A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology

Abstract

Synthetic biology allows us to bioengineer cells to synthesize novel valuable molecules such as renewable biofuels or anticancer drugs. However, traditional synthetic biology approaches involve ad-hoc engineering practices, which lead to long development times. Here, we present the Automated Recommendation Tool (ART), a tool that leverages machine learning and probabilistic modeling techniques to guide synthetic biology in a systematic fashion, without the need for a full mechanistic understanding of the biological system. Using sampling-based optimization, ART provides a set of recommended strains to be built in the next engineering cycle, alongside probabilistic predictions of their production levels. We demonstrate the capabilities of ART on simulated data sets, as well as experimental data from real metabolic engineering projects producing renewable biofuels, hoppy flavored beer without hops, fatty acids, and tryptophan. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach, and the practical consequences of the underlying assumptions failing.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 84

1. 1.

   Stephanopoulos G. Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 1999;1:1-11.

   Not in our library10.1006/mben.1998.0101

2. 2.

   Beller HR, Lee TS, Katz L. Natural products as biofuels and bio-based chemicals: fatty acids and isoprenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:1508-1526.

   Not in our library10.1039/c5np00068h

3. 3.
   Synthetic and systems biology for microbial production of commodity chemicals · 2016

   No notice
4. 4.

   Ajikumar PK, et al. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010;330:70-74.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1191652

5. 5.

   Cann, O. These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2016. World Economic Forum website https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/top-10-emerging-technologies-2016 (2016).

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   National Research Council. Industrialization of Biology: A Roadmap to Accelerate the Advanced Manufacturing of Chemicals (National Academies Press, 2015).

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Yadav VG, De Mey M, Lim CG, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G. The future of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: towards a systematic practice. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:233-241.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2012.02.001

8. 8.

   Hodgman CE, Jewett MC. Cell-free synthetic biology: thinking outside the cell. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:261-269.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.002

9. 9.

   Kurian JV. A new polymer platform for the future-Sorona® from corn derived 1, 3-propanediol. J. Polym. Environ. 2005;13:159-167.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Cameron DE, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:381.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3239

11. 11.
    A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes · 2018

    No notice
12. 12.

    Temme, K. et al. Methods and compositions for improving plant traits. US Patent App. 16/192,738 (2019).

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Chen Y, et al. Automated “Cells-To-Peptides” sample preparation workflow for high-throughput, quantitative proteomic assays of microbes. J. Proteome Res. 2019;18:3752-3761.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00455

14. 14.

    Fuhrer T, Zamboni N. High-throughput discovery metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015;31:73-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2014.08.006

15. 15.
    Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? · 2015

    No notice
16. 16.

    Ma S, Tang N, Tian J. DNA synthesis, assembly and applications in synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012;16:260-267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.05.001

17. 17.

    Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1258096

18. 18.

    Cumbers, J. Synthetic biology has raised $12.4 billion. Here are five sectors it will soon disrupt. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2019/09/04/synthetic-biology-has-raised-124-billion-here-are-five-sectors-it-will-soon-disrupt/#40b2b2cb3a14 (2019).

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Petzold CJ, Chan LJG, Nhan M, Adams PD. Analytics for metabolic engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015;3:135.

    Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2015.00135

20. 20.

    Nielsen J, Keasling JD. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell. 2016;164:1185-1197.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.004

21. 21.

    Gardner TS. Synthetic biology: from hype to impact. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:123-125.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.018

22. 22.

    Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011;10:712.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd3439-c1

23. 23.

    Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nat. N. 2016;533:452.

    Not in our library10.1038/533452a

24. 24.

    Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483:531.

    Not in our library10.1038/483531a

25. 25.

    Carbonell P, Radivojević T, Martin HG. Opportunities at the intersection of synthetic biology, machine learning, and automation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019;8:1474-1477.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.8b00540

26. 26.

    Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:5802-5805.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1218772110

27. 27.

    Wu, Y. et al. Googleʼs neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Preprint at arXiv:1609.08144 (2016).

    Not in our library

28. 28.
    A machine learning approach to predict metabolic pathway dynamics from time-series multiomics data · 2018

    No notice
29. 29.

    Jervis AJ, et al. Machine learning of designed translational control allows predictive pathway optimization in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018;8:127-136.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.8b00398

30. 30.

    Esteva A, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature21056

31. 31.

    Paeng, K., Hwang, S., Park, S. & Kim, M. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support 231–239 (Springer, 2017).

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Alipanahi B, Delong A, Weirauch MT, Frey BJ. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:831.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3300

33. 33.

    Shaked I, Oberhardt MA, Atias N, Sharan R, Ruppin E. Metabolic network prediction of drug side effects. Cell Syst. 2016;2:209-213.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cels.2016.03.001

34. 34.

    Metz, C. AI researchers are making more than $1 million, even at a nonprofit. The New York Times (2018).

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2nd edn (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003).

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Batth TS, et al. A targeted proteomics toolkit for high-throughput absolute quantification of Escherichia coli proteins. Metab. Eng. 2014;26:48-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2014.08.004

38. 38.

    Heinemann J, et al. On-chip integration of droplet microfluidics and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry for enzyme screening. Lab a Chip. 2017;17:323-331.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6lc01182a

39. 39.

    Alonso-Gutierrez J, et al. Principal component analysis of proteomics (PCAP) as a tool to direct metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2015;28:123-133.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.011

40. 40.
    Industrial brewing yeast engineered for the production of primary flavor determinants in hopped beer · 2018

    No notice

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Design of synthetic human gut microbiome assembly and butyrate production · 2021
  No notice
• Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.