Controlling COVID-19 via test-trace-quarantine
Cliff C. Kerr, Dina Mistry, Robyn M. Stuart and 14 more
Nature Communications · 2021
doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23276-9 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Initial COVID-19 containment in the United States focused on limiting mobility, including school and workplace closures. However, these interventions have had enormous societal and economic costs. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of an alternative control strategy, test-trace-quarantine: routine testing of primarily symptomatic individuals, tracing and testing their known contacts, and placing their contacts in quarantine. We perform this analysis using Covasim, an open-source agent-based model, which has been calibrated to detailed demographic, mobility, and epidemiological data for the Seattle region from January through June 2020. With current levels of mask use and schools remaining closed, we find that high but achievable levels of testing and tracing are sufficient to maintain epidemic control even under a return to full workplace and community mobility and with low vaccine coverage. The easing of mobility restrictions in June 2020 and subsequent scale-up of testing and tracing programs through September provided real-world validation of our predictions. Although we show that test-trace-quarantine can control the epidemic in both theory and practice, its success is contingent on high testing and tracing rates, high quarantine compliance, relatively short testing and tracing delays, and moderate to high mask use. Thus, in order for test-trace-quarantine to control transmission with a return to high mobility, strong performance in all aspects of the program is required.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References85
- 4.
- 9.
- 12.
- 15.
- 17.
- 24.
- 26.
- 28.
- 31.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
- 40.
- 45.
- 46.
- 48.
- 54.
- 55.
- 56.
- 62.
- 68.Corrected
- 69.
- 74.
- 78.
- 80.
- 81.
59 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Cited by papers we hold1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.