A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology

Abstract

Synthetic biology allows us to bioengineer cells to synthesize novel valuable molecules such as renewable biofuels or anticancer drugs. However, traditional synthetic biology approaches involve ad-hoc engineering practices, which lead to long development times. Here, we present the Automated Recommendation Tool (ART), a tool that leverages machine learning and probabilistic modeling techniques to guide synthetic biology in a systematic fashion, without the need for a full mechanistic understanding of the biological system. Using sampling-based optimization, ART provides a set of recommended strains to be built in the next engineering cycle, alongside probabilistic predictions of their production levels. We demonstrate the capabilities of ART on simulated data sets, as well as experimental data from real metabolic engineering projects producing renewable biofuels, hoppy flavored beer without hops, fatty acids, and tryptophan. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach, and the practical consequences of the underlying assumptions failing.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 84

1. 1.

   Stephanopoulos G. Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 1999;1:1-11.

   Not in our library10.1006/mben.1998.0101

2. 2.

   Beller HR, Lee TS, Katz L. Natural products as biofuels and bio-based chemicals: fatty acids and isoprenoids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:1508-1526.

   Not in our library10.1039/c5np00068h

3. 3.
   Synthetic and systems biology for microbial production of commodity chemicals · 2016

   No notice
4. 4.

   Ajikumar PK, et al. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010;330:70-74.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1191652

5. 5.

   Cann, O. These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2016. World Economic Forum website https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/06/top-10-emerging-technologies-2016 (2016).

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   National Research Council. Industrialization of Biology: A Roadmap to Accelerate the Advanced Manufacturing of Chemicals (National Academies Press, 2015).

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Yadav VG, De Mey M, Lim CG, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G. The future of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology: towards a systematic practice. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:233-241.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2012.02.001

8. 8.

   Hodgman CE, Jewett MC. Cell-free synthetic biology: thinking outside the cell. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:261-269.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.002

9. 9.

   Kurian JV. A new polymer platform for the future-Sorona® from corn derived 1, 3-propanediol. J. Polym. Environ. 2005;13:159-167.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Cameron DE, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:381.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3239

11. 11.
    A CRISPR–Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes · 2018

    No notice
12. 12.

    Temme, K. et al. Methods and compositions for improving plant traits. US Patent App. 16/192,738 (2019).

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Chen Y, et al. Automated “Cells-To-Peptides” sample preparation workflow for high-throughput, quantitative proteomic assays of microbes. J. Proteome Res. 2019;18:3752-3761.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00455

14. 14.

    Fuhrer T, Zamboni N. High-throughput discovery metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015;31:73-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2014.08.006

15. 15.
    Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? · 2015

    No notice
16. 16.

    Ma S, Tang N, Tian J. DNA synthesis, assembly and applications in synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012;16:260-267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.05.001

17. 17.

    Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1258096

18. 18.

    Cumbers, J. Synthetic biology has raised $12.4 billion. Here are five sectors it will soon disrupt. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johncumbers/2019/09/04/synthetic-biology-has-raised-124-billion-here-are-five-sectors-it-will-soon-disrupt/#40b2b2cb3a14 (2019).

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Petzold CJ, Chan LJG, Nhan M, Adams PD. Analytics for metabolic engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2015;3:135.

    Not in our library10.3389/fbioe.2015.00135

20. 20.

    Nielsen J, Keasling JD. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell. 2016;164:1185-1197.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.004

21. 21.

    Gardner TS. Synthetic biology: from hype to impact. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:123-125.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.018

22. 22.

    Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011;10:712.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd3439-c1

23. 23.

    Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nat. N. 2016;533:452.

    Not in our library10.1038/533452a

24. 24.

    Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483:531.

    Not in our library10.1038/483531a

25. 25.

    Carbonell P, Radivojević T, Martin HG. Opportunities at the intersection of synthetic biology, machine learning, and automation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019;8:1474-1477.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.8b00540

26. 26.

    Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:5802-5805.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1218772110

27. 27.

    Wu, Y. et al. Googleʼs neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Preprint at arXiv:1609.08144 (2016).

