Corrected on Dec 8, 2021.
Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 31, 2026 · Read the notice
Practical considerations for measuring the effective reproductive number, Rt
Katelyn M. Gostic, Lauren McGough, Edward B. Baskerville and 22 more
PLOS Computational Biology · 2020 · CC BY
doi:10.1101/2020.06.18.20134858
Abstract
Estimation of the effective reproductive number R t is important for detecting changes in disease transmission over time. During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, policy makers and public health officials are using R t to assess the effectiveness of interventions and to inform policy. However, estimation of R t from available data presents several challenges, with critical implications for the interpretation of the course of the pandemic. The purpose of this document is to summarize these challenges, illustrate them with examples from synthetic data, and, where possible, make recommendations. For near real-time estimation of R t , we recommend the approach of Cori and colleagues, which uses data from before time t and empirical estimates of the distribution of time between infections. Methods that require data from after time t , such as Wallinga and Teunis, are conceptually and methodologically less suited for near real-time estimation, but may be appropriate for retrospective analyses of how individuals infected at different time points contributed to the spread. We advise caution when using methods derived from the approach of Bettencourt and Ribeiro, as the resulting R t estimates may be biased if the underlying structural assumptions are not met. Two key challenges common to all approaches are accurate specification of the generation interval and reconstruction of the time series of new infections from observations occurring long after the moment of transmission. Naive approaches for dealing with observation delays, such as subtracting delays sampled from a distribution, can introduce bias. We provide suggestions for how to mitigate this and other technical challenges and highlight open problems in R t estimation.
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Wastewater-Based Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number of SARS-CoV-2 · 2022No notice
- Synergistic interventions to control COVID-19: Mass testing and isolation mitigates reliance on distancing. · 2021Not checked
- The epidemicity index of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infections · 2021Not checked
- Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions · 2021No notice
- BNT162b2 vaccination effectively prevents the rapid rise of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 in high-risk populations in Israel · 2021Not checked
- Tracking R of COVID-19: A new real-time estimation using the Kalman filter · 2021No notice
- Quantifying asymptomatic infection and transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using observed cases, serology, and testing capacity · 2021No notice
- Serial interval of SARS-CoV-2 was shortened over time by nonpharmaceutical interventions · 2020No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.