Controllability of structural brain networks

Abstract

Cognitive function is driven by dynamic interactions between large-scale neural circuits or networks, enabling behaviour. However, fundamental principles constraining these dynamic network processes have remained elusive. Here we use tools from control and network theories to offer a mechanistic explanation for how the brain moves between cognitive states drawn from the network organization of white matter microstructure. Our results suggest that densely connected areas, particularly in the default mode system, facilitate the movement of the brain to many easily reachable states. Weakly connected areas, particularly in cognitive control systems, facilitate the movement of the brain to difficult-to-reach states. Areas located on the boundary between network communities, particularly in attentional control systems, facilitate the integration or segregation of diverse cognitive systems. Our results suggest that structural network differences between cognitive circuits dictate their distinct roles in controlling trajectories of brain network function.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 146

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.
   On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity · 2008

   Corrected
9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.
    Resting-State Functional Connectivity between Fronto-Parietal and Default Mode Networks in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder · 2012

    No notice
18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

30. 30.
    Efficient Physical Embedding of Topologically Complex Information Processing Networks in Brains and Computer Circuits · 2010

    No notice
31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

32. 32.
    Default Mode, Dorsal Attention and Auditory Resting State Networks Exhibit Differential Functional Connectivity in Tinnitus and Hearing Loss · 2013

    No notice
33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

42. 42.
    The effect of theta-burst TMS on cognitive control networks measured with resting state fMRI · 2013

    No notice
43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

73. 73.
    Impaired Structural Motor Connectome in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · 2011

    No notice
74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

78. 78.
    Modeling the Impact of Lesions in the Human Brain · 2009

    No notice
79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

91. 91.
    Nonoptimal Component Placement, but Short Processing Paths, due to Long-Distance Projections in Neural Systems · 2006

    No notice
92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

100. 100.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

101. 101.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

102. 102.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

103. 103.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

104. 104.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

105. 105.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

106. 106.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

107. 107.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

108. 108.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

109. 109.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

110. 110.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

111. 111.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

112. 112.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

113. 113.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

114. 114.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

115. 115.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

116. 116.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

117. 117.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

118. 118.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

119. 119.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

120. 120.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

121. 121.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

122. 122.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

123. 123.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

124. 124.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

125. 125.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

126. 126.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

127. 127.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

128. 128.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

129. 129.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

130. 130.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

131. 131.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

132. 132.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

133. 133.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

134. 134.
     Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex · 2008

     No notice
135. 135.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

136. 136.
     The hubs of the human connectome are generally implicated in the anatomy of brain disorders · 2014

     No notice
137. 137.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

138. 138.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

139. 139.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

140. 140.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

141. 141.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

142. 142.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

143. 143.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

144. 144.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

145. 145.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

146. 146.

     This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

     Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 22

• Whole-brain modelling identifies distinct but convergent paths to unconsciousness in anaesthesia and disorders of consciousness · 2022
  Not checked
• Integrating Philosophy of Understanding With the Cognitive Sciences · 2022
  Not checked
• Receptor-informed network control theory links LSD and psilocybin to a flattening of the brain’s control energy landscape · 2022
  No notice
• Concurrent fNIRS and EEG for Brain Function Investigation: A Systematic, Methodology-Focused Review · 2022
  No notice
• Understanding neural flexibility from a multifaceted definition · 2021
  Not checked
• Data-driven control of complex networks · 2021
  Not checked
• Brain network dynamics during working memory are modulated by dopamine and diminished in schizophrenia · 2021
  No notice
• Temporal sequences of brain activity at rest are constrained by white matter structure and modulated by cognitive demands · 2020
  No notice
• Multimodal network dynamics underpinning working memory · 2020
  No notice
• Decoupling of brain function from structure reveals regional behavioral specialization in humans · 2019
  No notice
• Paying attention to attention in depression · 2019
  Corrected
• Connectomics of bipolar disorder: a critical review, and evidence for dynamic instabilities within interoceptive networks · 2018
  Corrected
• Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory · 2018
  No notice
• Diversity of meso-scale architecture in human and non-human connectomes · 2018
  No notice
• The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: Accounting for the cost of wiring · 2017
  No notice
• Developmental increases in white matter network controllability support a growing diversity of brain dynamics · 2017
  No notice
• Cliques and cavities in the human connectome · 2017
  No notice
• Widespread theta synchrony and high-frequency desynchronization underlies enhanced cognition · 2017
  No notice
• Stimulation-Based Control of Dynamic Brain Networks · 2016
  No notice
• Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology · 2016
  No notice

and 2 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.