Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking

R Brown, P N Butow, M J Boyer and 1 more

British Journal of Cancer · 1999 · Randomised trial

doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690346

Abstract

Active participation in the medical consultation has been demonstrated to benefit aspects of patients' subsequent psychological well-being. We investigated two interventions promoting patient question-asking behaviour. The first was a question prompt sheet provided before the consultation, which was endorsed and worked through by the clinician. The second was a face to face coaching session exploring the benefits of, and barriers to, question-asking, followed by coaching in question-asking behaviour employing rehearsal techniques. Sixty patients with heterogeneous cancers, seeing two medical oncologists for the first time, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: two intervention groups and one control group. Sociodemographic variables and anxiety were assessed prior to the intervention which preceded the consultation. The consultations were audiotaped and subsequently analysed for question-asking behaviour. Anxiety was assessed again immediately following the consultation. Questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction, anxiety and psychological adjustment were sent by mail 2 weeks following the consultation. Presentation and discussion of the prompt sheet significantly increased the total number of questions asked and the number of questions asked regarding tests and treatment. Coaching did not add significantly to the effects of the prompt sheet. Psychological outcomes were not different among the groups. We conclude that a question prompt sheet addressed by the doctor is a simple, inexpensive and effective means of promoting patient question asking in the cancer consultation.

References 19

  1. 1.

    Bertakis K. D., Roter D., Putnam S. M. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1991;32(2):175-181.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Blanchard C. G., Labrecque M. S., Ruckdeschel J. C., Blanchard E. B. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990;65(1):186-192.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<186::aid-cncr2820650136>3.0.co;2-4

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Butow P. N., Dunn S. M., Tattersall M. H., Jones Q. J. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(3):199-204.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058793

  5. 5.

    Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(6):832-836.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832

  6. 6.

    Derogatis L. R., Morrow G. R., Fetting J., Penman D., Piasetsky S., Schmale A. M., Henrichs M., Carnicke C. L. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA. 1983;249(6):751-757.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.249.6.751

  7. 7.

    Girgis A., Sanson-Fisher R. W. Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(9):2449-2456.

    Not in our library10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2449

  8. 8.

    Green L. W., Werlin S. H., Schauffler H. H., Avery C. H. Research and demonstration issues in self-care: measuring the decline of medicocentrism. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5(2):161-189.

    Not in our library10.1177/109019817700500206

  9. 9.

    Kaplan S. H., Greenfield S., Gandek B., Rogers W. H., Ware J. E. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(5):497-504.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-124-5-199603010-00007

  10. 10.

    Korsch B. M., Gozzi E. K., Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968;42(5):855-871.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Kupst M. J., Dresser K., Schulman J. L., Paul M. H. Evaluation of methods to improve communication in the physician-patient relationship. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1975;45(3):420-429.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1939-0025.1975.tb02553.x

  12. 12.

    Molleman E., Krabbendam P. J., Annyas A. A., Koops H. S., Sleijfer D. T., Vermey A. The significance of the doctor-patient relationship in coping with cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(6):475-480.

    Not in our library10.1016/0277-9536(84)90003-0

  13. 13.

    Mosconi P., Meyerowitz B. E., Liberati M. C., Liberati A. Disclosure of breast cancer diagnosis: patient and physician reports. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation, Italy). Ann Oncol. 1991;2(4):273-280.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057936

  14. 14.

    Novack D. H., Plumer R., Smith R. L., Ochitill H., Morrow G. R., Bennett J. M. Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA. 1979;241(9):897-900.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    OKEN D. What to tell cancer patients. A study of medical attitudes. JAMA. 1961;175:1120-1128.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.1961.03040130004002

  16. 16.

    Reiser S. J. Words as scalpels: transmitting evidence in the clinical dialogue. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(6):837-842.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-837

  17. 17.

    Roter D. L. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977;5(4):281-315.

    Not in our library10.1177/109019817700500402

  18. 18.

    Thomasma D. C. Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98(2):243-248.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-98-2-243

  19. 19.

    Watson M., Greer S., Young J., Inayat Q., Burgess C., Robertson B. Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med. 1988;18(1):203-209.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0033291700002026

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.