Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Nanotechnologies in Food Science: Applications, Recent Trends, and Future Perspectives

Shivraj Hariram Nile, Venkidasamy Baskar, Dhivya Selvaraj and 3 more

Nano-Micro Letters · 2020 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1007/s40820-020-0383-9

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a key advanced technology enabling contribution, development, and sustainable impact on food, medicine, and agriculture sectors. Nanomaterials have potential to lead qualitative and quantitative production of healthier, safer, and high-quality functional foods which are perishable or semi-perishable in nature. Nanotechnologies are superior than conventional food processing technologies with increased shelf life of food products, preventing contamination, and production of enhanced food quality. This comprehensive review on nanotechnologies for functional food development describes the current trends and future perspectives of advanced nanomaterials in food sector considering processing, packaging, security, and storage. Applications of nanotechnologies enhance the food bioavailability, taste, texture, and consistency, achieved through modification of particle size, possible cluster formation, and surface charge of food nanomaterials. In addition, the nanodelivery-mediated nutraceuticals, synergistic action of nanomaterials in food protection, and the application of nanosensors in smart food packaging for monitoring the quality of the stored foods and the common methods employed for assessing the impact of nanomaterials in biological systems are also discussed.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Nanotechnology is the technology applied in the manipulation of nanomaterials for several purposes, which plays a crucial role in the food and agriculture sectors, contributes to crop improvement, enhances the food quality and safety, and promotes human health through novel and innovative approaches. Owing to the unique physical, chemical, and biological properties with large surface–volume ratio as well as the altered solubility and toxicity when compared with their macroscale counterparts, engineered nanometer-sized particles have gained more attention in medicine, agro-food sectors, sewage water treatments, and other industries. Silver (Ag), gold (Au), zinc oxide (ZnO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and carbon nanoparticles are manufactured as much as tenfold that of other nanomaterials in amount due to their potential antimicrobial characteristics, being used in air filters, food storage containers, deodorants, bandages, toothpastes, paints, and other home appliances. Besides, the potent antibiotic activity of nanosized copper oxides (nCuO) has resulted in the wide application in commercial nano-biocide products. Nanomaterials are tiny particles ranging from 1 to 100 nm in size, insoluble or bio-persistent in nature, synthesized through various routes, and used in numerous fields including medicine, electronics, agriculture, and food industries. Different sized nanoparticles are used in nanotechnologies of food science for potential production and processing of healthier, safer, and high-quality foods (Fig. 1).

Food wastage leads to major losses in the food industry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reported that more than 1.3 billion metric tons of consumable food is lost or wasted every year throughout the supply chain, mainly because of inferior post-harvest techniques, storage, transport facilities, and market and consumer wastage of food. Apart from enhancing the food production rate, it is mandatory to tackle food wastage for the purpose to solve the food crisis caused by the emerging population and environmental issues. The major cause for food wastage is microbial contamination and food spoilage that reduces the food quality and affects food security, decreases shelf life of food products, and increases the risks of food-borne diseases. In food industry, nanotechnology is applied for all practices: food production, processing, storage, and distribution (Fig. 2). It provides enhanced security by using nanosensors to detect any pathogen or containments in food. Nanotechnology-enhanced food packaging offers an improvement over conventional packaging that uses plastic barriers, and at the same time its functional components such as antimicrobial activities provide increased shelf life to the food products. It is also involved in the detection of food toxins, flavor production, and color formation. Nanotechnology-based smart and intelligent systems provide localization, sensing, reporting, and remote control of food items with improved efficiency and security. Furthermore, nano-based delivery systems improve the nutraceutical values of the food components. Apart from their roles in food industry, nanomaterials also promote plant growth. For instance, TiO2 was shown to enhance the growth of many plants, gold nanoparticles increased the yield of seeds in Arabidopsis, and cellulose nanocrystals boost seed germination owing to their high water uptake potential.

The effective antimicrobial nature of biologically synthesized metallic nanoparticles not only controls the plant diseases, but also decreases environmental pollution. Nanomaterials, like carbon nanotubes, act as potential antimicrobial agents. Aggregates of carbon nanotubes caused cellular damage or death of E. coli by puncturing the cell when in direct contact with the bacterium. The implementation of nano-biosensors in the detection of carcinogenic pathogens to prepare high-quality and contamination-free food has been widely reported. In this review, the potential utilization and applications of nanotechnology with different nanomaterials in food sector considering processing, preservation, storage, and security in terms of enhanced shelf life and quality are discussed. The potential applications of nanotechnology in nutraceuticals, the diagnosis of food pathogens as well as the possible harmful effects of nanotechnology in human and animal health are reviewed.

Nanotechnology in Food Processing

Nanofood refers to the food generated by using nanotechnology in processing, production, security, and packaging of food. Nanotechnology has immense potential in the post-harvest food processing. It enhances food bioavailability, taste, texture, and consistency, or conceals the unpleasant taste or odor, and modifies the particle size, size distribution, possible cluster formation, and surface charge. Edible nano-coatings (~ 5 nm thin coatings) can be used in meat, fruits, vegetables, cheese, fast food, bakery goods, and confectionery products, in which they serve as gas and moisture barriers. In addition, they provide flavor, color, enzymes, antioxidants, anti-browning compounds, and a prolonged shelf life to the manufactured products. Various bakery goods, coated with edible antibacterial nano-coatings, are available. Nanofilters have been used to remove color from beetroot juice while retaining the flavor and the red wine, and to remove lactose from milk so that it can be substituted with other sugars, making the milk suitable for lactose-intolerant patients. Nanoscale filters help in the elimination of bacterial species from milk or water without boiling. Nanomaterials used for developing nanosieves can be used for the filtration of milk and beer.

Nanotechnology is used in the production of healthier food containing low fat, sugar, and salt to avoid food-borne diseases. It was reported that silicon dioxide (SiO2) and TiO2 were allowed as food additives in bulk quantities (E551 and E171, respectively). The shelf life of tomato has been increased by the bionanoencapsulated quercetin (biodegradable poly-D,L-lactide), and this approach should be extended to increase the shelf life of other vegetables and fruits. Nanogreen tea, Neosino capsules (dietary supplements), Canola active oil, Aquanova (micelle to enhance the solubility of vitamins (A, C, D, E, and K), beta-carotene, and omega fatty acids), Nutralease (fortifying nanocarriers to carry nutraceuticals and drugs) are the common commercialized nanotechnology-based products in the market. Similarly, fortified fruit juices, oat nutritional drinks, nanoteas, nanocapsules containing tuna fish oil in breads, and nanoceuticals slim shakes are few commercially available nano-processed foods in the market which are widely sold in the USA, Australia, China, and Japan. Nanotechnology in production of commercial nanofood products and their applications in various food science technologies are shown in Table 1.

Nanotechnology for Food Packaging

Packaging industry contributes largely to the world economy; nearly 55–65% of $130 billion was spent on food and beverage packaging in the USA. In recent years, the application of active and intelligent packaging systems in the muscle-based food products, which are prone to contamination, has increased tremendously. The aim of packaging meat and muscle products is to suppress spoilage, bypass contamination, enhance the tenderness by allowing enzymatic activity, decrease weight loss, and retain the cherry red color in red meats. The advent of nanosensors provides food spoilage or contamination alarm to the consumers by detecting toxins, pesticides, and microbial contamination in the food products, based on flavor production and color formation. Most of the nanoparticles used for packaging in food industry have potential antimicrobial activity, acting as carriers for antimicrobial polypeptides and providing protection against microbial spoilage. Packaging material made of a coating of starch colloids filled with the antimicrobial agent acts as a barrier to microbes through the controlled release of antimicrobials from the packaged material.

Nanoparticles are used as carriers to introduce enzymes, antioxidants, anti-browning agents, flavors, and other bioactive materials to improve the shelf life even after the package is opened. Few metals and metal oxide nanoparticles (inorganic nanoparticles), namely iron, silver, zinc oxides, carbon, magnesium oxides, titanium oxides, and silicon dioxide nanoparticles, are widely utilized as antimicrobials and in some conditions as food ingredients. Nanomaterials and their applications in food products are listed in Table 2. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by TiO2 is detrimental to pathogenic microbes, making it an effective antimicrobial agent. Enhanced heat resistance, low weight, and mechanical strength, and an increased barrier against O2, CO2, moisture, UV radiation, and volatiles can be achieved with the use of nanocomposites. Nanocomposites are commonly utilized for packaging and coating purposes. Numerous nanoparticles such as SiO2, clay and silicate nanoplatelets, carbon nanotubes, starch nanocrystals, graphene, chitin or chitosan nanoparticles, cellulose-based nanofibers, and other inorganics are filled in a polymeric matrix, making the matrix lighter and fire-resistant with improved thermal properties and low permeability to gases. Nanoparticles (100 nm or less) are included in plastics to enhance their properties. Polymer nanocomposites are thermoplastic polymers composed of 2–8% nanoscale incorporations, such as carbon nanoparticles, nanoclays, polymeric resins, and nanoscale metals and oxides. The extremely reactive nature of nanocomposites over their macroscale counterparts is due to the high surface-to-volume ratio. Silver in the silver zeolite is responsible for the antimicrobial activity via the production of ROS, and the ceramics coated with the silver zeolite are used in food preservation, decontamination of materials, and disinfection of medical products. The sustained antimicrobial performance of silver-based nanocomposite is superior to silver zeolite. Utilization of carbon nanotubes facilitates the elimination of CO2 or assimilation of unpleasant flavors. Furthermore, nanoclay in the nanocomposites (bentonite), used in the production of bottles and other food packaging materials, significantly enhances the gas barrier features and thereby inhibits oxygen and moisture from diffusion, drink destabilization, and spoilage of food materials.

The inclusion of active nanoparticles into the polymer matrices increases the performance of the food packaging material and provides functional attributes such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and scavenging which results in the longer shelf life of the packed food products. The utilization of nanocrystals developed by Nanocor (Arlington Heights, USA) in nanocomposite plastic beer bottles is to reduce the loss of CO2 and inflow of O2 into the beer bottles, like the natural biopolymer-based nanocomposites. The incorporation of clay nanoparticles into the ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer and polylactic acid (PLA) biopolymer was shown to improve the oxygen barrier and increase the shelf life of food materials. The organically modified nanoclays incorporated in the polymer matrix provide mechanical strength and serve as a barrier to gases, volatiles, and moisture. Interestingly, PLA bionanocomposite produced from the incorporation of nanofillers into the biodegradable polymer PLA showed more rapid biodegradation than its counterpart PLA without nanofillers. Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of the packaging material have been significantly increased by the inclusion of polymer–clay nanocomposites. Obstruction of oxidation, and regulations of moisture migration, respiration rate, microbial growth, volatile flavor, and aromas are greatly influenced by the application of nanotechnology in the packaging industries.

Potential antimicrobial activities were reported for the chitosan-based nanocomposite films, particularly silver-containing nanocomposites. Garlic essential oil filled in the PEG-coated nanoparticles can be utilized for the restriction of store-product pests. The shelf life of the food product has been increased efficiently by applying phytoglycogen octenyl nanoparticles included with the Ɛ-polylysine. Application of silicate nanoparticles in food packaging acts as a barrier to gases or moisture and thus decreases food spoilage and drying. Water-based nanocomposites forming 1–2-µm nano-coatings on food packaging materials act as a barrier to oxygen. Nanoemulsions are used in food packaging and decontamination of food packaging equipment. Glycerin included with nanomicelle-based products eliminates pesticide residues from fruits and vegetables and oil/dirt from cutlery. The addition of nanoemulsified bioactive and flavors to beverages does not affect the product appearance. Different food pathogens like gram-negative bacteria are significantly controlled by nanoemulsions. Active and intelligent packaging systems are widely used. Various nanoformulation approaches and their applications in food products are presented in Table 3.

Active Food Packaging Systems

The active packaging systems consist of moisture regulating agents, CO2 scavengers and emitters, oxygen scavengers, and antimicrobials. Active packaging systems are developed depending on the purpose of the storage. For example, overwrap packaging systems are used for short-term chilled storage, while modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) systems, vacuum packaging, MAP systems utilizing 100% CO2, and bulk gas flushing are employed for long-term chilled storage. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP), the commercially used polymeric films for packaging, are inert, are hydrophobic, and have less surface energy. Surface modifications with functional properties and polar groups for the inclusion of antimicrobial substances are essential to eliminate food spoilage. Factors such as lipid oxidation, dehydration, discoloration, and loss of aroma should be considered in the case of processed meats; additives are included in the packaging systems to extend and maintain the shelf life of meat products. Potential for the development of metallic-based nanocomposites in active food packaging is described in Fig. 3.

The MAP is one of the important packaging systems widely operated for the distribution, storage, and maintenance of meat products under cold condition. MAP technology enhances the shelf life and quality of the meat products by replacing the air compassing the meat products with formulated gas mixtures. In general, the non-inert gases such as O2 and CO2 are used in the MAP technology and their profiles change over time, influenced by factors like the type of product, respiration, materials used for packaging, size of the pack, storage conditions, and package integrity. The uniform dispersion of clay nanoparticles on the transparent plastic film produced by Chemical giant Bayer (Leverkusen, Germany) prevents O2, CO2, and moisture from reaching fresh meats and other foods. Several patents on the applications of nanomaterials in the food packaging have been filed in the USA, Europe, and Asia, and most of them report the utilization of nanoclays and nanosilver. The inclusion of allyl isothiocyanate and carbon nanotubes into the active packaging systems decreases microbial contamination and color changes, regulates oxidation, and helps in the storage of shredded, cooked chicken meat for 40 days.

