In situ architecture of the ER–mitochondria encounter structure

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria are main hubs of eukaryotic membrane biogenesis that rely on lipid exchange via membrane contact sites1–3, but the underpinning mechanisms remain poorly understood. In yeast, tethering and lipid transfer between the two organelles is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES), a four-subunit complex of unresolved stoichiometry and architecture4–6. Here we determined the molecular organization of ERMES within Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells using integrative structural biology by combining quantitative live imaging, cryo-correlative microscopy, subtomogram averaging and molecular modelling. We found that ERMES assembles into approximately 25 discrete bridge-like complexes distributed irregularly across a contact site. Each bridge consists of three synaptotagmin-like mitochondrial lipid binding protein domains oriented in a zig-zag arrangement. Our molecular model of ERMES reveals a pathway for lipids. These findings resolve the in situ supramolecular architecture of a major inter-organelle lipid transfer machinery and provide a basis for the mechanistic understanding of lipid fluxes in eukaryotic cells. Integrative structural biology combining quantitative live imaging, cryo-correlative microscopy, subtomogram averaging and molecular modelling enables in situ determination of the structure of the endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria encounter complex in yeast.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 79

1. 1.

   Vance JE. Phospholipid synthesis in a membrane fraction associated with mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:7248-7256.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Vance JE. Newly made phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine are preferentially translocated between rat liver mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:89-97.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Achleitner G, et al. Association between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria of yeast facilitates interorganelle transport of phospholipids through membrane contact. Eur J Biochem. 1999;264:545-553.

   Not in our library10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00658.x (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Kornmann B, et al. An ER-mitochondria tethering complex revealed by a synthetic biology screen. Science. 2009;325:477-481.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1175088 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Kawano S, et al. Structure-function insights into direct lipid transfer between membranes by Mmm1-Mdm12 of ERMES. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:959-974.

   Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201704119 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   John Peter AT, Petrungaro C, Peter M, Kornmann B. METALIC reveals interorganelle lipid flux in live cells by enzymatic mass tagging. Nat Cell Bio. 2022;24:996-1004.

   Not in our library10.1038/s41556-022-00917-9 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Reinisch KM, Prinz WA. Mechanisms of nonvesicular lipid transport. J Cell Biol. 2021;220.

   Not in our library10.1083/jcb.202012058 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.
   Coming together to define membrane contact sites · 2019

   No notice
9. 9.
   ER-associated mitochondrial division links the distribution of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA in yeast · 2013

   No notice
10. 10.

    Kopec KO, Alva V, Lupas AN. Homology of SMP domains to the TULIP superfamily of lipid-binding proteins provides a structural basis for lipid exchange between ER and mitochondria. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1927-1931.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq326 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Toulmay A, Prinz WA. A conserved membrane-binding domain targets proteins to organelle contact sites. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:49-58.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.085118 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Wong LH, Levine TP. Tubular lipid binding proteins (TULIPs) growing everywhere. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864:1439-1449.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.019 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Schauder CM, et al. Structure of a lipid-bound extended synaptotagmin indicates a role in lipid transfer. Nature. 2014;510:552-555.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13269 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    AhYoung AP, et al. Conserved SMP domains of the ERMES complex bind phospholipids and mediate tether assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:E3179-3188.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1422363112 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Lees JA, et al. Lipid transport by TMEM24 at ER-plasma membrane contacts regulates pulsatile insulin secretion. Science. 2017;355.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aah6171 (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Jeong H, Park J, Jun Y, Lee C. Crystal structures of Mmm1 and Mdm12-Mmm1 reveal mechanistic insight into phospholipid trafficking at ER-mitochondria contact sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114:E9502-E9511.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1715592114 (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    Hoffmann PC, et al. Tricalbins Contribute to Cellular Lipid Flux and Form Curved ER-PM Contacts that Are Bridged by Rod-Shaped Structures. Developmental cell. 2019;51:488-502.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.019 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.
    Visualizing the functional architecture of the endocytic machinery · 2015

    No notice
19. 19.

    Picco A, Kaksonen M. Precise tracking of the dynamics of multiple proteins in endocytic events. Methods Cell Biol. 2017;139:51-68.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.11.002 (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.
    Separating mitochondrial protein assembly and endoplasmic reticulum tethering by selective coupling of Mdm10 · 2016

    Not checked
21. 21.

