Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing

Abstract

Unconventional properties of non-Hermitian systems, such as the existence of exceptional points, have recently been suggested as a resource for sensing. The impact of noise and utility in quantum regimes however remains unclear. In this work, we analyze the parametric-sensing properties of linear coupled-mode systems that are described by effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Our analysis fully accounts for noise effects in both classical and quantum regimes, and also fully treats a realistic and optimal measurement protocol based on coherent driving and homodyne detection. Focusing on two-mode devices, we derive fundamental bounds on the signal power and signal-to-noise ratio for any such sensor. We use these to demonstrate that enhanced signal power requires gain, but not necessarily any proximity to an exceptional point. Further, when noise is included, we show that nonreciprocity is a powerful resource for sensing: it allows one to exceed the fundamental bounds constraining any conventional, reciprocal sensor.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 50

1. 1.

   Vollmer F, et al. Protein detection by optical shift of a resonant microcavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002;80:4057.

   Not in our library10.1063/1.1482797

2. 2.

   Vollmer F, Arnold S, Keng D. Single virus detection from the reactive shift of a whispering-gallery mode. PNAS. 2008;105:20701-20704.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0808988106

3. 3.

   Armani AM, Kulkarni RP, Fraser SE, Flagan RC, Vahala KJ. Label-free, single-molecule detection with optical microcavities. Science. 2007;317:783.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1145002

4. 4.

   Blais A, Huang RS, Wallraff A, Girvin SM, Schoelkopf RJ. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A. 2004;69:062320.

   Not in our library10.1103/physreva.69.062320

5. 5.

   Clerk AA, Devoret MH, Girvin SM, Marquardt F, Schoelkopf RJ. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:1155-1208.

   Not in our library10.1103/revmodphys.82.1155

6. 6.

   Aspelmeyer M, Kippenberg TJ, Marquardt F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014;86:1391.

   Not in our library10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391

7. 7.

   Caves CM. Microwave cavity gravitational radiation detectors. Phys. Lett. B. 1979;80:323-326.

   Not in our library10.1016/0370-2693(79)90227-2

8. 8.

   Ballantini R, et al. A detector of high frequency gravitational waves based on coupled microwave cavities. Class. Quantum Grav. 2003;20:3505.

   Not in our library10.1088/0264-9381/20/15/316

9. 9.

   Brodin G, Marklund M. Gravitational wave detection using electromagnetic modes in a resonance cavity. Class. Quantum Grav. 2003;20:L45.

   Not in our library10.1088/0264-9381/20/5/101

10. 10.

    Wiersig J. Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;112:203901.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.112.203901

11. 11.

    Hassan, A., Christodoulides, D., Hodaei, H., Khajavikhan, M. & Hayenga, W. Enhanced sensitivity in parity-time-symmetric microcavity sensors. Advanced Photonics 2015, OSA Technical Digest Paper SeT4C.3 (2015).

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Liu ZP, et al. Metrology with PT-symmetric cavities: enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117:110802.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.117.110802

13. 13.

    Wiersig J. Sensors operating at exceptional points: general theory. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:033809.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.93.033809

14. 14.

    Sunada S. Large Sagnac frequency splitting in a ring resonator operating at an exceptional point. Phys. Rev. A. 2017;96:033842.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.96.033842

15. 15.

    Ren J, et al. Ultrasensitive micro-scale parity-time-symmetric ring laser gyroscope. Opt. Lett. 2017;42:1556-1559.

    Not in our library10.1364/ol.42.001556

16. 16.

    El-Ganainy R, et al. Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry. Nat. Phys. 2018;14:11-19.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys4323

17. 17.

    Seyranian AP, Kirillov ON, Mailybaev AA. Coupling of eigenvalues of complex matrices at diabolic and exceptional points. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2005;38:1723-1740.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Demange G, Graefe EM. Signatures of three coalescing eigenfunctions. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2012;45:025303.

    Not in our library10.1088/1751-8113/45/2/025303

19. 19.

    Hodaei H, et al. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points. Nature. 2017;548:187-191.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature23280

20. 20.

    Chen W, Kaya Özdemir S, Zhao G, Wiersig J, Yang L. Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity. Nature. 2017;548:192-196.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature23281

21. 21.

    Langbein W. No exceptional precision of exceptional point sensors. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:023805.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreva.98.023805

22. 22.

    Hassan, A. U., et al. Ultra-sensitive PT-symmetric coupled cavities. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. Paper FTh1A.3 FTh1A.3 (2016).

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Gardiner Crispin W., Zoller Peter. The Stochastic Schrödinger Equation. Quantum Noise. 2000;341-396.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Braunstein S, Caves C. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994;72:3439.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439

25. 25.

    Banchi L, Braunstein SL, Pirandola S. Quantum fidelity for arbitrary Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115:260501.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.115.260501

26. 26.

    Caves CM. Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers. Phys. Rev. D. 1982;26:1817-1839.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevd.26.1817

27. 27.

    Deák L, Fülöp T. Reciprocity in quantum, electromagnetic and other wave scattering. Ann. Phys. 2012;327:1050-1077.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aop.2011.10.013

28. 28.

    Sounas DL, Alù A. Nonreciprocal photonics based on time modulation. Nat. Photonics. 2017;11:774-783.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x

29. 29.

    Metelmann A, Clerk AA. Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering. Phys. Rev. X. 2015;5:021025.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.112.133904

30. 30.

    Ozawa, T., et al. Topological photonics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04173 (2018).

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Yu Z, Fan S. Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions. Nat. Photonics. 2009;3:91-94.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphoton.2008.273

32. 32.

    Ranzani L, Aumentado J. Graph-based analysis of nonreciprocity in coupled-mode systems. New J. Phys. 2015;17:1-14.

    Not in our library10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023024

33. 33.

    Lira H, Yu Z, Fan S, Lipson M. Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:033901.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.109.033901

34. 34.

    Tzuang LD, Fang K, Nussenzveig P, Fan S, Lipson M. Nonreciprocal phase shift induced by an effective magnetic flux for light. Nat. Photonics. 2014;8:701-705.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphoton.2014.177

35. 35.

    Eggleton BJ, Fang K, Fan S, Li E. Photonic Aharonov–Bohm effect in photon–phonon interactions. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:1-5.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms4225

36. 36.

    Fang K, Yu Z, Fan S. Experimental demonstration of a photonic Aharonov–Bohm effect at radio frequencies. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:060301.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevb.87.060301

37. 37.

    Estep NA, Sounas DL, Soric J, Alù A. Magnetic-free nonreciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:923-927.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys3134

38. 38.

    Fang K, et al. Generalized nonreciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering. Nat. Phys. 2017;13:465-471.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys4009

39. 39.
    Nonreciprocal reconfigurable microwave optomechanical circuit · 2017

    Not checked
40. 40.

    Abdo B, Sliwa K, Frunzio L, Devoret M. Directional amplification with a Josephson circuit. Phys. Rev. X. 2013;3:031001.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.