Smart/Intelligent Food Packaging Systems

Smart packaging systems respond to environmental stimuli by repairing or alerting the consumer regarding the contamination or the presence of pathogens. Nanoparticles are used in the development of nanosensors to detect food contaminants. Custom-made nanosensors are used for food analysis, detection of flavors or colors, drinking water, and clinical diagnosis. Application of nanosensors in food packaging aids in tracing the physical, chemical, and biological modifications during food processing. Specifically designed nanosensors and nanodevices utilized in smart packaging help in detecting toxins, chemicals, and food pathogens. The intelligent packaging systems with sensors and indicators are also used to track and give information regarding the quality of the packaged foods during storage and transport. Various functional nanomaterials, used as nanosensors and active packaging materials that provide significant mechanical and barrier properties, are potential targeted nutrient delivery systems. With the advent of sensors, sensor-based indicators for integrity, freshness and time–temperature monitoring and radio frequency identification were used in the meat industry. It has been reported that smart or intelligent packaging retains the food quality during distribution. The response to modifications associated with the internal or external environmental stimuli is registered by the specific sensor. Integrity (package integrity determination), freshness (quality of the packaged products), and time–temperature (time and temperature dependent changes) indicators are commonly used in the food packaging applications. These indicators are monitored throughout the production and distribution chain in order to maintain the quality and enhance the shelf life of products. Barcodes developed with the help of nanoparticles, called nanobarcodes, can be used as ID tags.

Nanosensor application in packaging provides details of enzymes generated during the degradation of food compounds that makes food unsuitable for human intake. Packaging improves the shelf life of the food products by preventing air and other enzymes from entering and decreases the use of artificial preservatives. It also helps in the elimination of the ripening hormone known as ethylene to enhance the shelf life of food products. The nanosensors in the smart packaging systems are used for the detection of gases, chemical contaminants, aromas, temperature and light intensity, pathogens, or the products of microbial metabolism. Analytical techniques such as GC/MS, portable headspace O2, and CO2 gas analyzers are available to investigate the gas phases in the MAP products. However, these methods have certain demerits; optical sensor-based approaches are more effective than these methods in real-time packaging processes or large-scale usage. Food rotting is a major concern in the food industry; it is caused mainly by bacteria that result in the release of unpleasant odor, which may be difficult to detect with human nose, and sometimes rotting food may lead to poisoning. In order to detect the odors generated due to food poisoning, highly sensitive biosensors are required. For example, the device electronic nose functions like a human nose which utilizes sets of chemical sensors attached to a data processing system. Methods to determine chemical and physical characteristics of pears and fruit odors using the electronic nose signal have been reported. Interestingly, electronic nose can be used to detect variations in the aroma of strawberry fruit, osmotic dehydration, and the quality of milk during processing. This device is used for a highly accurate determination of volatiles and monitoring the quality control processes in food industry. Nanosensors were applied in the European project GOODFOOD (2004–2007) for food safety and quality control applications.

Mechanism of Nanoparticle Activity

Common factors such as product nature (formulation), processing conditions (intrinsic factors), type of package and storage and distribution crucially affect the shelf life of a food product. Intrinsic factors like water activity, pH, microbes, enzymes, and the level of reactive compounds can be regulated by using specific raw materials and ingredients and appropriate processing parameters. Temperature, total pressure, light, partial pressure of various gases, relative humidity, and mechanical stress (human handling) are the common extrinsic factors that influence the rate of degradation reactions during food material storage. It is worth noting that the microbial growth mostly occurs on the surface of the perishable foods, including muscle-based foods, and therefore, utilization of antimicrobial packaging efficiently controls the microbial growth compared to the application of antimicrobials as food additives. Furthermore, antimicrobial packaging effectively interacts with the food product as well as the environment. Nanoparticles are widely used in the packaging systems due to their potential antimicrobial properties. Most of the nanoparticles produce ROS, thus damaging the microbes present on the surface of food and packaging materials. Antimicrobial nanoparticles, namely Cu, CuO, MgO, Ag, ZnO, Pd, Fe, and TiO2, or nanoemulsions/nanoencapsulations enclosing natural antimicrobial substances that can be adhered to via electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and covalent interactions are developed to produce antimicrobial packaging systems. Several chemical modifications and deposition processes are being used for the attachment of silver NP onto the surface of the plastic substrate that facilitates slower release of silver ions to reduce their inclusion in the food.

The potential surface charge of engineered water nanostructures (EWNS) can deactivate Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and Listeria innocua effectively on the surface of stainless steel and on tomato without influencing the sensory quality of food, operating via ROS production. The degradation of EWNS results in the formation of water vapor, hence lowering the risk of hazardous environmental problems. The inorganic (ZnO, TiO2, and Ag) and organic (chitosan and essential oil) nanomaterials are also used for food product preservation. Since polymer matrices control the release of active components, they regulate the function of nanocomposites. Polymers such as polyolefins, nylons, ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer, polyethyleneterephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), polyamides, and polyimides have been used for nanocomposite production. For example, silver NPs immobilized in cellulose and collagen sausages casings showed potential bactericidal activity against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus, but they were not harmful to humans and the environment. Such superior antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus had been demonstrated with silver–polyamide nanocomposites, where the antimicrobial efficiency lasted for 28 days. The antimicrobial nature of the nanocomposite is significantly affected by the characteristics of the polymer and NP. Various types of nanoparticles that could help to prevent, detect, or treat bacterial infections like silver, gold, and tiny magnetic particles help to trigger or capture bacterial pathogens and help to prevent bacterial spread in hospitals and human body, providing an attractive way to rapidly detect bacterial biomolecules in a point-of-care compatible setting. The details about different nanotechnology-based solutions that could help to prevent, detect, or treat bacterial infections are presented in Fig. 4.

The LDPE films coated with silver NPs using a layer-by-layer method have a significant antimicrobial potential against S. aureus (gram-positive) and Pseudomonas fluorescens (gram-negative). Similarly, significant antimicrobial functions against L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157: H7, S. aureus, and S. typhimurium were observed in the chitosan–silver nanocomposite prepared by the solvent casting method. ZnO-encapsulated halloysite–polylactic acid nanocomposite comprising packaging films exhibited enhanced mechanical and antimicrobial activities. Pathogenic bacteria species such as E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and P. aeruginosa residing in the meat products were deactivated by the LDPE/ZnO+Ag nanocomposites. In addition, the application of these nanocomposites enhanced the shelf life of the chicken breast fillets and slowed down the bacterial growth and lipid oxidation. It was reported that the improved quality of lemon with lower total soluble solids and punch force, enhanced titratable acid, firmness, and peel shear forces were found when they were coated with the chosen clay nanocomposites during cold storage.

The storage conditions and duration also influence the antimicrobial activities of the nanocomposite films. For example, the stability and antimicrobial activity of pullulan films incorporated with NP (silver or ZnO NPs) and oregano or rosemary essential oils were studied at various temperatures (4, 25, 37, and 55 °C) for 7 weeks against the common food pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and S. aureus. Their results illustrated that the antimicrobial potential of the pullulan nanocomposite films was maintained at low temperature (< 25 °C), and reduced greatly at > 25 °C. Some studied showed that the migration of Ag from the Ag/PVC films to the chicken meat was least (8.85 mg/kg or 0.84 mg dm−2), below the legal migration limits provided by the European Union for plastic films. Food packaging with low silver concentration, having an enhanced and stable bioavailability is a challenge for the application of silver in food packaging. The citrate-mediated silver complex is the most commonly used standardized silver formulation for antimicrobial purposes.

Antimicrobial Properties of Nanoparticles

Several nanoproducts are available in the market to control the microbial growth. For instance, the four crucial food-related pathogens such as E. coli O157: H7, S. typhimurium, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and L. monocytogenes were effectively inhibited by the nanosilver product known as NanoCid® L2000 (Nano Nasb Pars Company, Tehran, Iran). Nanotechnology Consumer Product Inventory has listed many nanomaterial-related antimicrobial disinfectants. Most of the antimicrobial products found in the list contain nanosilver as the main antimicrobial agent. The antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles alone and the silver NP embedded in the carboxymethylcellulose film showed that AgNPs embedded in the carboxymethylcellulose film were more potent as bactericidal than the AgNPs alone, which was suggested that antibacterial activity of AgNPs can be used food packaging. Nanoengineered surfaces (antimicrobial coatings) are one of the efficient agents to suppress the growth of biofilms and enhance the quality and safety of the food. The nanoscale silver, TiO2, and ZnO or nanoscale topography is used for surface cleaning in the food industry. The biocontamination problems existing in poultry farming, food processing, and food transportation were effectively controlled by the UV-C ultraviolet light-activated TiO2. The pathogen transmission is mainly through air and may be involved in poultry meat contamination at different stages of slaughtering and processing. The incorporation of microbicidal materials such as silver and other metals in the nanofiber mats revealed a significant antimicrobial potential. Nanoenabled membranes, nanophotocatalysts, and nanoadsorbents are used for the purification of water in the wastewater treatment.

Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Nanoparticles

The combinatorial use of two or more nanoparticles provides a synergistic effect exhibiting potent antimicrobial activity compared to a single nanoparticle. Silver NPs combined with titanium dioxide and carbon nanotubes effectively combat E. coli and Bacillus cereus spores, respectively. B. cereus spores present on the surfaces of aluminum and polyesters were destroyed by the silver-doped TiO2 NP. The molds and airborne bacteria caught in the air filters are destroyed by the silver-doped TiO2 NP. Enhanced antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus was achieved by the stabilization of silver NP with SDS or PVP. Silver NP coatings have been used on the surfaces of refrigerators and storage containers. Several food-related pathogens, such as Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Salmonella choleraesuis, and Listeria monocytogenes, are shown to be affected by the UV-activated TiO2 NP Photoactivation of TiO2, reportedly caused biocidal activities against toxic food microbes.

Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity with Natural Derivatives

Several studies have shown the synergistic antimicrobial activities of various nanoparticles (silver, gold, zinc, chitosan, platinum, iron, copper, carbon nanotubes) with the essential oils (natural derivatives). Researchers have formulated an essential oil (EO) droplet emulsified with gold NP; also they utilized NP for the encapsulation of peppermint EOs and cinnamaldehyde. Similarly, thymols containing EO of Lippia sidoides were nanoencapsulated in the chitosan–gum NPs and are used in chemical, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Magnetic nanofluid was produced by fusion of EOs and iron oxide NPs. Oregano EO nanoencapsulated with the chitosan NPs was studied for its antimicrobial activity as well as the releasing pattern of Eos. The antimicrobial activity of thymol was increased when encapsulated with the zein-sodium caseinate NPs. The antibacterial and antifungal activity of the EOs is increased through nano-complex of various types of NPs. The eugenol and cinnamaldehyde incorporated in the poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) NPs were shown to have potent biocidal activity against Salmonella and Listeria. Similarly, the combinatorial preparation of liposome-based NP and Origanum dictamnus essential oil was highly effective in controlling gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Several essential oil derivatives of Santolina insularis such as γ-terpinene, carvacrol, p-cymene, thymol, and their combination with phosphatidylcholine liposome NPs were prepared by researchers, and they have been effective in controlling the growth of microbes.

The researchers reported that the encapsulation of essential oil derivatives such as thymol and carvacrol within the zein nanoparticles through liquid–liquid dispersion method demonstrated a strong antioxidant and antimicrobial activity against E. coli. Nanoencapsulation enhances the activity of essential oil against microbes, and the polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, and nanoemulsions are employed for this purpose; this can be used to regulate the release of drug molecule. Potential biocidal activity of EO encapsulated by chitosan/cashew gum nanoencapsulation was found against Stegomyia aegypti larvae due to the slow and sustained release. The gram-positive bacterial growth was effectively suppressed by the thymol encapsulated in zein nanoparticle compared to thymol only. Carvacrol, a monoterpenic phenol produced by aromatic plants, increased antimicrobial activity when nanoencapsulated with polylactic glycolic acid. The gold nanoparticles linked with the vancomycin substituent showed more toxicity toward vancomycin-resistant bacteria. Phytoglycogen NP coupled with nisin showed improved antimicrobial action against L. monocytogenes. The application of pullulan film containing essential oils (2% oregano, 2% rosemary) and NPs (100 nm Ag, 110 nm ZnO) to fresh turkey, raw beef, or processed turkey deli meat resulted in the suppression of L. monocytogenes, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and E. coli O157:H7 for more than 2 weeks when vacuum-packaged and stored at 4 °C. PLA/CEO/β-CD nanofilms were developed by the inclusion of cinnamon EO-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex (CEO/β-CD-IC) into the PLA nanofibers using electrospinning technique and showed potential antimicrobial functions against S. aureus and E. coli. In addition, the shelf life of fresh pork was increased to 8 days compared to control samples which had a shelf life of 3 days. Nanoencapsulation of essential oil enhanced their physical stability and bioactivity, reduced the volatility and toxicity, and protected it from environmental interactions with oxygen, light, pH, and moisture. Therefore, the combination of essential oils and nanoparticles significantly increased the antimicrobial properties as they complemented each other against various pathogens; this would be an ideal strategy to constrain the multidrug resistant microbes (MDR). The emergence of MDR pathogens results in increased rate of morbidity and mortality, emphasizing the need for alternative natural drugs. Moreover, application of nanotechnology to the natural drug product formulation may ensure slow and sustained release of drugs to combat MDR microbes.