    Not in our library

28. 28.
    A machine learning approach to predict metabolic pathway dynamics from time-series multiomics data · 2018

    No notice
29. 29.

    Jervis AJ, et al. Machine learning of designed translational control allows predictive pathway optimization in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018;8:127-136.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.8b00398

30. 30.

    Esteva A, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature21056

31. 31.

    Paeng, K., Hwang, S., Park, S. & Kim, M. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support 231–239 (Springer, 2017).

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Alipanahi B, Delong A, Weirauch MT, Frey BJ. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:831.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3300

33. 33.

    Shaked I, Oberhardt MA, Atias N, Sharan R, Ruppin E. Metabolic network prediction of drug side effects. Cell Syst. 2016;2:209-213.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cels.2016.03.001

34. 34.

    Metz, C. AI researchers are making more than $1 million, even at a nonprofit. The New York Times (2018).

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. & Rubin, D. B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2nd edn (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003).

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Batth TS, et al. A targeted proteomics toolkit for high-throughput absolute quantification of Escherichia coli proteins. Metab. Eng. 2014;26:48-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2014.08.004

38. 38.

    Heinemann J, et al. On-chip integration of droplet microfluidics and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry for enzyme screening. Lab a Chip. 2017;17:323-331.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6lc01182a

39. 39.

    Alonso-Gutierrez J, et al. Principal component analysis of proteomics (PCAP) as a tool to direct metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2015;28:123-133.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.011

40. 40.
    Industrial brewing yeast engineered for the production of primary flavor determinants in hopped beer · 2018

    No notice
41. 41.

    Opgenorth P, et al. Lessons from two design-build-test-learn cycles of dodecanol production in Escherichia coli aided by machine learning. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019;8:1337-1351.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.9b00020

42. 42.
    Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism · 2020

    No notice
43. 43.
    Towards a fully automated algorithm driven platform for biosystems design · 2019

    No notice
44. 44.

    Häse, F., Roch, L. M. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Next-generation experimentation with self-driving laboratories. Trends Chem.1, 282–291 (2019).

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    Morrell WC, et al. The experiment data depot: a web-based software tool for biological experimental data storage, sharing, and visualization. ACS Synth. Biol. 2017;6:2248-2259.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.7b00204

46. 46.

    McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 1979;21:239-245.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Unthan S, Radek A, Wiechert W, Oldiges M, Noack S. Bioprocess automation on a Mini Pilot Plant enables fast quantitative microbial phenotyping. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015;14:32.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12934-015-0216-6

48. 48.

    Renouard-Vallet G, et al. Improving the environmental impact of civil aircraft by fuel cell technology: concepts and technological progress. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010;3:1458-1468.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    Keasling JD. Manufacturing molecules through metabolic engineering. Science. 2010;330:1355-1358.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1193990

50. 50.

    Tracy NI, Chen D, Crunkleton DW, Price GL. Hydrogenated monoterpenes as diesel fuel additives. Fuel. 2009;88:2238-2240.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    Ryder, J. A. Jet fuel compositions. US Patent 7,589,243 (2009).

    Not in our library

52. 52.

    Duetz W, Bouwmeester H, Van Beilen J, Witholt B. Biotransformation of limonene by bacteria, fungi, yeasts, and plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003;61:269-277.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-003-1221-y

53. 53.

    Alonso-Gutierrez J, et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for limonene and perillyl alcohol production. Metab. Eng. 2013;19:33-41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2013.05.004

54. 54.

    Paddon CJ, et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature. 2013;496:528.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12051

55. 55.

    Meadows AL, et al. Rewriting yeast central carbon metabolism for industrial isoprenoid production. Nature. 2016;537:694.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature19769

56. 56.

    Magnuson K, Jackowski S, Rock CO, Cronan JE. Regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1993;57:522-542.

    Not in our library10.1128/mr.57.3.522-542.1993

57. 57.

    Salis HM, Mirsky EA, Voigt CA. Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:946.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1568

58. 58.
    Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites · 2013

    No notice
59. 59.

