Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 30, 2026.

An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders

Lindsay M. Alexander, Jasmine Escalera, Lei Ai and 64 more

Scientific Data · 2017 · CC BY-NC-SA

doi:10.1101/149369

Abstract

Technological and methodological innovations are equipping researchers with unprecedented capabilities for detecting and characterizing pathologic processes in the developing human brain. As a result, ambitions to achieve clinically useful tools to assist in the diagnosis and management of mental health and learning disorders are gaining momentum. To this end, it is critical to accrue large-scale multimodal datasets that capture a broad range of commonly encountered clinical psychopathology. The Child Mind Institute has launched the Healthy Brain Network (HBN), an ongoing initiative focused on creating and sharing a biobank of data from 10,000 New York area participants (ages 5–21). The HBN Biobank houses data about psychiatric, behavioral, cognitive, and lifestyle phenotypes, as well as multimodal brain imaging (resting and naturalistic viewing fMRI, diffusion MRI, morphometric MRI), electroencephalography, eye-tracking, voice and video recordings, genetics and actigraphy. Here, we present the rationale, design and implementation of HBN protocols. We describe the first data release ( n =664) and the potential of the biobank to advance related areas (e.g., biophysical modeling, voice analysis).

References 92

  1. 1.

    Functional Connectomes Project International Neuroimaging Data-Sharing Initiative2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.15387/CMI_HBN

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Kessler R. C. et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 593–602 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593

  3. 3.

    Di Martino A. et al. Unraveling the miswired connectome: a developmental perspective. Neuron 83, 1335–1353 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.050

  4. 4.

    Insel T. R. & Cuthbert B. N. Medicine. Brain disorders? Precisely. Science 348, 499–500 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aab2358

  5. 5.

    Kapur S., Phillips A. G. & Insel T. R. Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Mol. Psychiatry 17, 1174–1179 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2012.105

  6. 6.

    Milham M. P., Craddock R. C. & Klein A. Clinically useful brain imaging for neuropsychiatry: How can we get there? Depress. Anxiety 34, 578–587 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/da.22627

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Insel T. et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 167, 748–751 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379

  9. 9.

    Fair D. A., Bathula D., Nikolas M. A. & Nigg J. T. Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 6769–6774 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1115365109

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    Van Dam N. T. et al. Data-Driven Phenotypic Categorization for Neurobiological Analyses: Beyond DSM-5 Labels. Biol. Psychiatry 81, 484–494 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.027

  12. 12.

    Paus T. Population neuroscience: Why and how. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 891–903 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.21069

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Kaufman J. et al. Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 36, 980–988 (1997 ).

    Not in our library10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021

  15. 15.

    Lord C. et al. Autism diagnostic observation schedule--2nd edition (ADOS-2) (Western Psychological Corporation, 2012 ).

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Semel E. M., Wiig E. H. & Secord W. CELF3: clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (Psychological Corporation, 1995 ).

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children--Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) (The Psychological Corporation, 2003 ).

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Kaufman A. S. & Kaufman N. L. in Encyclopedia of Special Education (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013 ).

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Fourth edition (WAIS-IV), Australian and New Zealand Language Adaptation (NCS Pearson Inc, 2008 ).

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Test W. D. W. I. A. (WIAT II) (The Psychological Corp, 2005 ).

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Goldman R. GFTA-3: Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation 3. (Pearson, 2015).

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Wagner R. K., Torgesen J. K., Rashotte C. A. & Pearson N. A. Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: CTOPP2. (Pearson, 2013).

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Torgesen J. K., Wagner R. K. & Rashotte C. A. TOWRE: Test of word reading efficiency (Psychological Corporation, 1999 ).

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Wiig E. H., Semel E. M. & Secord W. CELF 5: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (Pearson/PsychCorp, 2003 ).

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Williams K. T. EVT-2: Expressive vocabulary test (Pearson Assessments, 2007 ).

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Dunn L. M. & Dunn D. M. PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test (Pearson Assessments, 2007 ).

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Achenbach T. M. Integrative manual for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF profiles (University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, 1991 ).

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Gershon R. C. et al. NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function. Neurology 80, S2–S6 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182872e5f

  29. 29.

    Koffarnus M. N. & Bickel W. K. A 5-trial adjusting delay discounting task: accurate discount rates in less than one minute. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 22, 222–228 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1037/a0035973

  30. 30.