Applications in Nutraceutical Delivery and Bioavailability

Bioactive substances present in food provide immunity and protect against diseases. Although most of the food items possessed higher concentrations of bioactive molecules, their potency was low. It is mainly due to low bioavailability, lower solubility, and stability in the gut, decreased permeability, and retention time in the intestinal tract. Nanomaterials usually consist of a wide surface area per unit mass and decreased particle dimension which enhances the biological activity, bioavailability, and solubility of the encapsulated food materials. Nanosized iron and iron/zinc materials used in the nutraceutical deliveries enhanced the bioavailability and reduced the color changes in the final products. The bioavailability of most of the vitamins (A, D, and E) and bioactive compounds such as curcumin, carotenoids, conjugated linoleic acids, coenzyme Q10, and ω-30 fatty acids is low or unstable after intake. Low bioavailability is due to the physicochemical and physiological parameters such as bioaccessibility, absorption, and transformation. In general, the low bioavailability, solubility, and stability of most of the bioactive molecules such as antioxidants, vitamins, micronutrients, polyphenols, carotenoids, and food ingredients can be enhanced with the help of nanotechnology specifically with nanoformulations. Most of the biologically active substances used in treatment of diseases are hydrophobic in nature having least bioavailability. Nanotechnology-based delivery systems are used to enhance the bioavailability and targeted delivery of natural bioactive compounds (Fig. 5).

Nanoparticles are also made up of natural food-grade macromolecules such as proteins, surfactants, polysaccharides, lipids, and phospholipids. Composite nanoparticles are produced by different combinations of these food-grade ingredients, such as lipid core with a protein referred to as “nanoemulsions” and lipid droplets inserted in the biopolymer microspheres. The efficiency, utilization, and stability of the bioactive food materials can be enhanced with the help of these food-grade nanoparticles due to their encapsulating nature, protection, and release of the bioactive food constituents. Nanonutraceuticals are a combination of nutrition and pharmaceuticals in which the dietary supplements, bioactive substances, functional foods, and herbal products are produced via nanoformulation approach. Different methods were employed for the delivery of nutraceuticals. Nanotubes, nanofibres, fullerenes, nanosheets, nanowhiskers are delivered via various vehicles such as liposomes, cubosome, microemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), biopolymeric nanoparticles, nanosensors, monolayers, microgels, and fibers. It is crucial to understand the advantages and the significant toxicity of nanocarrier systems in food products. For development of effective micronutrient delivery system for food manufactures, a great advancement in design and fabrication of various food-grade nanoparticles is done by recently with the addition of notable applications. Colloidal delivery-based foods (excipient foods) can improve the bioavailability of the food, although they do not possess any biological activity themselves. The absorption of the bioactive agents into the systemic circulation increases, resulting in enhanced bioactivity while providing powerful health benefits. In order to enhance the bioaccessibility, absorption, or transformation profiles of bioactive compounds in the gastrointestinal tract (GTI), the composition and structure of excipient foods are specifically designed. There are a number of nanoparticle-based delivery systems to improve the bioavailability of the food with suitable encapsulation of micronutrients presented in Fig. 6. The applications of nanotechnology in nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals which was discussed by many researchers in their studies are shown in Table 4.

Nanoemulsions

Nanoemulsions are a colloidal particulate system with oil-in-water emulsions characteristics having a very small droplet size that varies from 10 to 1000 nm and containing solid spheres with amorphous and lipophilic surfaces. The nanoemulsions act as excellent carriers for various bioactive compounds with enhanced properties compared to conventional emulsions, providing with excellent properties like high optical clarity, physical stability, and enhanced bioavailability. The small size of nanoemulsions helps to produce or have large surface area which can be very important for strong interaction with various bioactive compounds transported in the gastrointestinal tract. Also, the nanoemulsions show higher digestion rate compared to conventional emulsions as they are having more binding sites available amylase and lipase digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, these nanoemulsions are significantly helped in rapid transfer of naturally occurring hydrophobic bioactive compounds present in functional foods into the oil droplets. Various functional foods are the types of foods which significantly help to produce energy and ameliorate the human health problems. Some examples of functional food products which are already available for human beings are cereals with vitamins, minerals and ω-3 fatty acids, curds or yogurts with probiotics, milk products fortified with vitamin D, fruit juices enriched with various metal ions like iron and calcium, and breads fortified with phytosterols. The concept of development of functional or healthier food product has gained more importance to optimize and enhance various natural bioactive compounds as food for amelioration of intrinsic health properties and bioavailability. In this context, excipient foods have been introduced as foods that are able to improve the bioactivity of foods co-ingested with them (Fig. 7). The nanoemulsion-based approach effectively increases bioavailability of biologically active compounds as their structures, compositions, and properties can be regulated. Emulsion-based systems are prepared from the emulsifier-coated oil droplets dispersed in water phase. The conventional emulsion-based systems are larger in size (oil in water, d > 100 nm) while the latest nanoemulsions are smaller in size (d < 100 nm). The nonpolar domains containing a mixed micelle phase are larger in number and harbor all released hydrophobic bioactive compounds, thus enhancing their bioaccessibility. The inclusion of isolated bioactive compounds into the emulsion-based delivery systems leads to enhanced bioavailability. However, the enhanced bioavailability of bioactive compounds present in whole foods can be achieved by incorporating them into emulsion-based excipient systems (EES). Polyphenols are the naturally derived secondary metabolites possessing various health benefits. The stability and oral bioavailability of the epigallocatechin gallate and curcumin were enhanced by the nanoemulsion method, and the nanoemulsion was used to enhance the yellow color pigment in turmeric. The major applications of nanoemulsions include curing and treatment for enzyme replacement therapy in the liver, infection of the reticuloendothelial system, cancer prevention, and vaccination.

Nanoencapsulation

Encapsulation of bioactive nutraceutical molecules using nanoformulations increased their bioavailability and biodistribution. Nanoencapsulation is a process in which the substances are packed in tiny structures, either by nano-structuration, nano-emulsification, or nanocomposites that facilitate controlled release of the core. Different types of nanoencapsulations (nanoparticles, liposomes, nanospheres, micelles, nanocochleates, and nanoemulsions) have been employed depending on the requirement. They can be used as nutritional supplements, to conceal unpleasant taste, improve the bioavailability, and permit efficient dispersion of insoluble supplements without the requirement for surfactants or emulsifiers. The PLA-based nanoparticles were used as a stabilizer in the nanoencapsulated curcumin and quercetin in turmeric extract. Stevioside nanoparticles, nontoxic natural noncaloric sweeteners, were used as antidiabetic nutraceutical agents. The stability and bioavailability of the polyphenols (catechin and epicatechin) in tea were enhanced by encapsulating them in BSA nanoparticles. The nanoformulation of bioactive components which results in their slow release retains the antioxidant potential and enhances the effectiveness of the bioactive molecules. Most of the natural phytochemicals are sensitive to different environments. The entrapment of biologically active components (vitamins, antioxidants, phytochemicals, proteins, lipids and carbohydrates) within the nanoparticles not only gives protection, but also improves function and stability of the bioactive. These nanocapsules when dissolved release the active ingredients like the normal food. The encapsulation of curcumin in hydrophobically modified starch results in increased anticancer activity. Nanocoating can be used as vehicles for functional ingredients during nanoencapsulation, whereas the nanocapsules can be designed to include nanoadditives, antimicrobials, and detoxifying agents (e.g., mycotoxin binding) in the animal feeds. Some of the compounds (e.g., octenyl succinic anhydride-Ɛ-polylysine) are bifunctional molecules which can be either utilized as surfactants or emulsifiers and can be used in the encapsulation of bioactive compounds or drugs or antimicrobials. Interestingly, nanoencapsulation using lipid molecules increased the antioxidant potential through enhanced solubility and bioavailability and eliminated the undesirable interactions with other food constituents. Nanoliposomes, nanocochleates and archaeosomes are commonly employed lipid-based nanoencapsulation systems. Nanoliposomes are potentially used as cargos for nutrients, enzymes, food antimicrobials, and food additives. Nanoencapsulation of probiotics was also reported previously. The live mixtures of bacterial species supplemented in the food are known as probiotics. The common probiotic foods are cheese, fruit-based drinks, yogurts, and yogurt-type fermented milk and puddings. Encapsulation of these ingredients increases the shelf life of the product. The designer probiotic bacterial species produced using nanoencapsulation technique can be introduced into specific regions of the GI tract where they bind to the specific receptors. These nanoencapsulated designer probiotics may function as de novo vaccines, with the potential to regulate immune responses.

Mixed Nanoparticle Delivery System

Several studies demonstrated the encapsulation of a bioactive agent using a single type of nanoparticle in the food industry. A mixed nanoparticle delivery system (two or more types of nanoparticles with various functional characteristics) can be more useful for certain applications. It was reported that the encapsulation of chemically sensitive (labile), hydrophobic, biologically active substances using protein nanoparticles followed by mixing with lipid nanoparticles is highly advantageous; protein nanoparticle provides protection to the bioactive; and lipid nanoparticles attribute a source of digestible triglycerides (TGs) that in turn enhances the solubility of the bioactive components in the gastrointestinal tract. The triglycerides get hydrolyzed to free fatty acids and monoglycerides in the small intestine. These hydrolyzed products combine with the bile acids and phospholipids to produce mixed micelles that dissolve the hydrophobic bioactive substances once they are liberated from the encapsulated protein nanoparticles. Few studies have reported the fabrication of either curcumin-loaded or tangeritin-encapsulated zein nanoparticles with antisolvent preparation followed by mixing with lipid NP using microfluidization. They found that enhanced solubilizing ability of the mixed micelle phase significantly improved the bioaccessibility of the hydrophobic bioactive molecules. Nanoparticle clustering is a mixture of positively and negatively charged suspension nanoparticles of proportions resulting in the formation of highly viscous solutions or gels (NP clusters). The pH and ionic strength strongly influence the interaction between the oppositely charged particles. This concept is used to produce less calorie food products with enhanced or novel textural features. Trojan Horse NP is the entrapment of nanoparticles in larger particles (hydrogel beads) leading to enhanced functional features. In this delivery method, nanoparticles filled with biologically active substances can be trapped inside the larger particles and are liberated when they reach the site of action. It was utilized to encapsulate nanoemulsions in larger particles (hydrogel beads) where the release depends on the environment. In the upper GI tract, Trojan Horse nanoparticle systems provide protection to oil droplets from lipid digestion and then allow their release within the colon. In addition, digestion rate of lipid droplets in the small intestine and bioaccessibility of encapsulated hydrophobic bioactive substances can be regulated with the Trojan Horse nanoparticle systems. The major achievement of this system is the delivery of the bioactive substances to various regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Nanosized, self-assembled liquid structures are called as fortifying nano-vehicles where the expanded micelles (< 30 nm) are used for the targeted nutraceuticals such as beta-carotene, lycopene, isoflavones, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), phytosterols, and omega-3 fatty acids.

Environment-Specific NP-Mediated Delivery

The development of diagnostic sensors and controlled release delivery systems requires nanoparticles which can alter their characteristics with response to the specific environmental stimulations including ionic strength, pH, enzymatic activity, and temperature. Several studies have been carried out to develop NP that can change their properties according to the environment. For instance, bioactive molecules carrying lipid nanoparticles were broken down immediately upon contact with lipase and bioactive molecules were released under simulated GIT conditions. The pancreatic lipase releases the bioactive substances in the small intestine, while the bioactive substance-filled protein nanoparticles were readily broken down in the stomach or small intestine containing proteases. Whey protein-loaded riboflavin, zein nanoparticle-loaded curcumin, and resveratrol are some of the bioactive-loaded protein nanoparticles. In the pharmaceutical industry, pH-sensitive nanoparticles have been used to deliver anticancer molecules to the oncogenic tissues.

