Transcriptional changes in the mammary gland during lactation revealed by single cell sequencing of cells from human milk

Abstract

Under normal conditions, the most significant expansion and differentiation of the adult mammary gland occurs in response to systemic reproductive hormones during pregnancy and lactation to enable milk synthesis and secretion to sustain the offspring. However, human mammary tissue remodelling that takes place during pregnancy and lactation remains poorly understood due to the challenge of acquiring samples. We report here single-cell transcriptomic analysis of 110,744 viable breast cells isolated from human milk or non-lactating breast tissue, isolated from nine and seven donors, respectively. We found that human milk largely contains epithelial cells belonging to the luminal lineage and a repertoire of immune cells. Further transcriptomic analysis of the milk cells identified two distinct secretory cell types that shared similarities with luminal progenitors, but no populations comparable to hormone-responsive cells. Taken together, our data offers a reference map and a window into the cellular dynamics that occur during human lactation and may provide further insights on the interplay between pregnancy, lactation and breast cancer.

References 48

1. 1.

   Dontu G, Ince TA. Of mice and women: a comparative tissue biology perspective of breast stem cells and differentiation. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2015;20:51-62.

   Not in our library10.1007/s10911-015-9341-4 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Hassiotou F, Geddes D. Anatomy of the human mammary gland: current status of knowledge. Clin. Anat. 2013;26:29-48.

   Not in our library10.1002/ca.22165 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Dos Santos CO, Dolzhenko E, Hodges E, Smith AD, Hannon GJ. An epigenetic memory of pregnancy in the mouse mammary gland. Cell Rep. 2015;11:1102-1109.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.015 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Matulka LA, Triplett AA, Wagner KU. Parity-induced mammary epithelial cells are multipotent and express cell surface markers associated with stem cells. Dev. Biol. 2007;303:29-44.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.12.017 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.
   Differentiation dynamics of mammary epithelial cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing · 2017

   No notice
6. 6.

   Schedin P. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:281-291.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrc1839 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Victora CG, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475-490.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.
   Construction of developmental lineage relationships in the mouse mammary gland by single-cell RNA profiling · 2017

   No notice
9. 9.

   Giraddi RR, et al. Single-cell transcriptomes distinguish stem cell state changes and lineage specification programs in early mammary gland development. Cell Rep. 2018;24:1653.e7-1666.e7.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.025 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.
    Aging-Associated Alterations in Mammary Epithelia and Stroma Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing · 2020

    No notice
11. 11.

    Lim E, et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat. Med. 2009;15:907-913.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2000 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.
    Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity · 2018

    No notice
13. 13.

    Murrow, L. M. et al. Pregnancy and obesity modify the epithelial composition and hormone signaling state of the human breast. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/430611 (2020).

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Thong T, et al. Hybrid stem cell states: insights into the relationship between mammary development and breast cancer using single-cell transcriptomics. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:288.

    Not in our library10.3389/fcell.2020.00288 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Twigger AJ, Khaled WT. Mammary gland development from a single cell ‘omics view. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;114:171-185.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.013 (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Martin Carli JF, et al. Single cell RNA sequencing of human milk-derived cells reveals sub-populations of mammary epithelial cells with molecular signatures of progenitor and mature states: a novel, non-invasive framework for investigating human lactation physiology. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2020;25:367-387.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10911-020-09466-z (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    Eirew P, et al. A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability. Nat. Med. 2008;14:1384-1389.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.1791 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.

    Sharp JA, Lefevre C, Watt A, Nicholas KR. Analysis of human breast milk cells: gene expression profiles during pregnancy, lactation, involution, and mastitic infection. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2016;16:297-321.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10142-016-0485-0 (opens in a new tab)

19. 19.

    Bourlieu C, Michalski MC. Structure-function relationship of the milk fat globule. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2015;18:118-127.

    Not in our library10.1097/mco.0000000000000138 (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.
    Cells of human breast milk · 2017

    No notice
21. 21.

    Van de Sande B, et al. A scalable SCENIC workflow for single-cell gene regulatory network analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2020;15:2247-2276.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41596-020-0336-2 (opens in a new tab)

22. 22.

    Pervolarakis N, et al. Integrated single-cell transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility analysis reveals regulators of mammary epithelial cell identity. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108273.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108273 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Hughes K, Watson CJ. The spectrum of STAT functions in mammary gland development. JAKSTAT. 2012;1:151-158.