    The Cooper Institute. Fitnessgram and Activitygram Test Administration Manual-Updated. 4th edn (Human Kinetics, 2010 ).

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Langer N. et al. A resource for assessing information processing in the developing brain using EEG and eye tracking. Sci Data 4, 170040 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/sdata.2017.40

  32. 32.

    Moeller S. et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with 16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 63, 1144–1153 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.22361

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Sathian K. et al. Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information. Neuroimage 57, 462–475 (2011 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.001

  35. 35.

    LaConte, S., Glielmi, C., Heberlein, K. & Hu, X. Verifying visual fixation to improve fMRI with predictive eye estimation regression (PEER). Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 15, 3438 (2007).

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    LaConte, S., Peltier, S., Heberlein, K. & Hu, X. Predictive eye estimation regression (PEER) for simultaneous eye tracking and fMRI. Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 14, 2808 (2006).

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Sano, A. et al. Recognizing Academic Performance, Sleep Quality, Stress Level, and Mental Health using Personality Traits, Wearable Sensors and Mobile Phones. Int Conf Wearable Implant Body Sens Netw 2015, 1-6 (2015).

    Not in our library10.1109/bsn.2015.7299420

  38. 38.

    Cohen A. S., Renshaw T. L., Mitchell K. R. & Kim Y. A psychometric investigation of ‘macroscopic’ speech measures for clinical and psychological science. Behav Res 48, 475–486 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.3758/s13428-015-0584-1

  39. 39.

    Ghosh S. S., Ciccarelli G., Quatieri T. F. & Klein A. Speaking one’s mind: Vocal biomarkers of depression and Parkinson disease. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139, 2193–2193 (2016 ).

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Markova D. et al. Age- and sex-related variations in vocal-tract morphology and voice acoustics during adolescence. Horm. Behav. 81, 84–96 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.001

  41. 41.

    Rowlands A. V., Yates T., Davies M., Khunti K. & Edwardson C. L. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 48, 1935–1941 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1249/mss.0000000000000978

  42. 42.

    Berkovitz B. K. B., Holland G. R. & Moxham B. J. Oral anatomy, histology and embryology 398 (Elsevier, 2016 ).

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Arora M. et al. Spatial distribution of lead in human primary teeth as a biomarker of pre- and neonatal lead exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 371, 55–62 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.035

  44. 44.

    Arora M. et al. Determining prenatal, early childhood and cumulative long-term lead exposure using micro-spatial deciduous dentine levels. PLoS ONE 9, e97805 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0097805

  45. 45.

    Arora M. et al. Determining fetal manganese exposure from mantle dentine of deciduous teeth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5118–5125 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1021/es203569f

  46. 46.

    Andra S. S., Austin C. & Arora M. The tooth exposome in children’s health research. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 28, 221–227 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1097/mop.0000000000000327

  47. 47.

    Austin C. et al. Uncovering system-specific stress signatures in primate teeth with multimodal imaging. Sci. Rep 6, 18802 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/srep18802

  48. 48.

    Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler abbreviated intelligence scale (WASI) (The Psychological Corporation, 1999 ).

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    McCrimmon A. W. & Climie E. A. Wechsler D., Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson, 2009. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 26, 148–156 (2011 ).

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Andra S. S., Austin C., Wright R. O. & Arora M. Reconstructing pre-natal and early childhood exposure to multi-class organic chemicals using teeth: Towards a retrospective temporal exposome. Environ. Int. 83, 137–145 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envint.2015.05.010

  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    Guntupalli J. S. et al. A Model of Representational Spaces in Human Cortex. Cereb. Cortex 26, 2919–2934 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhw068

  53. 53.

    Birmaher B. et al. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 38, 1230–1236 (1999 ).

    Not in our library10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011

  54. 54.

    Mennes M., Biswal B. B., Castellanos F. X. & Milham M. P. Making data sharing work: the FCP/INDI experience. Neuroimage 82, 683–691 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.064

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Barratt W. The Barratt simplified measure of social status (BSMSS) (Indiana State University, 2006 ).

    Not in our library

  57. 57.
  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Frontiers|The Preprocessed Connectomes Project Quality Assessment Protocol—a resource for measuring the quality of MRI data. Available at http://www.frontiersin.org/10.3389/conf.fnins.2015.91.00047/event_abstract (Accessed: 11th June 2017).