Natural Carriers

Nano-vehicles were developed to carry out specific functions. Natural nanocarrier of nutrients such as casein micelle is used for the delivery of hydrophobic, bioactive substances. For hydrophobic nutraceutical delivery in clear acid beverages, β-lactoglobulin–pectin nanocomplexes and core–shell NP built from heat-aggregated β-lactoglobulin and nanocoated using beet pectin for bioactive molecules delivery were generated. Milk proteins such as lactoferrin or bovine serum albumin-fused NP were used for the potential drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier, in vivo. Nanoparticles were designed for targeted delivery to specific region, organ, or tissues. For example, targeted delivery to gastric cancer (β-casein NP), intestine (BSA NP coated with the fatty acid), and colon (Maillard conjugates of casein and resistant starch) was achieved with these applications. Soy lecithin used to produce aqueous nanodispersions acts as a carrier of hydrophobic bioactive, including fat-soluble vitamins. A sevenfold higher absorption of CoQ in the intestine was observed in the nanodispersion method compared to conventional powder formulations. Colloidosomes are self-connected tiny capsules forming a hollow shell in which bioactive or any other substances can be filled. Beta-carotene encapsulated in nanolipid carriers was designed which permits the hydrophobic β-carotene to easily disperse and stabilize in beverages. Nanocochleates are nanocolloid particles built mostly from lipids (75%) that encapsulate the micronutrients and provide stability, protection, and food with improved nutritional values. Starch like nanoparticles significantly improved the stability of the oil-in-water emulsion by preventing lipid oxidation.

Nanomaterials in Diagnostic Applications

Although the conventional molecular diagnostic methods are shown to have higher sensitivity and reproducibility in the detection of pathogens as well as their products (toxins), they are not used in many places due to the requirements for sophistication, high-cost instrumentation, and trained technicians. The unique magnetic, electrical, luminescent, and catalytic activities of nanomaterials are used for the development of rapid, sensitive, and low-cost diagnostic assays for the detection of microbial pathogens. With the application of nanosensors, microbial pathogen detection is rapid, sensitive, accurate, and low labor-intensive. In general, NPs are highly reactive compared to their large-sized particles; hence, it is worth noting to study their possible toxicity in living systems.

Liposomes

The detection of bacterial toxins such as botulinum, tetanus, and cholera was achieved with the help of engineered GT1b or GM1 ganglioside-bearing liposomes which are in the range of ∼ 120–130 nm, and they recognize the target toxins. Fluorescent-labeled (rhodamine dye) liposomes were able to detect the lowest concentrations of toxins (1 nM) using fluoroimmunoassay.

Carbon Nanotubes

Galactose biofunctionalized single-walled nanotubes (Gal-SWNTs), used to detect E. coli O157:H7 containing galactose binding surface proteins, revealed a strong aggregation due to their multivalent interactions. It was also reported that application of SWNT-mediated potentiometric aptamer biosensor was used for faster and label-free detection of live bacterial cells; 6 cfu mL−1 in milk and 26 cfu mL−1 in apple juice.

Gold Nanoparticles (Au NPs)

Gold nanoparticles are considered suitable for the adsorption of biomolecules without losing their biological functions, mainly due to their large surface-to-volume ratio and unique physical and chemical properties. Staphylococcus aureus cell membrane protein (protein A) was detected by the AuNP-anti-protein A antibody conjugate immobilized on the immunochromatographic strip. This device functions in a rapid (< 10 min) and highly sensitive (25 ng mL−1) manner for the detection of protein A. The detection of DNA from pathogenic bacteria by utilizing the cationic AuNPs attached to poly (para-phenyleneethynylene) (PPE) provided more rapid and efficient identification than conventional plating and culturing. PPE did not fluoresce in the bound state, whereas the presence of bacteria allowed electrostatic interactions between the bacterial surface and the AuNPs that led to the liberation of PPE from the bound conjugate. Free PPE (fluorescent signals) concentrations can be estimated for the rapid quantification of bacteria.

Silver Nanoparticles (Ag NPs)

Application of various antimicrobial substances like metals provides a promising way to control undesirable growth of microorganisms. Basically, the heavy metals have been considered for providing broad-spectrum biocide effects. Among all the metals, the ionic silver considered to have largest antimicrobial activity with long-term biocide properties and low volatility with low toxicity to eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, in recent years, silver has gained popularity because of the spread of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, being resistance to silver considered sporadic with a low clinical incidence. The release of silver ions helps to reduce microbial load with sustainable development of various aseptic food containers and antimicrobial surfaces, providing active packaging food systems with promising quality. Very low amount of silver ions (10–100 mg Ag t/kg) is required to achieve biocidal effects using in water or low buffered systems. Interestingly, the antimicrobial activity of silver decreases rapidly in the presence of proteins in food system, and hence, the silver amount required was 50–100 mg Agt kg−1 in realistic food applications. For microbial inhibition activity, using silver ions remains inconsistent in complex food matrix without proper standardization or determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value which leads to wrong claims. Also, the overuse of silver as nanoparticles leads to molecular basis of resistance in microorganism, which should be documented properly and considered in technological applications.

Toxicological Aspects of Nanomaterials in Food

The field of nanotechnology is growing, and along with it the public concern regarding the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials is also increasing. Nanoparticle-mediated toxicity is stimulated by dynamic, kinetic, and catalytic properties and by functionalization, net particle reactivity, agglomeration, and functional environment. Nanoparticles on the surface of the packaging material are not harmful to human beings, but their translocation and integration into food may affect the human health. The entrance/route, absorption, and distribution of NP in the human body with special attention to their cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were discussed previously. Nanoparticles reach the animal system via skin penetration, ingestion, inhalation, intravenous injections or by the implanted medical apparatus; inside the cells, they interact with the biological macromolecules. Toxicokinetic issues caused by the NP are mainly due to their persistent, non-dissolvable, and nondegradable nature. The lack of consumer awareness, government guidelines, policies, and detection methods for nanotechnology risk assessment warrants better understanding of nanomaterial-based toxicity characterization and regulatory processes. The toxicity increases as the size of the metal-based NP decreases. Nanoparticles are highly reactive substances that can readily cross the membrane barriers and capillaries resulting in different toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties. Some NPs bind to proteins and enzymes and result in the stimulation of ROS production and oxidative stress. ROS accumulation causes degeneration of mitochondria and induces apoptosis. Most of the NP-imposed toxicity studies carried out in animals revealed that NP could induce strong toxicity to various organs (liver, kidneys) and immune system. Lack of studies on the impact of NP on human health warrants extensive studies to be carried out. Although silver NP has been used in many commercial nanoproducts, only a few in vivo toxicological studies with silver NP have been conducted using the mammalian models (e.g., mice and rats). Tumor-like changes have been observed in the human cells exposed to TiO2 NP. Different cell lines of the lung, GI tract, and skin were used for the evaluation of nanomaterial-induced toxicity in in vitro conditions.

International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) proposed the widely accepted genotoxicity detection methods. These methods were used to determine gene mutations, DNA breaks, Ames test (Salmonella-based mutagenicity assay), and mammalian cell assays including mouse lymphoma gene mutation assay (MLA), comet assay for apoptotic induction, micronucleus (MN) estimation, and in vivo animal experiments. Modifications were made in the comet assay by the utilization of bacterial enzymes for the detection of oxidized DNA bases and the quantification of oxidative DNA damage. The significant negative results obtained in the in vivo comet and MN assay as compared to in vitro comet assay are mainly due to the potential DNA repairing ability of animal models. However, Ames test and the chromosomal aberration tests are not reliable for the detection of nanoproduct related toxicity assessments. The in vitro cellular mutagenesis system such as the investigation of epithelial cells from the lungs of the treated animals utilizing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL), neutrophil level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from chronic inflammation, and the correlation between bronchoalveolar lavage fluid-based neutrophil content and the extent of DNA strand damage is determined by in vivo comet assay using lung epithelial cells of the treated animals and hypoxanthin–phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) assay. Moreover, in vivo micronucleus and comet assays are considered suitable for the decision-making process by the regulatory authorities.

The uptake of exogenous materials, including nanomaterials, induced genetic damages in the cells and animal systems resulting in genotoxicity, which is grouped into primary and secondary genotoxicity. The direct contact between the NP and the genomic DNA without induction of inflammatory reactions is known as primary genotoxicity. This has been reported for some specific nanosilver materials, particulate material of asbestos, and crystalline silica. The indirect method of primary genotoxicity is via the generation of ROS in the NP-induced target cells or the reduction in intracellular antioxidants. Quartz particles induced primary genotoxicity through ROS generation from mitochondria that causes damage to DNA, TiO2 and C60 fullerenes induced genotoxicity via the formation of peroxynitrite and ZnO NP altered the level of hydroperoxide ions, ROS, malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, and lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH) which resulted in DNA fragmentation. The disruption of membrane integrity, suppression of DNA repair processes, and decreased ATP levels leading to alternative repairing processes in the nucleus are also reported for primary genotoxicity. In secondary genotoxicity, macrophages and neutrophils are activated by the nanomaterials that cause inflammatory reactions along with genetic damage. The ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and the mediators of phagocytes are responsible for the inflammation-associated DNA damages. The ZnO NP-induced oxidative and nitrative stresses cause elevated inflammatory reactions and genotoxicity in the human monocyte cells. The long-term application of nanoscale granular bio-persistent particles causes chronic inflammation as well as secondary genotoxicity. The physical and chemical parameters potentially affecting ROS generation and genotoxicity induction include particle size, surface, shape, charges, particle dissolution, the ions from nanometals and metal oxides, UV-mediated induction, aggregation, route of interaction with cells, inflammation, and pH of the medium. Prolonged oxidative stress arising from extreme generation of ROS and obstruction in the regular physiological redox-regulated functions causes detrimental toxic effects at the cellular level which results in DNA damage, uncontrolled cell signaling, altered cell motility, cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and tumor formation. The frequent exposure to NP affects various organs including inflammatory, immune and cardiovascular systems.

DNA fragmentation results from DNA single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, oxidative damage, or chromosomal damage. The tumor suppressor gene p53 is involved in the cellular repairing processes via the initiation of cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and senescence. Apoptosis and phagocytosis are involved in the degradation of severely damaged cells. The cells not cleared by apoptosis or phagocytosis result in the formation of cancerous cells. Interestingly, microarray and global gene expression-mediated signaling investigations indicated that silver NP-induced genotoxicity through ROS generation, DNA damage, chromosome instability, mitosis suppression, and immune response activation occurs through the JAK-STAT signal transduction pathway. The double-strand breaks, and cell cycle arrest initiated by TiO2 NP stimulated the expression of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM), p53, CdC-2 followed by the suppression of H2AX, ATM-and-Rad3-related (ATR), cyclin B1 which proved the genotoxic characteristics of TiO2 NP.

ZnO NP possesses various unique characteristics like semiconductor property, biocompatibility, pyroelectric, and piezoelectric properties. Due to their antimicrobial nature, they are used in the food industry for food packaging, smart packaging as well as in the nutritional additives. ZnO NP is less toxic compared to other nanomaterials used in the food industry. However, the potential chromosomal damage, single- and double-strand DNA damages were found in the alloy form of Cu–Zn nanoparticles (ANPs). In plant systems, lower concentrations (10 nM) of 3-mercaptopropanoic acid–CdSe/ZnS quantum dots induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. The NP uptake induces the generation of oxidative stresses (ROS, RNS) and lipid peroxidation in the biological systems that play a crucial role in DNA damage, membrane disintegration, and cell death. The bioavailability, fate, behavior, disposition, and toxicity of NP in the environment should be studied in detail to eradicate the problems associated with nanotechnology in food industry.

Safety Concerns and Regulatory Laws

Nanotechnology application in the food industry is tremendous, beginning with ingredients to packaging as well as in the analysis of food products. Apart from their potential uses, their interaction with food system raises a concern about human and animal health. The nanoformulated products are toxic to plants and animals, and no standard regulatory laws regarding their use in food and agri-sector have been introduced so far. Therefore, effective guidelines and policies are required for the safer utilization of nanoparticles in food industry. The regulatory body USFDA is involved in the regulation of nanofoods and food packaging in the USA. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ), a regulatory body under the Food Standards Code actively participates in the regulation of nanofood additives and ingredients in Australia. Risk assessment of nanotechnology in the European Union is performed by the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). Regulations of the European Union emphasized that the nanotechnology-based food ingredients should undergo safety assessment before being authorized for human use. The nanofood or food ingredients are completely covered by the European Union Novel Foods Regulation (EC 258-97). The re-evaluation program by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) suggested that the authorized nanoadditives before 2009 and food packaging materials should be treated as per the re-evaluation program. While Japan and China are the major nanomaterial producing countries, they do not have proper nanotechnology-specific regulations. The lack of food regulations in several countries is due to less information regarding exposure, availability, and toxicity to human. Due to the emerging regulatory problems, several countries have demanded a regulatory system for handling risks associated with the nanofood. Complete government guidelines and legislations, as well as rigorous toxicological screening methodologies are essential for the legal nanotechnological applications. A widely accepted international regulatory system is urgently required for the regulation of the utilization of nanoparticles in food industry.

Conclusion and Future Perspective

Nanotechnology plays a major role in the food sector through the quality food production ends with advanced processing, packaging, and long-term storage, provided enormous growth in food industry through enhancement in food quality by improving its flavor and texture. The nanomaterials and nanosensors help the consumers providing information on the state of the food inside and its nutritional status with enhanced security through pathogen detection. Most of the food bioactives against various diseases are hydrophobic in nature having least bioavailability and stability; thus, the nanotechnology-based delivery systems provided an enhanced bioavailability and targeted delivery of food bioactive compounds. The nanotechnology-based foods give significant challenges to both government and industry, ensuring the consumer confidence and acceptance for nanofoods available in market. Active utilization of nanocolloidal particles in different branches of food industry, such as food quality, safety, nutrition, processing, and packaging, has been widely reported recently. The properties and behavior of colloidal particles are important to design foods which are safer and healthier with improved quality and sustainability.