    Stroud DA, et al. Composition and topology of the endoplasmic reticulummitochondria encounter structure. J Mol Biol. 2011;413:743-750.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.012 (opens in a new tab)

22. 22.

    Wagner FR, et al. Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:2041-2070.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41596-020-0320-x (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Cohen Y, et al. Peroxisomes are juxtaposed to strategic sites on mitochondria. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10:1742-1748.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4mb00001c (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.
    Genome-Wide Localization Study of Yeast Pex11 Identifies Peroxisome–Mitochondria Interactions through the ERMES Complex · 2015

    No notice
25. 25.

    Jeong H, Park J, Lee C. Crystal structure of Mdm12 reveals the architecture and dynamic organization of the ERMES complex. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:1857-1871.

    Not in our library10.15252/embr.201642706 (opens in a new tab)

26. 26.
    Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2 · 2022

    Corrected
27. 27.
    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold · 2021

    No notice
28. 28.

    Kornmann B, Osman C, Walter P. The conserved GTPase Gem1 regulates endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:14151-14156.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1111314108 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Rasul F, et al. Emr1 regulates the number of foci of the endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria encounter structure complex. Nat Commun. 2021;12:521.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-020-20866-x (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Li P, Lees JA, Lusk CP, Reinisch KM. Cryo-EM reconstruction of a VPS13 fragment reveals a long groove to channel lipids between membranes. J Cell Biol. 2020;219.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.202001161 (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    Rogers JR, Espinoza Garcia G, Geissler PL. Membrane hydrophobicity determines the activation free energy of passive lipid transport. Biophys J. 2021;120:3718-3731.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2021.07.016 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Moser von Filseck J, Vanni S, Mesmin B, Antonny B, Drin G. A phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate powered exchange mechanism to create a lipid gradient between membranes. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6671.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms7671 (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Cai S, et al. In situ architecture of the lipid transport protein VPS13C at ER-lysosome membrane contacts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2022;119:e2203769119.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2203769119 (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    de la Mora E, et al. Nanoscale architecture of a VAP-A-OSBP tethering complex at membrane contact sites. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3459.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-021-23799-1 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Bian X, Zhang Z, Xiong Q, De Camilli P, Lin C. A programmable DNA-origami platform for studying lipid transfer between bilayers. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:830-837.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41589-019-0325-3 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Lawrimore J, Bloom KS, Salmon ED. Point centromeres contain more than a single centromere-specific Cse4 (CENP-A) nucleosome. J Cell Biol. 2011;195:573-582.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201106036 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Trabuco LG, Villa E, Mitra K, Frank J, Schulten K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure. 2008;16:673-683.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2008.03.005 (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Janke C, et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast. 2004;21:947-962.

    Not in our library10.1002/yea.1142 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Shaner NC, et al. A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nature methods. 2013;10:407-409.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2413 (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Laughery MF, et al. New vectors for simple and streamlined CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2015;32:711-720.

    Not in our library10.1002/yea.3098 (opens in a new tab)

41. 41.
    Visualizing the functional architecture of the endocytic machinery · 2015

    No notice
42. 42.

    Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature methods. 2012;9:676-682.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2019 (opens in a new tab)

43. 43.

    Joglekar AP, Bouck DC, Molk JN, Bloom KS, Salmon ED. Molecular architecture of a kinetochore-microtubule attachment site. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:581-585.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1414 (opens in a new tab)

44. 44.

    Russo CJ, Scotcher S, Kyte M. A precision cryostat design for manual and semi-automated cryo-plunge instruments. Rev Sci Instrum. 2016;87:114302.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.4967864 (opens in a new tab)

45. 45.

    Schaffer M, et al. Cryo-focused Ion Beam Sample Preparation for Imaging Vitreous Cells by Cryo-electron Tomography. Bio Protoc. 2015;5.

    Not in our library10.21769/bioprotoc.1575 (opens in a new tab)

46. 46.

    Wolff G, et al. Mind the gap: Micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae. J Struct Biol. 2019;208:107389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2019.09.006 (opens in a new tab)

47. 47.

    Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol. 2005;152:36-51.

    Not in our library10.1016/jjsb.2005.07.007 (opens in a new tab)

48. 48.

    Paul-Gilloteaux P, et al. eC-CLEM: flexible multidimensional registration software for correlative microscopies. Nature methods. 2017;14:102-103.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4170 (opens in a new tab)

49. 49.
    Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging · 2017

    No notice
50. 50.

