Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing

Ruben Sanchez-Garcia, Josue Gomez-Blanco, Ana Cuervo and 3 more

Communications Biology · 2021 · CC BY

doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1

Abstract

Cryo-EM maps are valuable sources of information for protein structure modeling. However, due to the loss of contrast at high frequencies, they generally need to be post-processed to improve their interpretability. Most popular approaches, based on global B-factor correction, suffer from limitations. For instance, they ignore the heterogeneity in the map local quality that reconstructions tend to exhibit. Aiming to overcome these problems, we present DeepEMhancer, a deep learning approach designed to perform automatic post-processing of cryo-EM maps. Trained on a dataset of pairs of experimental maps and maps sharpened using their respective atomic models, DeepEMhancer has learned how to post-process experimental maps performing masking-like and sharpening-like operations in a single step. DeepEMhancer was evaluated on a testing set of 20 different experimental maps, showing its ability to reduce noise levels and obtain more detailed versions of the experimental maps. Additionally, we illustrated the benefits of DeepEMhancer on the structure of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA polymerase.

References 28

  1. 1.

    Rosenthal PB, Henderson R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;333:721-745.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013

  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Vilas JL, et al. Re-examining the spectra of macromolecules. Current practice of spectral quasi B-factor flattening. J. Struct. Biol. 2020;209:107447.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107447

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Ramírez-Aportela E, et al. Automatic local resolution-based sharpening of cryo-EM maps. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:765-772.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btz671

  8. 8.

    Kaur S, et al. Local computational methods to improve the interpretability and analysis of cryo-EM maps. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1240.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-021-21509-5

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Wang F, et al. DeepPicker: A deep learning approach for fully automated particle picking in cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 2016;195:325-336.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2016.07.006

  11. 11.

    Zhu Y, Ouyang Q, Mao Y. A deep convolutional neural network approach to single-particle recognition in cryo-electron microscopy. BMC Bioinforma. 2017;18:348.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12859-017-1757-y

  12. 12.

    Gupta, H., McCann, M. T., Donati, L. & Unser, M. CryoGAN: a new reconstruction paradigm for single-particle cryo-EM via deep adversarial learning. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2020.03.20.001016 (2020).

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Davis, J. H. & Berger, B. Reconstructing continuous distributions of 3D protein structure from cryo-EM images. Preprint at arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.05215v3 (2019).

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya SR, Terashi G, Kihara D. Protein secondary structure detection in intermediate-resolution cryo-EM maps using deep learning. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:911-917.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41592-019-0500-1

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Avramov T, et al. Deep learning for validating and estimating resolution of cryo-electron microscopy density maps †. Molecules. 2019;24:1181.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules24061181

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Yang W, et al. Deep learning for single image super-resolution: a brief review. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 2019;21:3106-3121.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmm.2019.2919431

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI, Vol. 9351, (eds Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W. M., Frangi, A. F.) 234–241 (2015).

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Tenthorey JL, et al. The structural basis of flagellin detection by NAIP5: a strategy to limit pathogen immune evasion. Science (80-.). 2017;358:888-893.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aao1140

  22. 22.

    Johnson ZL, Chen J. ATP Binding enables substrate release from multidrug resistance protein 1. Cell. 2018;172:81-89e10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.005

  23. 23.

    Walter JD, Sawicka M, Dutzler R. Cryo-EM structures and functional characterization of murine Slc26a9 reveal mechanism of uncoupled chloride transport. Elife. 2019;8:e46986.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.46986

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Wu Y, He K. Group normalization. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2020;128:742-755.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11263-019-01198-w

  26. 26.

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In Proc. 2015 International IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1026–1034 (2015).

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 2004;60:2126-2132.

    Not in our library10.1107/s0907444904019158

  28. 28.

    Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605-1612.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20084

Cited by papers we hold 17

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.