Nanoparticles are manufactured all over the world, though very few countries possess the standard regulatory rules for the utilization of nanotechnology in food products. Insufficient scientific exploration on nanosystems creates difficulties in arriving at any conclusions regarding their efficacy. The applications of nanoparticles in food packaging are less harmful than the utilization of nanoparticles as a food ingredient. There is always a threat that nanomaterials may enter the food chain through the air, water, and soil during their manufacture and usage leading to DNA damage, cell membrane disruption, and cell death. So far, very few in vivo studies have been conducted on the effects of nanofoods in human and animal health. There should be appropriate labeling and regulations advised for marketing of nanofoods which can help to increase consumer acceptability. Thus, utilization of these nanotechnologies, if managed and regulated correctly, can play a significant role in improving food processing and product quality which will benefited for human health and well-being.

References 257

  1. 1.

    Duncan TV. Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;363:1-24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017

  2. 2.

    Parisi C, Vigani M, Rodríguez-Cerezo E. Agricultural nanotechnologies: what are the current possibilities? Nano Today. 2015;10:124-127.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.009

  3. 3.

    El-Temsah YS, Joner Bioforsk EJ. Impact of Fe and Ag nanoparticles on seed germination and differences in bioavailability during exposure in aqueous suspension and soil. Environ. Toxicol. 2006;165:16.

    Not in our library10.1002/tox.20610

  4. 4.

    Kumari M, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in Allium cepa. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407:5243-5246.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.024

  5. 5.

    Nair R, Varghese SH, Nair BG, Maekawa T, Yoshida Y, Kumar DS. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Sci. 2010;179:154-163.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.04.012

  6. 6.

    Duncan TV. The communication challenges presented by nanofoods. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:683-688.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2011.193

  7. 7.

    A.C. Tricco, H.M. Ashoor, J. Antony, Z. Bouck, M. Rodrigues et al., Essential Medicines List (EML) 2019 Application for the inclusion of long acting insulin analogues including biosimilar in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, as treatments used for patients with diabetes type 1 (2019)

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    W.H. Sperber, M.P. Doyle, Introduction to the Microbiological spoilage of foods and beverages, in Compendium of the microbiological spoilage of foods and beverages (Springer International Publishing, New Yark, 2009). pp. 1–40

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Sekhon BS. Food nanotechnology—an overview. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2010;3:1-15.

    Not in our library10.2147/nsa.s8677

  10. 10.

    Bajpai VK, Kamle M, Shukla S, Mahato DK, Chandra P, et al. Prospects of using nanotechnology for food preservation, safety, and security. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018;26:1201-1214.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2018.06.011

  11. 11.

    Kang S, Pinault M, Pfefferle LD, Elimelech M, Engineering M. Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity. Langmuir. 2007;23:8670-8673.

    Not in our library10.1021/la701067r

  12. 12.

    Powers KW, Brown SC, Krishna VB, Wasdo SC, Moudgil BM, Roberts SM. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of nanoscale particles for toxicological evaluation. Toxicol. Sci. 2006;90:296-303.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfj099

  13. 13.

    Azeredo HMC, Henrique CLM, Wood D, Williams TG, Roberto JA-B, Tara HM. Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers. J. Food Sci. 2009;74:31-35.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01186.x

  14. 14.

    Naoto S, Hiroshi O, Mitsutoshi N. Mitsutoshi, micro- and nanotechnology for food processing. (Food safety series) resource: engineering and technology for a sustainable. World. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2009;16:19.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    EFSA Scientific Committee. The potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. Sci Opin Sci Comm. 2009.

    Not in our library10.2903/j.efsa.2009.958

  16. 16.

    Yadav SK. Tissue science & engineering realizing the potential of nanotechnology for agriculture and food technology. J. Tissue Sci. Eng. 2017;8:8-11.

    Not in our library10.4172/2157-7552.1000195

  17. 17.

    B.K. Gilligan, Nanny, Nano, Boo, Boo Food ? (2008). http://www.towerofbabel.com/blog/2008/08/28/nanny-nano-boo-boo-food/

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    M.F.F. Pocas, T.F. Delgado, F.A.R. Oliveira, Smart packaging technologies for fruits and vegetables. in Smart Packaging Technologies for Fast Moving Consumer Goods, ed. by J. Kerry, P. Butler (2008). 10.1002/9780470753699.ch9

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Brody AL, Bugusu B, Han JH, Sand CK, Mchugh TH. Innovative food packaging solutions. J. Food Sci. 2008;73:107-116.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00933.x

  20. 20.

    Kerry JP, O’Grady MN, Hogan SA. Past, current and potential utilisation of active and intelligent packaging systems for meat and muscle-based products: a review. Meat Sci. 2006;74:113-130.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.024

  21. 21.

    He X, Deng H, Hwang H. The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019;27:1-21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.002

  22. 22.

    Sorrentino A, Gorrasi G, Vittoria V. Potential perspectives of bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007;18:84-95.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2006.09.004

  23. 23.

    Cha DS, Chinnan MS. Biopolymer-based antimicrobial packaging: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004;44:223-237.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408690490464276

  24. 24.

    Weiss J, Takhistov P, Mcclements DJ. Functional materials in food nanotechnology. J. Food Sci. 2006;71:107-116.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00195.x

  25. 25.

    Pinto RJB, Daina S, Sadocco P, Neto CP, Trindade T. Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of copper and cellulose. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013;2013:280512.

    Not in our library10.1155/2013/280512

  26. 26.

    Mihindukulasuriya SDF, Lim L-T. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014;40:149-167.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.009

  27. 27.

    Brody A. Nano and food packaging technologies converge. Food Technol. 2006;60:92-94.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Inoue Y, Hoshino M, Takahashi H, Noguchi T, Murata T, Kanzaki Y, Hamashima H, Sasatsu M. Bactericidal activity of Ag–zeolite mediated by reactive oxygen species under aerated conditions. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002;92:37-42.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0162-0134(02)00489-0

  29. 29.

    Matsumura Y, Yoshikata K, Kunisaki S, Tsuchido T. Mode of bactericidal action of silver zeolite and its comparison with that of silver nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:4278-4281.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.69.7.4278

  30. 30.

    Egger S, Lehmann RP, Height MJ, Loessner MJ, Schuppler M. Antimicrobial properties of a novel silver-silica nanocomposite materials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:2973-2976.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01658-08

  31. 31.

    Sinha N, Ma J, Yeow JTW. Carbon nanotube-based sensors. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006;6:573-590.

    Not in our library10.1166/jnn.2006.121

  32. 32.

    Nanotechnology Can Enhance Food Packaging (2010). http://www.plastemart.com/plastic-technical-articles/Amorphous-polymers-can-produce-transparent-clear-products-/1260

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Rhim J, Ng PKW, Rhim J. Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007;47:411-433.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408390600846366

  34. 34.

    Lagaron JM, Cabedo L, Cava D, Feijoo JL, Gavara R, Gimenez E. Improving packaged food quality and safety. Part 2: Nanocomposites. Food Addit. Contam. 2005;22:994-998.

    Not in our library10.1080/02652030500239656

  35. 35.

    Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, Ross B, Castle L, Aitken R, Watkins R. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit. Contam. 2008;25:241-258.

    Not in our library10.1080/02652030701744538

  36. 36.

    Ray S, Quek SY, Easteal A, Chen XD. The potential use of polymer-clay nanocomposites in food packaging. Int. J. Food Eng. 2006;2:1-11.

    Not in our library10.2202/1556-3758.1149

  37. 37.

    Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013;38:1629-1652.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008

  38. 38.

    Yang FL, Li XG, Zhu F, Lei CL. Structural characterization of nanoparticles loaded with garlic essential oil and their insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:10156-10162.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf9023118

  39. 39.

    An FES, Onzalez AG, Ao YUANY. Phytoglycogen octenyl succinate, an amphiphilic carbohydrate nanoparticle, and ε -polylysine to improve lipid oxidative stability of emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:660-667.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf903170b

  40. 40.

    Neethirajan S, Jayas DS. Nanotechnology for the food and bioprocessing industries. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015;4:39-47.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11947-010-0328-2

  41. 41.

    Garland A. Nanotechnology in Plastics Packaging: Commercial Applications in Nanotechnology. 2004;14-63.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Dias MV, de Soares NFF, Borges SV, de Sousa MM, Nunes CA, de Oliveira IRN, Medeiros EAA. Use of allyl isothiocyanate and carbon nanotubes in an antimicrobial film to package shredded, cooked chicken meat. Food Chem. 2013;141:3160-3166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.148

  43. 43.

    Morris MA, Padmanabhan SC, Cruz-Romero MC, Cummins E. Development of active, nanoparticle, antimicrobial technologies for muscle-based packaging applications. Meat Sci. 2017;132:163-178.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.234

  44. 44.

    Drew R, Hagen T. Nanotechnologies in food packaging: an exploratory appraisal of safety and regulation. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. 2016;75:1.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Li Z, Sheng C. Nanosensors for food safety. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014;14:905-912.

    Not in our library10.1166/jnn.2014.8743

  46. 46.

    Berekaa MM. Review article nanotechnology in food industry; advances in food processing, packaging and food safety. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015;4:345-357.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Augustin MA, Sanguansri P. Chapter 5: nanostructured materials in the food industry. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2009;58:183-213.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1043-4526(09)58005-9

  48. 48.

    Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, Bayley H, Benner SA, et al. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;26:1146-1153.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1495

  49. 49.

    Maneerat C, Hayata Y. Antifungal activity of TiO2 photocatalysis against Penicillium expansum in vitro and in fruit tests. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006;107:99-103.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.08.018

  50. 50.

    King T, Osmond-McLeod MJ, Duffy LL. Nanotechnology in the food sector and potential applications for the poultry industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;72:62-73.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2017.11.015

  51. 51.

    Ditta A. How helpful is nanotechnology in agriculture? Adv. Nat. Sci: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012;3:033002.

    Not in our library10.1088/2043-6262/3/3/033002

  52. 52.

    Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, Apetrei C, Lozano J, Anyogu A. Potential use of electronic noses, electronic tongues and biosensors as multisensor systems for spoilage examination in foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018;80:71-92.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.018

  53. 53.

    Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A. Nanotechnology in agro-food: from field to plate. Food Res. Int. 2015;69:381-400.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.005

  54. 54.

    Emblem A, Emblem H. Packaging Technology: Fundamentals, Materials and Processes. 2012;287-309.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    Fedotova AV, Snezhko AG, Sdobnikova OA, Samoilova LG, Smurova TA, Revina AA, Khailova EB. Packaging materials manufactured from natural polymers modified with silver nanoparticles. Plast. Massy. 2009;7:42-47.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Angiolillo L, Conte A, Del Nobile MA. Packaging and Shelf Life of Produce, Reference Module in Food Science. 2016.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Pyrgiotakis G, Vasanthakumar A, Gao Y, Eleftheriadou M, Toledo E, et al. Inactivation of foodborne microorganisms using engineered water nanostructures (EWNS). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49:3737-3745.

    Not in our library10.1021/es505868a

  58. 58.

    Šimon P, Chaudhry Q, Bakoš D. Migration of engineered nanoparticles from polymer packaging to food—a physicochemical view. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2008;47:105-113.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Damm C, Münstedt H, Rösch A. Long-term antimicrobial polyamide 6/silver-nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2007;42:6067-6073.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-006-1158-5

  60. 60.

    Azlin-Hasim S, Cruz-Romero MC, Cummins E, Kerry JP, Morris MA. The potential use of a layer-by-layer strategy to develop LDPE antimicrobial films coated with silver nanoparticles for packaging applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;461:239-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.021

  61. 61.

    De Silva RT, Pasbakhsh P, Lee SM, Kit AY. ZnO deposited/encapsulated halloysite–poly (lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites for high performance packaging films with improved mechanical and antimicrobial properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015;111:10-20.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.024

  62. 62.

    Taghinezhad E, Ebadollahi A. Potential application of chitosan-clay coating on some quality properties of lemon during storage. AgricEngInt: CIGR J. 2017;19:189-194.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Khalaf HH, Sharoba AM, El-Tanahi HH, Morsy MK. Stability of antimicrobial activity of pullulan edible films incorporated with nanoparticles and essential oils and their impact on turkey. J. Food Dairy Sci. Mansoura Univ. 2013;4:557-573.

    Not in our library10.21608/jfds.2013.72104

  64. 64.

    Cushen M, Kerry J, Morris M, Cruz-Romero M, Cummins E. Migration and exposure assessment of silver from a PVC nanocomposite. Food Chem. 2013;139:389-397.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.01.045

  65. 65.

    Djokic S. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of silver citrate complexes. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2008;2008:436458.

    Not in our library10.1155/2008/436458

  66. 66.

    Zarei M, Jamnejad A, Khajehali E. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles against four foodborne pathogens. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2014;7:1-4.

    Not in our library10.5812/jjm.8720

  67. 67.
  68. 68.

