

    Kaplan S. H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W. H., Ware J. E. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(5):497-504.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-124-5-199603010-00007

11. 11.

    Korsch B. M., Gozzi E. K., Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968;42(5):855-871.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Levinson W., Stiles W. B., Inui T. S., Engle R. Physician frustration in communicating with patients. Med Care. 1993;31(4):285-295.

    Not in our library10.1097/00005650-199304000-00001

13. 13.

    Roter D. L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5(4):281-315.

    Not in our library10.1177/109019817700500402

14. 14.

    Smith C. K., Polis E., Hadac R. R. Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding. J Fam Pract. 1981;12(2):283-288.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Stiles W. B., Putnam S. M., Wolf M. H., James S. A. Interaction exchange structure and patient satisfaction with medical interviews. Med Care. 1979;17(6):667-681.

    Not in our library10.1097/00005650-197906000-00010

16. 16.

    Street R. L. Information-giving in medical consultations: the influence of patients' communicative styles and personal characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(5):541-548.

    Not in our library10.1016/0277-9536(91)90288-n

17. 17.

    Sutherland H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas H. A., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L., Till J. E. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82(5):260-263.

    Not in our library10.1177/014107688908200506

18. 18.

    Tattersall M. H., Butow P. N., Griffin A. M., Dunn S. M. The take-home message: patients prefer consultation audiotapes to summary letters. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(6):1305-1311.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.1994.12.6.1305

19. 19.

    Wriglesworth J. M., Williams J. T. The construction of an objective test to measure patient satisfaction. Int J Nurs Stud. 1975;12(3):123-132.

    Not in our library10.1016/0020-7489(75)90009-7

Cited by papers we hold 3

• What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review · 2018
  No notice
• Older cancer patients' information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals · 2009
  Not checked
• Asking questions can help: development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients · 2003
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.