    Bharat TAM, Hoffmann PC, Kukulski W. Correlative Microscopy of Vitreous Sections Provides Insights into BAR-Domain Organization In Situ. Structure. 2018;26:879-886.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2018.03.015 (opens in a new tab)

51. 51.
    Structural basis for VPS34 kinase activation by Rab1 and Rab5 on membranes · 2021

    No notice
52. 52.

    Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 1996;116:71-76.

    Not in our library10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 (opens in a new tab)

53. 53.

    Castano-Diez D, Kudryashev M, Arheit M, Stahlberg H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J Struct Biol. 2012;178:139-151.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.017 (opens in a new tab)

54. 54.

    Nickell S, et al. TOM software toolbox: acquisition and analysis for electron tomography. J Struct Biol. 2005;149:227-234.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2004.10.006 (opens in a new tab)

55. 55.

    Forster F, Medalia O, Zauberman N, Baumeister W, Fass D. Retrovirus envelope protein complex structure in situ studied by cryo-electron tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:4729-4734.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0409178102 (opens in a new tab)

56. 56.

    Forster F, Hegerl R. Structure determination in situ by averaging of tomograms. Methods Cell Biol. 2007;79:741-767.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0091-679x(06)79029-x (opens in a new tab)

57. 57.

    Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1605-1612.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20084 (opens in a new tab)

58. 58.
    Structure and architecture of immature and mature murine leukemia virus capsids · 2018

    No notice
59. 59.
    High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy · 2013

    No notice
60. 60.

    Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30:70-82.

    Not in our library10.1002/pro.3943 (opens in a new tab)

61. 61.

    Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    Allen M, Poggiali D, Whitaker K, Rhys Marshall T, Kievit RA. in Wellcome Open Research. 2019;4.

    Not in our library10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1 (opens in a new tab)

63. 63.

    Flinner N, et al. Mdm10 is an ancient eukaryotic porin co-occurring with the ERMES complex. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:3314-3325.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.006 (opens in a new tab)

64. 64.

    Goddard TD, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018;27:14-25.

    Not in our library10.1002/pro.3235 (opens in a new tab)

65. 65.

    Evans R, et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2022;2021.2010.2004.463034.

    Not in our library10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (opens in a new tab)

66. 66.

    Sperka-Gottlieb CD, Hermetter A, Paltauf F, Daum G. Lipid topology and physical properties of the outer mitochondrial membrane of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;946:227-234.

    Not in our library10.1016/0005-2736(88)90397-5 (opens in a new tab)

67. 67.

    Jo S, Kim T, Iyer VG, Im W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem. 2008;29:1859-1865.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20945 (opens in a new tab)

68. 68.

    Essmann U, et al. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1995;103:8577-8593.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.470117 (opens in a new tab)

69. 69.

    McGreevy R, Teo I, Singharoy A, Schulten K. Advances in the molecular dynamics flexible fitting method for cryo-EM modeling. Methods. 2016;100:50-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.009 (opens in a new tab)

70. 70.

    Monroe L, Terashi G, Kihara D. Variability of Protein Structure Models from Electron Microscopy. Structure. 2017;25:592-602.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2017.02.004 (opens in a new tab)

71. 71.

    Olechnovic K, Venclovas C. VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas. Proteins. 2017;85:1131-1145.

    Not in our library10.1002/prot.25278 (opens in a new tab)

72. 72.

    Phillips JC, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD. J Chem Phys. 2020;153:044130.

    Not in our library10.1063/5.0014475 (opens in a new tab)

73. 73.

    Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:33-38.

    Not in our library10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 (opens in a new tab)

74. 74.
    CAVER 3.0: A Tool for the Analysis of Transport Pathways in Dynamic Protein Structures · 2012

    No notice
75. 75.
    EMDataBank unified data resource for 3DEM · 2015

    No notice
76. 76.
    EMPIAR: the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive · 2022

    No notice
77. 77.

    Dahan N, et al. Peroxisome function relies on organelle-associated mRNA translation. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabk2141.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abk2141 (opens in a new tab)

78. 78.

    Wu H, et al. Peroxisome development in yeast is associated with the formation of Pex3-dependent peroxisome-vacuole contact sites. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019;1866:349-359.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.08.021 (opens in a new tab)

79. 79.

    Takeda H, et al. Mitochondrial sorting and assembly machinery operates by beta-barrel switching. Nature. 2021;590:163-169.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-03113-7 (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Bringing Structure to Cell Biology with Cryo-Electron Tomography · 2023
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.