    Siqueira MC, Coelho GF, De Moura MR, Bresolin JD, Hubinger SZ, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles for carboxymethylcellulose film applications in food packaging. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014;14:5512-5517.

    Not in our library10.1166/jnn.2014.8991

  69. 69.

    Khan ST, Al-Khedhairy AA, Musarrat JJ. ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles as novel antimicrobial agents for oral hygiene: a review. Nanopart. Res. 2015;17:276-292.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11051-015-3074-6

  70. 70.

    Rodrigues SM, Demokritou P, Dokoozlian N, Hendren CO, Karn DB, et al. Environmental science nanotechnology for sustainable food production: promising opportunities and scientific challenges. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2017;1:767-781.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6en00573j

  71. 71.

    Krishna V, Pumprueg S, Lee SH, Zhao J, Sigmund W, Koopman B, Moudgil BM. Photocatalytic disinfection with titanium dioxide coated multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2005;83:393-397.

    Not in our library10.1205/psep.04387

  72. 72.

    Vohra A, Goswami DY, Deshpande DA, Block SS. Enhanced photocatalytic inactivation of bacterial spores on surfaces in air. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005;32:364-370.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10295-005-0006-y

  73. 73.

    Cho KH, Park JE, Osaka T, Park SG. The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient. Electrochim. Acta. 2005;51:956-960.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.071

  74. 74.

    Kim B, Kim D, Cho D, Cho S. Bactericidal effect of TiO2 photocatalyst on selected food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Chemosphere. 2003;52:277-281.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00051-1

  75. 75.

    Cerrada ML, Serrano C, Sanchez-Chaves M, Fernandez-Garcıa M, Fernandez-Martın F, et al. Self-sterilized EVOH-TiO2 nanocomposites: interface effects on biocidal properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008;18:1949-1960.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.200701068

  76. 76.

    Rai M, Jogee PS, Ingle AP. Emerging nanotechnology for detection of mycotoxins in food and feed. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015;66:363-370.

    Not in our library10.3109/09637486.2015.1034251

  77. 77.

    Schmitt J, Hajiw S, Lecchi A, Degrouard J, Salonen A, Impéror-Clerc M, Pansu B. Formation of superlattices of gold nanoparticles using ostwald ripening in emulsions: transition from fcc to bcc structure. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2016;120:5759-5766.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b03287

  78. 78.

    Duncan B, Li X, Landis RF, Kim ST, Gupta A, et al. Nanoparticle-stabilized capsules for the treatment of bacterial biofilms. ACS Nano. 2015;9:7775-7782.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.5b01696

  79. 79.

    Paula HCB, Oliveira EF, Carneiro MJM, de Paula RCM. Matrix effect on the spray drying nanoencapsulation of lippia sidoides essential oil in chitosan-native gum blends. Planta Med. 2017;83:392-397.

    Not in our library10.1055/s-0042-107470

  80. 80.

    Gaspar AS, Wagner FE, Amaral VS, Costa Lima SA, Khomchenko VA, Santos JG, Costa BFO, Durães L. Development of a biocompatible magnetic nanofluid by incorporating SPIONs in Amazonian oils. Spectrochim. Acta A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017;172:135-146.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.saa.2016.04.022

  81. 81.

    Hosseini SF, Zandi M, Rezaei M, Farahmandghavi F. Two-step method for encapsulation of oregano essential oil in chitosan nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and in vitro release study. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;95:50-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.031

  82. 82.

    Li K, Yin S, Yang X, Tang C, Wei Z. Fabrication and characterization of novel antimicrobial films derived from thymol-loaded zein-sodium caseinate (SC) nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:11592-11600.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf302752v

  83. 83.

    Gomes C, Moreira RG, Castell-perez E. Poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles with entrapped trans-cinnamaldehyde and eugenol for antimicrobial delivery applications. J. Food Sci. 2011;76:16-24.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01985.x

  84. 84.
  85. 85.

    Valenti D, De Logu A, Loy G, Bonsignore L, Cottiglia F, Fadda AM. Liposome-incorporated Santolina insularis essential oil: preparation, characterization and in vitro antiviral activity. J. Liposome Res. 2001;11:73-90.

    Not in our library10.1081/lpr-100103171

  86. 86.

    Wu Y, Luo Y, Wang Q. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of essential oils encapsulated in zein nanoparticles prepared by liquid–liquid dispersion method. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2012;48:283-290.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lwt.2012.03.027

  87. 87.
  88. 88.

    Abreu FOMS, Oliveira EF, Paula HCB, de Paula RCM. Chitosan/cashew gum nanogels for essential oil encapsulation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;89:1277-1282.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.048

  89. 89.

    Zhang Y, Niu Y, Luo Y, Ge M, Yang T, Yu L, Wang Q. Fabrication, characterization and antimicrobial activities of thymol-loaded zein nanoparticles stabilized by sodium caseinate–chitosan hydrochloride double layers. Food Chem. 2014;142:269-275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.058

  90. 90.

    Iannitelli A, Grande R, di Stefano A, di Giulio M, Sozio P, et al. Potential antibacterial activity of carvacrol-loaded poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles against microbial biofilm. Int. J. Mole. Sci. 2011;12:5039-5051.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms12085039

  91. 91.

    Gu H, Ho PL, Tong E, Wang L, Xu B. Presenting vancomycin on nanoparticles to enhance antimicrobial activities. Nano Lett. 2003;3:1261-1263.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl034396z

  92. 92.

    Bi L, Yang L, Narsimhan G, Bhunia AK, Yao Y. Designing carbohydrate nanoparticles for prolonged efficacy of antimicrobial peptide. J. Controlled Release. 2011;150:150-156.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.024

  93. 93.

    Morsy MK, Khalaf HH, Sharoba AM, El-tanahi HH, Cutter CN. Incorporation of essential oils and nanoparticles in pullulan films to control foodborne pathogens on meat and poultry products. J. Food Sci. 2014;79:675-684.

    Not in our library10.1111/1750-3841.12400

  94. 94.

    Wen P, Zhu DH, Feng K, Liu F-J, Lou WY, Li N, Zong M-H, Wu H. Fabrication of electrospun polylactic acid nanofilm incorporating cinnamon essential oil/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex for antimicrobial packaging. Food Chem. 2016;196:996-1004.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.043

  95. 95.

    Kumar MNVR. Nano and microparticles as controlled drug delivery devices. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. 2000;3:234-258.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    McClements DJ. The future of food colloids: next-generation nanoparticle delivery systems. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;28:7-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cocis.2016.12.002

  97. 97.

    Zhang R, McClements DJ. Enhancing nutraceutical bioavailability by controlling the composition and structure of gastrointestinal contents: emulsion-based delivery and excipient systems. Food Struct. Neth. 2016;10:21-36.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foostr.2016.07.006

  98. 98.

    Hildeliza QB, Chanona-pe J, Jose LSM, Gutie GF, Jimene A. Nanoencapsulation: a new trend in food engineering processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2010;2:39-50.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12393-009-9012-6

  99. 99.

    Cushen M, Kerry J, Morris M, Cruz-Romero M, Cummins E. Nanotechnologies in the food industry—recent developments, risks and regulation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012;24:30-46.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2011.10.006

  100. 100.

    Mcclements DJ. Edible nanoemulsions: fabrication, properties, and functional performance. Soft Matter. 2011;7:2297-2316.

    Not in our library10.1039/c0sm00549e

  101. 101.

    Joye IJ, Davidov-Pardo G, McClements DJ. Nanotechnology for increased micronutrient bioavailability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014;40:168-182.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2014.08.006

  102. 102.

    Mcclements DJ, Xiao H. Excipient foods: designing food matrices that improve the oral bioavailability of pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. Food Funct. 2014;5:1307-1632.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4fo00100a

  103. 103.

    Mcclements DJ, Rao J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011;51:285-330.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2011.559558

  104. 104.

    Salvia-Trujillo L, Qian C, Martín-Belloso O, McClements DJ. Influence of particle size on lipid digestion and β-carotene bioaccessibility in emulsions and nanoemulsions. Food Chem. 2013;141:1472-1480.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.050

  105. 105.

    Bigliardi B, Galati F. Innovation trends in the food industry: the case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013;31:118-129.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2013.03.006

  106. 106.

    Wang X, Jiang Y, Wang YW, Huang MT, Ho CT, Huang Q. Enhancing anti-inflammation activity of curcumin through O/W nanoemulsions. Food Chem. 2008;108:419-424.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.10.086

  107. 107.

    Kumari A, Kumar V, Yadav SK. Nanotechnology: a tool to enhance therapeutic values of natural plant products. Trends Med. Res. 2012;7:34-42.

    Not in our library10.3923/tmr.2012.34.42

  108. 108.

    Dura N, Marcato PD. Review Nanobiotechnology perspectives. Role of nanotechnology in the food industry: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013;48:1127-1134.

    Not in our library10.1111/ijfs.12027

  109. 109.

    Yadav SC, Yadav SK, Sood A, Sharma M, Singh B. Development of antidiabetic nanomedicine from stevioside. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2011;7:54-55.

    Not in our library10.1166/jbn.2011.1198

  110. 110.

    Yadav R, Kumar D, Kumari A, Yadav SK. Encapsulation of catechin and epicatechin on bsa nps improved their stability and antioxidant potential. Excli J. 2014;13:331-346.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Siddiqui IA. Hasan Mukhtar, Nanochemoprevention by bioactive food components: a perspective. Pharm. Res. 2010;27:1054-1060.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11095-010-0087-9

  112. 112.

    Wang S, Su R, Nie S, Sun M, Zhang J, Wu D, Moustaid-Moussa N. Application of nanotechnology in improving bioavailability and bioactivity of diet-derived phytochemicals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014;25:363-376.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.10.002

  113. 113.

    Chen H, Weiss J, Shahidi F. Nanotechnology in nutraceuticals and functional foods. Food Technol. 2006;60(3):30-36.

    Not in our library10.1201/9781315370859-14

  114. 114.

    Yu H, Huang Q. Enhanced in vitro anti-cancer activity of curcumin encapsulated in hydrophobically modified starch. Food Chem. 2010;119:669-674.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.018

  115. 115.

    Taylor P, Vargas M, Pastor C, Chiralt A. Recent advances in edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008;48:496-511.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408390701537344

  116. 116.

    Yu H, Huang Y. Qingrong Huang, Synthesis and characterization of novel antimicrobial emulsifiers from ε-polylysine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:1290-1295.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf903300m

  117. 117.

    Mozafari MR, Johnson C, Demetzos C. Nanoliposomes and their applications in food. J. Liposome Res. 2008;18:309-327.

    Not in our library10.1080/08982100802465941

  118. 118.

    Vidhyalakshmi R, Bhakyaraj R, Subhasree RS. Encapsulation“the future of probiotics”—a review. Adv. Biol. Res. 2009;3:96-103.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.
  120. 120.

    Hu K, Huang X, Gao Y, Huang X, Xiao H, McClements DJ. Core–shell biopolymer nanoparticle delivery systems: synthesis and characterization of curcumin fortified zein–pectin nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2015;182:275-281.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.009

  121. 121.

    Zou L, Zheng B, Zhang R, Zhang Z, Liu W, Liu C, Xiao H, McClements DJ. Enhancing the bioaccessibility of hydrophobic bioactive agents using mixed colloidal dispersions: curcumin-loaded zein nanoparticles plus digestible lipid nanoparticles. Food Res. Int. 2016;81:74-82.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodres.2015.12.035

  122. 122.

    Chen J, Zheng J, Decker EA, Mcclements J. Improving nutraceutical bioavailability using mixed colloidal delivery systems: lipid nanoparticles increase tangeretin bioaccessibility and absorption from tangeretin-loaded zein nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2015;5:73892-73900.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5ra13503f

  123. 123.

    Mao Y, Mcclements DJ. Modulation of food texture using controlled heteroaggregation of lipid droplets: principles and applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013;130:3833-3841.

    Not in our library10.1002/app.39631

  124. 124.

    Maier C, Zeeb B, Weiss J. Investigations into aggregate formation with oppositely charged oil-in-water emulsions at different pH values. Colloids Surf. B. 2014;117:368-375.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.03.012

  125. 125.

    Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Shi G, Yang J, Zhang J, Li W, Li A, Tai R. Nanodiamonds act as Trojan horse for intracellular delivery of metal ions to trigger cytotoxicity. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2015;12:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12989-014-0075-z

  126. 126.

    Li Y, Hu M, Du Y, Xiao H, McClements DJ. Control of lipase digestibility of emulsified lipids by encapsulation within calcium alginate beads. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25:122-130.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.06.003

  127. 127.

    N. Garti, A. Aserin, Nanoscale liquid self-assembled dispersions in foods and the delivery of functional ingredients, in: Understanding and Controlling the Microstructure of Complex Foods (Woodhead Publishing Ltd; Cambridge, UK, 2007), pp. 504–553

    Not in our library

  128. 128.

    Solaro R, Chiellini F, Battisti A. Targeted delivery of protein drugs by nanocarriers. Materials. 2010;3:1928-1980.

    Not in our library10.3390/ma3031928

  129. 129.