    Not in our library10.4161/jkst.19691 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.

    Liu X, et al. Stat5a is mandatory for adult mammary gland development and lactogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997;11:179-186.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.11.2.179 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.

    Liu X, Gallego MI, Smith GH, Robinson GW, Hennighausen L. Functional rescue of Stat5a-null mammary tissue through the activation of compensating signals including Stat5b. Cell Growth Differ. 1998;9:795-804.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Dravis C, et al. Sox10 regulates stem/progenitor and mesenchymal cell states in mammary epithelial cells. Cell Rep. 2015;12:2035-2048.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.040 (opens in a new tab)

27. 27.

    Dravis C, et al. Epigenetic and transcriptomic profiling of mammary gland development and tumor models disclose regulators of cell state plasticity. Cancer Cell. 2018;34:466.e6-482.e6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.001 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Azizi E, et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2018;174:1293.e36-1308.e36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.
    Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat · 2021

    No notice
30. 30.

    Muramatsu T. Structure and function of midkine as the basis of its pharmacological effects. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014;171:814-826.

    Not in our library10.1111/bph.12353 (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    Pfefferle AD, Spike BT, Wahl GM, Perou CM. Luminal progenitor and fetal mammary stem cell expression features predict breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015;149:425-437.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10549-014-3262-6 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Rudolph MC, McManaman JL, Hunter L, Phang T, Neville MC. Functional development of the mammary gland: Use of expression profiling and trajectory clustering to reveal changes in gene expression during pregnancy, lactation, and involution. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2003;8:287-307.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:jomg.0000010030.73983.57 (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Kelleher SL, Lonnerdal B. Zn transporter levels and localization change throughout lactation in rat mammary gland and are regulated by Zn in mammary cells. J. Nutr. 2003;133:3378-3385.

    Not in our library10.1093/jn/133.11.3378 (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747-752.

    Not in our library10.1038/35021093 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.
    Transfer of Maternal Immune Cells by Breastfeeding: Maternal Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Present in Breast Milk Localize in the Peyer’s Patches of the Nursed Infant · 2016

    No notice
36. 36.

    Jain L, et al. In vivo distribution of human milk leucocytes after ingestion by newborn baboons. Arch. Dis. Child. 1989;64:930-933.

    Not in our library10.1136/adc.64.7_spec_no.930 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Zhou L, et al. Two independent pathways of maternal cell transmission to offspring: through placenta during pregnancy and by breast-feeding after birth. Immunology. 2000;101:570-580.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00144.x (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Smith C, Goldman A. The cells of human colostrum. I. In vitro studies of morphology and functions. Pediatr. Res. 1968;2:103-109.

    Not in our library10.1203/00006450-196803000-00005 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    van Amerongen R. Behind the scenes of the Human Breast Cell Atlas Project. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2021;26:67-70.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10911-021-09482-7 (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Bach K, et al. Time-resolved single-cell analysis of Brca1 associated mammary tumourigenesis reveals aberrant differentiation of luminal progenitors. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1502.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-021-21783-3 (opens in a new tab)

41. 41.

    Stingl, J., Emerman, J. T. & Eaves, C. J. in Basic Cell Culture Protocols (eds Helgason, C. D. & Miller, C. L.) 249–263 (Humana Press, 2005).

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Engelbrecht, L. K. et al. A strategy to address dissociation-induced compositional and transcriptional bias for single-cell analysis of the human mammary gland. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.02.11.430721 (2020).

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    Schultz-Pernice I, Engelbrecht LK, Petricca S, Scheel CH, Twigger AJ. Morphological analysis of human milk membrane enclosed structures reveals diverse cells and cell-like milk fat globules. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2020;25:397-408.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10911-020-09472-1 (opens in a new tab)

44. 44.
    Quantification of regenerative potential in primary human mammary epithelial cells · 2015

    No notice
45. 45.
    EmptyDrops: distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data · 2019

    No notice
46. 46.
    Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R · 2017

    No notice
47. 47.
    A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor · 2016

    No notice
48. 48.

    Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:411-420.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.4096 (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 1

• A single-cell atlas enables mapping of homeostatic cellular shifts in the adult human breast · 2024
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.