    Bonde MT, et al. Predictable tuning of protein expression in bacteria. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:233.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3727

60. 60.

    Begoli E, Bhattacharya T, Kusnezov D. The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019;1:20.

    Not in our library

61. 61.

    Ham, T., Dmytriv, Z., Plahar, H., Chen, J. & Hillson, N. Design, implementation and practice of JBEI-ICE: an open source biological part registry platform and tools. Nucleic Acids Res.40, e141 (2012).

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks531

62. 62.

    Van Dien S. From the first drop to the first truckload: commercialization of microbial processes for renewable chemicals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013;24:1061-1068.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.002

63. 63.

    Granda JM, Donina L, Dragone V, Long D-L, Cronin L. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature. 2018;559:377.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8

64. 64.

    Le K, et al. A novel mammalian cell line development platform utilizing nanofluidics and optoelectro positioning technology. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018;34:1438-1446.

    Not in our library10.1002/btpr.2690

65. 65.

    Iwai, K. et al. Automated flow-based/digital microfluidic platform integrated with onsite electroporation process for multiplex genetic engineering applications. In 2018 IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 1229–1232 (2018).

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    Gach PC, et al. A droplet microfluidic platform for automating genetic engineering. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016;5:426-433.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssynbio.6b00011

67. 67.

    Hayden EC. The automated lab. Nat. News. 2014;516:131.

    Not in our library10.1038/516131a

68. 68.

    Wolpert D. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 1996;8:1341-1390.

    Not in our library

69. 69.

    Ho, T. K. Random decision forests. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (1995).

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    van der Laan, M., Polley, E. & Hubbard, A. Super learner. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.6, 25 (2007).

    Not in our library10.2202/1544-6115.1309

71. 71.

    Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raftery AE, Volinsky CT. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat. Sci. 1999;14:382-417.

    Not in our library

72. 72.

    Monteith, K., Carroll, J. L., Seppi, K. & Martinez, T. Turning Bayesian model averaging into Bayesian model combination. In The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (2011).

    Not in our library

73. 73.

    Yao Y, Vehtari A, Simpson D, Gelman A. Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributions (with discussion). Bayesian Anal. 2018;13:917-1003.

    Not in our library

74. 74.

    Chipman, H. A., George, E. I. & McCulloch, R. E. Bayesian Ensemble Learning. In Proceedings of The 19th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 265–272 (2006).

    Not in our library

75. 75.

    Olson, R. S. et al. In Automating Biomedical Data Science Through Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization (eds Squillero, G. & Burelli, P.) 123–137 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).

    Not in our library

76. 76.

    Breiman L. Stacked regressions. Mach. Learn. 1996;24:49-64.

    Not in our library

77. 77.

    LeDell, E. Scalable ensemble learning and computationally efficient variance estimation. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2015).

    Not in our library

78. 78.

    Aldave, R. Systematic ensemble learning and extensions for regression. PhD thesis, Université de Sherbrooke (2015).

    Not in our library

79. 79.

    Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Jones, G. & Meng, X.-L. (eds). Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (CRC Press, 2011).

    Not in our library

80. 80.

    Noack MM, et al. A kriging-based approach to autonomous experimentation with applications to X-ray scattering. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1-19.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-48114-3

81. 81.

    Williams, C. K. & Rasmussen, C. E. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning Vol. 2 (MIT press Cambridge, MA, 2006).

    Not in our library

82. 82.

    Mockus, J. Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization: Theory and Applications 1st edn (Springer Netherlands, 1989).

    Not in our library

83. 83.

    Snoek, J., Larochelle, H. & Adams, R. P. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. In NIPS’12 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2951–2959 (2012).

    Not in our library

84. 84.

    Earl, D. & Deem, M. W. Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.7, 3910–3916 (2005).

    Not in our library10.1039/b509983h

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Design of synthetic human gut microbiome assembly and butyrate production · 2021
  No notice
• Combining mechanistic and machine learning models for predictive engineering and optimization of tryptophan metabolism · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.