    Shahavi MH, Hosseini M, Jahanshahi M, Meyer RL, Darzi GN. Evaluation of critical parameters for preparation of stable clove oil nanoemulsion. Arab. J. Chem. 2019;12:3225-3232.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.08.024

  130. 130.

    Huang Q, Given P, Qian M. Micro/nano encapsulation of active food ingredients. 2009.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    Iris ALB. Ca2+ cross-linked alginic acid nanoparticles for solubilization of lipophilic natural colorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:7505-7512.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf900563a

  132. 132.

    V.R. Sinha, Vinay, Anamika, J. R. Bhinge, Nanocochleates: A novel drug delivery technology. Pharmaceutical Rev. 6 (2008)

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Laroui H, Rakhya P, Xiao B, Viennois E, Merlin D. Nanotechnology in diagnostics and therapeutics for gastrointestinal disorders. Dig. Liver Dis. 2013;45:995-1002.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dld.2013.03.019

  134. 134.

    Rajasundari K, Ilamurugu K. Nanotechnology and its applications in medical diagnosis. J. Basic. Appl. Chem. 2011;1:26-32.

    Not in our library

  135. 135.

    Singh AK, Harrison SH, Schoeniger JS. Gangliosides as receptors for biological toxins: development of sensitive fluoroimmunoassays using ganglioside-bearing liposomes. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:6019-6024.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac000846l

  136. 136.

    Gu L, Elkin T, Jiang X, Li H, Lin Y, Qu L, Tzeng TJ, Joseph R, Sun Y. Single-walled carbon nanotubes displaying multivalent ligands for capturing pathogens. Chem. Commun. 2005;7:874-876.

    Not in our library10.1039/b415015e

  137. 137.

    Zelada-guille GA, Bhosale SV, Riu J, Rius FX. Real-time potentiometric detection of bacteria in complex samples. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:9254-9260.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac101739b

  138. 138.

    Huang SH. Gold nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Sensor Actuat. B. 2007;127:335-340.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2007.04.027

  139. 139.

    Phillips RL, Miranda OR, You C, Rotello VM. Rapid and efficient identification of bacteria using gold-nanoparticle–poly (para-phenyleneethynylene) constructs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:2590-2594.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200703369

  140. 140.

    Llorens A, Lloret E, Picouet PA, Trbojevich R, Fernandez A. Metallic-based micro and nanocomposites in food contact materials and active food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012;24:19-29.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tifs.2011.10.001

  141. 141.

    A.I. Cano, A., C. González-martínez, Silver composite materials and food packaging. In Composites Materials for Food Packaging (Wiley, 2018)), pp. 123–151. 10.1002/9781119160243.ch3

    Not in our library

  142. 142.

    Fernández A, Picouet P, Lloret E. Cellulose-silver nanoparticle hybrid materials to control spoilage-related microflora in absorbent pads located in trays of fresh-cut melon. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;142:222-228.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.001

  143. 143.

    Valiyaveettil S, Teow Y, Asharani PV, Prakash M, Valiyaveettil S. Health impact and safety of engineered nanomaterials. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:7025-7038.

    Not in our library10.1039/c0cc05271j

  144. 144.

    Tiede K, Boxall ABA, Tear SP, Lewis J, David H, et al. Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment. Food Addit. Contam. Part A. 2008;25:795-821.

    Not in our library10.1080/02652030802007553

  145. 145.

    Schrand AM, Rahman MF, Hussain SM, Schlager JJ, Smith DA, Syed AF. Metal-based nanoparticles and their toxicity assessment Amanda. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2:544-568.

    Not in our library10.1002/wnan.103

  146. 146.

    Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Akbar Ashkarran AA, Jimenez de Aberasturi D, de Larramendi IR, et al. Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:499-511.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004

  147. 147.

    Mao B, Tsai J, Chen C, Yan S, Mao B, Tsai J, Chen C, Yan S, Wang Y. Mechanisms of silver nanoparticle-induced toxicity and important role of autophagy. Nanotoxicol. 2016;10:1021-1040.

    Not in our library10.1080/17435390.2016.1189614

  148. 148.

    Valdiglesias V, Costa C, Sharma V, Kiliç G, Pásaro E, Teixeira JP, Dhawan A, Laffon B. Comparative study on effects of two different types of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on human neuronal cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013;57:352-361.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2013.04.010

  149. 149.

    Botelho MC, Costa C, Silva S, Costa S, Dhawan A, Oliveira PA, Teixeira JP. Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human gastric epithelial cells in vitro. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2014;68:59-64.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2013.08.006

  150. 150.

    Magdolenova Z, Collins AR, Kumar A, Dhawam A, Stone V, Dusinska M. Mechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles. Nanotoxicol. 2014;8:233-278.

    Not in our library10.3109/17435390.2013.773464

  151. 151.

    Kumar A, Dhawan A. Genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of engineered nanoparticles: an update. Arch. Toxicol. 2013;87:1883-1900.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00204-013-1128-z

  152. 152.

    Shukla AK, Pragya P, Chowdhuri DK. A modified alkaline Comet assay for in vivo detection of oxidative DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2011;726:222-226.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.09.017

  153. 153.

    Guo X, Chen T. Progress in genotoxicity evaluation of engineered nanomaterials. Nanomater. Toxicity Risk Assess. 2015.

    Not in our library10.5772/61013

  154. 154.

    Knaapen AM, Albrecht C, Becker A, Winzer A, Haenen GR, Borm PJA, Schins RPF. DNA damage in lung epithelial cells isolated from rats exposed to quartz: role of surface reactivity and neutrophilic inflammation. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1111-1120.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/23.7.1111

  155. 155.

    Xu A, Chai Y, Nohmi T, Hei TK. Genotoxic responses to titanium dioxide nanoparticles and fullerene in gpt delta transgenic MEF cells. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2009;6:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1186/1743-8977-6-3

  156. 156.

    Kumar A, Pandey AK, Singh SS, Shanker R, Dhawan A. Engineered ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA damage leading to reduced viability of Escherichia coli. Free Rad. Biol. Med. 2011;51:1872-1881.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.025

  157. 157.

    Wojewódzka M, Lankoff A, Dusińska M, Brunborg G, Czerwińska J, Iwaneńko T, Stępkowski T, Szumiel I. Treatment with silver nanoparticles delays repair of X-ray induced DNA damage in HepG2 cells. Nukleonika. 2011;56:29-33.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    Senapati VA, Kumar A, Gupta GS, Pandey AK, Dhawan A. ZnO nanoparticles induced inflammatory response and genotoxicity in human blood cells: a mechanistic approach. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015;85:61-70.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2015.06.018

  159. 159.

    Xia Q, Hwang H-M, Ray PC, Yu H. Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J. Food Drug. Anal. 2014;22:64-75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.005

  160. 160.

    Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, Hagens WI, Bulder AS, et al. Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009;53:52-62.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.008

  161. 161.

    Mouneyrac C, Buffet P, Poirier L. Fate and effects of metal-based nanoparticles in two marine invertebrates, the bivalve mollusc Scrobicularia plana and the annelid polychaete Hediste diversicolor. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:7899-7912.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11356-014-2745-7

  162. 162.

    Xu L, Li X, Takemura T, Hanagata N, Wu G, Chou LL. Genotoxicity and molecular response of silver nanoparticle (NP) -based hydrogel. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2012;10:1-11.

    Not in our library10.1186/1477-3155-10-16

  163. 163.

    Kansara K, Patel P, Shah D, Shukla RK, Singh S, Kumar A, Dhawan A. TiO2 nanoparticles induce DNA double strand breaks and cell cycle arrest in human alveolar cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2015;56:204-217.

    Not in our library10.1002/em.21925

  164. 164.

    Kwon JY, Lee SY, Koedrith P, Lee JY, Kim K-M, et al. Lack of genotoxic potential of ZnO nanoparticles in in vitro and in vivo tests. Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2014;761:1-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.01.005

  165. 165.

    Kumbıçak Ü, Çavaş T, Çinkılıç N, Kumbıçak Z, Vatan Ö, Yılmaz D. Evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of copper–zinc alloy nanoparticles in human lung epithelial cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014;73:105-112.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2014.07.040

  166. 166.

    Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E, Zakem E, Chappell MJ. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2007;22:86-108.

    Not in our library10.1017/s1742170507001640

  167. 167.

    Bowman DM, Hodge GA. Nanotechnology: mapping the wild regulatory frontier. Futures. 2006;38:1060-1073.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.017

  168. 168.

    Cubadda F, Aureli F, Raggi A, Cristina M, Toscan B, Mantovani A. Nanotechnologies and nanomaterials in the food sector and their safety assessment. Rapp. ISTISAN. 2016;13:48.

    Not in our library

  169. 169.

    Tinkle S, Mcneil SE, Stefan M, Bawa R, Borchard G. Nanomedicines: addressing the scientific and regulatory gap. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 2014;1313:35-56.

    Not in our library10.1111/nyas.12403

  170. 170.

    Brien NO, Cummins E. Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials. J. Environ. Sci. Health A. 2010;45:992-1007.

    Not in our library10.1080/10934521003772410

  171. 171.

    Buzea C. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases. 2007;2:17-71.

    Not in our library10.1116/1.2815690

  172. 172.

    González-nilo F, Pérez-acle T, Guínez- S. Nanoinformatics: an emerging area of information technology at the intersection of bioinformatics, computational chemistry and nanobiotechnology. Biol. Res. 2011;44:43-51.

    Not in our library10.4067/s0716-97602011000100006

  173. 173.

    Center for Food Safety (2017). (www.centerforfoodsafety.org) Retrieved from http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/1881/p/salsa/web/common/public/content?content_item_KEY=14112%20#showJoin

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    Pradhan N, Singh S, Ojha N, Shrivastava A, Barla A, Rai V, Bose S. Facets of Nanotechnology as seen in food processing, packaging, and preservation industry. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:1-17.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/365672

  175. 175.

    Gramza-Michałowska A, Kmiecik D, Kobus-Cisowska J, Żywica A, Dziedzic K, Brzozowska A. Phytonutrients in oat (Avena sativa L.) Drink: Effect of plant extract on antiradical capacity, nutritional value and sensory characteristics. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2018;68:63-71.

    Not in our library10.1515/pjfns-2017-0009

  176. 176.

    Pathakoti K, Manubolu M, Hwang H-M. Nanostructures: current uses and future applications in food science. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017;25:245-253.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2017.02.004

  177. 177.

    Lee HA. Effect of nanometric Lactobacillus plantarum in kimchi on dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. J. Med. Food. 2015;18:1073-1080.

    Not in our library10.1089/jmf.2015.3509

  178. 178.

    Rashidi L, Khosravi-Darani K. The applications of nanotechnology in food industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011;51:723-730.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408391003785417

  179. 179.

    Walia N, Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Ramalingam C, Gandhi M. Food—rade nanoencapsulation of vitamins. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019;17:991-1002.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10311-018-00855-9

  180. 180.

    Pawar AY, Jadhav KR, Sonkamble NB, Kale MR. Nanocochleate: a novel drug delivery system. Asian J. Pharm. 2016;10:234-242.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.

    Chatterjee B. Synthetic Lycopene: the future but unaware fact. Int. J. Clin. Biomed. Res. 2016;2:14-18.

    Not in our library

  182. 182.

    Rossi M, Passeri D, Sinibaldi A, Angjellari M, Tamburri E, Sorbo A, Carata E, Dini L. Nanotechnology for food packaging and food quality assessment. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2017;82:149-204.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.afnr.2017.01.002

  183. 183.

    Chowdhury EH, Akaike T. Fibronectin-coated nano-precipitates of calcium–magnesium phosphate for integrin-targeted gene delivery. J. Controlled Release. 2006;116:68-69.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.09.053

  184. 184.

    K. Jennifer, The Nanotechnology-Biology Interface: Exploring Models for Oversight, Workshop Report (Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy, 2005)

    Not in our library

  185. 185.

    Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008;279:71-76.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01012.x

  186. 186.

    Zhao R, Torley P, Halley PJ. Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2008;43:3058-3071.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10853-007-2434-8

  187. 187.

    Acosta E. Bioavailability of nanoparticles in nutrient and nutraceutical delivery. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;14:3-15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cocis.2008.01.002

  188. 188.

    Arshak K, Adley C, Moore E, Cunniffe C, Campion M, Harris J. Characterisation of polymer nanocomposite sensors for quantification of bacterial cultures. Sensor Actuat. B. 2007;126:226-231.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2006.12.006

  189. 189.

    Xing Y, Xu Q, Li X, Chen C, Ma L, Li S, Che Z, Lin H. Chitosan-based coating with antimicrobial agents: preparation, property, mechanism, and application effectiveness on fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016;5:1-24.

    Not in our library10.1155/2016/4851730

  190. 190.

    Ozdemir C, Yeni F, Odaci D, Timur S. Electrochemical glucose biosensing by pyranose oxidase immobilized in gold nanoparticle-polyaniline/AgCl/gelatin nanocomposite matrix. Food Chem. 2010;119:380-385.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.087

  191. 191.

    Antiochia R, Lavagnini I, Magno F. Amperometric mediated carbon nanotube paste biosensor for fructose determination paste biosensor for fructose. Anal. Lett. 2007;37:1657-1669.