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady M. & Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17, 825–841 (2002 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8

  61. 61.

    Power J. D., Schlaggar B. L. & Petersen S. E. Recent progress and outstanding issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 105, 536–551 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.044

  62. 62.

    Ciric R. et al. Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity. Neuroimage 154, 174–187 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.020

  63. 63.

    Power J. D., Barnes K. A., Snyder A. Z., Schlaggar B. L. & Petersen S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018

  64. 64.

    Vanderwal T., Kelly C., Eilbott J., Mayes L. C. & Castellanos F. X. Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 122, 222–232 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.069

  65. 65.

    Delorme A. & Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009

  66. 66.

    Gershon J. A meta-analytic review of gender differences in ADHD. J. Atten. Disord 5, 143–154 (2002 ).

    Not in our library10.1177/108705470200500302

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Satterthwaite T. D. et al. An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data. Neuroimage 64, 240–256 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.052

  69. 69.

    Pruim R. H. R. et al. ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage 112, 267–277 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.064

  70. 70.

    Behzadi Y., Restom K., Liau J. & Liu T. T. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 37, 90–101 (2007 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042

  71. 71.

    Chai X. J., Castañón A. N., Ongür D. & Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage 59, 1420–1428 (2012 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.048

  72. 72.

    Yan C.-G., Craddock R. C., Zuo X.-N., Zang Y.-F. & Milham M. P. Standardizing the intrinsic brain: towards robust measurement of inter-individual variation in 1000 functional connectomes. Neuroimage 80, 246–262 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.081

  73. 73.
  74. 74.

    Bezgin G., Solodkin A., Bakker R., Ritter P. & McIntosh A. R. Mapping complementary features of cross-species structural connectivity to construct realistic ‘Virtual Brains’. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 2080–2093 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.23506

  75. 75.
  76. 76.

    Vanderwal T. et al. Individual differences in functional connectivity during naturalistic viewing conditions. Neuroimage 157, 521–530.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.027

  77. 77.

    Kauttonen J., Hlushchuk Y. & Tikka P. Optimizing methods for linking cinematic features to fMRI data. Neuroimage 110, 136–148 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.063

  78. 78.
  79. 79.

    Dubois J. & Adolphs R. Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 425–443 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.014

  80. 80.

    Wang J. et al. Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 2226–2241 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.23517

  81. 81.

    O’Connor D. et al. The Healthy Brain Network Serial Scanning Initiative: a resource for evaluating inter-individual differences and their reliabilities across scan conditions and sessions. Gigascience 6, 1–14 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1093/gigascience/giw011

  82. 82.
  83. 83.

    Fayers P. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Qual. Life Res. 13, 715–716 (2004 ).

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    Embretson S. E. & Reise S. P. Item Response Theory (Psychology Press, 2013 ).

    Not in our library

  85. 85.

    Kim-O, M. A. & Embretson, S. E. Item response theory and its application to measurement in behavioral medicine. In Handbook of behavioral medicine 113–123. (Springer New York, 2010).

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Magnotta V. A. & Friedman L. Measurement of Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise in the fBIRN Multicenter Imaging Study. J. Digit. Imaging 19, 140–147 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1007/s10278-006-0264-x

  87. 87.

    Mortamet B. et al. Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 62, 365–372 (2009 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/mrm.21992

  88. 88.

    Atkinson D., Hill D. L., Stoyle P. N., Summers P. E. & Keevil S. F. Automatic correction of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images using an entropy focus criterion. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 903–910 (1997 ).

    Not in our library10.1109/42.650886

  89. 89.

    Friedman L., Glover G. H., Krenz D. & Magnotta V. Reducing inter-scanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: role of smoothness equalization. Neuroimage 32, 1656–1668 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.062

  90. 90.

    Giannelli M., Diciotti S., Tessa C. & Mascalchi M. Characterization of Nyquist ghost in EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two clinical 1.5 T MR scanner systems: effect of readout bandwidth and echo spacing. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 11, 3237 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3237

  91. 91.

    Nichols, T. E. "Notes on creating a standardized version of DVARS." arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01469 (2017).

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    Cox R. W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 29, 162–173 (1996 ).

    Not in our library10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014

Cited by papers we hold 12

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.