    Not in our library10.1081/al-120037594

  192. 192.

    Viswanathan S, Radecka H, Radecki J. Electrochemical biosensor for pesticides based on acetylcholinesterase immobilized on polyaniline deposited on vertically assembled carbon nanotubes wrapped with ssDNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009;24:2772-2777.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2009.01.044

  193. 193.

    Tominaga M, Nomura S, Taniguchi I. d-Fructose detection based on the direct heterogeneous electron transfer reaction of fructose dehydrogenase adsorbed onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes synthesized on platinum electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009;24:1184-1188.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2008.07.002

  194. 194.

    Li X, Zhou Y, Zheng Z, Yue X, Dai Z, Liu S, Tang Z. Glucose biosensor based on nanocomposite films of CdTe quantum dots and glucose oxidase. Langmuir. 2009;25:6580-6586.

    Not in our library10.1021/la900066z

  195. 195.

    Zhang H, Wang J, Ye S. Predictions of acidity, soluble solids and firmness of pear using electronic nose technique. J. Food Eng. 2008;86:370-378.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.026

  196. 196.

    Wang M, Li Z. Nano-composite ZrO2/Au film electrode for voltammetric detection of parathion. Sensor Actuat. B. 2008;133:607-612.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2008.03.023

  197. 197.

    El-boubbou K, Gruden C, Huang X. Magnetic glyco-nanoparticles: a unique tool for rapid pathogen detection, decontamination, and strain differentiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:13392-13393.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja076086e

  198. 198.

    Liju Yang Y. Li, Quantum dots as fluorescent labels for quantitative detection of Salmonella typhimurium in chicken carcass wash water. J. Food Prot. 2005;68:1241-1245.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-68.6.1241

  199. 199.

    Norman RS, Stone JW, Gole A, Murphy CJ, Sabo-attwood TL. Targeted photothermal lysis of the pathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Gold Nanorods. Nano Lett. 2008;8:302-306.

    Not in our library10.1021/nl0727056

  200. 200.

    Nanoshells AS, Kalele SA, Kundu AA, Gosavi SW, Deobagkar DN, Deobagkar DD, Kulkarni SK. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli by using antibody-conjugated silver nanoshells. Small. 2006;2:335-338.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.200500286

  201. 201.

    Yakes BJ, Lipert RJ, Bannantine JP, Porter MD. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by a sonicate immunoassay based on surface-enhanced raman scattering. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:227-234.

    Not in our library10.1128/cvi.00334-07

  202. 202.

    Vinayaka AC, Basheer S, Thakur MS. Bioconjugation of CdTe quantum dot for the detection of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by competitive fluoroimmunoassay based biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009;24:1615-1620.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2008.08.042

  203. 203.

    Ji X, Zheng J, Xu J, Rastogi VK, Cheng T, Defrank JJ, Leblanc RM. (CdSe) ZnS quantum dots and organophosphorus hydrolase bioconjugate as biosensors for detection of paraoxon. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:3793-3799.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp044928f

  204. 204.

    Simonian AL, Good TA, Wang SS, Wild JR. Nanoparticle-based optical biosensors for the direct detection of organophosphate chemical warfare agents and pesticides. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2005;534:69-77.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2004.06.056

  205. 205.

    Wei H, Wang E, Nanotechnol XYN. Fe3O4 Magnetic nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics and their applications in H2O2 and glucose detection. Anal. Chem. 2008;80:2250-2254.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac702203f

  206. 206.

    Sandros MG, Shete V, Benson DE. Selective, reversible, reagentless maltose biosensing with core-shell semiconducting nanoparticles. Analyst. 2006;131:229-235.

    Not in our library10.1039/b511591d

  207. 207.

    Thangavel G, Thiruvengadam S. Nanotechnology in food industry—a review. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2014;6:4096-4101.

    Not in our library

  208. 208.

    Reed RB, Faust JJ, Yang Y, Doudrick K, Capco DG, Hristovski K, Westerho P. Characterization of nanomaterials in metal colloid-containing dietary supplement drinks and assessment of their potential interactions after ingestion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:1616-1624.

    Not in our library10.1021/sc500108m

  209. 209.

    Sundramoorthy AK, Gunasekaran S. Applications of graphene in quality assurance and safety of food. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2014;60:36-53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trac.2014.04.015

  210. 210.

    Yu H, Yan C, Yao J. Fully biodegradable food packaging materials based on functionalized cellulose nanocrystals/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2014;4:59792-59802.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4ra12691b

  211. 211.

    Augustine R, Abraham AR, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Novel Approaches of Nanotechnology in Food. 2016.

    Not in our library

  212. 212.

    Lorne T, Jiménez-Ruiz M, Rols S, Escudier J-M, Rubio-Zuazo J, et al. Competition between covalent and non-covalent grafting of fluorescein isothiocyanate on double-walled carbon nanotubes: a quantitative approach. Carbon. 2017;123:735-743.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.070

  213. 213.

    Barrow CJ, Nolan C, Holub BJ. Bioequivalence of encapsulated and microencapsulated fish-oil supplementation. J. Funct. Foods. 2009;1:38-43.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jff.2008.09.006

  214. 214.

    Bouyer E, Mekhloufi G, Rosilio V, Grossiord J-L, Agnely F. Proteins, polysaccharides, and their complexes used as stabilizers for emulsions: alternatives to synthetic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field. Int. J. Pharm. 2012;436:359-378.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.052

  215. 215.

    Emami S, Azadmard-damirchi S, Peighambardoust SH, Valizadeh H, Hesari J. Liposomes as carrier vehicles for functional compounds in food sector. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2016;11:737-759.

    Not in our library10.1080/17458080.2016.1148273

  216. 216.

    Ghorbanzade T, Jafari SM, Akhavan S, Hadavi R. Nano-encapsulation of fish oil in nano-liposomes and its application in fortification of yogurt. Food Chem. 2017;216:146-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.022

  217. 217.

    Barwal I, Sood A, Sharma M, Singh B, Yadav SC. Development of stevioside Pluronic-F-68 copolymer based PLA-nanoparticles as an antidiabetic nanomedicine. Colloids Surface B. 2013;101:510-516.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.005

  218. 218.

    Singh H. Nanotechnology applications in functional foods: opportunities and challenges. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016;21:1-8.

    Not in our library10.3746/pnf.2016.21.1.1

  219. 219.

    Mehmood T. Optimization of the canola oil based vitamin E nanoemulsions stabilized by food grade mixed surfactants using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2015;183:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.021

  220. 220.

    Cho I, Ku S. Current technical approaches for the early detection of foodborne pathogens: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Mole. Sci. 2017;18:2078.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms18102078

  221. 221.
  222. 222.
  223. 223.

    Kuswandi B. Environmental friendly food nano-packaging. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017;15(2):205-221.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10311-017-0613-7

  224. 224.

    Malhotra B, Keshwani ANU, Kharkwal H. Natural polymer based cling films for food packaging. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015;7:10-18.

    Not in our library

  225. 225.

    Malaysiana S, Mengenai K, Hijau T, Selenium D, Penguatan K, et al. A Review on selenium-enriched green tea: fortification methods, biological activities and application prospect. Sains Malays. 2014;43:1685-1692.

    Not in our library

  226. 226.

    Fulekar MH. Nanotechnology: Importance and Applications. 2010.

    Not in our library

  227. 227.

    Ardalani H, Avan A, Ghayour-mobarhan M. Podophyllotoxin: a novel potential natural anticancer agent. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2017;7:285-294.

    Not in our library

  228. 228.

    Hu B, Liu X, Zhang C, Zeng X. Food macromolecule based nanodelivery systems for enhancing the bioavailability of polyphenols. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017;25:3-15.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2016.11.004

  229. 229.

    He X, Hwang H-M. Nanotechnology in food science: functionality, applicability, and safety assessment. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016;24:671-681.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.001

  230. 230.

    Wijaya CJ, Saputra SN, Soetaredjo FE, Putro JN, Lin CX, Kurniawan A, Ju Y-H, Ismadji S. Cellulose nanocrystals from passion fruit peels waste as antibiotic drug carrier. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;175:370-376.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.004

  231. 231.

    Wang L, Hu C. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017;12:1227-1249.

    Not in our library10.2147/ijn.s121956

  232. 232.

    Rastogi V, Yadav P, Bhattacharya SS, Mishra AK, Verma N, Verma A, Pandit JK. Carbon nanotubes: an emerging drug carrier for targeting cancer cells. J. Drug Deliv. 2014;10:1-24.

    Not in our library10.1016/10.1155/2014/670815

  233. 233.

    Jiang H, Jiang D, Shao J, Sun X, Wang J. High-throughput living cell-based optical biosensor for detection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) using a red fluorescent protein reporter system. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep36987

  234. 234.

    Jain NK, Mishra V, Mehra NK, Jain NK, Mishra V, Mehra NK. Targeted drug delivery to macrophages. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013;10:353-367.

    Not in our library10.1517/17425247.2013.751370

  235. 235.

    Głab TK, Boratynski J. Potential of casein as a carrier for biologically active. Top. Curr. Chem. 2017;375:1-20.

    Not in our library10.1007/s41061-017-0158-z

  236. 236.

    Chandrika KP, Singh A, Tumma MK, Yadav P, Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Lichtfouse E. Nanotechnology prospects and constraints in agriculture. Environmental chemistry for a sustainable world. 2018.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    Betzer O, Meir R, Dreifuss T, Shamalov K, Motiei M, Shwartz A, Baranes K, Cohen CJ, Shraga-heled N, Ofir R. In-vitro optimization of nanoparticle-cell labeling protocols for In-vivo Cell tracking applications. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15400.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep15400

  238. 238.

    Silva HD, Cerqueira MÂ, Vicente AA. Nanoemulsions for food applications: development and characterization. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:854-867.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11947-011-0683-7

  239. 239.

    Nelson KM, Dahlin JL, Bisson J, Graham J, Pauli GF, Walters MA. The essential medicinal chemistry of curcumin. J. Med. Chem. 2017;60:1620-1637.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975

  240. 240.

    Kim D, Kwon SJ, Wu X, Sauve J, Lee I, Nam J, Kim J, Dordick JS. Selective killing of pathogenic bacteria by antimicrobial silver nanoparticle-cell wall binding domain conjugates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:13317-13324.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b00181

  241. 241.
  242. 242.
  243. 243.

    Gao X, Dave SR. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2007.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-0-387-76713-0_5

  244. 244.

    Bakhtiary Z, Saei AA, Hajipour MJ, Raoufi M, Vermesh O, Mahmoudi M. Targeted superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for early detection of cancer: possibilities and challenges. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2016;12:287-307.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2015.10.019

  245. 245.

    Kedar U, Phutane P, Shidhaye S, Kadam V. Advances in polymeric micelles for drug delivery and tumor targeting. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010;6:714-729.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nano.2010.05.005

  246. 246.

    Goswami D, Medda SK, De G. Superhydrophobic films on glass surface derived from trimethylsilanized silica gel nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2011;3:3440-3447.

    Not in our library10.1021/am200666m

  247. 247.

    Danhier F, Feron O, Préat V. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. J. Controlled Release. 2010;148:135-146.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.08.027

  248. 248.

    Hirenkumar M, Steven S. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers. 2012;3:1-19.

    Not in our library10.3390/polym3031377.poly

  249. 249.

    Sun H, Sakka Y, Sun H, Sakka Y. Luminescent metal nanoclusters: controlled synthesis and functional applications luminescent metal nanoclusters: controlled synthesis and functional applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2014;15:014205.

    Not in our library10.1088/1468-6996/15/1/014205

  250. 250.

    Bharti C, Nagaich U, Pal AK, Gulati N. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in target drug delivery system: a review. Int. J. Pharmac. Investig. 2015;5:124-133.

    Not in our library10.4103/2230-973x.160844

  251. 251.

    Mustafa FM, Hodali HA. Use of mesoporous silicate nanoparticles as drug carrier for mefenamic acid. Marer. Sci. Eng. 2015;92:1-6.

    Not in our library10.1088/1757-899x/92/1/012018

  252. 252.

    Furasova AD, Fakhardo AF, Milichko VA, Tervoort E, Niederberger M, Vinogradov VV. Synthesis of a rare-earth doped hafnia hydrosol: towards injectable luminescent nanocolloids. Colloid Surface B. 2017;154:21-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.02.029

  253. 253.

    Bakry R, Najam-ul-haq M, Huck CW. Medicinal applications of fullerenes. Int. J. Nanomed. 2007;2:639-649.

    Not in our library10.2147/nano.2007.2.1.117

  254. 254.

    Pradhan GC, Dash S, Swain SK. Barrier properties of nano silicon carbide designed chitosan nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;134:60-65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.081

  255. 255.

    McNeil SE. Nanotechnology for the biologist. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005;78:585-594.

    Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0205074

  256. 256.

    Herrmann IK. How nanotechnology-enabled concepts could contribute to the prevention, diagnosis and therapy of bacterial infections. Crit. Care. 2015;19:239.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13054-015-0957-y

  257. 257.

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.